C63 AMG (W204) 2008 - 2015

C63 at high altitude

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 01-23-2012, 02:56 AM
  #1  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
McGG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 165
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
GL350
C63 at high altitude

Here in Calgary, the air is relatively thin. From what I've read, this can have a serious impact on power in a normally aspirated car.

Both of my current vehicles are turbo-powered, so this is less of a concern. (although I anticipate that the turbos work harder at altitude).

Anyone else have a C63 at altitude that can comment? I'd hate to pay the money, and effort to get a C63, and then find out I'm getting far less than 400hp from the motor.

Turbo-charged cars appear to represent a better value across the board, than big displacement cars here.

(Maybe I should wait for the C class that has the V8-TT).
Old 01-23-2012, 03:42 AM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
rage2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Montana/Alberta
Posts: 1,669
Received 62 Likes on 43 Posts
C63 BS, GLA45
Originally Posted by McGG
Here in Calgary, the air is relatively thin. From what I've read, this can have a serious impact on power in a normally aspirated car.

Both of my current vehicles are turbo-powered, so this is less of a concern. (although I anticipate that the turbos work harder at altitude).

Anyone else have a C63 at altitude that can comment? I'd hate to pay the money, and effort to get a C63, and then find out I'm getting far less than 400hp from the motor.

Turbo-charged cars appear to represent a better value across the board, than big displacement cars here.

(Maybe I should wait for the C class that has the V8-TT).
Calgarian here. The C63 is much faster in Vancouver at sea level. With P31 or chipped you're getting about 400hp in Calgary. My 420hp 996TT is slightly faster here.

With that being said, the C63 is much more fun to drive. Instant torque with zero lag. Turbo cars here can make the same power, but it gets much laggier here too. So choose what's more important.

With traction probs in the first 2 gears, you're only going to lose out at the drag strip. Since we lost our track this winter, the choice should be obvious.
Old 01-23-2012, 03:57 AM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Merc63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,562
Received 42 Likes on 36 Posts
C63 AMG
FI car still looses power as elevation increases (absolute pressure) but not as much as an NA car. Turbo has to work harder so lag increases with elevation like rage2 said.

I wouldn't worry about it. Edmonton here
Old 01-23-2012, 04:11 AM
  #4  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
McGG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 165
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
GL350
Originally Posted by rage2
Calgarian here. The C63 is much faster in Vancouver at sea level. With P31 or chipped you're getting about 400hp in Calgary. My 420hp 996TT is slightly faster here.

With that being said, the C63 is much more fun to drive. Instant torque with zero lag. Turbo cars here can make the same power, but it gets much laggier here too. So choose what's more important.

With traction probs in the first 2 gears, you're only going to lose out at the drag strip. Since we lost our track this winter, the choice should be obvious.
If I'm not mistaken, the P31 actually is under-rated and makes more like 500+ hp at the crank?

So it's down almost 100hp here? Yikes!

Still, the feel is probably still there....
Old 01-23-2012, 05:43 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
GeorgeSmooth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
C63
I am at 5500ft altitude. The C63's normally make in the region of 310whp up here. So the losses are great the higher you go. Rule of thumb at my altitude is a 17% loss on average.
Old 01-23-2012, 06:03 AM
  #6  
Super Member
 
Sher Judge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2017 991.2 Turbo PDK 2017 C63S Coupe Ceramic Brakes 2015 CLS63S AMG Full House
Where I live, its about 1600 meters or more above Sea Level, yes a naturally aspirated engine does suffer, but only a small percentage.

Obviously on a really hot day you will be out gunned by a turbo or charged motor.
Old 01-24-2012, 05:46 AM
  #7  
Member
 
Multispeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
C63
I am in Calgary and central Alberta as well. Remember that one of the few good things about winter below zero temps is the cars, etc. start running pretty good. I think the car runs the strongest around -20 to -25 C. Freezing my *** off but the car sure rocks! Colder than -30 and the whole thing just feels stiff.
Then every spring you can feel it get wimpy and on a hot summer day you dont even want to drive it.
And of course the other good thing about winter is the slippery roads. You can drift to your hearts content and it easier on the car doing it on slippery roads.
We get to drive like the road test guy who put those skinny tires on the C63, but for at least a third of the year! Calgary aint so bad!
Old 01-24-2012, 10:59 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
GeorgeSmooth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
C63


Did a run today. 70% humidity at 32 degrees celsius ambient. 5600ft altitude.
Old 01-24-2012, 02:20 PM
  #9  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
C63newdude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 1,699
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
C63 AMG
Originally Posted by McGG
Here in Calgary, the air is relatively thin. From what I've read, this can have a serious impact on power in a normally aspirated car.

Both of my current vehicles are turbo-powered, so this is less of a concern. (although I anticipate that the turbos work harder at altitude).

Anyone else have a C63 at altitude that can comment? I'd hate to pay the money, and effort to get a C63, and then find out I'm getting far less than 400hp from the motor.

Turbo-charged cars appear to represent a better value across the board, than big displacement cars here.

(Maybe I should wait for the C class that has the V8-TT).
You are going to lose power no matter what. It doesn't matter what engine powerplant you use (I owned 18 Turbo cars and I live in altitude).
I go to mount Lemmon in AZ and at 9000 ft you can tell the powerloss too.

If your main concern is losing power then you don't have the right mind set. Every neighboor that lives near you has a car that also loses power to altitude. I live in some altitude and summers here rob a lot of power to ALL my cars.

I couldn't do much to my previous turbo cars because the 115 degree heat will cause knock on the engine. I could run about 3-4 PSI less on my turbo cars in the Summer than in the winter when the temps were in the high 20-low 30's. The only thing that I have done to some of my previous turbos cars(Evos and Eclipses mainly) has been running them with alcohol/methanol injection and also having them tune for E-85.
If I were you I would just forget about that psychological barrier that you are creating.
Old 01-24-2012, 02:23 PM
  #10  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
C63newdude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 1,699
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
C63 AMG
Originally Posted by GeorgeSmooth
I am at 5500ft altitude. The C63's normally make in the region of 310whp up here. So the losses are great the higher you go. Rule of thumb at my altitude is a 17% loss on average.

I always heard that it is about 10% of power loss every 1000 meters but who knows. All that I can tell is that US the people that live in altitude are use to.
Old 01-24-2012, 02:24 PM
  #11  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
C63newdude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 1,699
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
C63 AMG
Originally Posted by rage2
Calgarian here. The C63 is much faster in Vancouver at sea level. With P31 or chipped you're getting about 400hp in Calgary. My 420hp 996TT is slightly faster here.

With that being said, the C63 is much more fun to drive. Instant torque with zero lag. Turbo cars here can make the same power, but it gets much laggier here too. So choose what's more important.

With traction probs in the first 2 gears, you're only going to lose out at the drag strip. Since we lost our track this winter, the choice should be obvious.
+1. You can also tell that the BOV makes more nosie and takes longer to open and close. Turbos has to work harder and if you have an older turbo car that don't have a boost controlling mechanism you can also lose power.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: C63 at high altitude



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:20 PM.