C63 AMG (W204) 2008 - 2015

Speeding up MCT response

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 09-06-2014, 09:01 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
odonnks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: North of Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 408
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ford Truck, 2014 C63 AMG 507
Speeding up MCT response

Do any of the tunes shorten the time between the pull of the paddle shifter and the actual gear change?

The gear change is decently quick, it's the fraction of a second that it occurs after pulling the paddle is what I'd like to shorten.

Thanks !
Old 09-06-2014, 09:13 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
jmueller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Ft. Lauderdale
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Jag F-Type V8
I'm pretty sure the only way to speed that up is with Weistech's valve body upgrade.
Old 09-06-2014, 10:33 AM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
chrisridebike8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,750
Received 408 Likes on 290 Posts
'10 C63
I don't have a FL but most people say the delay is shortened with most ECU tunes. I know on my pre-FL the delay is much less with the Eurocharged tune. Both the v4 and my current v5 are a huge improvement over the stock shift delay. I used to always bump the limiter. Now I don't. And if I flash back to stock, I still bump sometimes. It's no dual clutch box, but it makes the 7G tolerable.
Old 09-06-2014, 11:27 AM
  #4  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Wobble64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Cincinnati Area
Posts: 1,001
Received 52 Likes on 40 Posts
C63 507 with BS Body; 2008 SLK 55
According to Eurocharged themselves, their tune does not touch the transmission control program at all, but is limited to the ECU. The engine blips more (to match revvs or does it maybe even overdue it for drama?), but I struggle to see how an ECU tune would change shifting times.


Does anybody really know?
Old 09-06-2014, 11:47 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
odonnks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: North of Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 408
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ford Truck, 2014 C63 AMG 507
My thought was that since the ECU tune is loaded via the OBD port that a TCU tune could also be loaded.

The MCT shift is nice and hard but it seems that the command to do so while in M is delayed a tad.
Old 09-06-2014, 12:53 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
alexmtl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Montreal, QC
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
2013 C63 coupe P31
There's a lot that can be done with software to help the transmission, I wish some tuner seriously looked into it. That said I believe the lag is a mechanical issue and I don't think it can be much helped with a software update (and to me, it's not the biggest issue on the transmission). I could be wrong though.
Old 09-07-2014, 04:01 PM
  #7  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
604 C63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,818
Received 393 Likes on 272 Posts
2012 E550 Cabrio
I know a guy who knows a guy.....

who, when he had sluggish transmission issues, ended up with a new ECU being the fix.
So there is something to that train of thought.
Old 09-07-2014, 07:53 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
odonnks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: North of Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 408
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ford Truck, 2014 C63 AMG 507
The shifts are nice and firm but the delay seems electrical. I could be wrong and it may be hydralic which I'm sure is tougher to speed up.
Old 09-07-2014, 10:11 PM
  #9  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
rage2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Montana/Alberta
Posts: 1,669
Received 62 Likes on 43 Posts
C63 BS, GLA45
The delay is definitely software. The FL C63 and the BS has the exact same hardware, yet the BS is faster from click of the paddle to actual shift. The new W205 C400 is as fast as my BS from paddle to shift as well, and it's not an AMG nor MCT. Pretty sure the W205 has the same old 7G-Tronic gearbox.
Old 09-08-2014, 01:17 AM
  #10  
Member
 
average joe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 149
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C63 Weistec Supercharged
The TCU needs removing to "tune it" as far as i am aware.
I am planning on the Weistec valve body and TCU upgrade for my 7G box. (just a pain having to ship it to the USA from UK)

I have driven a C63 with MCT with the Weistec upgrade and it was really quick in M when changing compared to a standard MCT.
Old 09-11-2014, 11:10 PM
  #11  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
roadtalontsi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,093
Received 286 Likes on 184 Posts
10 C six trizzle
that delay will never go away, it's still an automatic transmission.
Old 09-12-2014, 08:18 AM
  #12  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Wobble64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Cincinnati Area
Posts: 1,001
Received 52 Likes on 40 Posts
C63 507 with BS Body; 2008 SLK 55
I keep hearing that an MCT by principle, will be slower than, for example, a dual clutch transmission. Does anybody here know why this would be the case? In other words, is a planetary gearbox with multiple clutches that stop the planetary gear cages, always slower than a traditional gearbox with switching pins? If so, why?
Old 09-12-2014, 10:29 AM
  #13  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
rage2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Montana/Alberta
Posts: 1,669
Received 62 Likes on 43 Posts
C63 BS, GLA45
Originally Posted by Wobble64
I keep hearing that an MCT by principle, will be slower than, for example, a dual clutch transmission. Does anybody here know why this would be the case? In other words, is a planetary gearbox with multiple clutches that stop the planetary gear cages, always slower than a traditional gearbox with switching pins? If so, why?
A lot less moving parts when executing a shift would be my guess, but the shift times itself is negligible. If we're focusing on response (time between paddle push to shift) a DCT has a huge advantage in that the next gear is pre loaded in the transmission, so all of the work is done already, and the paddle push literally just activates clutch actuation.
Old 09-12-2014, 12:03 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
alexmtl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Montreal, QC
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
2013 C63 coupe P31
Originally Posted by rage2
A lot less moving parts when executing a shift would be my guess, but the shift times itself is negligible. If we're focusing on response (time between paddle push to shift) a DCT has a huge advantage in that the next gear is pre loaded in the transmission, so all of the work is done already, and the paddle push literally just activates clutch actuation.
+1 DCT means Dual clutch, the software decides which gear to preload depending on the conditions, and if you do the shift the software predicted then it's done in milliseconds.
If you don't do the shift the software predicted then it takes a very similar time, if not longer, but it's quite rare.
Old 09-12-2014, 12:45 PM
  #15  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Wobble64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Cincinnati Area
Posts: 1,001
Received 52 Likes on 40 Posts
C63 507 with BS Body; 2008 SLK 55
Aren't all gears preloaded also in the MCT? Maybe there is more inertia in a planetary gearbox. I would have to study up some......
Old 09-14-2014, 09:20 PM
  #16  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
roadtalontsi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,093
Received 286 Likes on 184 Posts
10 C six trizzle
no, mct only has one input shaft. its in essence one clutch with multiple disks. Dual clutch has separate input shafts, with separate cluthes. One clutch is disengaged and waiting in the next gear. so all that is necessary for the shift is to disengage one clutch and engage another. Dct's are pretty much like 2 manual gear boxs put together, they also have regular gears and synchros except those parts are automated.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Speeding up MCT response



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:08 PM.