C63 AMG (W204) 2008 - 2015

Turbos and the m156

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 05-30-2014, 06:53 PM
  #51  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
mr747's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,398
Received 370 Likes on 212 Posts
c63
Originally Posted by jrcart
First off, it can be done and has been done on an M159 which is nearly identical to a M156 only dry sumped.

It has nothing to do with $$, I have plenty of it and you dont see me trying to put turbos on any or my cars. Case and point, there is a tt M159 SLS in California, they have had lots of problems with it, tuning was a nightmare and it makes less hp and tq than my Weistec 3.0L twin screw powered SLS. So while somebody is trying to figure out how to squeeze a couple turbos into the engine bay of an M156 powered car I will be out running 8's with my SC's M156.......case closed.
Lol I can't argue your point there

But your sls doesn't run 8s your clk is in a whole different league
I understand what you are saying though
Old 05-31-2014, 12:05 AM
  #52  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
roadtalontsi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,093
Received 286 Likes on 184 Posts
10 C six trizzle
it doesnt run 8's because getrag and benz wont give out any service information on the dual clutch gear box or tools to service/assemble it.
Old 06-02-2014, 01:00 PM
  #53  
Out Of Control!!
 
blackbenzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 13,487
Received 94 Likes on 77 Posts
haters crazy
One word... tuning...
Old 10-31-2014, 11:28 PM
  #54  
Senior Member
 
skaarlaj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
ford svt's, and C63!!!
Turbos can be very quick, but usually requires a lot of other drivetrain changes to make them work right. A good friend of mine made 647hp to the wheels with his 3500lb turbocharged 6.0 liter ls engine chevy c10 pick-up. on the same day, my little fox mustang made 414rwhp, and is about 300lbs lighter.



Calculations would say I'd get my *** handed to me in my mustang with over 200whp deficit, But in the eighth mile drag race I'm ahead of him by over a second. Turbo lag does suck, and playing catch-up is a tough *** game to play for sure. Also, neither of us spun too badly off the line at the track.
Old 11-01-2014, 04:32 AM
  #55  
Senior Member
 
Gadget's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Southern Maryland USA
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
06 E55 AMG, 13 C63 AMG
I do not think it would be much of a problem to get a couple of turbos installed. Getting the air to and from the turbos, out to the charge air cooler and back will take some work.

Also keep in mind you will have to replace that intake plenum setup as well. The way the throttle valves are placed and that sheet metal ducting to get the air to them does not look like it will hold boost at all. That I think would be the hardest part.

G
Old 11-01-2014, 08:51 AM
  #56  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Kriston's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,252
Received 369 Likes on 184 Posts
C63 AMG


I would love to see a Turbo package for the M156. Tuning is the magic word here though. Hopefully people pursuit it enough to get the tuning right.

All other major components to the build are pretty much off the shelf parts. Some fab work for piping / IC mount etc. But its definitely doable with the right tune.

Originally Posted by blackbenzz
One word... tuning...
Old 11-01-2014, 01:13 PM
  #57  
Senior Member
 
skaarlaj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
ford svt's, and C63!!!
I think if someone pulled it off, they'd have a dyno killer for sure. Hell, I'd love to see what 8lbs of turbo would do with one of these motors!! Probably equivilant to what 13-15 lbs from a blower would do hp-wise, but I'd still give the race to the blower at higher boost though.
Old 11-01-2014, 02:33 PM
  #58  
Senior Member
 
ToXicXxX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2011 C63 AMG P31
I imagine a 6.2 on TT could run 1000HP+ easy on something as simple as a set of BorgWerner KKK K04's. Imagine a set of Garrett GT3071R's...

I'm not sure how well this engine would hold 10-20PSI, that's a lot of juice to shove down the throat of an engine built for high output NA power. Especially on a 11.3:1 CR.
Old 11-01-2014, 11:19 PM
  #59  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
roadtalontsi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,093
Received 286 Likes on 184 Posts
10 C six trizzle
and ya'll think the weistec kits are expensive. lol . Price out 2x 2500$ turbos, an *** load of piping, intercoolers, new exhaust manifolds/downpipes, supply lines for oil and coolant, return lines to drain back in the pan. The problem has been the transmissions. Making a 156 make the power isnt the problem. Keeping the trans together is the issue. Weistec could've been in 8's and possibly 7's years ago had they slapped in a motec and a powerglide. But you cant be the worlds fastest mercedes when your not using mercedes core parts. Even these 1500whp tt gallardos with billet everything transmission still dont drag race because they blowup almost everytime.
Old 11-01-2014, 11:55 PM
  #60  
Senior Member
 
skaarlaj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
ford svt's, and C63!!!
Yeah it stinks that anything made by or for Mercedes has to be so damn expensive.


2.3 liter twin screw blower for my ford svt lightning or cobra costs 4K and change, same blower for this car, with an inner-cooler and recirculating system and manifold and all the sudden you're up around 13K???


SS headers with cats for 03 svt lightning 1,200. I paid over 2K for a used set for this car, and it feels like I stole them, hahaha. Oh, and the lightning will beat the snot out of this car in an acceleration race. Sorry for the rant guys, just kills me sometimes. Obviously an outstanding car in many ways, and does a lot of stuff real well, just costs more than enough to do so.


One more quick rant, I have a 91 fox mustang 5.0, that came from the factory with a traction loc rear-end to go along with it's 225hp rating, I buy a 450hp C63 that came from the factory with an open rear-end??? Because at 450hp it's an option, but on a little ford 225hp car, a posi unit is "what you get", wow Mercedes, "really"???
The following users liked this post:
KXC (08-23-2020)
Old 11-03-2014, 06:47 AM
  #61  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
ecampbell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,058
Received 16 Likes on 13 Posts
2008 BS
Originally Posted by roadtalontsi
and ya'll think the weistec kits are expensive. lol . Price out 2x 2500$ turbos, an *** load of piping, intercoolers, new exhaust manifolds/downpipes, supply lines for oil and coolant, return lines to drain back in the pan. The problem has been the transmissions. Making a 156 make the power isnt the problem. Keeping the trans together is the issue. Weistec could've been in 8's and possibly 7's years ago had they slapped in a motec and a powerglide. But you cant be the worlds fastest mercedes when your not using mercedes core parts. Even these 1500whp tt gallardos with billet everything transmission still dont drag race because they blowup almost everytime.
You make it sound like 8's and 7's would be easy with a Mercedes. I can tell you from experience it isn't.
Old 11-03-2014, 11:50 PM
  #62  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
roadtalontsi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,093
Received 286 Likes on 184 Posts
10 C six trizzle
Originally Posted by ecampbell
You make it sound like 8's and 7's would be easy with a Mercedes. I can tell you from experience it isn't.
hell no, not easy at all. but considering how far they've gotten with what they are working with. They are only a few tenths from hitting 8's, With all the effort they've put in, swapping to parts outside mb it could easily be in 8's. I've seen their cheesey traction control setup lol. Drag racing is much easier when all you have to worry about is putting the pedal down. The 7's are quite a stretch and wouldn't be possible without gutting out and in my opinion modfications that destroy a street car.

Im not even in 10's in either one of my cars. Mostly time and money restricted. Hoping to see 10's with both pretty soon.
Old 11-04-2014, 07:28 AM
  #63  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
ecampbell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,058
Received 16 Likes on 13 Posts
2008 BS
Originally Posted by roadtalontsi
hell no, not easy at all. but considering how far they've gotten with what they are working with. They are only a few tenths from hitting 8's, With all the effort they've put in, swapping to parts outside mb it could easily be in 8's. I've seen their cheesey traction control setup lol. Drag racing is much easier when all you have to worry about is putting the pedal down. The 7's are quite a stretch and wouldn't be possible without gutting out and in my opinion modfications that destroy a street car.

Im not even in 10's in either one of my cars. Mostly time and money restricted. Hoping to see 10's with both pretty soon.
Traction control? Who has this?
Old 11-04-2014, 09:43 PM
  #64  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
roadtalontsi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,093
Received 286 Likes on 184 Posts
10 C six trizzle
Originally Posted by ecampbell
Traction control? Who has this?
i dont know? perhaps ive said too much.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Turbos and the m156



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:18 PM.