C32 AMG, C55 AMG (W203) 2001 - 2007

For those who have headers on their C55

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 02-24-2015, 01:18 AM
  #1  
tw2
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
tw2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 3,412
Received 280 Likes on 231 Posts
2005 E55 AMG, 1991 MR2
For those who have headers on their C55

I figure more people have done headers here than the CLK55 forum but an M113 is an M113. I am considering having custom headers made, stainless long tube 4-1 with slip joins and ceramic coated inside and out. My local shop does an awesome warranty on leaking, cracks etc and has an excellent reputation. This will of course eliminate the primary cats.

- Are the secondary cats enough to stop the smell of gas with the primaries gone?

- Would these alterations with an otherwise completely stock exhaust be at all loud? Mainly I don't want to annoy the neighbors with cold starts as I live in a townhouse complex (in garage, door open).

- I presume a tune is required to get rid of the CEL? Are there any other options to get rid of it before having a tune done?
Old 02-24-2015, 08:05 AM
  #2  
Super Member
 
c32kompressor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Orlando FL
Posts: 769
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
CLK55 AMG
the secondaries might be able to mask the smell but maybe not. I did shorties on my w209 55. they were good until they cracked but they were cheap. longtubes will be a bit louder than the shorties but not by much. it should be relatively quiet
Old 02-24-2015, 05:52 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
amgen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 363
Received 40 Likes on 33 Posts
C55 AMG T with Kleemann K2 and some stuff: 414 hp and 576Nm :-)
I have Kleemanns mid/long-tubes.
Primary cats gone of course and the secondaries take very well care of
exhaustfumes in my countrys sniff-test. Actually they have said several
times my exhausts are very clean!

I´ve kept the rest of the exhaustsystem untouched, with a very nice
sound left. Not too loud. Tried for some time without the resonator but
it was far too loud for me, put it back on.

ECU-tune is a must to get all the power out of the headers, and to turn off
the CEL.
Old 02-25-2015, 04:19 AM
  #4  
tw2
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
tw2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 3,412
Received 280 Likes on 231 Posts
2005 E55 AMG, 1991 MR2
Thanks for the feedback, I won't bother with primaries then.

I found your topspeed thread again c32. I can't believe the stock headers have a 1.6" exit, thats 41mm for us metric people, insanely small. I would consider 2.25" barely adequate. Not that I know what is inside the resonators or mufflers but surely this must be by far the main restriction in the exhaust.

Good to know I won't wake up the neighborhood. I like to fly under the radar, at least near home.
Old 02-25-2015, 06:45 AM
  #5  
Super Member
 
c32kompressor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Orlando FL
Posts: 769
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
CLK55 AMG
yup, the headers on the w209 55 and w203 55 and the main restriction.
Old 02-25-2015, 07:08 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
amgen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 363
Received 40 Likes on 33 Posts
C55 AMG T with Kleemann K2 and some stuff: 414 hp and 576Nm :-)
Originally Posted by c32kompressor
yup, the headers on the w209 55 and w203 55 and the main restriction.
Don´t forget primaries restrict a lot too.
Old 02-25-2015, 07:14 AM
  #7  
Super Member
 
c32kompressor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Orlando FL
Posts: 769
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
CLK55 AMG
primarys are restrictive, not nearly as much as the stock headers
Old 02-25-2015, 07:17 AM
  #8  
Super Member
 
c32kompressor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Orlando FL
Posts: 769
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
CLK55 AMG
while primarys are restrictive, they provide the necessary back pressure for our vehicles. this is where all our low end power comes from. cats really aren't restrictive anyway. they cant be too restrictive. if they were really as restrictive as people say, it would defeat the purpose of them. the combustion chamber temps would rise affecting emissions.
Old 02-25-2015, 08:29 PM
  #9  
Member
 
Naugamanator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2005 C55
With respect, I beg to differ on 'necessary back pressure'. Exhaust gas velocity at lower RPMs is what brings the low end power.

Myths about "back-pressure"
http://www.mustangevolution.com/forum/f312/t296628/
Old 02-25-2015, 09:51 PM
  #10  
tw2
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
tw2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 3,412
Received 280 Likes on 231 Posts
2005 E55 AMG, 1991 MR2
Good read. I learnt from previous cars that bigger is usually worse. Mild to moderate increase in sizing with a better design usually increases torque throughout most of the rev range. Otherwise it comes back to being a trade off and certainly low rpm torque is the most enjoyable for a daily driver around town.
Old 02-25-2015, 11:16 PM
  #11  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Lenin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: North NJ
Posts: 2,073
Likes: 0
Received 27 Likes on 25 Posts
2002 C32 AMG, 2013 GLK 350/4, 2015 E63S AMG Wagon
Originally Posted by Naugamanator
With respect, I beg to differ on 'necessary back pressure'. Exhaust gas velocity at lower RPMs is what brings the low end power.

Myths about "back-pressure"
http://www.mustangevolution.com/forum/f312/t296628/
Absolutely agree. It's about the scavenging effect. just look up the exhaust design for a top fuel dragster. Very little backpressure considering the HP and TQ they generate.
Old 02-26-2015, 04:08 AM
  #12  
Super Member
 
C3Duece's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 522
Received 14 Likes on 14 Posts
2002 C32AMG
IMHO you'd should replace the primaries with 300cell cats and ditch the secondaries completely. Cold starts with headers/high flow cats will be loud enough to wake the dead.
Old 02-26-2015, 05:20 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
amgen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 363
Received 40 Likes on 33 Posts
C55 AMG T with Kleemann K2 and some stuff: 414 hp and 576Nm :-)
If you decide to go with Kleemann mid/long-tube headers or similar,
you have to get rid of primaries since there´s no room. They´re designed
that way. If you want to change secondaries to racecats, no problems but
the gains are max 5 hp. It´s been discussed here before.

Use the search-engine and you will find a lot of useful information here!

Last edited by amgen; 02-26-2015 at 05:23 PM.
Old 02-26-2015, 05:36 PM
  #14  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Newzchspy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,165
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
PLAID
Originally Posted by amgen
If you decide to go with Kleemann mid/long-tube headers or similar,
you have to get rid of primaries since there´s no room. They´re designed
that way. If you want to change secondaries to racecats, no problems but
the gains are max 5 hp. It´s been discussed here before.

Use the search-engine and you will find a lot of useful information here!
I've got the Kleemann shorty headers on mine and they sound great and fitment is excellent. Don't know what they give HP wise, BUT the sound is excellent.
Old 02-26-2015, 06:01 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
amgen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 363
Received 40 Likes on 33 Posts
C55 AMG T with Kleemann K2 and some stuff: 414 hp and 576Nm :-)
Nice to see you again Newz, where´s the popcorn?
Old 02-27-2015, 03:22 AM
  #16  
tw2
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
tw2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 3,412
Received 280 Likes on 231 Posts
2005 E55 AMG, 1991 MR2
Unfortunately being right hand drive I cannot use any off the shelf headers that I am aware of. The kleemann mid length require work to make it fit around the steering column. By the time I pay shipping, import tax and the exchange rate I would have more than paid for custom full length 4-1's and the merge collector they use is almost a masterpiece.

I never considered a race cat in place of the secondaries. Good idea; I would consider that if I was annoyed with the smell of gas I think.
Old 03-01-2015, 05:11 PM
  #17  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Tump43's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Posts: 1,001
Received 34 Likes on 27 Posts
2014 E350 4Matic
Originally Posted by amgen
I have Kleemanns mid/long-tubes.
Primary cats gone of course and the secondaries take very well care of
exhaustfumes in my countrys sniff-test. Actually they have said several
times my exhausts are very clean!

I´ve kept the rest of the exhaustsystem untouched, with a very nice
sound left. Not too loud. Tried for some time without the resonator but
it was far too loud for me, put it back on.

ECU-tune is a must to get all the power out of the headers, and to turn off
the CEL.
I have the same Kleemann set up and agree. Replaced the secondary cat's with highflow cats, kept the resonator and love the results. More power throughout, more noise outside but not in the cabin.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: For those who have headers on their C55



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:11 PM.