C63 AMG (W204) 2008 - 2015

Supercharged M156 vs Tuned M157 with downpipes

Old 02-19-2012, 01:43 AM
  #1  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
jacob502's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 955
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2008 C63 ,2009 SL 63 AMG, 2011 SLS AMG
Supercharged M156 vs Tuned M157 with downpipes

Ideally, if we had this matchup which car would win the race from a roll @ lets say 45MPH and on?. I'm talking lets say a weistec supercharged Stage 1+ M156 runing with longtubes vs 2012 tuned CLS 63 runing with turbo downpipes.
Old 02-19-2012, 01:55 AM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
mthis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Ny
Posts: 4,453
Received 30 Likes on 29 Posts
Anything W/4Wheels
Originally Posted by jacob502
Ideally, if we had this matchup which car would win the race from a roll @ lets say 45MPH and on?. I'm talking lets say a weistec supercharged Stage 1+ M156 runing with longtubes vs 2012 tuned CLS 63 runing with turbo downpipes.
M156 with SC and LTs is badass and should win
Old 02-19-2012, 08:20 AM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
c32AMG-DTM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 2,949
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2008 A8L, 2002 996TT X50, 2009 X5
Originally Posted by mthis
M156 with SC and LTs is badass and should win
+1

Assuming equal gearing, since both would be F/I with free-flowing exhaust mods, I'd expect the displacement advantage, instantaneous boost response, and torque advantage (just a guess here) would result in the modded M156 being the victor over the M157 vehicle.

To be fair, we're talking one motor with $20k+ in mods, to the other with (again, guessing) around, what, $4k? Just sayin'.
Old 02-19-2012, 09:17 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
ATL_MB's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Hong Kong/Charlotte
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2010 C63
I am going to be real unpopular here and say that the 157 will win, if done right. That motor has DI and is designed for FI so should be able to run a lot more boost than the 156. So can the extra displacement make up for it? I don't think so. But maybe.

However, if its a C vs. a CLS, the the C would probably win due to being 400 lbs lighter.
Old 02-19-2012, 09:49 AM
  #5  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
hhughes1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
2013 Chevy 427 Torch Red
Forced induction provides the all important third tuning variable in addition to fuel and timing.......BOOST!!!!

My money would be on whoever's willng to take the biggest risk. It would be an entertaining matchup to watch!
Old 02-19-2012, 10:30 AM
  #6  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
jacob502's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 955
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2008 C63 ,2009 SL 63 AMG, 2011 SLS AMG
Whatever the outcome. I think they both will be close
Old 02-19-2012, 10:40 AM
  #7  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
propain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 3,974
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
See Sig
Originally Posted by jacob502
Ideally, if we had this matchup which car would win the race from a roll @ lets say 45MPH and on?. I'm talking lets say a weistec supercharged Stage 1+ M156 runing with longtubes vs 2012 tuned CLS 63 runing with turbo downpipes.
2012 CLS63 is already running 10's without the headers.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pS54-o26qsY

So no headers on the Wiestec car? Just the SC? I believe the The CLS will walk it with headers + Tune. Probably walk it with just the tune.

Edit:

I see you meant the Weistec car has headers.... Probably a very close race then.

Last edited by propain; 02-19-2012 at 10:54 AM.
Old 02-19-2012, 11:29 AM
  #8  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
jacob502's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 955
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2008 C63 ,2009 SL 63 AMG, 2011 SLS AMG
Originally Posted by propain
2012 CLS63 is already running 10's without the headers.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pS54-o26qsY

So no headers on the Wiestec car? Just the SC? I believe the The CLS will walk it with headers + Tune. Probably walk it with just the tune.

Edit:

I see you meant the Weistec car has headers.... Probably a very close race then.

Hi Propain,


I think the CLS you showed us had headers+tune. look at this slip:

http://www.dragtimes.com/Mercedes-Be...lip-23728.html


It also had lighter wheels and drag radials.

weve seen NA C63's hitting 10's including a 10.66 (Mike "Dodger63"). a supercharged M156 runing with longtubes will have a better ET

Jrcart made a 10.6 in a worse condition than that ET by the 2012 CLS. All that doesnt matter. we need both cars showing up at the same time and same location racing in the same condition. It should be a close race, but I do believe that the M156 can outpreform it. At the start I belive the CLS will get the kick due to its high torque figures, but once the torque flatens the M156 will start pulling it quickly and early, as early as before shifting to fourth gear.
Old 02-19-2012, 12:31 PM
  #9  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Merc63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,562
Received 42 Likes on 36 Posts
C63 AMG
Why is there no one with a SC C63 running at the track??
Old 02-19-2012, 03:21 PM
  #10  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
_AMG_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 6,677
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
C63
It will definitely a close race, but I would lean towards the M156 with SC + LTH's.
Old 02-19-2012, 03:32 PM
  #11  
Super Member
 
dbasons55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 976
Received 75 Likes on 44 Posts
Well guys to sum it up for you, I raced a SC C63 the other day and I don't know what stage he is in but I am sure he had LT headers, my car has the Brabus Tune which is not running good at all, and I don't have downpipes I have high flow 200 cells cats, the C63 was about 3-4 car lengths quicker from 80km to 250km, the C was gaining very quickly but after 230km he stopes gaining, I am sure with a proper tune and down pipe the cars will be somewhere even.
Old 02-19-2012, 03:43 PM
  #12  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
propain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 3,974
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
See Sig
Originally Posted by jacob502
Hi Propain,


I think the CLS you showed us had headers+tune. look at this slip:

http://www.dragtimes.com/Mercedes-Be...lip-23728.html


It also had lighter wheels and drag radials.

weve seen NA C63's hitting 10's including a 10.66 (Mike "Dodger63"). a supercharged M156 runing with longtubes will have a better ET

Jrcart made a 10.6 in a worse condition than that ET by the 2012 CLS. All that doesnt matter. we need both cars showing up at the same time and same location racing in the same condition. It should be a close race, but I do believe that the M156 can outpreform it. At the start I belive the CLS will get the kick due to its high torque figures, but once the torque flatens the M156 will start pulling it quickly and early, as early as before shifting to fourth gear.
Hmmmmm... I thought they pulled off 10's with nothing more than a tune. You are right though, I was mistaken. 10.9 with Stage II.

I know what dodgers car can do and its quite amazing, but there is a big difference between the CLS and his car as far as mods. Dodger is well beyond a stage II. He shed big weight to make that 10.6 and in way more favorable DA than this CLS was running in. I think dodger said once he shed almost 400 pounds.

JRCart would be another example. 10.6 in some bad DA. The CLS was running some pretty unfavorable DA as well and very high humidity. I would also consider Cart to be beyond stage II.

Both above cars are also race fuel only tunes. I see no mention of fuel in the CLS car so I assume pump.

I still think a true Weistec Stage I will be a close race to a TT Stage I. I wish I could see some results from Weistec but I can never seem to find any actual track results other than Cart's runs and he has like 300K into his car.
Old 02-19-2012, 08:27 PM
  #13  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
c32AMG-DTM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 2,949
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2008 A8L, 2002 996TT X50, 2009 X5
Originally Posted by propain
Hmmmmm... I thought they pulled off 10's with nothing more than a tune. You are right though, I was mistaken. 10.9 with Stage II.

I know what dodgers car can do and its quite amazing, but there is a big difference between the CLS and his car as far as mods. Dodger is well beyond a stage II. He shed big weight to make that 10.6 and in way more favorable DA than this CLS was running in. I think dodger said once he shed almost 400 pounds.

JRCart would be another example. 10.6 in some bad DA. The CLS was running some pretty unfavorable DA as well and very high humidity. I would also consider Cart to be beyond stage II.

Both above cars are also race fuel only tunes. I see no mention of fuel in the CLS car so I assume pump.

I still think a true Weistec Stage I will be a close race to a TT Stage I. I wish I could see some results from Weistec but I can never seem to find any actual track results other than Cart's runs and he has like 300K into his car.
I think the OP's question is a Weistec M156, plus LT's - vs. a tuned M157 with DP's. Not "stage 1 vs. stage 1." Just FWIW.

2010 E63 vs. 2012 E63 would be great for this comparison - maybe we'll see it someday.
Old 02-19-2012, 10:40 PM
  #14  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
mthis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Ny
Posts: 4,453
Received 30 Likes on 29 Posts
Anything W/4Wheels
What should win this
Tuned 2012E63 vs weistec st1 2010 E63 (stock exhaust both cars)
Old 02-20-2012, 01:44 AM
  #15  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
jacob502's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 955
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2008 C63 ,2009 SL 63 AMG, 2011 SLS AMG
Originally Posted by mthis
What should win this
Tuned 2012E63 vs weistec st1 2010 E63 (stock exhaust both cars)
That should be a good one.
Old 02-20-2012, 02:08 AM
  #16  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
jacob502's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 955
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2008 C63 ,2009 SL 63 AMG, 2011 SLS AMG
Originally Posted by dbasons55
Well guys to sum it up for you, I raced a SC C63 the other day and I don't know what stage he is in but I am sure he had LT headers, my car has the Brabus Tune which is not running good at all, and I don't have downpipes I have high flow 200 cells cats, the C63 was about 3-4 car lengths quicker from 80km to 250km, the C was gaining very quickly but after 230km he stopes gaining, I am sure with a proper tune and down pipe the cars will be somewhere even.

Thank you for the input. Do you know the owner of the C63?

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:
You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Supercharged M156 vs Tuned M157 with downpipes



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:53 PM.