Moved from '09 C300 to '11 E350
Overall I'm very pleased with the move. While the C300 was a great car, the E350 is worth its price premium.
Nice work on a unique color as well.
I had a similar one on my C300. One day a Neandertal Texas trooper pulled me over (I think because he saw my radar detector) and, as he walked around the car trying to cite me for something, he saw the plate and said: "Whut's this? Are y'all with NATO or sumthin'?" I replied: "No, the plate is a tribute to the car's heritage." He replied: "Huh?."
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Regarding the trooper, he is one of three who live within a few blocks. NM troopers take their cars home when off-duty, so there are always police cars parked nearby.
Needless to say, we have a very low crime rate and my new E350 is very secure.
Handling: The C wins hands down. While the E is fun to drive, the C felt much closer to a driver's car: better road feel; tighter, firmer steering; less body roll.
Ride comfort: As you would expect, the E wins easily. The same suspension that gives the C great handling also gives it a harsher ride.
Road noise: A real weakness in the C and a real advantage in the E. C really needs more insulation.
Exterior styling: In the front, I like them both. The C is more pointed and aggressive while the E is taller and more upright, but they are both beautiful to me. In the rear I must say I have never liked the C too much. It always looked abrupt and unfinished. The tail lights are rather bland, too. The E rear, on the other hand, always appealed to me. I know it has been criticized roundly and had to grow on many, but I have always liked it. The vertical crease in the taillights is a really subtle touch of luxury.
Interior styling: The E really shines over the C here. The C interior, while highly functional, is truly minimalist in luxury. I can't speak to the new facelift C's just starting to appear. Additional features in the E like lots of wood, ambient lighting, and stitching on the MB-TEX are nice luxury treatments but the overall design itself is superior. Simple things like hiding the cup holders make a world of difference in overall feel in the cabin.
Engine: I'm comparing a 3L to a 3.5L here. In real-world driving with my conservative style, I don't see much difference. Comparing the HP/Wt ratios, the E has a fractional advantage on paper, but it's not noticeable to me. Perhaps this is a function of the added sound insulation.
Conclusion: Well, it's all about affordability, preferences and priorities, isn't it? Similarly equipped, there is a $9-10k difference in the two vehicles. To me, it is well worth it.
Handling: The C wins hands down. While the E is fun to drive, the C felt much closer to a driver's car: better road feel; tighter, firmer steering; less body roll.
Ride comfort: As you would expect, the E wins easily. The same suspension that gives the C great handling also gives it a harsher ride.
Road noise: A real weakness in the C and a real advantage in the E. C really needs more insulation.
Exterior styling: In the front, I like them both. The C is more pointed and aggressive while the E is taller and more upright, but they are both beautiful to me. In the rear I must say I have never liked the C too much. It always looked abrupt and unfinished. The tail lights are rather bland, too. The E rear, on the other hand, always appealed to me. I know it has been criticized roundly and had to grow on many, but I have always liked it. The vertical crease in the taillights is a really subtle touch of luxury.
Interior styling: The E really shines over the C here. The C interior, while highly functional, is truly minimalist in luxury. I can't speak to the new facelift C's just starting to appear. Additional features in the E like lots of wood, ambient lighting, and stitching on the MB-TEX are nice luxury treatments but the overall design itself is superior. Simple things like hiding the cup holders make a world of difference in overall feel in the cabin.
Engine: I'm comparing a 3L to a 3.5L here. In real-world driving with my conservative style, I don't see much difference. Comparing the HP/Wt ratios, the E has a fractional advantage on paper, but it's not noticeable to me. Perhaps this is a function of the added sound insulation.
Conclusion: Well, it's all about affordability, preferences and priorities, isn't it? Similarly equipped, there is a $9-10k difference in the two vehicles. To me, it is well worth it.

That sounds absurd. I don't know anything about leases on preowned, but compared to what MBUSA shows on their web site, $800 is far higher than they advertise for new E classes. They give an example of a selling price of $52k with $4684 down (including 1st month lease payment) for 33 months at $589 + taxes.









