C63 AMG (W204) 2008 - 2015

I've been Mustang-ed! Dyno input

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 02-24-2015, 07:15 PM
  #1  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
SROC276's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
2010 C63 P31 AMG
I've been Mustang-ed! Dyno input

Visited a great shop today...FFTec in Hayward, CA. I needed to do a baseline to get my afr rates after fuel pumps were changed out. Anyway the cars best pull was 397whp with 374tq. Question....for those that may have used a mustang Dyno before....are these ok numbers? If we use 12% correction to dynojet I may be at around 440-445hp?

I am running an Oetuning tune, shorty renntech header into primary cat, hi flow secondary cat into ipe exhaust. Drop in filter with row boxes.

Thoughts?

Last edited by SROC276; 02-24-2015 at 07:56 PM.
Old 02-24-2015, 07:20 PM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
bhamg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,899
Received 92 Likes on 81 Posts
C63 AMG
I can't comment on your numbers but I can conclusively state that running with primary cats in place puts you down 19 RWHP vs. the same setup w/o cats.
Old 02-24-2015, 07:55 PM
  #3  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
SROC276's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
2010 C63 P31 AMG
Originally Posted by bhamg
I can't comment on your numbers but I can conclusively state that running with primary cats in place puts you down 19 RWHP vs. the same setup w/o cats.
Yup I agree....just not worth the fumes and emission problems I could run into...removed my ipe long tube headers a while back and settled for this set up. Loss a lot of top end power for sure.
Old 02-24-2015, 09:17 PM
  #4  
Junior Member
 
AwdthisC63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
2011 C63 1998 ML430
I use mustang dyno. From what is said yes reads lower than a dynojet but percentage is not known 12% is a guess. Stock baseline I put 390 rwhp torque don't remember.
Old 02-24-2015, 09:34 PM
  #5  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
SROC276's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
2010 C63 P31 AMG
Originally Posted by AwdthisC63
I use mustang dyno. From what is said yes reads lower than a dynojet but percentage is not known 12% is a guess. Stock baseline I put 390 rwhp torque don't remember.
Got it..I've been collecting some figures and so far we have a baseline p31 anywhere between 350rwhp-370rwhp and now 390rwhp on yours.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: I've been Mustang-ed! Dyno input



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:26 AM.