Go Back   MBWorld.org Forums > Mercedes-Benz AMG Vehicles > C63 AMG (W204)
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?
Register Photos FAQ Members Insurance Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read CarsGarageVendors
Welcome to MBWorld.org Forums


C63 AMG (W204) Discuss the C63 AMG

Sponsored by : Kleemann USA
Click Here

Reply
 
 
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 04-23-2011, 04:09 PM   #1
Super Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 631
Drives: 2010 AMG C63
How much rwkw is lost going up in wheel size?

When I had my car first tuned I had already put on my 20" wheels and it ran 260rwkw standard this figure rose to 297rwkw. Almost a 40 rwkw gain. Any idea what the figures would be with the factory 18's. I understand the gains would be the same but would be interested to know what loss there is with larger wheel size. Would it be around 15 - 20 rwkw?
To remove this ad, register today or login if you already are registered!

AMG-010 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2011, 09:32 PM   #2
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 73
Drives: 09 Acura MDX
I assume by rwkw, you mean power. Wheel size doesn't impact rw power at all. Your wheel & tire combo could affect accelleration through its effects on gearing and the weight of the wheel & tire combo, but the power doesn't change.
looney100 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2011, 10:16 PM   #3
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 1,453
Drives: C63 AMG
The wheel size doesn't impact, what it matters is the overall weight (rim/tire together).
C63newdude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2011, 12:11 AM   #4
MBWorld Fanatic!

 
propain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 3,981
Drives: See Sig
Quote:
Originally Posted by C63newdude View Post
The wheel size doesn't impact, what it matters is the overall weight (rim/tire together).
Weight aside....


Bigger the rim the smaller the sidewall.

Smaller rim, bigger sidewall = better launch.
Smaller rim, better acceleration.
Bigger rim, better top speed.

Marginal differences but every bit helps.


Bigger sidewall better quality ride also. Also the smaller the rim the cheaper the tire. Big rims cost way more to put rubber on.


Thats about it. If your not worried about every 10th of a second and don't hit the track 10 times a year go with what you think looks best because the performance difference wont be that noticeable on the street.
__________________
Fastest OE Tune only Record 2010 C63
11.531 @ 122.12 MPH (1.751 60')(3/26/11MIR) 9.41 60-130
Fastest OE Tune Only 60-130 Record 8.57
propain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2011, 12:49 AM   #5
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 6,674
Drives: C63
Wheel diameter has nothing to do with power.
Propain described the aspects perfectly.
__________________




_AMG_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2011, 02:40 AM   #6
SPONSOR
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,935
Drives: AMG
Both wheel diameter and weight affect acceleration. Whether or not it shows up on a dyno depends on what kind of dyno you use.

Intertia = mass x radius^2 so the radius of the weight is actually exponentially more important than the mass itself (literally).

It is a delecate balance of the two that will determine the exact difference. On larger wheels with lower side walls more of the mass is concentrated at a larger radius hence the reduction in performance even if overall tire diameter is the same.

Hope that helps
AMS Performance is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2011, 03:55 AM   #7
Super Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 631
Drives: 2010 AMG C63
Thanks for the replies. What I actually meant was if I put the factory 18's on the back of my car and did another run on the Dyno the number would be higher as the overall size of the wheel is slightly smaller. My last car came with 20" wheels and when I put on 22" wheels the Dyno reading was lower but I can't remember by how much.
My car did a run with standard tune of 348.5 rwhp on the 20" wheels and after tune with the 20's it did 398 rwhp. I haven't measured the difference of overall diameter between the factory 18's and my HRE 20"s
AMG-010 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2011, 04:01 AM   #8
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
DuaneC63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: San Diego/San Francisco
Posts: 1,443
Drives: AMG C63, Porsche 996TTX50
Quote:
Originally Posted by propain View Post
Weight aside....


Bigger the rim the smaller the sidewall.

Smaller rim, bigger sidewall = better launch.
Smaller rim, better acceleration.
Bigger rim, better top speed.

Marginal differences but every bit helps.


Bigger sidewall better quality ride also. Also the smaller the rim the cheaper the tire. Big rims cost way more to put rubber on.


Thats about it. If your not worried about every 10th of a second and don't hit the track 10 times a year go with what you think looks best because the performance difference wont be that noticeable on the street.
This sums it up right on the mark.
__________________
Current
2003 996TTX50
2009 C63
2009 Lexus RS350 (wifeys car)
In Loving memory of my bank account
2006 X3
2005 C55
1999 C43
1997 M3 4Dr
1995 325 4Dr
1985 318i
1995 Porsche 993 RS
1985 Porsche 911 widebody
1983 Porsche 911 Cab
1980 Porsche 911
1978 Porsche 911
DuaneC63 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2011, 04:25 AM   #9
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
MB_Forever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: California, USA
Posts: 9,156
Drives: E63 P30, CL500 Sport
Quote:
Originally Posted by propain View Post
Weight aside....


Bigger the rim the smaller the sidewall.

Smaller rim, bigger sidewall = better launch.
Smaller rim, better acceleration.
Bigger rim, better top speed.

Marginal differences but every bit helps.


Bigger sidewall better quality ride also. Also the smaller the rim the cheaper the tire. Big rims cost way more to put rubber on.


Thats about it. If your not worried about every 10th of a second and don't hit the track 10 times a year go with what you think looks best because the performance difference wont be that noticeable on the street.
Good post

Going back to the weight issue, it is not neccessarily always the case that the bigger rim is the heavier one. For example, many people switch from 18" AMG rims to 19" HREs or BBS yet still save on rotational weight due to the wheel being made out of much lighter material. However, if the new wheel/tire combo does indeed weight more than the old wheel/tire combo, then your drivetrain loss percentage would become "slightly" higher since the car would now have to spend more energy accelerating the heavier wheel/tires, and similarly, the car would have to spend more energy stopping the heavier wheel/tire combo. And even though one may see a loss (or gain) of power on the dyno due to heavier rotational parts, it is important to note that the power loss (or gain) is not changing the crank horsepower output.
__________________
2007 E63 w/P30
MB_Forever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2011, 04:27 AM   #10
Senior Member
 
PistolWhipC63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 282
Drives: C63 AMG
I just put on 265/35/18 on stock 18's and i feel like my top speed may have decreased slightly. Maybe the 35 sidewall is too much?
__________________
Palladium Silver C63 ///AMG
PistolWhipC63 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2011, 04:47 AM   #11
Super Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 631
Drives: 2010 AMG C63
Would it be fair to say 2 cars side by side with the same power just different wheel sizes would be fairly equal in a race.
AMG-010 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2011, 10:25 PM   #12
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
DuaneC63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: San Diego/San Francisco
Posts: 1,443
Drives: AMG C63, Porsche 996TTX50
Quote:
Originally Posted by AMG-010 View Post
Would it be fair to say 2 cars side by side with the same power just different wheel sizes would be fairly equal in a race.
A taller aspect ratio tire is going to change the differential ratio making it "taller" (ie less rear end gear ratio...a smaller number). So you're going to a wider tire with the same aspect ratio that tire is taller thereby reducing your rear end gear ratio. Technically this will cause the engine to gain revs slower but will also increase top speed. Off course the taller sidewall with more flex could make it hook up a bit better from the dig. Changing one tire size wouldn't make much a difference for example going from 255x35 to 265x35 will only add 3.5mm to the side wall or a total of 7mm to the overall tire diameter.
__________________
Current
2003 996TTX50
2009 C63
2009 Lexus RS350 (wifeys car)
In Loving memory of my bank account
2006 X3
2005 C55
1999 C43
1997 M3 4Dr
1995 325 4Dr
1985 318i
1995 Porsche 993 RS
1985 Porsche 911 widebody
1983 Porsche 911 Cab
1980 Porsche 911
1978 Porsche 911
DuaneC63 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2011, 04:19 PM   #13
Super Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 631
Drives: 2010 AMG C63
Thanks Duane. I have gone from the factory 18's with factory tires which I think were 255/35/18 on back to HRE 20's with 285/25/20, so there would be a slight loss of power showing on dyno due to a overall larger wheel
AMG-010 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2011, 04:19 PM
 
 
 
Reply

Tags
big, bigger, car, dyno, horsepower, impact, loss, make, rims, rwkw, size, sizes, slower, small, tire, tuning, wheel



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:52 PM.


Copyright © 2001-2012 InternetBrands, Inc. / MBWorld.org. All Rights Reserved.
Everyone's Personal Details

SEO by vBSEO 3.5.2