How poor is the ride on a 2015 c300, and how defective are they likely to be?
#26
Super Member
Yeah, a strut with "agility control" is still using passive damping. Something about how a normal strut has progressive firmness, but the valving on the AG strut allows it to react and rebound quicker in certain conditions.
I like the non sport steel suspension set up. The loaner that got me thinking about the C had it on 17" wheels and I loved the way it rode and handled. If could have gotten a Sport with a comfort suspension I probably wouldn't have gotten AirMatic.
I like the non sport steel suspension set up. The loaner that got me thinking about the C had it on 17" wheels and I loved the way it rode and handled. If could have gotten a Sport with a comfort suspension I probably wouldn't have gotten AirMatic.
#27
MBWorld Fanatic!
We'll see how the NRF BFG Comp TA affects the ride quality. The car is in the shop for the next few days getting tint, an Audison DSP amp, Focal speakers, and I'm having them Hushmat and foam all 4 doors and the front footwells which will have an effect on road noise independent of the tires.
#28
Senior Member
In other threads, dissatisfied owners are discussing how to unload their 2015 C300s, especially those (like me!) whose engines have had to be rebuilt. Those repairs do show up on Carfax. My rebuilt engine displays no problems. But one owner complained that his engine runs well and shows no problems, but his mileage is down 25%. You will not detect this on a test drive. Another complained that his engine had lost a lot power. He had the 0-60 times to prove it, but neither he nor a dealer selling a CPO car will share them with a purchaser. So I would not buy a CPO 2015 C300.
I was never really comfortable with the ride quality though...maybe that prompted me to an early exit. Even with the luxury & airmatic options, it was never the right ride for me. I think the run-flat tires really ruin the ride and I never got around (couldn't find anyone) to change them to conventional tires.
I've bought several cars over the years looking for that perfect ride and I think I finally found it. It's the smoothest, softest, best riding car I have ever been in. I only have 300 miles on it although reliability may be an issue. (2016 Genesis AWD Ultimate).
Today I saw my C300 being driven around town with big numbers on the windshield....$37,000.00. I took a $6k hit according to that. I told the dealer that a part was on order from Germany and the car had issues. But I guess they are willing to sell it before it's repaired. It only has 7k miles, so what the heck. Lot's of warranty left (it was a January 15 build).
Last edited by PeteInGilroy; 04-05-2016 at 09:44 PM.
#29
MBWorld Fanatic!
The Genesis is a nice piece, and the Asian builders know how to make a suspension soft and a cabin quiet. They benchmark the S (more so in the Equus) and it's amazing how much stuff they outright copy from the S Class.
I was watching a YouTube review of the new Equus in Korean, so the only phrase I understood was "S Class!". They must have said it thirty times as they ran through the features
I will say the Genesis does sacrifice some handling for ride comfort, but overall it's a lot of car for the money and a very handsome design. For the C300, I like the precision of the steering and how light and athletic it feels, so I'm okay with the AirMatic ride on the 18" wheels on run flats but I suspect I can squeeze a little more comfort by swapping in conventional tires.
Sorry about your crappy MB experience, and enjoy the new ride.
I was watching a YouTube review of the new Equus in Korean, so the only phrase I understood was "S Class!". They must have said it thirty times as they ran through the features
I will say the Genesis does sacrifice some handling for ride comfort, but overall it's a lot of car for the money and a very handsome design. For the C300, I like the precision of the steering and how light and athletic it feels, so I'm okay with the AirMatic ride on the 18" wheels on run flats but I suspect I can squeeze a little more comfort by swapping in conventional tires.
Sorry about your crappy MB experience, and enjoy the new ride.
#30
Senior Member
The Genesis is a nice piece, and the Asian builders know how to make a suspension soft and a cabin quiet. They benchmark the S (more so in the Equus) and it's amazing how much stuff they outright copy from the S Class.
I was watching a YouTube review of the new Equus in Korean, so the only phrase I understood was "S Class!". They must have said it thirty times as they ran through the features
I will say the Genesis does sacrifice some handling for ride comfort, but overall it's a lot of car for the money and a very handsome design. For the C300, I like the precision of the steering and how light and athletic it feels, so I'm okay with the AirMatic ride on the 18" wheels on run flats but I suspect I can squeeze a little more comfort by swapping in conventional tires.
Sorry about your crappy MB experience, and enjoy the new ride.
I was watching a YouTube review of the new Equus in Korean, so the only phrase I understood was "S Class!". They must have said it thirty times as they ran through the features
I will say the Genesis does sacrifice some handling for ride comfort, but overall it's a lot of car for the money and a very handsome design. For the C300, I like the precision of the steering and how light and athletic it feels, so I'm okay with the AirMatic ride on the 18" wheels on run flats but I suspect I can squeeze a little more comfort by swapping in conventional tires.
Sorry about your crappy MB experience, and enjoy the new ride.
#31
Junior Member
Thread Starter
I keep flip flopping on this car, because some of you guys seem to love them and some of you seem to really dislike them. The only thing I am concerned about at this point, is the one I am looking at was manufactured in 2/2015. It seems the cut off date for the wrist pin issue is 4/22/2015. However, it was a company fleet vehicle and only has 4k miles on it and is under warranty until 2020. In the case something goes wrong, it will be covered (even though the resale will take a massive hit - but cars are not investments). Thoughts on this? Would rather go to Mercedes than get a 328, but my mind is not made up yet.
Thanks again for the help my friends!
Thanks again for the help my friends!
#32
MBWorld Fanatic!
I keep flip flopping on this car, because some of you guys seem to love them and some of you seem to really dislike them. The only thing I am concerned about at this point, is the one I am looking at was manufactured in 2/2015. It seems the cut off date for the wrist pin issue is 4/22/2015. However, it was a company fleet vehicle and only has 4k miles on it and is under warranty until 2020. In the case something goes wrong, it will be covered (even though the resale will take a massive hit - but cars are not investments). Thoughts on this? Would rather go to Mercedes than get a 328, but my mind is not made up yet.
Thanks again for the help my friends!
Thanks again for the help my friends!
I had an early build, 8/14, that was awful and required many trips to the dealer. It was replaced by my current 3/15 build which has been excellent with only a few very minor issues. The 2015 was not rated as particularly reliable by any reporting organization I know of, and certainly had its share of problems.
A 2/15 build is beyond the MBTex bleeding issue, so that's one problem you wouldn't have to deal with. If the dealer checks the engine for abnormal sounds and finds none, that car likely does not have a wrist pin issue. Check the car's service records and see if there are any red flags there. Drive it at highway speeds and listen for wind leaks around the front doors. If everything looks okay, you probably will wind up with a good car; and one still under warranty if anything does come up.
The C300 is a good car, and it does everything well. If you like it, and you think you have a competent and supportive dealer to work with, buy it.
#33
MBWorld Fanatic!
Look at a different 205 if you like the car but are wary of that particular one. Mercedes made like fifty million of them.
I will say that it was not "love at first sight" for me with the C Class. I had one first as a loaner and I was probably in it for a good week before I realized how much I liked driving it. I believe what got me considering it was when my wife got in and expressed how "gorgeous" the interior was vs my S550. I was like WTF...it's a little loaner fleet car. I knew I was screwed when I was disappointed that the S was ready to be picked up. And I had a really nice looking S:
My experience is unique I guess since most guys don't get a two week long test drive though.
I will say that it was not "love at first sight" for me with the C Class. I had one first as a loaner and I was probably in it for a good week before I realized how much I liked driving it. I believe what got me considering it was when my wife got in and expressed how "gorgeous" the interior was vs my S550. I was like WTF...it's a little loaner fleet car. I knew I was screwed when I was disappointed that the S was ready to be picked up. And I had a really nice looking S:
My experience is unique I guess since most guys don't get a two week long test drive though.
#34
Not so great feeling
I have a 2015 Mercedes C300, and i would say I dont like the suspension at all. I felt it was better initially, even though not very nice. Now i feel horrible, even in many normal roads. Especially the people on the rear seats, were always mentioning this. I felt that one of my friend's Camry was having a better suspension
Last edited by ashok abraham; 01-29-2017 at 11:11 PM.
#35
MBWorld Fanatic!
Yeah, the Sport steel suspension is too stiff. It's a common complaint. I'd highly recommend swapping 19" for 18" ( if you're on 19), and swapping run flats for Michelin Pilot Supersports. You'll see a huge improvement in ride quality.
#36
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Düsseldorf / Germany
Posts: 17
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2018 GLC Coupe & 2019 C300 Station Wagon
My C250 was also delivered with Standard Sport Steel Springs. Too Stiff and quite too high ride-height for the stiffness... i´ve swapped out the standard springs for KW Coilovers - what a huge difference in ride quality. additionally to that i´ve also replaced the 19" runflat Pirelli´s with nonRunFlat Dunlop Sport Maxx RT MO´s - so much better now - also the lowered look with the KW is much better imho
#37
Super Member
My C250 was also delivered with Standard Sport Steel Springs. Too Stiff and quite too high ride-height for the stiffness... i´ve swapped out the standard springs for KW Coilovers - what a huge difference in ride quality. additionally to that i´ve also replaced the 19" runflat Pirelli´s with nonRunFlat Dunlop Sport Maxx RT MO´s - so much better now - also the lowered look with the KW is much better imho
#38
MBWorld Fanatic!
As an alternate view, I love the ride of the sport suspension. I did have the dealer swap out the runflats for all-seasons on the 19 inch wheels.
#40
MBWorld Fanatic!
Yeah, I think "harsh" or "stiff" have a negative connotation and are subjective. The right term is firm. Depending on what you want out of the car, more or less firm is your call as an owner. There is always a give and take between a compliant suspension with duller handling and vice versus.
Basically if you find your Sport suspension to be stiff, it's probably too firm for you and you should take steps to make it less so. If you find your Sport suspension to be damn near perfect then you my friend made a smart choice.
Basically if you find your Sport suspension to be stiff, it's probably too firm for you and you should take steps to make it less so. If you find your Sport suspension to be damn near perfect then you my friend made a smart choice.
#42
MBWorld Fanatic!
When MB wants to deliver a smooth ride, nobody does it better. The S Class is unlike any car I've ever driven in that regard. I think with the C they were going for a sport sedan with less cush and better driving dynamics.
#43
Super Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Eastern Massachusetts
Posts: 789
Received 45 Likes
on
39 Posts
2021 E450, 2020 C43, 2015 C300, 2007 C280
Cold Start
I keep flip flopping on this car, because some of you guys seem to love them and some of you seem to really dislike them. The only thing I am concerned about at this point, is the one I am looking at was manufactured in 2/2015. It seems the cut off date for the wrist pin issue is 4/22/2015. However, it was a company fleet vehicle and only has 4k miles on it and is under warranty until 2020. In the case something goes wrong, it will be covered (even though the resale will take a massive hit - but cars are not investments). Thoughts on this? Would rather go to Mercedes than get a 328, but my mind is not made up yet.
Thanks again for the help my friends!
Thanks again for the help my friends!
As for the ride. my 2015 Luxury 4W with 17" stock wheels and original Pirelli MOE run-flat tires rides fine. (If this combination signifies spiritual death to you, stop reading. But remember, the engineers in Germany are designing family sedans and chauffeured executive transports, not sports sedans. When Germans think of sports sedans, only BMWs come to mind.) For details, see "Mercedes-Benz Original Extended Tires (MOExtended or MOE) at tirerack.com. When new, the ride was okay. It has gotten better, with 10,600 miles of wear making the tires that much thinner. It got even better just two weeks ago. After my C300 received its recent "B Service," I found that tire pressures had been reset to 40/45 PSI. I had been running 38/40. Higher pressures actually made the ride better! I can't explain it, but I once had a Mazda Protégé that did the same thing. When my local roads are less than smooth, it is usually rough surfaces and small bumps, not large bumps or potholes. My theory is that the tires respond to bumps more quickly, passing more energy into the shock absorbers.
#45
I use a 17". Which one is better, 17" or 18"?
The following users liked this post:
ashok abraham (02-20-2017)
#47
Senior Member
I switched from run flats to michelin a/s 3 on 18s but it was very similar in terms of translating harsh road conditions to the driver. What made the biggest difference was using the 36 all around psi; i was trying the full load 39/45 before and it was a touch more sensitive to cracks and holes in the road
I sat as a passenger for a 120 mile round trip in it and you cant feel the same stuff you do when driving. On flat road the car is sweet; its when youre on bad patches of ground that it comes through the suspension.
On the upside, ive never been in a car that corners or handles as well with the sport steering ratio and the firm suspension components. Its not just the height/springs, its also different hardware i believe... Anyone whos driven an AMG will tell you its definitely a notch more soft than that.... They can be punishing on the 405 expansion plates!
I think Mike was the most correct, and others who reported: if its too harsh for you, you shouldve got luxury or airmatic. I drove a luxury c300 for a long time and people thought my shocks/struts were worn but it was just like that from new.... overly soft. The softer setups do sacrifice a tad of handling......More/Less road bounce, better turn in; Just up to you whether its a good trade off or not; I imagine it will require maintenance on the suspension sooner than a regular one too.
ALl mercedes are great, but not all configs are for you; 5 suvs, 5 cars, etc etc... all very different in spec and options. You may just have picked the wrong combo.
I sat as a passenger for a 120 mile round trip in it and you cant feel the same stuff you do when driving. On flat road the car is sweet; its when youre on bad patches of ground that it comes through the suspension.
On the upside, ive never been in a car that corners or handles as well with the sport steering ratio and the firm suspension components. Its not just the height/springs, its also different hardware i believe... Anyone whos driven an AMG will tell you its definitely a notch more soft than that.... They can be punishing on the 405 expansion plates!
I think Mike was the most correct, and others who reported: if its too harsh for you, you shouldve got luxury or airmatic. I drove a luxury c300 for a long time and people thought my shocks/struts were worn but it was just like that from new.... overly soft. The softer setups do sacrifice a tad of handling......More/Less road bounce, better turn in; Just up to you whether its a good trade off or not; I imagine it will require maintenance on the suspension sooner than a regular one too.
ALl mercedes are great, but not all configs are for you; 5 suvs, 5 cars, etc etc... all very different in spec and options. You may just have picked the wrong combo.
Last edited by Trancebolt; 02-20-2017 at 07:06 PM.
The following users liked this post:
ashok abraham (02-20-2017)
#48
I switched from run flats to michelin a/s 3 on 18s but it was very similar in terms of translating harsh road conditions to the driver. What made the biggest difference was using the 36 all around psi; i was trying the full load 39/45 before and it was a touch more sensitive to cracks and holes in the road
I sat as a passenger for a 120 mile round trip in it and you cant feel the same stuff you do when driving. On flat road the car is sweet; its when youre on bad patches of ground that it comes through the suspension.
On the upside, ive never been in a car that corners or handles as well with the sport steering ratio and the firm suspension components. Its not just the height/springs, its also different hardware i believe... Anyone whos driven an AMG will tell you its definitely a notch more soft than that.... They can be punishing on the 405 expansion plates!
I think Mike was the most correct, and others who reported: if its too harsh for you, you shouldve got luxury or airmatic. I drove a luxury c300 for a long time and people thought my shocks/struts were worn but it was just like that from new.... overly soft. The softer setups do sacrifice a tad of handling......More/Less road bounce, better turn in; Just up to you whether its a good trade off or not; I imagine it will require maintenance on the suspension sooner than a regular one too.
ALl mercedes are great, but not all configs are for you; 5 suvs, 5 cars, etc etc... all very different in spec and options. You may just have picked the wrong combo.
I sat as a passenger for a 120 mile round trip in it and you cant feel the same stuff you do when driving. On flat road the car is sweet; its when youre on bad patches of ground that it comes through the suspension.
On the upside, ive never been in a car that corners or handles as well with the sport steering ratio and the firm suspension components. Its not just the height/springs, its also different hardware i believe... Anyone whos driven an AMG will tell you its definitely a notch more soft than that.... They can be punishing on the 405 expansion plates!
I think Mike was the most correct, and others who reported: if its too harsh for you, you shouldve got luxury or airmatic. I drove a luxury c300 for a long time and people thought my shocks/struts were worn but it was just like that from new.... overly soft. The softer setups do sacrifice a tad of handling......More/Less road bounce, better turn in; Just up to you whether its a good trade off or not; I imagine it will require maintenance on the suspension sooner than a regular one too.
ALl mercedes are great, but not all configs are for you; 5 suvs, 5 cars, etc etc... all very different in spec and options. You may just have picked the wrong combo.
When you say 36psi, you mean 40psi (+4 psi for warm tire)on a warm tire? Or you still maintain 36 psi on warm tire?
#49
MBWorld Fanatic!
Originally Posted by Trancebolt
I switched from run flats to michelin a/s 3 on 18s but it was very similar in terms of translating harsh road conditions to the driver. What made the biggest difference was using the 36 all around psi; i was trying the full load 39/45 before and it was a touch more sensitive to cracks and holes in the road
I sat as a passenger for a 120 mile round trip in it and you cant feel the same stuff you do when driving. On flat road the car is sweet; its when youre on bad patches of ground that it comes through the suspension.
On the upside, ive never been in a car that corners or handles as well with the sport steering ratio and the firm suspension components. Its not just the height/springs, its also different hardware i believe... Anyone whos driven an AMG will tell you its definitely a notch more soft than that.... They can be punishing on the 405 expansion plates!
I think Mike was the most correct, and others who reported: if its too harsh for you, you shouldve got luxury or airmatic. I drove a luxury c300 for a long time and people thought my shocks/struts were worn but it was just like that from new.... overly soft. The softer setups do sacrifice a tad of handling......More/Less road bounce, better turn in; Just up to you whether its a good trade off or not; I imagine it will require maintenance on the suspension sooner than a regular one too.
ALl mercedes are great, but not all configs are for you; 5 suvs, 5 cars, etc etc... all very different in spec and options. You may just have picked the wrong combo.
I sat as a passenger for a 120 mile round trip in it and you cant feel the same stuff you do when driving. On flat road the car is sweet; its when youre on bad patches of ground that it comes through the suspension.
On the upside, ive never been in a car that corners or handles as well with the sport steering ratio and the firm suspension components. Its not just the height/springs, its also different hardware i believe... Anyone whos driven an AMG will tell you its definitely a notch more soft than that.... They can be punishing on the 405 expansion plates!
I think Mike was the most correct, and others who reported: if its too harsh for you, you shouldve got luxury or airmatic. I drove a luxury c300 for a long time and people thought my shocks/struts were worn but it was just like that from new.... overly soft. The softer setups do sacrifice a tad of handling......More/Less road bounce, better turn in; Just up to you whether its a good trade off or not; I imagine it will require maintenance on the suspension sooner than a regular one too.
ALl mercedes are great, but not all configs are for you; 5 suvs, 5 cars, etc etc... all very different in spec and options. You may just have picked the wrong combo.
Both the C43 and C63 ride hard regardless of setting, more so with the 19" wheel package. Most automotive press on the AMG 205s, while being overwhelmingly positive, usually dings them for an excessively hard ride vs other cars in the class.
I'd have gone for a C450 if Air was an option.
#50
Senior Member
I keep my tires at 36. they go up to about 39 when hot after 45 mins of driving. I'm always driving alone with an empty car tho. my girls car is the travel car
I drive the canyons home everyday. not a really crazy one at all but it isn't the freeway. as I've put more of those miles on the car the suspension has been setting nicely. I could see this car feeling nicely worn in at 70k. despite already having rattles 0_o
I see soccer mom's and young women with sport c classes and the 19 inch "upgrade" and I wonder... hmmm.. is she miserable? my girl hates it enough on 18s...lol
the old s classes were on 16s I believe. 55h. or something. super squishy. 18 is f1 size of choice.
any higher is all visual and certainly worse ride.
I'm very interested in the airmatic I might get my next one with it despite potential repair costs in late life.
it's remarkable how much steering and suspension from the sport package changes the feeling from the lux/standard. drove a loaner without sport pack and was like "wtf is this"
I think weirdly enough a 400 is the one I want. just enough extra motor/sound,and I think it cones with 4matic(something I really want on my next one). not the same suspension as the 450/43 either.
I drive the canyons home everyday. not a really crazy one at all but it isn't the freeway. as I've put more of those miles on the car the suspension has been setting nicely. I could see this car feeling nicely worn in at 70k. despite already having rattles 0_o
I see soccer mom's and young women with sport c classes and the 19 inch "upgrade" and I wonder... hmmm.. is she miserable? my girl hates it enough on 18s...lol
the old s classes were on 16s I believe. 55h. or something. super squishy. 18 is f1 size of choice.
any higher is all visual and certainly worse ride.
I'm very interested in the airmatic I might get my next one with it despite potential repair costs in late life.
it's remarkable how much steering and suspension from the sport package changes the feeling from the lux/standard. drove a loaner without sport pack and was like "wtf is this"
I think weirdly enough a 400 is the one I want. just enough extra motor/sound,and I think it cones with 4matic(something I really want on my next one). not the same suspension as the 450/43 either.
Last edited by Trancebolt; 02-20-2017 at 10:55 PM.