Dyno Runs - The effects of wheel/tire weights on wheel horsepower
#1
Former Vendor of MBWorld
Thread Starter
Dyno Runs - The effects of wheel/tire weights on wheel horsepower
Test:
Davenport Motorsports (www.davenportmotorsports.com) of Canada, wanted to see the dyno effects of running different wheels on cars. They took a factory 2012 Camaro SS and ran 3 dyno runs. They ran the first run with a set of aftermarket wheels, the 2nd run with a set of stock factory wheels and the 3rd run with a set of HRE P45S wheels, all in 20” sizes.
These results highlight the effects of rotational inertia on drive-train losses (the hp lost between the engine crank and the ground). Wheels and tires contribute to drive-train losses as energy is used to spin up the wheels (and decelerate the wheels under braking). From the dyno chart you can see the effect of replacing factory wheels with lighter HRE wheels and see the negative effects of installing heavier aftermarket wheels.
Results:
1. (Blue curve) Factory wheels: 20”x9.0” with Pirelli 275/40-20 tires weighing 68 lbs combined per rear wheel. – Max hp: 371 hp, Max Torque: 375 ftlbs - (Baseline)
2. (Red curve) Aftermarket wheels: 20”x9.0” with Pirelli 275/40-20 tires weighing 72 lbs combined per rear wheel – Max hp: 369 hp, Max Torque: 373 ftlbs - (A [-] loss of 2 hp and 2 ftlbs)
3. (Green curve) HRE wheels: 20”x11.0” with Nitto 315/35-20 tires weighing 60 lbs combined per rear wheel – Max hp: 380hp, Max Torque: 384 ftlbs - (A [+] gain of 8 hp and 9 ftlbs and that is running a 2” wider wheel/tire combo)
Conclusion:
The engine obviously still cranks out the same amount of hp and torque, the lighter HREs simply waste less of it before it gets to the ground. Also interesting to note is that the gains are not just peak gains, but gains across the entire rev range. If they had done a braking test, we would have seen similar results as the rotational inertia effects also have a significant effect on how much energy is used to stop the wheel/tire combo vs. stopping the car. We talk about these effects all the time and focus on designing lightweight wheels with low rotational inertia, but it isn’t every day that you get to see real hard data showing the true effects.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/hrewheels/6757639011/http://www.flickr.com/photos/hrewheels/6757639011/ by http://www.flickr.com/people/hrewheels/, on Flickr
Davenport Motorsports (www.davenportmotorsports.com) of Canada, wanted to see the dyno effects of running different wheels on cars. They took a factory 2012 Camaro SS and ran 3 dyno runs. They ran the first run with a set of aftermarket wheels, the 2nd run with a set of stock factory wheels and the 3rd run with a set of HRE P45S wheels, all in 20” sizes.
These results highlight the effects of rotational inertia on drive-train losses (the hp lost between the engine crank and the ground). Wheels and tires contribute to drive-train losses as energy is used to spin up the wheels (and decelerate the wheels under braking). From the dyno chart you can see the effect of replacing factory wheels with lighter HRE wheels and see the negative effects of installing heavier aftermarket wheels.
Results:
1. (Blue curve) Factory wheels: 20”x9.0” with Pirelli 275/40-20 tires weighing 68 lbs combined per rear wheel. – Max hp: 371 hp, Max Torque: 375 ftlbs - (Baseline)
2. (Red curve) Aftermarket wheels: 20”x9.0” with Pirelli 275/40-20 tires weighing 72 lbs combined per rear wheel – Max hp: 369 hp, Max Torque: 373 ftlbs - (A [-] loss of 2 hp and 2 ftlbs)
3. (Green curve) HRE wheels: 20”x11.0” with Nitto 315/35-20 tires weighing 60 lbs combined per rear wheel – Max hp: 380hp, Max Torque: 384 ftlbs - (A [+] gain of 8 hp and 9 ftlbs and that is running a 2” wider wheel/tire combo)
Conclusion:
The engine obviously still cranks out the same amount of hp and torque, the lighter HREs simply waste less of it before it gets to the ground. Also interesting to note is that the gains are not just peak gains, but gains across the entire rev range. If they had done a braking test, we would have seen similar results as the rotational inertia effects also have a significant effect on how much energy is used to stop the wheel/tire combo vs. stopping the car. We talk about these effects all the time and focus on designing lightweight wheels with low rotational inertia, but it isn’t every day that you get to see real hard data showing the true effects.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/hrewheels/6757639011/http://www.flickr.com/photos/hrewheels/6757639011/ by http://www.flickr.com/people/hrewheels/, on Flickr
#3
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 5,493
Received 431 Likes
on
354 Posts
2012 C63;1971 280SE 3.5(Sold);2023 EQS 450 SUV 4 Matic (Wife's)
Interesting test and results. Thanks for posting.
Nice to verify what we often discuss in theory and to add some empirical evidence and quantify the results for this particular wheel/tire combination.
Nice to verify what we often discuss in theory and to add some empirical evidence and quantify the results for this particular wheel/tire combination.
#4
MBWorld Fanatic!
So hopefully this will shut people up about roatating mass! I've been saying it all along
This shows about 1hp gain to 1lb savings
Now redyno with the lightest tires you can find
This shows about 1hp gain to 1lb savings
Now redyno with the lightest tires you can find
#7
MBWorld Fanatic!
For the non believers
https://mbworld.org/forums/c63-amg-w...lly-users.html
https://mbworld.org/forums/c63-amg-w...lly-users.html
Last edited by C63newdude; 01-24-2012 at 09:55 PM.
Trending Topics
#8
bringing an old thread back to life !!
Rotational mass in an interesting topic not talked about much here. Dyno shows that having less weight on the rear tires shows up as extra power since it has to spend less energy spinning the lighter wheel.
Now what happens when you also lighten up the front wheels? This obv will only show up on a dyno for an awd car that is also putting power to the front wheels. In real world driving it should have just as much of an impact as the rears and the power gains here should be theoretically doubled correct? The feel of acceleration should be more than just 8hp that was shown for rear wheels only.
I recently changed my rotors to girodisc 2 piece rotors that measured almost 13 pounds lighter EACH in the front and 6 pounds lighter EACH in the rear. At the same time also switched to a lighter wheel (forgestar cf10) and the difference is far from subtle the butt dyno is telling me the car is flat out quicker and i can tell by how much faster it dumps each gear out. Also the braking advantage is obvious with lighter rotaional mass but i felt an equal gain in steering response/agility ! All that weight taken off the front tires combined with a stickier tire compound has made the car feel much more agile and i feel like i can carry more speed thru turns as the directional change is alot "crisper"
Rotational mass in an interesting topic not talked about much here. Dyno shows that having less weight on the rear tires shows up as extra power since it has to spend less energy spinning the lighter wheel.
Now what happens when you also lighten up the front wheels? This obv will only show up on a dyno for an awd car that is also putting power to the front wheels. In real world driving it should have just as much of an impact as the rears and the power gains here should be theoretically doubled correct? The feel of acceleration should be more than just 8hp that was shown for rear wheels only.
I recently changed my rotors to girodisc 2 piece rotors that measured almost 13 pounds lighter EACH in the front and 6 pounds lighter EACH in the rear. At the same time also switched to a lighter wheel (forgestar cf10) and the difference is far from subtle the butt dyno is telling me the car is flat out quicker and i can tell by how much faster it dumps each gear out. Also the braking advantage is obvious with lighter rotaional mass but i felt an equal gain in steering response/agility ! All that weight taken off the front tires combined with a stickier tire compound has made the car feel much more agile and i feel like i can carry more speed thru turns as the directional change is alot "crisper"
#9
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 3,685
Received 763 Likes
on
529 Posts
W204 C63 Coupe, W166 ML350 BlueTEC, 928GT, C5 Z06 & IS300 race cars, EQE 4Matic+ on order
bringing an old thread back to life !!
Rotational mass in an interesting topic not talked about much here. Dyno shows that having less weight on the rear tires shows up as extra power since it has to spend less energy spinning the lighter wheel.
Now what happens when you also lighten up the front wheels? This obv will only show up on a dyno for an awd car that is also putting power to the front wheels. In real world driving it should have just as much of an impact as the rears and the power gains here should be theoretically doubled correct? The feel of acceleration should be more than just 8hp that was shown for rear wheels only.
I recently changed my rotors to girodisc 2 piece rotors that measured almost 13 pounds lighter EACH in the front and 6 pounds lighter EACH in the rear. At the same time also switched to a lighter wheel (forgestar cf10) and the difference is far from subtle the butt dyno is telling me the car is flat out quicker and i can tell by how much faster it dumps each gear out. Also the braking advantage is obvious with lighter rotaional mass but i felt an equal gain in steering response/agility ! All that weight taken off the front tires combined with a stickier tire compound has made the car feel much more agile and i feel like i can carry more speed thru turns as the directional change is alot "crisper"
Rotational mass in an interesting topic not talked about much here. Dyno shows that having less weight on the rear tires shows up as extra power since it has to spend less energy spinning the lighter wheel.
Now what happens when you also lighten up the front wheels? This obv will only show up on a dyno for an awd car that is also putting power to the front wheels. In real world driving it should have just as much of an impact as the rears and the power gains here should be theoretically doubled correct? The feel of acceleration should be more than just 8hp that was shown for rear wheels only.
I recently changed my rotors to girodisc 2 piece rotors that measured almost 13 pounds lighter EACH in the front and 6 pounds lighter EACH in the rear. At the same time also switched to a lighter wheel (forgestar cf10) and the difference is far from subtle the butt dyno is telling me the car is flat out quicker and i can tell by how much faster it dumps each gear out. Also the braking advantage is obvious with lighter rotaional mass but i felt an equal gain in steering response/agility ! All that weight taken off the front tires combined with a stickier tire compound has made the car feel much more agile and i feel like i can carry more speed thru turns as the directional change is alot "crisper"
#11
MBWorld Fanatic!
Not only will light wheels net you some nice gains but light weight rotors will as well as will a CF drive shaft and lightweight pulley. Any time you can remove rotating mass from the driveline you are freeing up lost hp.
#12
Interesting thread. Thanks for bumping it up.
So far I was okay with the looks of my OEM 18"s. This gives me a valid reason to "upgrade" from the my stock OEM wheels to lightweight HREs.
So far I was okay with the looks of my OEM 18"s. This gives me a valid reason to "upgrade" from the my stock OEM wheels to lightweight HREs.
#13
MBWorld Fanatic!
This raises a couple interesting questions about wheel size. Does an 18" wheel & tire combo weigh the same as a 20" of the same brands? If yes, the move to bigger wheel diameters may not be such a good idea.
Rotational inertia is partly related to weight. The other big factor is WHERE that weight is. Weight in close to the hub doesn't add nearly as much inertia as weight out close to the tread. A bigger wheel puts that heavy tub out closer to the tread diameter. Does an 18" wheel & tire combo have the same rotational inertia as a 20" of the same brands?
Think about the wheel sizes in formula one and on top fuel dragsters. Are these examples of intentionally NOT going to bigger wheel diameters?
Insights appreciated . . .
Rotational inertia is partly related to weight. The other big factor is WHERE that weight is. Weight in close to the hub doesn't add nearly as much inertia as weight out close to the tread. A bigger wheel puts that heavy tub out closer to the tread diameter. Does an 18" wheel & tire combo have the same rotational inertia as a 20" of the same brands?
Think about the wheel sizes in formula one and on top fuel dragsters. Are these examples of intentionally NOT going to bigger wheel diameters?
Insights appreciated . . .
#14
Too bad us car guys don't get same we use on our bikes. Love running our forged magnesium rims. We see big gains on dyno too. Weight is huge consideration. Now if HRE starts making forged Mag. Never mind I can imagine cost.. We drop $4k for just a pair..
#15
Not sure on dyno charts, since I live on one, but hre you guys should have compared same tires! We can see over 5% just from Pirelli to Dunlops race tired same size due to weight & compound! I'd like to see HRE vs Stock same size same exact tires (and psi as well) I still think you'd be impressed but really hate dyno comparisons with different variables
#16
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 3,685
Received 763 Likes
on
529 Posts
W204 C63 Coupe, W166 ML350 BlueTEC, 928GT, C5 Z06 & IS300 race cars, EQE 4Matic+ on order
This raises a couple interesting questions about wheel size. Does an 18" wheel & tire combo weigh the same as a 20" of the same brands? If yes, the move to bigger wheel diameters may not be such a good idea.
Rotational inertia is partly related to weight. The other big factor is WHERE that weight is. Weight in close to the hub doesn't add nearly as much inertia as weight out close to the tread. A bigger wheel puts that heavy tub out closer to the tread diameter. Does an 18" wheel & tire combo have the same rotational inertia as a 20" of the same brands?
Rotational inertia is partly related to weight. The other big factor is WHERE that weight is. Weight in close to the hub doesn't add nearly as much inertia as weight out close to the tread. A bigger wheel puts that heavy tub out closer to the tread diameter. Does an 18" wheel & tire combo have the same rotational inertia as a 20" of the same brands?
There was a discussion at http://backfires.caranddriver.com/fo...-profile-tires. Keeping the brake sizes small as someone suggested is obviously not the issue, as the current size brakes are more than adequate to repeatedly stop the car without experiencing brake fade past the point where the wheels lock up.
Of course, F1 regulations specify the allowed wheel sizes so running lower-profile wheels is not an option, but I assume you meant why the regulations themselves haven't changed.
#18
Sorry for bringing this old topic,
But I was wondering if there is 2 set of wheels , 18 and 20, they both have same tire brand, and they weight exactly the same with tires.
Which one will have a better acceleration ? The 18 or the 20 ?
I was thinking that the 20 will be faster since the wheel will move bigger distance comparing to the 18 ?!
But I was wondering if there is 2 set of wheels , 18 and 20, they both have same tire brand, and they weight exactly the same with tires.
Which one will have a better acceleration ? The 18 or the 20 ?
I was thinking that the 20 will be faster since the wheel will move bigger distance comparing to the 18 ?!
#19
Senior Member
Sorry for bringing this old topic,
But I was wondering if there is 2 set of wheels , 18 and 20, they both have same tire brand, and they weight exactly the same with tires.
Which one will have a better acceleration ? The 18 or the 20 ?
I was thinking that the 20 will be faster since the wheel will move bigger distance comparing to the 18 ?!
But I was wondering if there is 2 set of wheels , 18 and 20, they both have same tire brand, and they weight exactly the same with tires.
Which one will have a better acceleration ? The 18 or the 20 ?
I was thinking that the 20 will be faster since the wheel will move bigger distance comparing to the 18 ?!
I may be wrong, but I don't believe there is any change in the circumference in the tires, at least not a significant amount. True the 18" wheel is smaller, but the tire has more side wall, than the one on a 20" wheel. My understanding was tire/wheel manufactorers tried to keep the end circumference as close to stock as possible in order to keep the vehicle's odometer accurate for the DIY's out there who can't reprogram the computer to adjust for changes...
I'd be interested to hear if this is actually correct or not.