|
Sign in using an external account
|
|
||||||||
| C63 AMG (W204) Discuss the C63 AMG
Sponsored by : Kleemann USA ![]() |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 | ||
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: washington, DC
Posts: 466
Drives: 2012 c63 mercedes benz
|
CLS 63 or BMW F10 M5 ?
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Johannesburg
Posts: 94
Drives: 2012 C63 AMG
|
I agree a very hard one to choose, the amg is a lot of fun as you would know with yours.. but i really think the M5 is amazing, must test them both.. i think the M5 is a bit more technical..
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: eNyCe
Posts: 1,417
Drives: Steel Grey Metallic C63!!
|
According the the reviews, the F10 M5 isn't all that great. The TTe63 beat it out in a recent Car and Driver comparison. So I would go CLS63
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,069
Drives: 2012 C63 Sedan Black with CF interior
|
I wouldnt get the F10 just because it has synthesized exhaust sounds in the stereo LOL. I cant live with a car like that. I like my naturally aspirated and naturally loud v8s.
I like the CLS more than the M5 styling wise also. but now E63 is really growing on me. I'd think I'd go E63 over CLS 63 |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 289
Drives: C63, C55 (Sold)
|
That's right, the E63 kicked the M5's butt on the Chassis and Engine categories. Amazing how things have changed on the latest 5 years. BMW M was always the brand that emphasize the lateral agility and the "fun to drive" factor. AMG's were designed only for straights (no offense, but this was the truth). Now we have an M5 so soft that BMW had to mimic the exhaust sound via speakers and the AMG's are more fun to drive than ever before...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,069
Drives: 2012 C63 Sedan Black with CF interior
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Super Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 695
|
CLS63 is the way to go especially if you are going to tune your ride, it's more tuner friendly and pays off more performance than an M5 would. A friend of mine sold his M5 F10 and bought a CLS 63 after he test drove my car.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: THE Orange County, California
Posts: 8,573
Drives: 2013 M5, 2013 M6, 2012 R8 V10, 2012 C63 Black Series
|
You posted on a benz site so the responses will be biased. And most if not all posters here have not driven the F10 let alone owned one. Its not even available stateside- yet.
I have a CLS63TT with a tune and agree that the aftermarket mods available are more prevalent- especially your tuning options. The larger displacement engine along with a tune will help the 5.5 shine since it has about a 1 liter advantage over the F10. Stock vs Stock is a very close race based on many mags and some recent vids. I like the CLS looks better as its more aggressive whereas the F10 maintains a more subtle approach. The exhaust note on the M157 is excellent and a resonator removal makes it even better sounding. But I still want to see how the F10 drives. I have had 6 AMGs and 4 M's and the driving experience for me has been more involving with the M cars. Generally the handling and steering along with throttle feel as always impressed me. But the M157 is an amazing engine and thats why I got the CLS and E63. Match that up with AMG dumping the airmatic up front and adding steel springs and you get a better driving experience with the Benz vs older models to the likes of the W211 E55. One arena where the F10 will beat the Benz without a doubt is the Tranny. The DCT aka PDK in Pcars is world class- so efficient and fast. It allows more power to the ground and the shift speeds truly allow a less hp car to make up ground. Im on my 3rd DCT car and would hope Benz would consider this in their M157's in the future. Ill probably consider the F10... why? Because I already have the CLS and want to see what M brings to the table in regards to a TQ monster where they have always been behind. We know AMG has crossed the gap in handling so lets see if M has done it with TQ.
__________________
2013 BMW M5 2013 BMW M6 2012 Audi R8 V10 2012 C63 Black Series |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: washington, DC
Posts: 466
Drives: 2012 c63 mercedes benz
|
^ very nice an detailed .. i am a benz guy in the end, the M5 is cheaper though and probably has newer electronics, my dealership has a used 2012 for 95k, with 9900 miles and no performance package, i can negotiate the price ofcourse .. should i consider a used or will the 2013 be way different ?
as for sound, i don't expect any car to sound like my car right now :P and btw \/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: THE Orange County, California
Posts: 8,573
Drives: 2013 M5, 2013 M6, 2012 R8 V10, 2012 C63 Black Series
|
Quote:
A nicely appointed M5 on the buildsite is about 105k- a far cry from my CLS at 116k (sticker). The 2013 CLS is not changed much- a few more color options and a B and O stereo add for some stupid amount of money (6k plus).
__________________
2013 BMW M5 2013 BMW M6 2012 Audi R8 V10 2012 C63 Black Series |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 6,674
Drives: C63
|
Quote:
Ask the same question on M5Board and you will get the exact opposite answer.
__________________
![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: washington, DC
Posts: 466
Drives: 2012 c63 mercedes benz
|
LOOL
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,508
Drives: W212 E63 M156 non-pano 18" P2 ParkT NightV
|
Definitely turned off by M5's synthetic engine sound. Indeed, the DCT is probably the only thing M5 has over the 63.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Hainesport, NJ
Posts: 236
Drives: 2010 CTS-V (black raven), 2010 Cadillac Escalade ESV (black raven)
|
I am also considering the same 2 cars when my current lease is up.
I read the Car and Driver article as well and not sure how much weight to give it since it gave the S6 the win?! The only thing that gives me pause about the M5 is the exhaust note as already mentioned. I think price wise they will be pretty close. One of my partners just ordered 2013 CLS63 loaded with PP/LSD/wheels with build date starting 7/2012 list for 110k, he got it for 98k. I think the sheer fact that he already ordered the CLS would sway me towards the M5, so we don't show up with the same dress...
__________________
![]() Shih-han Current rides: 2010 CTS-V sedan (Black Raven), 2010 Cadillac Escalade ESV (Black Raven); Gone but not forgotten: 2008 M5 (SMG, sapphire black), 2007 GL450 (black), 2004 645Ci (SMG, sapphire black) |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Junior Member
|
Quote:
IMO M5 looks a lot better than CLS63 (don't hate me!!!)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: NorCal
Posts: 3,181
Drives: Vivid Racing '09 C63 AMG
|
Quote:
__________________
--DT =============== My other ride is a Ducati. "Speed has never killed anyone, suddenly becoming stationary...that's what gets you." "Sure the M3 has got a top notch weapon in it, but this is a nuke." - Jeremy Clarkson ![]() YouTube - C63 AMG by Vivid Racing HRE | Vorsteiner | H&R Coilovers | Agency Power | Powerchip
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: OC
Posts: 370
Drives: 2011 C63 P31, 2006 Lotus Elise Supercharged, 2011 Infiniti G37S Coupe, 2013 Smart
|
Here are my thoughts:
CLS63 Pros: Better sound - Not quite as good as the 6.2L NA, but should be better than the M5 More torque with PP - 590lb-ft vs ~500 Potentially Faster than the M5 in a straight line, especially with PP M5 Pros: DCT Transmission - much better than the MCT! Handling - An assumption, but I would expect nothing less from an M car Interior - Cleaner, better LCD screen. But looks are subjective. Exclusivity - At least for some time. Though the new M5 looks a bit too plain, so you will have a somewhat boring looking "exclusive" car. Even though I love the CLS63 and I'm clearly an AMG fan, I would go for the M5 because it is an iconic and historically significant car, and it will be much more exclusive for a year or two. In the end, drive both cars and pick the one your heart points at. You shouldn't buy such cars based on numbers, specs, comparisons and the opinions of others. Buy it based on the feelings it evokes when you sit in it and grab the steering wheel, fire up the engine, and take it for that first drive. Don't let us convince you one way or the other. Good luck! Last edited by vmx128; 06-13-2012 at 04:57 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
MBWorld Fanatic!
|
Quote:
what?? ![]() ![]() synthetic sound??? WTF bmw???? that would make my choice right there.......unless the bmw sprouted wings and flies!
__________________
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=0kQ73UgGIRU new COB coming soon!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: THE Orange County, California
Posts: 8,573
Drives: 2013 M5, 2013 M6, 2012 R8 V10, 2012 C63 Black Series
|
Quote:
Ill reserve judgement when I drive one in 3 months.
__________________
2013 BMW M5 2013 BMW M6 2012 Audi R8 V10 2012 C63 Black Series |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Johannesburg
Posts: 94
Drives: 2012 C63 AMG
|
i see everyone is knocking the sound on the m5, but! i actually heard the m5 floor it down the road, and yes it doesnt sound as great at the amg's but in person the sound isnt that bad!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 244
Drives: e55
|
I agree. Had a encounter with the M6 veret on the freeway a couple of weks ago. He nailed at a roll from about 70 mph, made a nice roar. I was surprised considering all the poor reviews about the sound, but it sounded very good. Didnt even know the M6 verts were out yet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Edmonton alberta, canada.
Posts: 424
Drives: 2012 F10 M5, 2012 cls63, 2008 BMW M5 (traded), 2008 X5
|
Quote:
amg has the advantage in exterior styling over the m5, its just a much much sexier looking car. and the exhaust note is maginficant. interior however is less special. its almost like mercedes said, "well we got the exterior looking so amazing why kill ourselves on the interior?" - theres more to design than just slapping a bunch of carbon fiber and brushed aluminum all over the place, with no underlyng functionality backing it. as well, its a little harder to enjoy the exterior styling from the inside and your DRIVING. and thats where the m5 manhandles the cls. if your someone who lives for the driving experience, the m5 is designed for the driver. it just feels more special when you sit in the cabin. the feel, and placement of the controls, the steering wheel, the seats, the leather..., all on a different level than the cls. example: in the m5 i can reach all the steering wheel controls while my hands are in the driving position, in the cls, i have to move my hand as i cant reach all of the buttons. the BMW idrive humiliates teh mercedes comand system; its screen is almost twice the size, the graphics are animated, and has WAAAY more features, you can even read the owners manual from the idrive screen! search it by pictures, etc!!! its just completely nuts.!!! i havent driven the f10 m5, but i owned an e60 m5, and even that car was more fun to drive than my cls. it just slingshoted your around corners and inspired confidence in a way the cls doesnt. where it really feels big and heavy and feels like its hanging on for dear life when you take a corner fast. (this could partially be due to the not so grippy stock tires) but if you mainly care about great exhaust note, driving really fast in a straight line and looking like a BOSS when your on the road, than go for the cls63.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Newport Beach
Posts: 50
Drives: C63 AMG Coupe
|
Pointless discussion until you spend time driving both.
__________________
2010 GT3 - Guards Red - great to be back in a GT3 2012 C63 Coupe - Lunar Blue - gone 2004 GT3 "4 Liter" - Basalt Black - dearly missed |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| 2012, 63, amg, bmw, c63, cls, cls63, e63, f10, m5, mercedes, package, performance, review, va |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|