C63 AMG (W204) 2008 - 2015
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Dyno result with Cargraphic Headers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 11-21-2011, 02:59 AM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Jak63AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Jakarta, Indonesia
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2010 C 63 AMG
Dyno result with Cargraphic Headers

Hi all,

I have installed Cargraphic Headers with no primary but haven't got the chance to do the dyno testing. So today i did some dyno and the result is 393.4 RWHP and 338 RWTQ which is a gain of 23.6 RWHP and 22 RWTQ from the last mods.


So far the progress is as follows:
Stock Dyno : 309.9 RWHP 300 RWTQ
Eurocharged Tune : 351.2 RWHP
Sec cats+resonators delete : 369.8 RWHP 316 RWTQ
CG headers, primary cats delete, Eurocharged header tune : 393.4 RWHP 338 RWTQ

I'm pretty happy with the power that the car is making now and the sound is crazy LOUD now
Attached Thumbnails Dyno result with Cargraphic Headers-after-cargraphic-headers-primary-delete.jpg  
Old 11-21-2011, 03:14 AM
  #2  
Banned
 
jacob502's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 955
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2008 C63 ,2009 SL 63 AMG, 2011 SLS AMG
Originally Posted by Jak63AMG
Hi all,

I have installed Cargraphic Headers with no primary but haven't got the chance to do the dyno testing. So today i did some dyno and the result is 393.4 RWHP and 338 RWTQ which is a gain of 23.6 RWHP and 22 RWTQ from the last mods.


So far the progress is as follows:
Stock Dyno : 309.9 RWHP 300 RWTQ
Eurocharged Tune : 351.2 RWHP
Sec cats+resonators delete : 369.8 RWHP 316 RWTQ
CG headers, primary cats delete, Eurocharged header tune : 393.4 RWHP 338 RWTQ

I'm pretty happy with the power that the car is making now and the sound is crazy LOUD now
Dont be happy. Be ashamed. caragraphic headers alone should give you at least 35-40HP. I have seen them being tested on a one of my friend's car. How is it that your only getting 23HP?

Do you even have a headers tune?

Do you have a check engine light on?

393HP on dynodynamics especially at this time of the year is pretty low. your car should be making at least around 425HP.

something is wrong. find out what it is and fix it
Old 11-21-2011, 03:31 AM
  #3  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Jak63AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Jakarta, Indonesia
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2010 C 63 AMG
Originally Posted by jacob502
Dont be happy. Be ashamed. caragraphic headers alone should give you at least 35-40HP. I have seen them being tested on a one of my friend's car. How is it that your only getting 23HP?

Do you even have a headers tune?

Do you have a check engine light on?

393HP on dynodynamics especially at this time of the year is pretty low. your car should be making at least around 425HP.

something is wrong. find out what it is and fix it
Hi Jacob,

Thanks for your advice. Yes it seems low but look at the stock dyno result whic is only 309 RWHP and I'm using the same dyno to check all the modifications so I gain about 84 RWHP so far. One thing that I must consider is fuel quality in Indonesia is very crappy so always remind the tuner to be safe on AFR.

I don't have CEL because Jerry took care of it and yes it is hot and humid as hell this time of the year in Indonesia. Maybe there is something that needs to be fix and I will do some checking.
Old 11-21-2011, 03:37 AM
  #4  
Banned
 
Sirex63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: UAE
Posts: 500
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C63
Jacob502 +1

That's too low , u should get around 400 with at least a tune , then pushed to 425-435 with headers.
Old 11-21-2011, 03:48 AM
  #5  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Jak63AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Jakarta, Indonesia
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2010 C 63 AMG
Yup agreed but somehow this dyno is very low, i think one of the lowest in the region. Even a friend of mine E63 with weistec sc "only" reads 430 RWHP on this very same dyno
Old 11-21-2011, 03:58 AM
  #6  
Banned
 
Sirex63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: UAE
Posts: 500
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C63
Originally Posted by Jak63AMG
Yup agreed but somehow this dyno is very low, i think one of the lowest in the region. Even a friend of mine E63 with weistec sc "only" reads 430 RWHP on this very same dyno
then why dont u just try a shot on another dyno , if the same then there's a problem
Old 11-21-2011, 04:09 AM
  #7  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Jak63AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Jakarta, Indonesia
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2010 C 63 AMG
Originally Posted by Sirex63
then why dont u just try a shot on another dyno , if the same then there's a problem
That's the problem since this dyno is the most reliable and "true" dyno among others in Indonesia. Most tuners and car enthusiasts choose this dyno
Old 11-21-2011, 05:28 AM
  #8  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Maverick1975's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 2,155
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
Vath ML63 Brabus C63 SL63 CLK63BS C63BS
How can you stand the noise of longtube headers no cats and resonators? The volume at wide open throttle will be unbearable after a while.
Old 11-21-2011, 05:30 AM
  #9  
Banned
 
jacob502's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 955
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2008 C63 ,2009 SL 63 AMG, 2011 SLS AMG
Jaks,


I understand the consequences of fuel and all, but in your case it should not matter. you started out at a baseline of 309HP. you ended with around 393 by getting an ECU tune, Caragraphics headers, and deleating the secondary cats. the total HP gained is 84. A headers and tune alone should give you 100RWHP gain on any dyno. installing a catless pipe will give you about another 10-15HP extra. The gains you should be witnissig is around 110-115RWHP. Therefore, you are off by about 27-31 .You mentioned that the gains you got from your CG headers was only 24. Something is seriously wrong with your tune. Maybe you need to ask your tuner to adjust the necessary timing and ignition for your new exhust. I dont think Eurocharged worked with caragraphic before. They must have loaded a headers file for the headers that they have worked on and not yours. I know a tuner that has a a specific file for your caragraphic headers that will do magic for your car. If your intrested PM me.
Old 11-21-2011, 05:56 AM
  #10  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Jak63AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Jakarta, Indonesia
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2010 C 63 AMG
Guys,

I've just been informed by the dyno technician that his particular dyno dynamics reads around 35% lower RWHP than the supposed Engine HP figure.
What is the normal HP loss from engine to rear wheel HP? 15-20%?
Old 11-21-2011, 06:14 AM
  #11  
Banned
 
jacob502's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 955
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2008 C63 ,2009 SL 63 AMG, 2011 SLS AMG
Originally Posted by Jak63AMG
Guys,

I've just been informed by the dyno technician that his particular dyno dynamics reads around 35% lower RWHP than the supposed Engine HP figure.
What is the normal HP loss from engine to rear wheel HP? 15-20%?
If thats true, then your car is making 604 HP at the cranks. I personally think he is full of ****. a Dynodynamics dyno is the same Dynodynamics elsewhere. I dont know where he got this 35% figure. Anyway, tell him your car with your set up should still read around 420-430 RWHP
Old 11-21-2011, 06:19 AM
  #12  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Jak63AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Jakarta, Indonesia
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2010 C 63 AMG
Originally Posted by jacob502
If thats true, then your car is making 604 HP at the cranks. I personally think he is full of ****. a Dynodynamics dyno is the same Dynodynamics elsewhere. I dont know where he got this 35% figure. Anyway, tell him your car with your set up should still read around 420-430 RWHP
Got my PM?
Old 11-21-2011, 09:25 AM
  #13  
Junior Member
 
golfinz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 67
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
z06
84rwhp from LTs and a tune isn't all bad...all a dyno is is a tuning device, which can be altered by the dyno operator to make all cars read higher/lower just by changing the settings. Take it to the track to see the real results. I would imagine Jerry did his job in tuning as well
Old 11-21-2011, 02:31 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
C230Kompressed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Inland Empire / So Cal
Posts: 486
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I drive what I drive
I have a question about C63 tunes and sorry to semi-hijack your dyno result thread, but when you guys get tunes, are tuners loading up pre-made maps or custom tuning your car on a dyno? This may have something to do with why you are not getting full potential HP.

Although I do agree with OP, he went from 300whp to 393whp from stock to his current mods, I'd say that's about normal, and the dyno might be a very low reading dyno due to elevation/weather/last time dyno was re-calibrated etc. The most imporant is base vs tuned gain, and 93 is a good gain.
Old 11-21-2011, 02:47 PM
  #15  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
SonnyakaPig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,494
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
MB
Originally Posted by Jak63AMG
Hi Jacob,

Thanks for your advice. Yes it seems low but look at the stock dyno result whic is only 309 RWHP and I'm using the same dyno to check all the modifications so I gain about 84 RWHP so far. One thing that I must consider is fuel quality in Indonesia is very crappy so always remind the tuner to be safe on AFR.

I don't have CEL because Jerry took care of it and yes it is hot and humid as hell this time of the year in Indonesia. Maybe there is something that needs to be fix and I will do some checking.
I would say if your car is running nice and there doesn't seem to be any hiccups in drivability, then your gains are solid.

You're doing the right thing by sticking with the same dyno.

84 rwhp from stock is right where you should be given the following factors: 1) The weather is not ideal for making best power, 2) Your fuel octane isn't great so your car is not programmed to advance as much timing as it would if you were running better gas, 3) Your headers are great quality no doubt, but they're not MHP LT's which seem to make the most power for these cars.

If your car is making 600 bhp, your car is strong and right where it should be for your mods.
Old 11-21-2011, 02:54 PM
  #16  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
SonnyakaPig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,494
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
MB
Originally Posted by jacob502
Dont be happy. Be ashamed. caragraphic headers alone should give you at least 35-40HP. I have seen them being tested on a one of my friend's car. How is it that your only getting 23HP?

Do you even have a headers tune?

Do you have a check engine light on?

393HP on dynodynamics especially at this time of the year is pretty low. your car should be making at least around 425HP.

something is wrong. find out what it is and fix it
Easy there. Nothing to be ashamed about. These are mass produced items on a mass produced car, so the variables are not likely related to the hardware or the car (if the car is running well), rather, they probably have to do with this particular dyno, ambient temps and fuel.

23 whp on this dyno may be a good gain because it is very low reading. There's no way to know because there are so many factors to consider when you dyno. So you can't just attach a fixed hp gain to every car around the world. In reality, the hp is there, but the measurements can vary.

Also, the headers were installed after the OP removed the secondary cats and resonator so there was already a gain from the increased exhaust flow from that modification, as can be seen in the OP's stated results. The subsequent header install, then, may contribute to less hp gain than might be the case if the headers were installed prior to the secondary cats/resonator mod.
Old 11-21-2011, 05:09 PM
  #17  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
bhamg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,899
Received 92 Likes on 81 Posts
C63 AMG
Originally Posted by SonnyakaPig
Easy there. Nothing to be ashamed about. These are mass produced items on a mass produced car, so the variables are not likely related to the hardware or the car (if the car is running well), rather, they probably have to do with this particular dyno, ambient temps and fuel.

23 whp on this dyno may be a good gain because it is very low reading. There's no way to know because there are so many factors to consider when you dyno. So you can't just attach a fixed hp gain to every car around the world. In reality, the hp is there, but the measurements can vary.

Also, the headers were installed after the OP removed the secondary cats and resonator so there was already a gain from the increased exhaust flow from that modification, as can be seen in the OP's stated results. The subsequent header install, then, may contribute to less hp gain than might be the case if the headers were installed prior to the secondary cats/resonator mod.
Exactly...well put.
Old 11-21-2011, 05:15 PM
  #18  
SPONSOR
 
loungn14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Houston/ Austin /Toronto / UAE / Minneapolis / Orlando /Cincinnati
Posts: 5,459
Received 149 Likes on 109 Posts
Eurocharged Performance ML63 and TT lambo
Originally Posted by SonnyakaPig
Easy there. Nothing to be ashamed about. These are mass produced items on a mass produced car, so the variables are not likely related to the hardware or the car (if the car is running well), rather, they probably have to do with this particular dyno, ambient temps and fuel.

23 whp on this dyno may be a good gain because it is very low reading. There's no way to know because there are so many factors to consider when you dyno. So you can't just attach a fixed hp gain to every car around the world. In reality, the hp is there, but the measurements can vary.

Also, the headers were installed after the OP removed the secondary cats and resonator so there was already a gain from the increased exhaust flow from that modification, as can be seen in the OP's stated results. The subsequent header install, then, may contribute to less hp gain than might be the case if the headers were installed prior to the secondary cats/resonator mod.
nicely done...you beat me to it...

people just have to remember that when staking mods, the overall gains don't stack. IE a pulley might gain 50whp and a tune 50whp but together they won't give you 100whp.

Old 11-21-2011, 05:42 PM
  #19  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
GHAZAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Norte America
Posts: 1,463
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
MBUSA
numbers sound good, i gained about 90-100rwhp for headers/tune (catless), 91 octane....Jacob sounds mistaken. BTW most of us use 18% drivetrain loss.
Old 11-21-2011, 06:01 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
W109 W211 6.2L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 388
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
2008 W463 G500, 2003 Terminator Cobra (710RWHP), 2012 S350 Bluetec, 2010 911 C4S, 2007 VRSCDX
Originally Posted by bhamg
Exactly...well put.

Yep!

Also who cares what number it reads, you gonna enter a dyno contest? If so you will lose. The only contest that matters is the street contest , there will always be other cars with big numbers. If you can get a street tune and forget the dyno numbers.
Old 11-21-2011, 06:03 PM
  #21  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
bhamg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,899
Received 92 Likes on 81 Posts
C63 AMG
Originally Posted by GHAZAN
numbers sound good, i gained about 90-100rwhp for headers/tune (catless), 91 octane....Jacob sounds mistaken. BTW most of us use 18% drivetrain loss.
GHAZAN - what combination did you go with?
Old 11-21-2011, 06:19 PM
  #22  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
SonnyakaPig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,494
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
MB
Originally Posted by bhamg
Exactly...well put.
Thanks.
Old 11-21-2011, 06:20 PM
  #23  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
SonnyakaPig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,494
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
MB
Originally Posted by loungn14
nicely done...you beat me to it...

people just have to remember that when staking mods, the overall gains don't stack. IE a pulley might gain 50whp and a tune 50whp but together they won't give you 100whp.

Thanks for the post.

Good point about the stacking too.
Old 11-21-2011, 07:39 PM
  #24  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Jak63AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Jakarta, Indonesia
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2010 C 63 AMG
Originally Posted by SonnyakaPig
I would say if your car is running nice and there doesn't seem to be any hiccups in drivability, then your gains are solid.

You're doing the right thing by sticking with the same dyno.

84 rwhp from stock is right where you should be given the following factors: 1) The weather is not ideal for making best power, 2) Your fuel octane isn't great so your car is not programmed to advance as much timing as it would if you were running better gas, 3) Your headers are great quality no doubt, but they're not MHP LT's which seem to make the most power for these cars.

If your car is making 600 bhp, your car is strong and right where it should be for your mods.
Thanks Sonny,

Yes the car is running strong and no problem whatsoever
Old 11-21-2011, 08:25 PM
  #25  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Merc63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,563
Received 42 Likes on 36 Posts
C63 AMG
Take it to the track. I wouldn't worry about dyno numbers too much. 90+/- RWHP is nothing to be ashamed of lol. That's good gains in my book!


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Dyno result with Cargraphic Headers



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:51 PM.