Go Back   MBWorld.org Forums > Mercedes-Benz AMG Vehicles > C32 AMG, C55 AMG (W203)
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?


C32 AMG, C55 AMG (W203) Discuss the C32 and C55 AMG.

Sponsored by CARiD
Click Here



Reply
 
 
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 02-21-2003, 07:18 PM   #26
Almost a Member!
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The Cape
Posts: 70
Send a message via AIM to Instuh Send a message via Yahoo to Instuh
S60R drives like a FWD car most of the time, they say..

Interestingly enough, last night me and my friend got his S4 stuck in snow..

Rear wheels weren't in a bad spot and should of been able to get traction, but they didn't spin, in reverse..

Only Front wheels spun, it was wierd.
To remove this ad, register today or login if you already are registered!

__________________
2003 Black C32 AMG with Kenwood DVD/Sirius 18inch Dualspokes
2004 E55 AMG, Designo Graphite
2004 E500 4MATIC, Pewter/ Charcoal
2003 X5 Black Sapphire 4.6is
Instuh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2003, 08:44 PM   #27
MBworld Guru
 
FrankW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Diamond Bar, CA
Posts: 22,009
Drives: white and whiter
The S60R is pretty nice, but not enough to go against the C32 or the M3. Maybe the New S4 in the 0-60 time, but not at higher speed.

IMO Volvo should've use the turbo 6 cyclinder from the S80 and sup it up instead of the 5 cyclinder.
FrankW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2003, 03:00 AM   #28
Super Member
 
Shine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Lean runner
Posts: 972
Smile

Quote:
Originally posted by FrankW
The S60R is pretty nice, but not enough to go against the C32 or the M3. Maybe the New S4 in the 0-60 time, but not at higher speed.
IMO Volvo should've use the turbo 6 cyclinder from the S80 and sup it up instead of the 5 cyclinder.
I was an Volvo 850R, C70 T5 owner
The inline-5 is the best knowledged turbo engine out of Volvo. whatever invites performance, BTCC racing, "R" rated Volvo,
T5 is the best platform.


Regarding the Bi-turbo T6 , powerful though, less appears
in the tunning business,nose heavy is just one of the concerns ....
Shine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2003, 02:22 AM   #29
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
steve s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 1,597
Drives: 1996 C36 AMG, 1995 Volvo 850 Turbowagon
Send a message via ICQ to steve s
Quote:
Originally posted by FrankW
IMO Volvo should've use the turbo 6 cyclinder from the S80 and sup it up instead of the 5 cyclinder.
their insistence on transversely mounting the engine for torque and safety reasons won't allow for all 6 cylinders AND a tranny to fit in the engine bay....even on the s80, whose engine bay is humongous, the tranny is one of the smallest available (size-wise)...so they're stuck with inline-5...unbalanced as it is... but i ain't complaining ..pretty peppy for 5 cylinders at only 2.5L (2.3L in my car hehe), plus, volvo has been developing/working on it for over a decade, and it's n/a racing inline-5 was one of the most durable (except for the 97 s40 season) in the old btcc (which unfortunately got it's feet pulled from them, is not what it once was anymore, by monetary reasons...too bad)
__________________
1996 c36 amg stock
1995 850 Turbowagon
steve s is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2003, 10:40 PM   #30
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Anacortes, WA
Posts: 23
Drives: 2004 C320 sport 6speed manual
The Volvo S60R leaves me wishing I had waited a little before buying my Mercedes. Sure I've got the Benz but I don't need that kind of attention. I love the Mercedes, but for the same price, I could have been sitting fat in the Volvo and had all the options I'm hoping to put on my C320 sport (suspension, exhaust, rims, body kit refinements). With a Mercedes, there is a presumption of status allowing many of it's inferior qualities to be overlooked by both the onlooker and owner, but this new R will likely turn just as many heads if not more than the Mercedes.

The C32 is for someone who isn't as picky with their money. All the numbers are in favor of the Vovo with the exception of horsepower and acceleration. Volvo's lateral acceleration limits and top speed surpised the heck out of me. Not to mention the sound system which MB should be ashamed of. But of course, if you've got loads of cash to spend, all the negatives can easily be turned into positives up and above the already 15k difference in price. But who cares about the extra cash for someone who bought a C32 in the first place.

I'll go with a C32, but first you would have to give it a manual transmission and put $20K in my bank account so I can buy it, have the speed governor removed, and the soundsystem upgraded.

Nice Job Volvo!!
__________________
2004 Black C320 Sport Sedan 6Spd manual, C2, C4, Bose w/Changer, H&R coilovers, Kleemann Exhaust, 20mm rear spacers

Last edited by alundo; 08-16-2003 at 11:23 PM.
alundo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2003, 11:03 PM   #31
Super Member
 
Mr.PS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Miami
Posts: 719
C32 Hands down.
Mr.PS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2003, 12:44 AM   #32
MBworld Guru
 
FrankW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Diamond Bar, CA
Posts: 22,009
Drives: white and whiter
211 E55 hands down

and whoa, old thread alert
FrankW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2003, 03:08 AM   #33
Super Member
 
Mr.PS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Miami
Posts: 719
Frank got any more pics of your C32 Those Ones in the detailing forum where awsome.
Mr.PS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2003, 06:34 AM   #34
Almost a Member!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: orange county, california
Posts: 35
Drives: 2003 C32 AMG
re: Volvo S60R

I test drove the S60R cuz I wanted to get it for my wife. If you're comparing it to the C32, which I also have, there is no comparison. There is a lag up to 1800 or 2000 RPM with the Volvo and then the turbo kicks in. The whine at 4800 to 5000 RPM may get annoying. It still is a very nice car for the money. You get a trick suspension which may be very expensive to replace once the warranty wears out. The one major thing I did not like was that it is based on an old 5 cylinder platform. Other than that, the cars a great bargain. I test drove the car at Cerritos Volvo. The car was fully loaded and they were asking $48K for it. I told them they were crazy. They wanted $4000 out of pocket and close to $900/month for 72 months. I walked out of there after I heard that. They since have called me twice to make a deal but I told them that I got an Infinit FX35 already. A $15000 difference is a lot of money. But the joy of the C32 is priceless.
dondi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2003, 06:59 AM   #35
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,439
Volvo's sound system is one of the best in the "stock system" market.

Btw, I just smoked one tonight! Apparently, that S60R guy thinks he's driving a E55. :o
Harris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2003, 08:17 AM   #36
MBworld Guru
 
FrankW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Diamond Bar, CA
Posts: 22,009
Drives: white and whiter
Quote:
Originally posted by Fr0zen
Frank got any more pics of your C32 Those Ones in the detailing forum where awsome.
thx, how's this one
Attached Thumbnails
this should be interesting.....C32 vs. S60R-photo8-14-004.jpg  
FrankW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2003, 08:18 AM   #37
MBworld Guru
 
FrankW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Diamond Bar, CA
Posts: 22,009
Drives: white and whiter
and this one
Attached Thumbnails
this should be interesting.....C32 vs. S60R-photo8-14-005.jpg  
FrankW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2003, 08:10 AM   #38
Almost a Member!
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 40
Drives: Mercedes-Benz 2006 ML350 , '04 VW R32
Quote:
Originally posted by onster
Here are my two cents on this:

On another note MB, is part of Daimler/Chrysler but this is a merger of two car companies not a buy out of another company as Ford did to Volvo. So MB still retains its own distinctive values and style. Whereas Volvo has lost its distinctiveness because of FORD.
You don't really believe it was a merger do you?? Daimler-Benz bougth Chrysler...just look at all the Germans in Auburn Hills, and the composition of the Board of Directors at DC.
Chuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2003, 08:10 AM
 
 
 
Reply

Tags
31017, amg, bar, benz, c32, diamond, govenor, limiter, mercedes, remove, s60r, speed, sterling, top, volvo



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Join MbWorld


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:38 PM.


Copyright 2001-2012 InternetBrands, Inc. / MBWorld.org. All Rights Reserved.
Everyone's Personal Details