C63 AMG (W204) 2008 - 2015

does 2012 c63 coupe improved ALOT???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 10-06-2011, 03:30 AM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
kg21nba's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Toronto
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C63 coupe EVO X(sold) WRX (sold)
does 2012 c63 coupe improved ALOT???

Not the straight line , but the turning.
Can it beat m3 at the conner or track?
Old 10-06-2011, 03:51 AM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
_AMG_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 6,677
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
C63
To put it in short.......No.
Old 10-06-2011, 03:43 PM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
C63newdude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 1,699
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
C63 AMG
Not yet. It still needs to lose some 300 lbs, get rear LSD, have stiockier tires, perhaps wider wheels and rims and some better weight distribution and more emphasis on suspension tweaks.
Old 10-06-2011, 06:45 PM
  #4  
Banned
 
Helms's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 1,304
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
C63 AMG
Originally Posted by C63newdude
Not yet. It still needs to lose some 300 lbs, get rear LSD, have stiockier tires, perhaps wider wheels and rims and some better weight distribution and more emphasis on suspension tweaks.
+1, Its definitely on the right track.
Old 10-06-2011, 06:53 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Vegas_AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C63 & Mustang Mach1(s)
There was a show on the other night on Speed Channel, Car Sceince, that discussed and demonstrated the importance of low Center of Gravity in turning a vehicle. The C-Class has a higher center of gravity and a less advantagous weight distribution than the M. Power is only part of the equation.
Old 10-06-2011, 07:16 PM
  #6  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
_AMG_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 6,677
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
C63
Originally Posted by Vegas_AMG
There was a show on the other night on Speed Channel, Car Sceince, that discussed and demonstrated the importance of low Center of Gravity in turning a vehicle. The C-Class has a higher center of gravity and a less advantagous weight distribution than the M. Power is only part of the equation.
"Power is nothing without control"

-Pirelli
Old 10-06-2011, 08:35 PM
  #7  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
GHAZAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Norte America
Posts: 1,463
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
MBUSA
What is the weight diff between coupe and sedan C63?
Old 10-06-2011, 09:48 PM
  #8  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
gthal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,294
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2012 C63 coupe
Originally Posted by _AMG_
To put it in short.......No.
Originally Posted by C63newdude
Not yet. It still needs to lose some 300 lbs, get rear LSD, have stiockier tires, perhaps wider wheels and rims and some better weight distribution and more emphasis on suspension tweaks.
Guys like me who are moving from an E92 M3 to a C63 AMG coupe don't like to hear this from guys who have extensive time in a C63 . It seems the reports on the '12s have been very favourable compared to the M3 and that would reflect my limited experience.

So, what is it about the C63 (the 2012 coupe that is) that would have people buy the AMG over the M3? Is it just the power/torque issue?
Old 10-06-2011, 10:34 PM
  #9  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
_AMG_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 6,677
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
C63
Originally Posted by gthal
Guys like me who are moving from an E92 M3 to a C63 AMG coupe don't like to hear this from guys who have extensive time in a C63 . It seems the reports on the '12s have been very favourable compared to the M3 and that would reflect my limited experience.

So, what is it about the C63 (the 2012 coupe that is) that would have people buy the AMG over the M3? Is it just the power/torque issue?
The reason why I bought a C63 is to have fun, that's one of the main reasons. Loads of torque and an all around great car.
I was looking for a car with quality and beastly characteristics and the C63 was it for me.
I actually drove an E92 M3 for over a month and I was very impressed with the handling, but lacked in the power department.
Does the C63 handle as well as the M3? No way, but that's nothing a set of KW coilovers cant cure.

If I wanted a car with surgical precision I would've bought a GT-R.

Last edited by _AMG_; 10-07-2011 at 03:20 AM.
Old 10-06-2011, 10:36 PM
  #10  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Rsquad911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,022
Received 24 Likes on 11 Posts
97 Porsche GT2 Wide Bodied Cabrio, Mercedes G500
Originally Posted by GHAZAN
What is the weight diff between coupe and sedan C63?
I believe the coupe is 100-150 pounds HEAVIER.
Old 10-07-2011, 08:32 AM
  #11  
MBWorld Fanatic!
iTrader: (1)
 
Cylinder Head's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 6,706
Received 542 Likes on 359 Posts
'19 E63S, ‘16 CLS63 RIP, '09 E63 Gone, '06 M5 Gone, '97 Supra TT Gone
Originally Posted by Rsquad911
I believe the coupe is 100-150 pounds HEAVIER.
That B-Pillar in the Sedan does wonders for structural rigidity.

Until Mercedes builds a capable enough chassis for their entry-level lineup, they won't out handle or out-feel the M3. Coilovers don't matter, putting fatter tires on it doesn't matter (as much).
Old 10-07-2011, 09:09 AM
  #12  
Member
 
CPBRI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 116
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
E63 S
Originally Posted by _AMG_
The reason why I bought a C63 is to have fun, that's one of the main reasons. Loads of torque and an all around great car


Same here. Just wanted a fun V8 N/A motor. Love hearing the exhaust. Also wanted a sedan.

M3 is a great car. Just did not want to have to keep the revs up to get to the power.
Old 10-07-2011, 10:39 AM
  #13  
Super Member
 
CELLryuu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: DFW
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
C63 AMG Coupe P31
Originally Posted by C63newdude
get rear LSD
it doesnt have a LSD?
Old 10-07-2011, 11:55 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
ATL_MB's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Hong Kong/Charlotte
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2010 C63
The coupe and the sedan weigh nearly the same.

In my mind, the difference between the C63 and M3 is similar to the difference between the CLK63 Black Series and a 911 GT3. For 95% of the people, and 95% of the time, the AMG is going to be more fun, more usable around town and faster around the track than the M3 or the 911. But for someone that knows what they are doing, the M3 or 911 will be faster at the track. Maybe by a lot. To me, potentially being faster around the track was not worth living with an M3. Around town - that is, 95% of the time - the C63 kills the M3.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: does 2012 c63 coupe improved ALOT???



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:25 PM.