C63/C63S AMG
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

C63S with RENNtech ECU Tune vs. Ferrari 458 with Capristo Exhaust

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 05-04-2016, 10:32 AM
  #1  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
AlexZTuned's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,537
Received 368 Likes on 262 Posts
2017 Porsche 911 C4
C63S with RENNtech ECU Tune vs. Ferrari 458 with Capristo Exhaust

Found this on YouTube and had to share. This is C63S with only a RENNtech ECU tune vs. a Ferrari 458 Italia with a Capristo Exhaust.

I'll let the video speak for itself... but a stock 458 Italia traps around ~125 MPH in the 1/4 mile.

Old 05-04-2016, 11:09 AM
  #2  
SPONSOR
 
sales@eurocharged.com's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Houston
Posts: 4,909
Received 129 Likes on 92 Posts
C63S
I own both cars... 2015 C63S and 2012 Ferrari 458.

I have 1/4 mile videos from both cars....same day, same track.

The C63S is faster by .1 / .2

Old 05-04-2016, 11:32 AM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
AlexZTuned's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,537
Received 368 Likes on 262 Posts
2017 Porsche 911 C4
Originally Posted by sales@eurocharged.com
I own both cars... 2015 C63S and 2012 Ferrari 458.

I have 1/4 mile videos from both cars....same day, same track.

The C63S is faster by .1 / .2

Eurocharged C63S World Record 1/4 - YouTube
Very nice! What did your 458 trap in the 1/4 mile that day?

I noticed you're running catless downpipes and air filters on top of the Eurocharged tune. Still very impressive that these cars can creep away from a 458 with just the tune alone on pump gas!
Old 05-04-2016, 12:41 PM
  #4  
Super Member
 
vaelin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 640
Received 70 Likes on 60 Posts
'15 C63S
Wonder why this is; a tune should only give a slight hp advantage, but the 458 has nearly 900 pounds weight advantage... and probably aero too.
Old 05-04-2016, 01:11 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
CT-AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
Received 30 Likes on 22 Posts
AMG C63S
Torque and Turbo Boost in Addition to more HP and rolling start helps
Old 05-04-2016, 01:23 PM
  #6  
Banned
 
Guilty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,838
Received 69 Likes on 58 Posts
'16 C63-S
Originally Posted by vaelin
Wonder why this is; a tune should only give a slight hp advantage, but the 458 has nearly 900 pounds weight advantage... and probably aero too.
Yes, can someone please explain?
Old 05-04-2016, 01:27 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
CT-AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
Received 30 Likes on 22 Posts
AMG C63S
Gearing, Boost, Shifting, temperature outside.. Lots of factors
Old 05-04-2016, 02:08 PM
  #8  
SPONSOR
 
sales@eurocharged.com's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Houston
Posts: 4,909
Received 129 Likes on 92 Posts
C63S
Originally Posted by AlexZTuned
Very nice! What did your 458 trap in the 1/4 mile that day?

I noticed you're running catless downpipes and air filters on top of the Eurocharged tune. Still very impressive that these cars can creep away from a 458 with just the tune alone on pump gas!
The 458 trapped 123-124mph

My 458 has 22's on it too. LOL
Old 05-04-2016, 03:47 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Iceman II's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: SoCal
Posts: 482
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
2015 C63S / 2015 BMW M4
Impressive indeed -- thanks for sharing.
Old 05-04-2016, 04:46 PM
  #10  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
AlexZTuned's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,537
Received 368 Likes on 262 Posts
2017 Porsche 911 C4
Originally Posted by vaelin
Wonder why this is; a tune should only give a slight hp advantage, but the 458 has nearly 900 pounds weight advantage... and probably aero too.
The standard 458 weighs about ~600lbs less than the C63S (has a curb weight of around 3350 lbs), but makes 450 WHP and only 316 WTQ:



It makes sense that at rolling speeds, a tuned C63S with 517 WHP and 565 WTQ is more than enough to compensate for the weight with an extra 67 WHP and 249 WTQ!



Torque is a great thing
Old 05-04-2016, 04:50 PM
  #11  
Super Member
 
vaelin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 640
Received 70 Likes on 60 Posts
'15 C63S
Makes sense. Wasn't too familiar with the 458, so my Google search pulled up 3050 as the weight.
Old 05-04-2016, 11:38 PM
  #12  
AV1
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
AV1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 2,263
Received 52 Likes on 45 Posts
C204 C250-CDI
Originally Posted by vaelin
Wonder why this is; a tune should only give a slight hp advantage, but the 458 has nearly 900 pounds weight advantage... and probably aero too.
Torque, it's all about the torque

I think a lot of people who are not used to high torque powered vehicles especially forced induction ones that produce all their torque from low revs underestimate how much quicker they are, ie. if traction is not an issue
Old 05-05-2016, 08:54 AM
  #13  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
AMG 17GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: ATLANTA
Posts: 3,964
Received 696 Likes on 530 Posts
R Nine T
Nice run there.

Speaking of torque, would like to see 488 vs c63s having 250! Ft pounds more than 458....
Old 05-05-2016, 09:36 AM
  #14  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
AlexZTuned's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,537
Received 368 Likes on 262 Posts
2017 Porsche 911 C4
Originally Posted by ROMEO550
Nice run there.

Speaking of torque, would like to see 488 vs c63s having 250! Ft pounds more than 458....
No chance against a 488 GTB. Those are running somewhere around 10.5 @ 135 MPH stock. Amazing what a pair of turbos (and $250k) can do 😋
Old 05-24-2016, 01:27 PM
  #15  
IB Staff
 
MBWorld Editor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 664
Received 30 Likes on 25 Posts
Front page news!

Thought the front page would dig this one too...
https://mbworld.org/articles/modifie...h-c63s-vs-458/
Old 06-03-2016, 02:29 AM
  #16  
Super Member
 
ML63 AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 963
Received 58 Likes on 43 Posts
CL63 AMG
Originally Posted by vaelin
Makes sense. Wasn't too familiar with the 458, so my Google search pulled up 3050 as the weight.
The Italians are VERY deceiving... All Italian manufacturers quote DRY weight as their vehicle weight. Add a solid 300 pounds to all the Italian numbers you read to get a more accurate number. Mclaren started doing the same thing too in order to compare apples to apples versus the Italians.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: C63S with RENNtech ECU Tune vs. Ferrari 458 with Capristo Exhaust



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:44 PM.