C63 AMG (W204) 2008 - 2015

Just got my 13 p31 off the dyno

Old 12-24-2015, 10:47 AM
  #1  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
skratch77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,684
Received 368 Likes on 271 Posts
2005 E55
Just got my 13 p31 off the dyno

Not sure if this is normal but car is stock with row boxes only and made 400whp and do these car run this lean stock?

Here is the dyno sheet and its compared to my e55 on pump gas on same dyno.its just insane how much more torque my e55 made
Attached Thumbnails Just got my 13 p31 off the dyno-screenshot_2015-12-24-10-44-26.png  
Old 12-24-2015, 11:17 AM
  #2  
Banned
 
avery.whss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,317
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
S550 on order
Sometimes yeah, my car put down around the same stock ...just a heads up..you're going to have people call you a liar for making 400whp stock even with dyno sheets. Good job though either way, and yeah it is crazy what those older e-classes put down!!

My tune runs the car super lean...15ish AFR ratios..i think normal is around 12-14 ..but you get a bit extra power leaning the engine out a bit more

Last edited by avery.whss; 12-24-2015 at 12:04 PM.
Old 12-24-2015, 11:37 AM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
skratch77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,684
Received 368 Likes on 271 Posts
2005 E55
Thanks for the heads up but I have nothing to lie about.I was the one dynoing my car at my friends shop for a baseline run.the car does have row boxes and is a development sls package car.

Yea my e55 is night and day lol
Attached Thumbnails Just got my 13 p31 off the dyno-screenshot_2015-12-24-11-42-32.png  

Last edited by skratch77; 12-24-2015 at 11:47 AM.
Old 12-24-2015, 11:46 AM
  #4  
Super Member
 
ELITE_KOV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 528
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
06 E55 / 13 C63
Are you more surprised that the car made 400rwhp or that's running so lean or both?


400rwhp is fairly consistent with healthy C63s, no? The E55 makes gobs of torque because of the positive displacement blower.


And long tubes and a good tune make close to 100+rwhp on the 6.2L?
Old 12-24-2015, 11:46 AM
  #5  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
chrisridebike8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,749
Received 407 Likes on 289 Posts
'10 C63
Doesn't sound unreasonable to me. I remember reading that the P31 cars are a little underrated from the factory. Now if you said you made 450 whp stock, that would raise an eyebrow. Also, where was the afr taken? Did they just put a sniffer in the exhaust tip? If so, that's not a true afr since you have cats.
Old 12-24-2015, 11:54 AM
  #6  
Banned
 
avery.whss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,317
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
S550 on order
Originally Posted by ELITE_KOV
Are you more surprised that the car made 400rwhp or that's running so lean or both?


400rwhp is fairly consistent with healthy C63s, no? The E55 makes gobs of torque because of the positive displacement blower.


And long tubes and a good tune make close to 100+rwhp on the 6.2L?
according to some members a 400whp stock c63 isn't possible ..I'm sure you've seen some of my posts with said members ..because with OP's current numbers ..with a tune and some other small work he'd be pushing 450-470whp without headers and 500 whp or more with headers. Which actually isn't unrealistic at all

skratch77 - I wouldn't worry about your AFR...you still have room to play with, like I said..mine runs 15 or so AFR on WOT and i never have issues besides the gas - http://postimg.org/image/q9pbtyt9t/

Last edited by avery.whss; 12-24-2015 at 12:04 PM.
Old 12-24-2015, 11:54 AM
  #7  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
skratch77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,684
Received 368 Likes on 271 Posts
2005 E55
We were concerned of the 12.7-12.8 afr and yes it was down in the exhaust pipe and is a bit richer before the cats but I had k&n filters with me and we both agreed to not run them as it would get a point leaner and wanted to see how these cars run before I do intake work.

I also have the jl motering carbon front intake to install and will be flashing a renntech tune on the car.

My goal is 450whp and dyno run was 3 back to back pulls in 4 mins with zero cool down and the car hit 400whp on all 3 runs back to back so that was a big shocker coming from a blown e55 as it would loose 15-20 whp if I did the same thing to it.
Old 12-24-2015, 11:57 AM
  #8  
Member
 
C63-AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Boston or North Carolina
Posts: 198
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
2009 C63 2016 AMG GT S
Dude those are awesome numbers for sure :-)
I made 319whp stock, 359whp stock tune and IPE headerback exhaust. 456whp with a custom dyno tune (stage 1) and now 499whp as of the end of this year.
E55's are no joke on torque. Seen some crazy numbers at a few of the local shops.
Old 12-24-2015, 12:02 PM
  #9  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
skratch77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,684
Received 368 Likes on 271 Posts
2005 E55
After the holidays I will flash the car and redyno it and I'll be installing the intake also with k&n filters
Old 12-24-2015, 12:11 PM
  #10  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
skratch77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,684
Received 368 Likes on 271 Posts
2005 E55
Originally Posted by C63-AMG
Dude those are awesome numbers for sure :-)
I made 319whp stock, 359whp stock tune and IPE headerback exhaust. 456whp with a custom dyno tune (stage 1) and now 499whp as of the end of this year.
E55's are no joke on torque. Seen some crazy numbers at a few of the local shops.
Thanks bro!

I will be happy with 440-450whp
Old 12-24-2015, 12:20 PM
  #11  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
skratch77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,684
Received 368 Likes on 271 Posts
2005 E55
Originally Posted by C63-AMG
Dude those are awesome numbers for sure :-)
I made 319whp stock, 359whp stock tune and IPE headerback exhaust. 456whp with a custom dyno tune (stage 1) and now 499whp as of the end of this year.
E55's are no joke on torque. Seen some crazy numbers at a few of the local shops.
Bro your from Boston? I live in Methuen!
Old 12-24-2015, 12:46 PM
  #12  
Super Member
 
thesaintusa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Canada
Posts: 542
Received 71 Likes on 56 Posts
2019 911 GTS / 2016 X3 / 2015 E63s / 1993 RX-7
Originally Posted by avery.whss
according to some members a 400whp stock c63 isn't possible ..I'm sure you've seen some of my posts with said members ..because with OP's current numbers ..with a tune and some other small work he'd be pushing 450-470whp without headers and 500 whp or more with headers. Which actually isn't unrealistic at all

skratch77 - I wouldn't worry about your AFR...you still have room to play with, like I said..mine runs 15 or so AFR on WOT and i never have issues besides the gas - http://postimg.org/image/q9pbtyt9t/

Actually at WOT your AFRs drop pretty quickly down to 13.5 and then progressively richer at the top end.

Running 15:1 at WOT top end would result in a new engine being needed.
Old 12-24-2015, 01:03 PM
  #13  
Banned
 
avery.whss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,317
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
S550 on order
Originally Posted by thesaintusa
Actually at WOT your AFRs drop pretty quickly down to 13.5 and then progressively richer at the top end.

Running 15:1 at WOT top end would result in a new engine being needed.
the OBD2 reader i use says inside the app I use ..between 14-15 on WOT unless the OBD2 readers are off/wrong? i dont have much experience with them but ive read they sometimes arent very accurate

Last edited by avery.whss; 12-24-2015 at 01:15 PM.
Old 12-24-2015, 01:18 PM
  #14  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
skratch77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,684
Received 368 Likes on 271 Posts
2005 E55
Originally Posted by avery.whss
the OBD2 reader i use says inside the app I use ..between 14-15 on WOT unless the OBD2 readers are off/wrong? i dont have much experience with them but ive read they sometimes arent very accurate
From 4500 rps and up your are running way richer than I am.I'm in the high 12s at 7k rpms and you are safe rich at 10.5 damn I thought my mpg sucked yours must be really bad lol
Old 12-24-2015, 01:53 PM
  #15  
Super Member
 
thesaintusa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Canada
Posts: 542
Received 71 Likes on 56 Posts
2019 911 GTS / 2016 X3 / 2015 E63s / 1993 RX-7
Originally Posted by avery.whss
the OBD2 reader i use says inside the app I use ..between 14-15 on WOT unless the OBD2 readers are off/wrong? i dont have much experience with them but ive read they sometimes arent very accurate
The dyno sheet you posted shows what many would consider 'standard' target AFRs. You start at 14-15, but as you roll into the throttle is aims for a much richer / safer AFR.

Some cars have a WBO2 sensor, but most do not.

I would not trust the O2 sensor / OBD2 reader for anything other than telling you if you are in open or closed loop mode.
Old 12-24-2015, 01:55 PM
  #16  
Super Member
 
thesaintusa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Canada
Posts: 542
Received 71 Likes on 56 Posts
2019 911 GTS / 2016 X3 / 2015 E63s / 1993 RX-7
Originally Posted by skratch77
From 4500 rps and up your are running way richer than I am.I'm in the high 12s at 7k rpms and you are safe rich at 10.5 damn I thought my mpg sucked yours must be really bad lol
I think that the 10.5 might be a pre-tune AFR and that the AFR reading in the 12s is post tune.

Either way, his AFRs look pretty standard, and not at a 14:1 or 15:1 as mentioned previously.

But the pick up in power between the 10.5:1 and 12.5:1 at WOT at top end is impressive.
Old 12-24-2015, 02:16 PM
  #17  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
skratch77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,684
Received 368 Likes on 271 Posts
2005 E55
Originally Posted by thesaintusa
I think that the 10.5 might be a pre-tune AFR and that the AFR reading in the 12s is post tune.

Either way, his AFRs look pretty standard, and not at a 14:1 or 15:1 as mentioned previously.

But the pick up in power between the 10.5:1 and 12.5:1 at WOT at top end is impressive.
If we go by both runs on his sheet I would assume the red afr line went with the higher power red whp line.
Old 12-24-2015, 02:18 PM
  #18  
Super Member
 
thesaintusa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Canada
Posts: 542
Received 71 Likes on 56 Posts
2019 911 GTS / 2016 X3 / 2015 E63s / 1993 RX-7
You are correct, seems counter intuitive.

Either way the AFRs are not in the 15s at WOT top end.
Old 12-24-2015, 02:23 PM
  #19  
Member
 
C63-AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Boston or North Carolina
Posts: 198
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
2009 C63 2016 AMG GT S
Originally Posted by skratch77
Bro your from Boston? I live in Methuen!
Yeah, south of the city, Definitely should meetup come spring with a few of the other local AMG's
Old 12-24-2015, 02:37 PM
  #20  
Banned
 
avery.whss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,317
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
S550 on order
Originally Posted by thesaintusa
I think that the 10.5 might be a pre-tune AFR and that the AFR reading in the 12s is post tune.

Either way, his AFRs look pretty standard, and not at a 14:1 or 15:1 as mentioned previously.

But the pick up in power between the 10.5:1 and 12.5:1 at WOT at top end is impressive.
Yeah that's what i figured with the readers, a lot of people say they are only good for clearing codes..I don't have any primaries/2nd cats, O2 sensors disabled via tune which is probably why it shows what it does

the green lines are EC V4 and the red lines are the custom tune i run with a few other mods ..but i see what you mean now ..I was looking at it wrong.. the AFR came in and dropped down on the dyno sheet...my bad guys!!

skratch77 - its horrible on all our cars!!..my dash is usually between 7-10mpg..i think 10-20 is average for our cars depending how you drive ..once you get a tune you'll notice it go down! ..i think you'll hit that 450whp mark easy

Last edited by avery.whss; 12-24-2015 at 03:52 PM.
Old 12-24-2015, 05:03 PM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
dubzAMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 6 Posts
2010 C63 AMG FBO, 2014 E63 AMG S
My pre fl p31 made 399 whp, 370 ft/lbs on a dynojet as well with row airboxes, secondary cat delete. Your numbers look normal.
Old 12-24-2015, 05:14 PM
  #22  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
skratch77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,684
Received 368 Likes on 271 Posts
2005 E55
Ok guys now the real question what options does this platform have to do our own Tuning?
Old 12-24-2015, 05:28 PM
  #23  
Member
 
Stanley59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
GLA45 AMG
Just to clarify; is this with the 507 package or the standard 6.3?
Old 12-24-2015, 05:35 PM
  #24  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
skratch77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,684
Received 368 Likes on 271 Posts
2005 E55
Originally Posted by Stanley59
Just to clarify; is this with the 507 package or the standard 6.3?
It's a regular c63 with development package and row air boxes.

Factory 481 rated
Old 12-24-2015, 05:46 PM
  #25  
Super Member
 
gzim335's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 642
Likes: 0
Received 105 Likes on 56 Posts
c63 coupe p31weistec stg3 SOLD,2013 C63 BLACK SERIES.
Originally Posted by skratch77

It's a regular c63 with development package and row air boxes.

Factory 481 rated
do you have sae corrected numbers?ive seen a stock 12 p31 car put down 420whp on a dynojet sae corrected numbers so give or take your where u should be nothing surprising

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:
You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Just got my 13 p31 off the dyno



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:32 PM.