|
Sign in using an external account
|
|
||||||||
| C63 AMG (W204) Discuss the C63 AMG
Sponsored by : Kleemann USA ![]() |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 | ||
|
Super Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 631
Drives: 2010 AMG C63
|
How much rwkw is lost going up in wheel size?
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 73
Drives: 09 Acura MDX
|
I assume by rwkw, you mean power. Wheel size doesn't impact rw power at all. Your wheel & tire combo could affect accelleration through its effects on gearing and the weight of the wheel & tire combo, but the power doesn't change.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 1,453
Drives: C63 AMG
|
The wheel size doesn't impact, what it matters is the overall weight (rim/tire together).
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 3,981
Drives: See Sig
|
Quote:
Bigger the rim the smaller the sidewall. Smaller rim, bigger sidewall = better launch. Smaller rim, better acceleration. Bigger rim, better top speed. Marginal differences but every bit helps. Bigger sidewall better quality ride also. Also the smaller the rim the cheaper the tire. Big rims cost way more to put rubber on. Thats about it. If your not worried about every 10th of a second and don't hit the track 10 times a year go with what you think looks best because the performance difference wont be that noticeable on the street.
__________________
Fastest OE Tune only Record 2010 C63 11.531 @ 122.12 MPH (1.751 60')(3/26/11MIR) 9.41 60-130 Fastest OE Tune Only 60-130 Record 8.57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 6,674
Drives: C63
|
Wheel diameter has nothing to do with power.
Propain described the aspects perfectly.
__________________
![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
SPONSOR
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,935
Drives: AMG
|
Both wheel diameter and weight affect acceleration. Whether or not it shows up on a dyno depends on what kind of dyno you use.
Intertia = mass x radius^2 so the radius of the weight is actually exponentially more important than the mass itself (literally). It is a delecate balance of the two that will determine the exact difference. On larger wheels with lower side walls more of the mass is concentrated at a larger radius hence the reduction in performance even if overall tire diameter is the same. Hope that helps |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Super Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 631
Drives: 2010 AMG C63
|
Thanks for the replies. What I actually meant was if I put the factory 18's on the back of my car and did another run on the Dyno the number would be higher as the overall size of the wheel is slightly smaller. My last car came with 20" wheels and when I put on 22" wheels the Dyno reading was lower but I can't remember by how much.
My car did a run with standard tune of 348.5 rwhp on the 20" wheels and after tune with the 20's it did 398 rwhp. I haven't measured the difference of overall diameter between the factory 18's and my HRE 20"s |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: San Diego/San Francisco
Posts: 1,443
Drives: AMG C63, Porsche 996TTX50
|
Quote:
__________________
Current 2003 996TTX50 2009 C63 2009 Lexus RS350 (wifeys car) In Loving memory of my bank account 2006 X3 2005 C55 1999 C43 1997 M3 4Dr 1995 325 4Dr 1985 318i 1995 Porsche 993 RS 1985 Porsche 911 widebody 1983 Porsche 911 Cab 1980 Porsche 911 1978 Porsche 911 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: California, USA
Posts: 9,156
Drives: E63 P30, CL500 Sport
|
Quote:
Going back to the weight issue, it is not neccessarily always the case that the bigger rim is the heavier one. For example, many people switch from 18" AMG rims to 19" HREs or BBS yet still save on rotational weight due to the wheel being made out of much lighter material. However, if the new wheel/tire combo does indeed weight more than the old wheel/tire combo, then your drivetrain loss percentage would become "slightly" higher since the car would now have to spend more energy accelerating the heavier wheel/tires, and similarly, the car would have to spend more energy stopping the heavier wheel/tire combo. And even though one may see a loss (or gain) of power on the dyno due to heavier rotational parts, it is important to note that the power loss (or gain) is not changing the crank horsepower output.
__________________
2007 E63 w/P30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 282
Drives: C63 AMG
|
I just put on 265/35/18 on stock 18's and i feel like my top speed may have decreased slightly. Maybe the 35 sidewall is too much?
__________________
Palladium Silver C63 ///AMG |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Super Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 631
Drives: 2010 AMG C63
|
Would it be fair to say 2 cars side by side with the same power just different wheel sizes would be fairly equal in a race.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: San Diego/San Francisco
Posts: 1,443
Drives: AMG C63, Porsche 996TTX50
|
A taller aspect ratio tire is going to change the differential ratio making it "taller" (ie less rear end gear ratio...a smaller number). So you're going to a wider tire with the same aspect ratio that tire is taller thereby reducing your rear end gear ratio. Technically this will cause the engine to gain revs slower but will also increase top speed. Off course the taller sidewall with more flex could make it hook up a bit better from the dig. Changing one tire size wouldn't make much a difference for example going from 255x35 to 265x35 will only add 3.5mm to the side wall or a total of 7mm to the overall tire diameter.
__________________
Current 2003 996TTX50 2009 C63 2009 Lexus RS350 (wifeys car) In Loving memory of my bank account 2006 X3 2005 C55 1999 C43 1997 M3 4Dr 1995 325 4Dr 1985 318i 1995 Porsche 993 RS 1985 Porsche 911 widebody 1983 Porsche 911 Cab 1980 Porsche 911 1978 Porsche 911 |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Super Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 631
Drives: 2010 AMG C63
|
Thanks Duane. I have gone from the factory 18's with factory tires which I think were 255/35/18 on back to HRE 20's with 285/25/20, so there would be a slight loss of power showing on dyno due to a overall larger wheel
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| big, bigger, car, dyno, horsepower, impact, loss, make, rims, rwkw, size, sizes, slower, small, tire, tuning, wheel |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|