C BS at F1 in Australia shootout between V8 supercar and FI car
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Seattle, Warshington
Posts: 377
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2005 C55, 2006 Ram 2500 MegaCab diesel, sold 2001 Dodge 2500 Cummins, sold 87 190e-16v, sold 97 e420
C BS at F1 in Australia shootout between V8 supercar and FI car
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hC1Vq...ature=youtu.be
The BS is loosing time from lack of rear grip.
The BS is loosing time from lack of rear grip.
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Seattle, Warshington
Posts: 377
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2005 C55, 2006 Ram 2500 MegaCab diesel, sold 2001 Dodge 2500 Cummins, sold 87 190e-16v, sold 97 e420
Well tell MB that otherwise they wouldn't have put R compound tires and made the springs so stiff you can't drive it on the street.
I am pretty disappointed, for the $100K you can get the Viper ACR-X that holds major track records or the GTR that is still faster and completely street-able.
I am pretty disappointed, for the $100K you can get the Viper ACR-X that holds major track records or the GTR that is still faster and completely street-able.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Sydney & the NSW Central Coast, Australia
Posts: 499
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
C63 AMG, BMW 135i
That doesn’t make it a race car, far from it. At best it’s a reasonably quick street performance sedan/coupe.
Where did you get the info on the suspension and how did you ascertain it’s too stiff to drive on the street?
Is it just your own personal opinion?
I haven’t driven a BS but I have always found the stock suspension on the Non-BS C63’s to be too soft to be considered a serious track weapon. In fact I find them too soft to be a serious street warrior and way too nose heavy. Just my opinion.
If that’s the case, don’t buy one as it’s not the car for you. This car was not designed to compete with the types you have mentioned. Better you spend your money on one of those and not be disappointed.
.