Can a C-class car be considered as "luxury car"?
It is one of the lower-priced models, but it is also a small sedan. E, S, etc are larger, and so they cost more.
I've been in several upper model sedans made by MB. My dad used to own a E320... and sure, I can see the cosmetic differences... but its never anything substantial. My C240 has a very nice interior (I think) and the ride is amazing compared to other cars i've driven and owned.
The way I see it, I'd much rather have my C-class than some 'comparable' honda, toyota, mercury, etc... What defines 'luxury'? Leather, power, heated seats? Moonroof? Features most other cars on the market don't have --- headlight washers, power rear sunshade, rain sensing wipers, the mercedes-benz name?
I just don't see how you could NOT call it a luxury sedan. Especially at 35K MSRP. Just my 2 cents
Leather
Power Seats
3 Memory seats (per side)
Huge Panoramic Roof
Automatic Climate Control
Dual heated seats
Bi-Xenon headlights
Air Conditioned armrest box
Leather steering wheel
Leather shifter
Remote entry
Alarm
Remote window open/close
IR Key
Ability to check oil level inside the car
24x7 Roadside for the life of the car
I could go on and on, but honestly, do I need to? In fact, besides the size difference and possibly cooled seats, the C class has very similar 'luxury' items as the rest of the lineup. There isn't much more out there that we don't have (well, besides an inlcuded CD player when Kia gives you one and MB wanted $1,200).
Erik
I had an Accord EX V6 loaded, before it met its doom, and granted, it had "luxury" appointments, but I was never smitten with it.
Trending Topics
To me, what sets a true "luxury" car apart from the wannabe's is the sound the doors make when they close and the feel of the ride on the pavement. MB's have always had a cool "thump" as the doors close and felt very heavy (in a good way) on the road. Hondas feel like a strong wind might blow them away.
So, yes, the C is a luxury car to me.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Just my two cents, argue as you will. ;-)
I find it interesting that KBB (Kelly Blue Book) does NOT list the C-Class in the LUXURY category. You have to go through the 'Sedan' category to select it...



HOWEVER, Edmunds has a different opinion... MB C-class IS listed as a luxury sedan...

Soooo... the argument goes on...
Just to note, though... NEITHER KBB nor Edmunds listed ford, mercury, toyota, etc etc etc as luxury for ANY of their models...
Last edited by Moze; Aug 7, 2006 at 02:12 PM. Reason: Edmunds has a different view...
The point was that features/options don't nessesarily make something a luxury car these days. It's more about the feel.Wait, I just got it. your comment was intended to be sarcasim. Well done. You really had me going for a minute.
Luxury cars should not be defined upon how many featuers it has, but instead upon the quality of the features it has. For instance, my parents 94 c280 (maybe 95?) has near 200k miles on the thing, and yet it still runs flawlessly and has no issues w/ any of its features. The leather reamins uncracked and still vibrantly colored, the dash board is still its original color and has no cracks either, the exterior paint is still in great shape, and the car still performs as if it only has 30k miles on it. The best part about this car is that it hasnt required any major maintience. It just runs and all of its features have been completely reliable.
My coworker's 94 accord which has many similiar featuers and miles has a worn out interior, cracked dash and trim items, and he had to replace the entire rear axel(or something of the sort back there), and yet the accord has been maintained in a very similiarly fashion.
I dunno, I think we, C-class owners, drive luxury cars, but I think im a bit biased.
-j0hn
edit: I sat in a mid sized kia (forgot the name), but the thing had great features, nice interior, and a smooth ride. I later found out that this kia is supposed to average 18/24 mpg, but my coworker who drives this car has never averaged more than 13 mpg. - that kinda stuff scares me :x
Last edited by TruTaing; Aug 7, 2006 at 04:06 PM.
Audi A4 and Acura TSX are MSRP priced quite close to $30k and so they are likely to be considered as luxury cars.
Volvo S40 and VW Passat are priced a bit below $25k and so they are less likely to be considered as luxury cars.
Honda Accord, Toyota Camery, and Hyundai Sonata are all priced just above or below $20k and so they are certainly not considered as luxury cars, no matter how many added options they have.
Subaru STI and Mitsubishi Lancer EVO are priced at $30k but they are not luxury cars because the price is coming from their extrodinary powerful engines.
According to this "guideline", our baby Benz is definitely a luxury car (with prefix/suffix of entry-level, compact, sports, etc...)
I guess I'm confused. Do you, or do you not think the C is a luxury car?
I, for one would never confuse a Kia or Hyundai with a luxury car.
i think the word luxury is vague. if an e class was stripped of all its interior/features and recieved everything from the c class (including the engine) would that be considered a luxury car?
but if you can call camery a luxury car, then any MB is definintely a luxury car as well.
Power Seats - stop the car and adjust manually
3 Memory seats (per side) - just adjust it every time
Automatic Climate Control - just adjust manually if you feel too cold/hot
Dual heated seats - wear more cloths
Remote entry - use a key physically
Rear sunshade - wear darker sunglasses
MB - luxury = VOLVO



