xtyper

Overall, I'm very pleased with the results. Based on other comparable dynojet numbers I've seen, I think I got a very healthy car with lots of potential. Can't wait to see where the Stage 2 setup puts me!

Dyno: Dynojet 224xLC
Shop: SpecialtyZ in Chatsworth, CA
Fuel: Chevron 91 octane
Mods: AFE Dry Filters, Charcoal Deletes
Peak #'s: 385whp/375wtq (see attached graphs)
Pulls done in 4th gear

Let me know what you guys think.

Thanks!

Dads C63

CONGRATS!! Those look like good numbers! Do you have the performance package?

Wait till you install the headers!!

PetroC63

Nice Eric.

Those are some healthy baseline numbers.

xtyper

Thanks Keith. Nope, no performance package, yet about 15whp higher than my 2010 did with the same mods, same dyno, same conditions. Now I'm even more excited to get the MHP headers on!

xtyper

Thanks mike. Hope you ended up deciding to go to atco tonight.

PetroC63

I'm going.

AMG-010

According to this http://www.youtube.com/user/sonnymad#p/u/73/lobma86OZT0 a 2010 makes more power than a 2008 model. I wonder if a 2011 is even more powerful

khmergod

I need to do a run with P31.

MB_Forever

Very healthy numbers from the new beast, congrats

Now I really can't wait to see what it does at Famoso in December

SonnyakaPig

Great looking graphs.

How many pulls did you do? Did your numbers increase as you did more pulls?

I'm not trying to be rude here, just stating my opinion: I think the numbers are on the high side. When you do the math, 385 whp on 91 octane represents slightly less than 15% drivetrain loss, which doesn't seem realistic for our automatic trans.

Also, I would bet that if you dynoed your car stock with 93 octane on that same dyno with similar conditions, you would have even higher numbers than 385. Reason being, our cars are meant to run on 93 octane and the car doesn't advance full timing for 91 octane gas. If you ever put in higher octane, you can feel the difference.

So, if your car made more than 385 whp with 93 octane, that would account for even less drivetrain loss than your car is displaying now.

Having said all of that, this dyno will obviously give you accurate results between this baseline and post LT's runs.

SonnyakaPig

Are you going to run DR's at the Famoso rental?

SonnyakaPig

@xtyper,

I just want to reiterate that I was not trying to be rude. Definitely was not trying to rain on your parade. And, I really hope it didn't come across that way. I'm certainly excited for your upcoming mods.

_AMG_

Car looks stout Eric!

xtyper

Unfortunately not, just the stock contis.

xtyper

No worries, I didn't take your post as rude at all. I agree, the numbers are on the high side compared to what I was expecting. But I did also dyno my 2010 at this same location with the same mods, and it made about 15whp less. Very similar conditions adjusted for SAE, and as far as I know no change in calibrations to the dynojet.

Guess we will see next weekend at Famoso if the track runs jive with the higher than usual dyne results.

xtyper

Thank you! Now get out to Famoso this weekend with me!