C63 AMG (W204) 2008 - 2015

Bad Kleemann Tune??? Help please

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 09-15-2012, 06:20 PM
  #1  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
stealthc63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2009 C63
Bad Kleemann Tune??? Help please

So I got my K1 tune about a month ago and finally got my car on the dyno today. I have to say I was very disappointed with the numbers. I've seen other peoples results and compared to mine something is not right. Any feedback is greatly appreciated. My car is stock btw with approx 40,000 miles.

Thanks
Attached Thumbnails Bad Kleemann Tune??? Help please-photo1.jpg   Bad Kleemann Tune??? Help please-photo2.jpg   Bad Kleemann Tune??? Help please-photo3.jpg  
Old 09-15-2012, 07:51 PM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
solekeeper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,162
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
A V8
360? Hm, sounds like something is off somewhere.. But doesn't a stock c63 put those kinds of numbers down?
Old 09-15-2012, 08:11 PM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Jim Brady's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Cave Creek, AZ and Newport Beach
Posts: 1,309
Received 86 Likes on 58 Posts
'22 G 63 AMG, '21 GLE 53 AMG, '20 NSX
I'm confused, are the other dyno runs you posted other vehicles?

First rule of modding, run the baseline so you know where you started from. The dyno is only a number, how's your 60-120 times compared to a stock car?
That is far more telling than dyno numbers. Some dyno's are heart breakers others are not.
Old 09-15-2012, 08:18 PM
  #4  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
stealthc63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2009 C63
The two dyno graphs are the same...One pic just shows more of the page. The other pic is the air/fuel ratios. I didnt do a base dyno beforehand but I don't think in this case it matters. Considering nobody with a K1 tune is posting these kind of numbers. And if you look at the power curve it is very sloppy. Almost everyone else has a very smooth, linear curve. I should also note that the dyno was done with esp off and in manual mode in 5th gear.

Last edited by stealthc63; 09-15-2012 at 08:24 PM.
Old 09-15-2012, 08:24 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
HoozyerdaddyC63's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C63
Originally Posted by stealthc63
The two dyno graphs are the same...One pic just shows more of the page. The other pic is the air/fuel ratios. I didnt do a base dyno beforehand but I don't think in this case it matters. Considering nobody with a K1 tune is posting these kind of numbers. And if you look at the power curve it is very sloppy. Almost everyone else has a very smooth, linear curve.
Those do look like stock numbers. Have you taken it to the dealership or elsewhere for service since you had the tune?

IMO, I would ask for my money back and grab one of the handheld programmer tuners that are out now. You've got Eurocharged, OE Tuning and Velos Designworks as options right now.

Good luck and I hope this gets figured out for you.
Old 09-15-2012, 10:48 PM
  #6  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
khmergod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,290
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
2011 P31 C63 2015 CLA45
Looks like 381/360.
Old 09-15-2012, 11:08 PM
  #7  
Member
 
NovA_S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2012 C63 Coupe. Eurocharged, Charcoal Filters Removed, R-S3 Tires
This is what Eurocharged did to my car. Follow the link bellow. Huge difference with stock.
https://mbworld.org/forums/c63-amg-w...rocharged.html
Old 09-16-2012, 07:44 AM
  #8  
Super Member
 
Mr. Happy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 520
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
2014 Lotus Evora S
Get Cory involved. He will reflash it for free.
Old 09-16-2012, 02:41 PM
  #9  
Member
 
BFNYM156's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
M156 and LS7
Looks like A/F ratio is too rich
Old 09-16-2012, 03:48 PM
  #10  
Junior Member
 
SLEPER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Sumwhere in TEXAS
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2005 E55 AMG....Speed is Relaxin'
Agree. Too rich also.
Aren't most DYNOs pulls in 3rd gear anyway ??
Old 09-16-2012, 05:42 PM
  #11  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
BerBer63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,257
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
2009 C63
Either your tune or your car is an underachiever, probably the tune. Tell them to set the smoothing to 5 so it's not so choppy, you will get more accurate results.
Old 09-16-2012, 06:51 PM
  #12  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Mort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 5,492
Received 430 Likes on 353 Posts
2012 C63;1971 280SE 3.5(Sold);2023 EQS 450 SUV 4 Matic (Wife's)
Originally Posted by SLEPER
Agree. Too rich also.
Aren't most DYNOs pulls in 3rd gear anyway ??
Dynos should preferably done in the gear with 1:1 ratio which is 5th gear in the C63. With stock ECU tunes a lot of people use 4th gear to get to the rev limit because in 5th gear the car runs into the speed limiter at 155 mph and just over 6000 rpm.
Old 09-16-2012, 07:35 PM
  #13  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
stealthc63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2009 C63
I sent Cory an email so I'm just waiting to hear back from him. I definitely agree that the car is running too rich. Which leads me to believe that it is the tune. Then again, I really dont have much experience with ecu tunes but with all the research I've done something definitely isn't right. I was expecting to see numers in the low 4's and from the looks of everyone else's K1 tunes I'm about 50 hp off.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Bad Kleemann Tune??? Help please



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:10 PM.