Dyno result with Cargraphic Headers
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Jakarta, Indonesia
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2010 C 63 AMG
Dyno result with Cargraphic Headers
Hi all,
I have installed Cargraphic Headers with no primary but haven't got the chance to do the dyno testing. So today i did some dyno and the result is 393.4 RWHP and 338 RWTQ which is a gain of 23.6 RWHP and 22 RWTQ from the last mods.
So far the progress is as follows:
Stock Dyno : 309.9 RWHP 300 RWTQ
Eurocharged Tune : 351.2 RWHP
Sec cats+resonators delete : 369.8 RWHP 316 RWTQ
CG headers, primary cats delete, Eurocharged header tune : 393.4 RWHP 338 RWTQ
I'm pretty happy with the power that the car is making now and the sound is crazy LOUD now
I have installed Cargraphic Headers with no primary but haven't got the chance to do the dyno testing. So today i did some dyno and the result is 393.4 RWHP and 338 RWTQ which is a gain of 23.6 RWHP and 22 RWTQ from the last mods.
So far the progress is as follows:
Stock Dyno : 309.9 RWHP 300 RWTQ
Eurocharged Tune : 351.2 RWHP
Sec cats+resonators delete : 369.8 RWHP 316 RWTQ
CG headers, primary cats delete, Eurocharged header tune : 393.4 RWHP 338 RWTQ
I'm pretty happy with the power that the car is making now and the sound is crazy LOUD now
#2
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 955
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2008 C63 ,2009 SL 63 AMG, 2011 SLS AMG
Hi all,
I have installed Cargraphic Headers with no primary but haven't got the chance to do the dyno testing. So today i did some dyno and the result is 393.4 RWHP and 338 RWTQ which is a gain of 23.6 RWHP and 22 RWTQ from the last mods.
So far the progress is as follows:
Stock Dyno : 309.9 RWHP 300 RWTQ
Eurocharged Tune : 351.2 RWHP
Sec cats+resonators delete : 369.8 RWHP 316 RWTQ
CG headers, primary cats delete, Eurocharged header tune : 393.4 RWHP 338 RWTQ
I'm pretty happy with the power that the car is making now and the sound is crazy LOUD now
I have installed Cargraphic Headers with no primary but haven't got the chance to do the dyno testing. So today i did some dyno and the result is 393.4 RWHP and 338 RWTQ which is a gain of 23.6 RWHP and 22 RWTQ from the last mods.
So far the progress is as follows:
Stock Dyno : 309.9 RWHP 300 RWTQ
Eurocharged Tune : 351.2 RWHP
Sec cats+resonators delete : 369.8 RWHP 316 RWTQ
CG headers, primary cats delete, Eurocharged header tune : 393.4 RWHP 338 RWTQ
I'm pretty happy with the power that the car is making now and the sound is crazy LOUD now
Do you even have a headers tune?
Do you have a check engine light on?
393HP on dynodynamics especially at this time of the year is pretty low. your car should be making at least around 425HP.
something is wrong. find out what it is and fix it
#3
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Jakarta, Indonesia
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2010 C 63 AMG
Dont be happy. Be ashamed. caragraphic headers alone should give you at least 35-40HP. I have seen them being tested on a one of my friend's car. How is it that your only getting 23HP?
Do you even have a headers tune?
Do you have a check engine light on?
393HP on dynodynamics especially at this time of the year is pretty low. your car should be making at least around 425HP.
something is wrong. find out what it is and fix it
Do you even have a headers tune?
Do you have a check engine light on?
393HP on dynodynamics especially at this time of the year is pretty low. your car should be making at least around 425HP.
something is wrong. find out what it is and fix it
Thanks for your advice. Yes it seems low but look at the stock dyno result whic is only 309 RWHP and I'm using the same dyno to check all the modifications so I gain about 84 RWHP so far. One thing that I must consider is fuel quality in Indonesia is very crappy so always remind the tuner to be safe on AFR.
I don't have CEL because Jerry took care of it and yes it is hot and humid as hell this time of the year in Indonesia. Maybe there is something that needs to be fix and I will do some checking.
#5
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Jakarta, Indonesia
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2010 C 63 AMG
Yup agreed but somehow this dyno is very low, i think one of the lowest in the region. Even a friend of mine E63 with weistec sc "only" reads 430 RWHP on this very same dyno
#6
#7
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Jakarta, Indonesia
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2010 C 63 AMG
Trending Topics
#9
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 955
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2008 C63 ,2009 SL 63 AMG, 2011 SLS AMG
Jaks,
I understand the consequences of fuel and all, but in your case it should not matter. you started out at a baseline of 309HP. you ended with around 393 by getting an ECU tune, Caragraphics headers, and deleating the secondary cats. the total HP gained is 84. A headers and tune alone should give you 100RWHP gain on any dyno. installing a catless pipe will give you about another 10-15HP extra. The gains you should be witnissig is around 110-115RWHP. Therefore, you are off by about 27-31 .You mentioned that the gains you got from your CG headers was only 24. Something is seriously wrong with your tune. Maybe you need to ask your tuner to adjust the necessary timing and ignition for your new exhust. I dont think Eurocharged worked with caragraphic before. They must have loaded a headers file for the headers that they have worked on and not yours. I know a tuner that has a a specific file for your caragraphic headers that will do magic for your car. If your intrested PM me.
I understand the consequences of fuel and all, but in your case it should not matter. you started out at a baseline of 309HP. you ended with around 393 by getting an ECU tune, Caragraphics headers, and deleating the secondary cats. the total HP gained is 84. A headers and tune alone should give you 100RWHP gain on any dyno. installing a catless pipe will give you about another 10-15HP extra. The gains you should be witnissig is around 110-115RWHP. Therefore, you are off by about 27-31 .You mentioned that the gains you got from your CG headers was only 24. Something is seriously wrong with your tune. Maybe you need to ask your tuner to adjust the necessary timing and ignition for your new exhust. I dont think Eurocharged worked with caragraphic before. They must have loaded a headers file for the headers that they have worked on and not yours. I know a tuner that has a a specific file for your caragraphic headers that will do magic for your car. If your intrested PM me.
#10
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Jakarta, Indonesia
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2010 C 63 AMG
Guys,
I've just been informed by the dyno technician that his particular dyno dynamics reads around 35% lower RWHP than the supposed Engine HP figure.
What is the normal HP loss from engine to rear wheel HP? 15-20%?
I've just been informed by the dyno technician that his particular dyno dynamics reads around 35% lower RWHP than the supposed Engine HP figure.
What is the normal HP loss from engine to rear wheel HP? 15-20%?
#11
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 955
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2008 C63 ,2009 SL 63 AMG, 2011 SLS AMG
If thats true, then your car is making 604 HP at the cranks. I personally think he is full of ****. a Dynodynamics dyno is the same Dynodynamics elsewhere. I dont know where he got this 35% figure. Anyway, tell him your car with your set up should still read around 420-430 RWHP
#12
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Jakarta, Indonesia
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2010 C 63 AMG
If thats true, then your car is making 604 HP at the cranks. I personally think he is full of ****. a Dynodynamics dyno is the same Dynodynamics elsewhere. I dont know where he got this 35% figure. Anyway, tell him your car with your set up should still read around 420-430 RWHP
#13
84rwhp from LTs and a tune isn't all bad...all a dyno is is a tuning device, which can be altered by the dyno operator to make all cars read higher/lower just by changing the settings. Take it to the track to see the real results. I would imagine Jerry did his job in tuning as well
#14
Senior Member
I have a question about C63 tunes and sorry to semi-hijack your dyno result thread, but when you guys get tunes, are tuners loading up pre-made maps or custom tuning your car on a dyno? This may have something to do with why you are not getting full potential HP.
Although I do agree with OP, he went from 300whp to 393whp from stock to his current mods, I'd say that's about normal, and the dyno might be a very low reading dyno due to elevation/weather/last time dyno was re-calibrated etc. The most imporant is base vs tuned gain, and 93 is a good gain.
Although I do agree with OP, he went from 300whp to 393whp from stock to his current mods, I'd say that's about normal, and the dyno might be a very low reading dyno due to elevation/weather/last time dyno was re-calibrated etc. The most imporant is base vs tuned gain, and 93 is a good gain.
#15
Hi Jacob,
Thanks for your advice. Yes it seems low but look at the stock dyno result whic is only 309 RWHP and I'm using the same dyno to check all the modifications so I gain about 84 RWHP so far. One thing that I must consider is fuel quality in Indonesia is very crappy so always remind the tuner to be safe on AFR.
I don't have CEL because Jerry took care of it and yes it is hot and humid as hell this time of the year in Indonesia. Maybe there is something that needs to be fix and I will do some checking.
Thanks for your advice. Yes it seems low but look at the stock dyno result whic is only 309 RWHP and I'm using the same dyno to check all the modifications so I gain about 84 RWHP so far. One thing that I must consider is fuel quality in Indonesia is very crappy so always remind the tuner to be safe on AFR.
I don't have CEL because Jerry took care of it and yes it is hot and humid as hell this time of the year in Indonesia. Maybe there is something that needs to be fix and I will do some checking.
You're doing the right thing by sticking with the same dyno.
84 rwhp from stock is right where you should be given the following factors: 1) The weather is not ideal for making best power, 2) Your fuel octane isn't great so your car is not programmed to advance as much timing as it would if you were running better gas, 3) Your headers are great quality no doubt, but they're not MHP LT's which seem to make the most power for these cars.
If your car is making 600 bhp, your car is strong and right where it should be for your mods.
#16
Dont be happy. Be ashamed. caragraphic headers alone should give you at least 35-40HP. I have seen them being tested on a one of my friend's car. How is it that your only getting 23HP?
Do you even have a headers tune?
Do you have a check engine light on?
393HP on dynodynamics especially at this time of the year is pretty low. your car should be making at least around 425HP.
something is wrong. find out what it is and fix it
Do you even have a headers tune?
Do you have a check engine light on?
393HP on dynodynamics especially at this time of the year is pretty low. your car should be making at least around 425HP.
something is wrong. find out what it is and fix it
23 whp on this dyno may be a good gain because it is very low reading. There's no way to know because there are so many factors to consider when you dyno. So you can't just attach a fixed hp gain to every car around the world. In reality, the hp is there, but the measurements can vary.
Also, the headers were installed after the OP removed the secondary cats and resonator so there was already a gain from the increased exhaust flow from that modification, as can be seen in the OP's stated results. The subsequent header install, then, may contribute to less hp gain than might be the case if the headers were installed prior to the secondary cats/resonator mod.
#17
Easy there. Nothing to be ashamed about. These are mass produced items on a mass produced car, so the variables are not likely related to the hardware or the car (if the car is running well), rather, they probably have to do with this particular dyno, ambient temps and fuel.
23 whp on this dyno may be a good gain because it is very low reading. There's no way to know because there are so many factors to consider when you dyno. So you can't just attach a fixed hp gain to every car around the world. In reality, the hp is there, but the measurements can vary.
Also, the headers were installed after the OP removed the secondary cats and resonator so there was already a gain from the increased exhaust flow from that modification, as can be seen in the OP's stated results. The subsequent header install, then, may contribute to less hp gain than might be the case if the headers were installed prior to the secondary cats/resonator mod.
23 whp on this dyno may be a good gain because it is very low reading. There's no way to know because there are so many factors to consider when you dyno. So you can't just attach a fixed hp gain to every car around the world. In reality, the hp is there, but the measurements can vary.
Also, the headers were installed after the OP removed the secondary cats and resonator so there was already a gain from the increased exhaust flow from that modification, as can be seen in the OP's stated results. The subsequent header install, then, may contribute to less hp gain than might be the case if the headers were installed prior to the secondary cats/resonator mod.
#18
SPONSOR
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Houston/ Austin /Toronto / UAE / Minneapolis / Orlando /Cincinnati
Posts: 5,459
Received 149 Likes
on
109 Posts
Eurocharged Performance ML63 and TT lambo
Easy there. Nothing to be ashamed about. These are mass produced items on a mass produced car, so the variables are not likely related to the hardware or the car (if the car is running well), rather, they probably have to do with this particular dyno, ambient temps and fuel.
23 whp on this dyno may be a good gain because it is very low reading. There's no way to know because there are so many factors to consider when you dyno. So you can't just attach a fixed hp gain to every car around the world. In reality, the hp is there, but the measurements can vary.
Also, the headers were installed after the OP removed the secondary cats and resonator so there was already a gain from the increased exhaust flow from that modification, as can be seen in the OP's stated results. The subsequent header install, then, may contribute to less hp gain than might be the case if the headers were installed prior to the secondary cats/resonator mod.
23 whp on this dyno may be a good gain because it is very low reading. There's no way to know because there are so many factors to consider when you dyno. So you can't just attach a fixed hp gain to every car around the world. In reality, the hp is there, but the measurements can vary.
Also, the headers were installed after the OP removed the secondary cats and resonator so there was already a gain from the increased exhaust flow from that modification, as can be seen in the OP's stated results. The subsequent header install, then, may contribute to less hp gain than might be the case if the headers were installed prior to the secondary cats/resonator mod.
people just have to remember that when staking mods, the overall gains don't stack. IE a pulley might gain 50whp and a tune 50whp but together they won't give you 100whp.
#19
MBWorld Fanatic!
numbers sound good, i gained about 90-100rwhp for headers/tune (catless), 91 octane....Jacob sounds mistaken. BTW most of us use 18% drivetrain loss.
#20
Senior Member
Yep!
Also who cares what number it reads, you gonna enter a dyno contest? If so you will lose. The only contest that matters is the street contest , there will always be other cars with big numbers. If you can get a street tune and forget the dyno numbers.
#21
#23
#24
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Jakarta, Indonesia
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2010 C 63 AMG
I would say if your car is running nice and there doesn't seem to be any hiccups in drivability, then your gains are solid.
You're doing the right thing by sticking with the same dyno.
84 rwhp from stock is right where you should be given the following factors: 1) The weather is not ideal for making best power, 2) Your fuel octane isn't great so your car is not programmed to advance as much timing as it would if you were running better gas, 3) Your headers are great quality no doubt, but they're not MHP LT's which seem to make the most power for these cars.
If your car is making 600 bhp, your car is strong and right where it should be for your mods.
You're doing the right thing by sticking with the same dyno.
84 rwhp from stock is right where you should be given the following factors: 1) The weather is not ideal for making best power, 2) Your fuel octane isn't great so your car is not programmed to advance as much timing as it would if you were running better gas, 3) Your headers are great quality no doubt, but they're not MHP LT's which seem to make the most power for these cars.
If your car is making 600 bhp, your car is strong and right where it should be for your mods.
Yes the car is running strong and no problem whatsoever