ML350 or VW Touareg, which one?
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
A160(Sold) C180(Sold), ML320(Dead! Sold) CDi, R300 CDi
ML350 or VW Touareg, which one?
I am looking for a four wheel drive. My choice is a second hand W163 ML, a brand new W164 ML350 or a VW Touareg 3.2. In Australia, a second hand W163 ML350 costs around $A60k. New W164 ML350 cost $100k, a new VW Touareg costs $75k. Which one will you choose? And why?
I personal like new ML but cost too much. New VW is in good price but VW is better or Mercedes is better?
New Range Rover Sport costs $100k too, but is it worth to trust?
Thanks
Kevin
I personal like new ML but cost too much. New VW is in good price but VW is better or Mercedes is better?
New Range Rover Sport costs $100k too, but is it worth to trust?
Thanks
Kevin
Newbie
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
My recommendation
I just turned my 2005 VW Touareg V8 back in to the dealership. I was able
to turn it in under lemon law provisions because it had had the same
issue over and over. I had to get a wheel alignment every month or so and the tire wear was terrible. I got all my money back from VW. They even offered me a 2006. I replaced the Touareg with a 2006 ML350 and have no regrets. The VW was nice. It had plenty of power and felt solid but having to take it to the dealer monthly where I got mediocre service in my opinion just wasn't acceptable. Check Consumer Reports for the Touareg and you will see that is it extremely unreliable, and the 2004 and 2005 models are on the list of used cars to avoid. I hope this helps...
to turn it in under lemon law provisions because it had had the same
issue over and over. I had to get a wheel alignment every month or so and the tire wear was terrible. I got all my money back from VW. They even offered me a 2006. I replaced the Touareg with a 2006 ML350 and have no regrets. The VW was nice. It had plenty of power and felt solid but having to take it to the dealer monthly where I got mediocre service in my opinion just wasn't acceptable. Check Consumer Reports for the Touareg and you will see that is it extremely unreliable, and the 2004 and 2005 models are on the list of used cars to avoid. I hope this helps...
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
A160(Sold) C180(Sold), ML320(Dead! Sold) CDi, R300 CDi
which one??
VW dealer service is very bad, so I worry how bad they will be after I buy.
Another option will be Range Rover sport. It is a same price as ML.
BTW, I am looking for a car in Australia.
Another option will be Range Rover sport. It is a same price as ML.
BTW, I am looking for a car in Australia.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,221
Likes: 11
From: Sydney, Australia
W203 slightly modified
Originally Posted by kevinchung
VW dealer service is very bad, so I worry how bad they will be after I buy.
Another option will be Range Rover sport. It is a same price as ML.
BTW, I am looking for a car in Australia.
Another option will be Range Rover sport. It is a same price as ML.
BTW, I am looking for a car in Australia.
.... second thing .... no retrofits in the VW. What you pay is what you get. Cant add Xenon's, no second battery, no way to add things easily. In Australia all of the packages suck unless you go to the highest and the one below that. In the lowest model there is no CD stacker possible to retrofit.
However, it is technically higher and more intelligent as a car than the ML. It can do more than the ML can do. I think the 2007 is getting the optical fibre technology same as the ML.
At least with the Mercedes you can order all options with all engine sizes. Maybe the car is already in Australia or maybe it is custom build. With the VW it is a preset menu in Australia.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,260
Likes: 6
From: Philadelphia area
2010 ML550, 2010 E350 4M, 1966 Corvette Convt C2
My advice is anything but the Touraeg. They are horrible and I believe ugly. Both the Touraeg and its sister the Cayenne have been deemed a commercial failure by leading auto industry analyists. Of the other 2 ML choices of ML's my first would be a new W164 and then a W163. The W164 is far superior to the W163 and with much better quality control. I owned 2 W163's, a 98 ML320 and an 02 ML500. I now have a 06 ML500. Both W163's were fine with a few minor glitches and the W164 has been flawless.
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
A160(Sold) C180(Sold), ML320(Dead! Sold) CDi, R300 CDi
no more Touareg
Range Rover sport looks good but all Land Rover is very bad resell value.
I am driving a W203 Mercedes and I am very happy, so I think new ML will be the only one choice
Kevin
I am driving a W203 Mercedes and I am very happy, so I think new ML will be the only one choice
Kevin
MB World Stories
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Dubai Tuner Gives the Mercedes G-Class An Entirely New Look
Verdad Gallardo
Six Gift Ideas Your AMG Loving Dad or Grad Will Cherish
7 Craziest Things AMG Gas Ever Built
Verdad Gallardo
New Electric Mercedes-AMG GT 4-Door Coupe Unveiled: 10 Things You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)
Verdad Gallardo
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren
Verdad Gallardo
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine
Verdad Gallardo
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction
Verdad Gallardo
Super Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 627
Likes: 1
From: The Earth
Mercedes all the way!
OK, first thing: just strike the W163 out of your list. nice when it came out, now too outdated.
toureg vs ML: toureg for off roading; ML for the city. ML cabin is nicer IMO and it is much more "car like" than the toureg. but in the mud you need the off-road pack on the ML to catch up with the standard toureg.
toureg vs ML: toureg for off roading; ML for the city. ML cabin is nicer IMO and it is much more "car like" than the toureg. but in the mud you need the off-road pack on the ML to catch up with the standard toureg.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,260
Likes: 6
From: Philadelphia area
2010 ML550, 2010 E350 4M, 1966 Corvette Convt C2
Originally Posted by ruykava
OK, first thing: just strike the W163 out of your list. nice when it came out, now too outdated.
toureg vs ML: toureg for off roading; ML for the city. ML cabin is nicer IMO and it is much more "car like" than the toureg. but in the mud you need the off-road pack on the ML to catch up with the standard toureg.
toureg vs ML: toureg for off roading; ML for the city. ML cabin is nicer IMO and it is much more "car like" than the toureg. but in the mud you need the off-road pack on the ML to catch up with the standard toureg.
Out Of Control!!
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 13,394
Likes: 6
From: San Diego
2015 S212
Originally Posted by ruykava
OK, first thing: just strike the W163 out of your list. nice when it came out, now too outdated.
toureg vs ML: toureg for off roading; ML for the city. ML cabin is nicer IMO and it is much more "car like" than the toureg. but in the mud you need the off-road pack on the ML to catch up with the standard toureg.
toureg vs ML: toureg for off roading; ML for the city. ML cabin is nicer IMO and it is much more "car like" than the toureg. but in the mud you need the off-road pack on the ML to catch up with the standard toureg.
I agree. The old ML was OLD a few years back!! The VW is definitely better off-road, but most people don't use that ability.
Newbie
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
I am also in the market for a SUV - my choices at this point are the same - Touareg, Cayenne, ML. I really like the Touareg but.....all I've read and heard about them has kicked it out of consideration. My neighbor run the repair shop of a local VW dealer and he hasn't said pleasant things about the Touareg (even though he likes them). A lot of basic quality issues. I just spoke to him yesterday about this same issue and he's said there has been some re-engineering that's made them better. If you've visited some of the boards for the Touareg, it doesn't provide you a lot of comfort that things are better. Tire wear, alignment issues, etc. Same holds true for the Cayenne - but not to the degree of the VW. The ML seems to have been good out of the box - except for the transmission issue that appears to have been worked out. I like the design of the Touareg over the ML - but I'm likely to go ML.
Super Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 627
Likes: 1
From: The Earth
Mercedes all the way!
As far as the VW is concerned they are terrible off road or for that matter in snow on road.
take approach/departure angles: Toureg 28 degrees (33 with air); W164 approach 25/31 (air) approach, 24/29 (air) depart.
http://www.canadiandriver.com/articles/rr/04touareg.htm
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...iew_specs.html
and it comes with hill descent and hill start as standard as well. in fact, i found it easier to switch modes with the big rotary dial on the Toureg. but overall i prefer the W164 interior.
as for W163: maybe there are more outdated SUVs out there, but it is outdated. and yes, family has a W163 - i appreciate it's not as bad as the magazines make it out to be, but it is outclassed in this company.
Last edited by ruykava; Apr 30, 2006 at 07:38 PM.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
A160(Sold) C180(Sold), ML320(Dead! Sold) CDi, R300 CDi
off road car
I will never use it off road, just city use. I need a car drive everyday, less porblem. My friend had a Freelander, always has small problem. Can't open door, sometime all lock open itself, water go in...
I worry I buy a car like this cos I will drive it everyday.
Kevin
I worry I buy a car like this cos I will drive it everyday.
Kevin
