Bad Kleemann Tune??? Help please
#1
Bad Kleemann Tune??? Help please
So I got my K1 tune about a month ago and finally got my car on the dyno today. I have to say I was very disappointed with the numbers. I've seen other peoples results and compared to mine something is not right. Any feedback is greatly appreciated. My car is stock btw with approx 40,000 miles.
Thanks
Thanks
#3
MBWorld Fanatic!
I'm confused, are the other dyno runs you posted other vehicles?
First rule of modding, run the baseline so you know where you started from. The dyno is only a number, how's your 60-120 times compared to a stock car?
That is far more telling than dyno numbers. Some dyno's are heart breakers others are not.
First rule of modding, run the baseline so you know where you started from. The dyno is only a number, how's your 60-120 times compared to a stock car?
That is far more telling than dyno numbers. Some dyno's are heart breakers others are not.
#4
The two dyno graphs are the same...One pic just shows more of the page. The other pic is the air/fuel ratios. I didnt do a base dyno beforehand but I don't think in this case it matters. Considering nobody with a K1 tune is posting these kind of numbers. And if you look at the power curve it is very sloppy. Almost everyone else has a very smooth, linear curve. I should also note that the dyno was done with esp off and in manual mode in 5th gear.
Last edited by stealthc63; 09-15-2012 at 08:24 PM.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
C63
The two dyno graphs are the same...One pic just shows more of the page. The other pic is the air/fuel ratios. I didnt do a base dyno beforehand but I don't think in this case it matters. Considering nobody with a K1 tune is posting these kind of numbers. And if you look at the power curve it is very sloppy. Almost everyone else has a very smooth, linear curve.
IMO, I would ask for my money back and grab one of the handheld programmer tuners that are out now. You've got Eurocharged, OE Tuning and Velos Designworks as options right now.
Good luck and I hope this gets figured out for you.
#7
Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2012 C63 Coupe. Eurocharged, Charcoal Filters Removed, R-S3 Tires
This is what Eurocharged did to my car. Follow the link bellow. Huge difference with stock.
https://mbworld.org/forums/c63-amg-w...rocharged.html
https://mbworld.org/forums/c63-amg-w...rocharged.html
Trending Topics
#11
MBWorld Fanatic!
Either your tune or your car is an underachiever, probably the tune. Tell them to set the smoothing to 5 so it's not so choppy, you will get more accurate results.
#12
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 5,492
Received 430 Likes
on
353 Posts
2012 C63;1971 280SE 3.5(Sold);2023 EQS 450 SUV 4 Matic (Wife's)
Dynos should preferably done in the gear with 1:1 ratio which is 5th gear in the C63. With stock ECU tunes a lot of people use 4th gear to get to the rev limit because in 5th gear the car runs into the speed limiter at 155 mph and just over 6000 rpm.
#13
I sent Cory an email so I'm just waiting to hear back from him. I definitely agree that the car is running too rich. Which leads me to believe that it is the tune. Then again, I really dont have much experience with ecu tunes but with all the research I've done something definitely isn't right. I was expecting to see numers in the low 4's and from the looks of everyone else's K1 tunes I'm about 50 hp off.