CLK-Class (W209) 2003 on: CLK 270 CDI, CLK 200K, CLK 200 CGI, CLK 240, CLK 320, CLK 350, CLK 500, CLK 550 [Coupes & Cabriolets]

Non-OE Brake Pads

Old 04-12-2012, 03:47 PM
  #1  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
mis3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,200
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
2004 CLK320
Non-OE Brake Pads

For the next brake pads change, I am thinking to go non-OE.

I read many good reviews on Akebono Euro Ceramic Pads (Premium). Somehow Tirerack's rating on stopping power is only 3 of 5 stars. How do these pads feel, as compared to stock OE pads?

Just curious, who makes the OE pads?

Last edited by mis3; 04-12-2012 at 03:52 PM.
Old 04-12-2012, 04:25 PM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Clkboi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,292
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
CLS550 4Matic
I have heard great reviews on Centric rotors + Akebono pads.
The price is very decent as well!


I am changing mine soon so will update this thread again when done
Old 04-12-2012, 04:32 PM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
mis3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,200
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
2004 CLK320
I did not think of changing the rotors as well. I want to change th pads because of the brake dusts.

Why change the rotor?
Old 04-12-2012, 04:49 PM
  #4  
Super Member
 
Louie D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: San Diego North County
Posts: 672
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2015 E400 CAB, 2010 Jeep Compass, 2009 E350 Sedan
I was having the same problems with the brake dust as you are with the OEM pads. I replaced the rears with the Akebono pads and love them iI will do the fronts when needed.

No need to get new rotors unless you need them and you will sooner or later.

Louie

Last edited by Louie D; 04-12-2012 at 04:52 PM.
Old 04-12-2012, 06:48 PM
  #5  
Super Moderator

 
Glyn M Ruck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Llandudno, Cape Town, South Africa
Posts: 19,941
Received 175 Likes on 142 Posts
late 2009 CLK 350 Coupe Elegance, '65 Jaguar S Type wires
Pity stock pads make such a mess. I still rate them highly all round for feel & bite.
Old 04-12-2012, 06:55 PM
  #6  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
eddieo45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Milton, MA USA
Posts: 2,901
Received 160 Likes on 134 Posts
me: 2015 SL400 & 2015 ML400; wife: 2022 GLC Coupe kid: 2017 GLC SUV
I have stock pads on my E350 and they grab like glue, stop on a dime, and make a *****-mess of my wheels in a day and half. Akebonos and R1 rotors on the CLK and not a speck of dust and minimal rotor wear, but they don't stop as well. Oh, and I rear-ended an X5 with my C230K cuz I couldn't stop in time (yet still bought Akebonos again, but not for my wife's E)
Old 04-12-2012, 07:18 PM
  #7  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Mka77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Witness Protection Program
Posts: 1,314
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
06 CLK350 -SOLD! 2010 Cadillac SRX Premium Turbo
Plenty of bite with my Akebono pads and R1 drilled/slotted rotors... oh, and zero dust
Old 04-12-2012, 09:08 PM
  #8  
MBworld Guru
 
Rudeney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 10,783
Received 999 Likes on 868 Posts
NO LONGER ACTIVE
A lot of people scoff at Centric rotors as they are made in China, but I put a complete set of Centric D+S rotors and their matching "Posi-Quiet" ceramic pads on the C240 for about $300. They've been great! They stop better than OEM and are dust free. They roar a bit on hard stops because of the slots, but otherwise, they've been on there about 18 months and no complaints.
Old 04-12-2012, 11:27 PM
  #9  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
mis3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,200
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
2004 CLK320
My priority is the feel and bite. The brake dust is annoying but can be managed, just a lot of work.
Wish they make pads that perform as well as OE but less dust.
Old 04-13-2012, 02:55 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Frank Rizzo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: via Mulholland
Posts: 376
Received 28 Likes on 18 Posts
2018 E43
Originally Posted by mis3
My priority is the feel and bite. The brake dust is annoying but can be managed, just a lot of work.
Wish they make pads that perform as well as OE but less dust.
Then you don't want the Akebonos then. I did all four wheels about a month ago. There is almost zero dust but the initial grab and pull down feels about 20% weaker than stock. And they squeak whenever I back up. I'm going to try a set of EBC RedStuff ceramics. I had them on my R32 and they were pretty good.
Old 04-13-2012, 03:28 AM
  #11  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Kevwood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: A Canadian in Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Posts: 4,748
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'05 C200K SS, '05 Kleemann CLK500K, '08 Hummer H3 & '92 Z34 5sp (track car in Canada)
Originally Posted by Frank Rizzo
Then you don't want the Akebonos then. I did all four wheels about a month ago. There is almost zero dust but the initial grab and pull down feels about 20% weaker than stock. And they squeak whenever I back up. I'm going to try a set of EBC RedStuff ceramics. I had them on my R32 and they were pretty good.
I couldn't agree more. The Akebono pads on my 500 were great for absolutely no dust but the initial bite was significantly reduced. On the track, they disintegrated in 7 laps and as a result almost ended up in a very bad accident.

I ran EBC reds back home and really liked them, also a very clean pad and not much of a bite reduction.
Old 04-13-2012, 10:36 AM
  #12  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
mikata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,595
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mercedes CLK 320 W209
Originally Posted by Glyn M Ruck
Pity stock pads make such a mess. I still rate them highly all round for feel & bite.
+1
Old 04-13-2012, 12:01 PM
  #13  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
mis3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,200
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
2004 CLK320
Looks like we have to choose between safety and cosmetic.
Definitely safety for me.
Old 04-13-2012, 01:37 PM
  #14  
Super Member
 
Supafly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 655
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I drive the racism out of BadDebt. ;)
Texstar has come out with a new line of pads....Low dust; no squeek, but with OEM gripping capabilities...

I find them way better than my Hawk Ceramics and Akebono Ceramics...
Old 04-13-2012, 04:29 PM
  #15  
Junior Member
 
CLK5OO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Delaware Ohio
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'06 CLK500 '10 C63
Don't mess with the junk. I have been racing cars in SCCA club racing for years. I've used pads from every racing pad manufacturer and I found that the company I have been buying from for years has pads that don't dust and flat out work. I got them from Porterfield. Google them and while not cheap the R-4 line will hold up to track use and stop your car on the street without the dust of factory. Those on a budget need not apply. It was about $180 for a set of front pads. Thank me later. I have no affiliation with porterfield and frankly I prefer Hawk for my current competition car, but have used the endurance porterfield compounds in long distance races with good results. These are not racing pads I'm using on my CLK.
Old 04-13-2012, 07:20 PM
  #16  
Super Moderator

 
Glyn M Ruck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Llandudno, Cape Town, South Africa
Posts: 19,941
Received 175 Likes on 142 Posts
late 2009 CLK 350 Coupe Elegance, '65 Jaguar S Type wires
Originally Posted by mis3

Just curious, who makes the OE pads?
Sorry - just reread & realised I did not answer this.

Pagid and Jurid
Old 04-13-2012, 10:29 PM
  #17  
MBworld Guru
 
Rudeney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 10,783
Received 999 Likes on 868 Posts
NO LONGER ACTIVE
On the Porterfields, I have not used them myself, but I have heard nothing but good things about them. I ran Rotex Gold Kevlar pads on my ML and they were superb, but also expensive. I don't think they make them for the CLK, though.
Old 04-13-2012, 11:20 PM
  #18  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
mis3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,200
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
2004 CLK320
I am confused with the part numbers.

Last time the dealership changed my brakes, these are the part no:
Front pads:. 003-420-60-20
Rear pads: 003-420-28-20

I just went to Autohasaz and found these part no. for my car (2004 CLK320):
Front pads:. 003-420-26-20
Rear pads:. 003-420-52-20 and 003-420-28-20 (why 2 different items)

Also, I could not find OE rotors there.
Old 04-14-2012, 01:10 PM
  #19  
MBworld Guru
 
Rudeney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 10,783
Received 999 Likes on 868 Posts
NO LONGER ACTIVE
A 003 420 60 20 is the correct updated part number for the front brakes. A 003 420 26 20 is an older part number, but Autohaus often lists them since that may be what customers are searching for.

A 003 420 52 20 is the rear brake pad set for vehicles with the sport package. A 003 420 28 20 is the rear brake pad set for cars without the sport package (i..e with the luxury or elegance package).
Old 04-14-2012, 01:45 PM
  #20  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
mis3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,200
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
2004 CLK320
Thanks, Rudeney.

IMO. The stock rotors and pads are well performed. The only problem is the brake dust. I will stick with OE.
Old 04-14-2012, 11:30 PM
  #21  
MBworld Guru
 
Rudeney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 10,783
Received 999 Likes on 868 Posts
NO LONGER ACTIVE
While the OE pads do generate a lot of dust, it washed off easily. I had a BMW X3 and it was terrible. Not only did the brakes generate a ton of black dust, it stuck to and pitted the rims. I tried every cleaning solution and nothing helped. I even clayed and waxed the rims and that didn't help, either. It was terrible! The only redeeming quality was that the X3 stopped on a dime - it stopped faster than most everything on the street, except for a few Porsches and some supercars.
Old 04-15-2012, 01:32 PM
  #22  
Member
 
LexDiamonds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Montana, USA
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2004 CLK500
The Porterfield R4s sound interesting. Can anyone comment on if they squeak at all? Looking at pairing these with the R1 premium drilled/slotted.

Also, are the OEM rotors on the 55AMG larger? Will those work on the CLK500 with the stock 4pot calipers?
Old 04-15-2012, 02:03 PM
  #23  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Kevwood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: A Canadian in Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Posts: 4,748
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'05 C200K SS, '05 Kleemann CLK500K, '08 Hummer H3 & '92 Z34 5sp (track car in Canada)
Originally Posted by CLK5OO
Don't mess with the junk. I have been racing cars in SCCA club racing for years. I've used pads from every racing pad manufacturer and I found that the company I have been buying from for years has pads that don't dust and flat out work. I got them from Porterfield. Google them and while not cheap the R-4 line will hold up to track use and stop your car on the street without the dust of factory. Those on a budget need not apply. It was about $180 for a set of front pads. Thank me later. I have no affiliation with porterfield and frankly I prefer Hawk for my current competition car, but have used the endurance porterfield compounds in long distance races with good results. These are not racing pads I'm using on my CLK.
I raced SCCA for years, now I'm in Extreme Super Lap, what are you running for a competition car?
Old 04-15-2012, 05:59 PM
  #24  
Super Moderator

 
Glyn M Ruck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Llandudno, Cape Town, South Africa
Posts: 19,941
Received 175 Likes on 142 Posts
late 2009 CLK 350 Coupe Elegance, '65 Jaguar S Type wires
One should also remember that the stock Brembo rotors from Benz are fine & well priced.

Porterfield pads are great!
Old 04-15-2012, 08:10 PM
  #25  
MBworld Guru
 
Rudeney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 10,783
Received 999 Likes on 868 Posts
NO LONGER ACTIVE
As for brake squeal, I've only once found a pad I couldn't keep from squealing - and it was the Rotex on my ML. 99% of the time, brake squeal isn't coming from the pad to rotor contact, but from the pad to caliper (or piston) contact. The pad vibrates and causes the squeal. Some pads come with backing material that dampens the squeal. If not, you need to use anti-squeal compound that basically creates a soft layer of cushion between the back of the pad and the caliper/piston surface.

Oh, and on the Rotex pads, they squealed because they had too much metal in the. The solution was to sand them down occasionally (along with a rotor knock-down sanding), but it would seem to come back every month or two. I just lived with it because of their incredible stopping and dustless output.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:
You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Non-OE Brake Pads



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:46 AM.