Go Back   MBWorld.org Forums > Mercedes-Benz AMG Vehicles > CL55 AMG, CL65 AMG, CL63 AMG (W215, W216)
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?
Register Photos FAQ Members Insurance Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read CarsGarageVendors
Welcome to MBWorld.org Forums


CL55 AMG, CL65 AMG, CL63 AMG (W215, W216) Discuss the CL55, CL65, and the CL63 AMG.

Sponsored by : Velos Designwerks
Click Here

Reply
 
 
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Rating: Thread Rating: 5 votes, 4.20 average. Display Modes
Old 04-13-2012, 01:08 AM   #76
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
desired_speeds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 1,782
Drives: 02 E55 & 04 E55
Send a message via AIM to desired_speeds
Quote:
Originally Posted by 559cl55amg View Post
Not really... Think about this 55k vs v12tt??? Tie!!!! Bone stock!!!!! It's like WTF!!!! So before you try to prove me wrong read your specs! Us 55k people have a sportier car,better on maintenance and as fast. V12 ppl Is a donkey
v12 is no donkey. I mean think about it. It has 4 cylinders more than a v8, now throw two turbos on it... surely no donkey and opens the door to huge power with a simple tune.
To remove this ad, register today or login if you already are registered!

__________________

W210 | W211

FOR SALE:
(2) two w211 OEM heat exchangers. will take best offer!
desired_speeds is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2012, 01:10 AM   #77
Banned

 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Fresno , Ca
Posts: 320
Drives: 2003 cl55 amg, 2008 Range Rover Sport SC
Right. But how sad 4 more cylinders and can't beat the 55k stock? I find it sad that a simple tune is needed to beat me. Wow!! What a waist

Last edited by 559cl55amg; 04-13-2012 at 01:18 AM.
559cl55amg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2012, 10:00 AM   #78
Super Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 998
Drives: 1994 Toyota Supra, 2005 CL65
Quote:
Originally Posted by 559cl55amg View Post
Right. But how sad 4 more cylinders and can't beat the 55k stock? I find it sad that a simple tune is needed to beat me. Wow!! What a waist

Are you sure you raced a TT V12 and not the NA version? A stock CL600 TT will eat a CL55/E55/CLS55. A modded one will rape those cars. A stock CL65 will rape a tuned CL600 TT. A tuned CL65 rapes all!!!

R.K.
radride is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2012, 10:37 AM   #79
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Benz-O-Rama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 7,773
Drives: Eurocharged Stage (1) 2004 E500, OE Tuning/Speedriven ECU/TCU 2005 SL600, 2010 Caddy SwaggerWagon
Quote:
Originally Posted by radride View Post
Are you sure you raced a TT V12 and not the NA version? A stock CL600 TT will eat a CL55/E55/CLS55. A modded one will rape those cars. A stock CL65 will rape a tuned CL600 TT. A tuned CL65 rapes all!!!

R.K.
Well, I was right there with you, until the highlighted portion.

But yes, a stock 600 is quicker than a stock 55K, regardless of what MB or the magazines state. The 600 cars were grossly underrated by MB, so they didn't undercut themselves on sales of the 55K AMG cars.

A tuned 600 is indeed quicker than a stock 65
A tuned 65 is marginally quicker, if any, than a tuned 600.

Case in point is my tuned SL600 that is the current 1/4mile record holder at 11.02@126mph. A stock SL65 runs about 11.50-.60@123-124, and a tuned SL65 runs 11.00-.10


Either way, it's quite obvious that the OP will never be educated by any of us on the V12TT platform. He can't even formulate a proper sentence, and has no idea how to use grammar.

So, OP....enjoy your new wheels.
__________________

2010 CTS SportWagon
2004 E500 - Eurocharged ECU, VRP headers and E55 exhaust (13.49@102.5)
2005 SL600 - OE Tuning ECU/ Speedriven TCU - (11.02@126.01)


..And some bad **** teefusus.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jb1g_f_gBA0



Outfitted by:

Last edited by Benz-O-Rama; 04-13-2012 at 04:28 PM.
Benz-O-Rama is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2012, 11:15 AM   #80
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 144
Drives: 2005 CL65
Quote:
Originally Posted by 559cl55amg View Post
Right. But how sad 4 more cylinders and can't beat the 55k stock? I find it sad that a simple tune is needed to beat me. Wow!! What a waist
Can I get a pic of said waist?
cjcalo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2012, 12:02 PM   #81
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,457
Drives: 04 CL55 (sold), 2012 CLS550
I told you guys this fool was a clown....I'm embarrassed for all 55K owners
__________________
danlnyc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2012, 01:53 PM   #82
Banned

 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Fresno , Ca
Posts: 320
Drives: 2003 cl55 amg, 2008 Range Rover Sport SC
How I didn't know I was publishing book to watch my grammar! I'm not denying the power of a v12. I'm just saying that a stock cl55 and a stock v12 = tie!! Don't be mad because this is a fact! Watch YouTube videos for your reference. Also check out ecabs comment here. You guys are on denial!!!! Losers!
559cl55amg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2012, 01:54 PM   #83
Junior Member
 
TheRoadWarrior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 44
Drives: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by cjcalo View Post
Can I get a pic of said waist?
lol

i cant tell if 559cl55amg is just a total clown..... or a really good troll
__________________
"I spent 90% of my money on women, cars, and booze. The other 10% I wasted."
TheRoadWarrior is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2012, 02:07 PM   #84
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,457
Drives: 04 CL55 (sold), 2012 CLS550
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheRoadWarrior View Post
lol

i cant tell if 559cl55amg is just a total clown..... or a really good troll
100% clown and fail troll IMO
__________________
danlnyc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2012, 02:28 PM   #85
Banned

 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Fresno , Ca
Posts: 320
Drives: 2003 cl55 amg, 2008 Range Rover Sport SC
One word... Hater!
559cl55amg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2012, 03:51 PM   #86
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 144
Drives: 2005 CL65
Quote:
Originally Posted by 559cl55amg View Post
Ya weren't haiting. Ya others let us see???
Quote:
Originally Posted by 559cl55amg View Post
One word... Hater!
Thank god he's learning............
cjcalo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2012, 06:22 PM   #87
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,457
Drives: 04 CL55 (sold), 2012 CLS550
Quote:
Originally Posted by 559cl55amg View Post
One word... Hater!
is that your comeback every time somebody disagrees with you?
__________________
danlnyc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2012, 01:50 AM   #88
Banned

 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Fresno , Ca
Posts: 320
Drives: 2003 cl55 amg, 2008 Range Rover Sport SC
You guys are retards! Whatever you say.
559cl55amg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2012, 03:59 AM   #89
Junior Member
 
TheRoadWarrior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 44
Drives: n/a
We can't hear you over your mouthbreathing.... Uh oh, I must be a "hater"
__________________
"I spent 90% of my money on women, cars, and booze. The other 10% I wasted."
TheRoadWarrior is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2012, 04:09 AM   #90
Banned

 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Fresno , Ca
Posts: 320
Drives: 2003 cl55 amg, 2008 Range Rover Sport SC
Your quote is stupid! Ahahha what a looser
559cl55amg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2012, 07:25 AM   #91
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
hyperion667's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 7,998
Drives: 2011 E5504M, 2012 CLS63P30, 2007 997 TT
face what?? lame ??? gamers get lives what??
what's is LOOSER??
__________________


hyperion667 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2012, 09:50 AM   #92
Junior Member
 
Yawnald's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 24
Drives: CL55 AMG
Listen here: It's fully possible for a stock cl55 and a stock cl65 to be running side by side to 60-80 or so. Traction issues are the cause. At the 1/4, if the 65 is behind (it won't be), it'll be GOBBLING up the distance. In my experience, the 65, all things being equal, will trap between 8-10 MPH higher than the 55. While you MAY be able to hang from stoplight to stoplight in a quick 0-~60 jaunt, the 65 will pull the hell out of you on the top. Same goes for a tuned 600.

Respect the v12tt cars, or they'll make you look like a fool.
__________________
2004 CL55
Almandine Black
Yawnald is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2012, 12:03 AM   #93
Junior Member
 
TheRoadWarrior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 44
Drives: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by 559cl55amg View Post
Your quote is stupid! Ahahha what a looser
The irony is delicious
__________________
"I spent 90% of my money on women, cars, and booze. The other 10% I wasted."
TheRoadWarrior is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2012, 03:55 AM   #94
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
benz_addict's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,816
Drives: V12TT
Quote:
Originally Posted by 559cl55amg View Post



FROM DEEP DISH RIMS TO CONCAVE!!!! CHECK OUT PICS LET ME KNOW WHAT YA THINK?
Don't like them.



























I think a certain word beginning with the letter "H" is about to be said by the OP
__________________

S600 V12TT - S65 cluster, S65 exhaust, Brabus ABC ELM, delimited

Last edited by benz_addict; 04-30-2012 at 03:57 AM.
benz_addict is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2012, 12:35 AM   #95
Senior Member
 
AZBENZ-CTSV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 446
Drives: MERCEDES SL600 (MODDED)LAMBORGHINI GALLARDO SPIDER MERCEDES E55 (MODDED) PORSCHE 911 TURBO S
Quote:
Originally Posted by Benz-O-Rama View Post
Well, I was right there with you, until the highlighted portion.

But yes, a stock 600 is quicker than a stock 55K, regardless of what MB or the magazines state. The 600 cars were grossly underrated by MB, so they didn't undercut themselves on sales of the 55K AMG cars.

A tuned 600 is indeed quicker than a stock 65
A tuned 65 is marginally quicker, if any, than a tuned 600.

Case in point is my tuned SL600 that is the current 1/4mile record holder at 11.02@126mph. A stock SL65 runs about 11.50-.60@123-124, and a tuned SL65 runs 11.00-.10


Either way, it's quite obvious that the OP will never be educated by any of us on the V12TT platform. He can't even formulate a proper sentence, and has no idea how to use grammar.

So, OP....enjoy your new wheels.
QUOTED for da troof
and the concave wheels look great! i think they look better on the SL'S but still a better look on the CL'S than most wheel set ups i've seen.
__________________

Last edited by AZBENZ-CTSV; 06-19-2012 at 12:38 AM.
AZBENZ-CTSV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2012, 12:57 PM   #96
Senior Member
 
M1RAG3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Trinidad & Tobago / Canada
Posts: 292
Drives: CLS550 AMG Pkg.
X_TH3_M1RAG3_X
wheels look good mang
__________________
W219 CLS 550 AMG Package - Iridium Silver
[x] Concept One CS5.0 Matte Black Machined [20x9,20x10.5 on 255/30 and 305/25]
[x] ProgRama ELM v2
[x] 55tech 1-Fin Grille
[x] Carbon Fiber Front Lip
[x] Painted Headlight Housings
[x] 6K HID Fogs
[x] 6K LED Parking Lights & Plate Lights
[x] Custom Audio
[ ] 6K All-LED Interior: coming soon

MBWorld.org Gun Owners Club Member #110
M1RAG3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2012, 12:51 AM   #97
Banned

 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Fresno , Ca
Posts: 320
Drives: 2003 cl55 amg, 2008 Range Rover Sport SC
appreciate the love guys. Some people just can't appreciate.
559cl55amg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2012, 04:33 AM   #98
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Bay area
Posts: 187
Drives: CL55
Here's one...just look at the dash, CL55 has 200 on the dash, CL600 160----they are pretty even stock, the 600 has a lot more HP potential with a simple tune, however it is not an ///AMG car. no big brakes, no AMG performance----55=sport 600=luxury sure you can make a 600 a lot faster with less tuning, but the 55 has a lot more performance that comes with the car already. This was a hard choice when I was in the market for a CL, but I ended up with a 55 vs the 600 for the simple fact that its a ///AMG. Cheers

Last edited by N.cali CL55club; 06-20-2012 at 04:37 AM.
N.cali CL55club is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2012, 02:17 PM   #99
Senior Member
 
iAMGod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 417
Drives: 996tt
Quote:
Originally Posted by 559cl55amg View Post
Right. But how sad 4 more cylinders and can't beat the 55k stock? I find it sad that a simple tune is needed to beat me. Wow!! What a waist
The logic is strong in this one...
__________________
http://mbworld.org/forums/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=182034&dateline=13389  23233
iAMGod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2012, 06:42 PM   #100
Senior Member
 
AZBENZ-CTSV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 446
Drives: MERCEDES SL600 (MODDED)LAMBORGHINI GALLARDO SPIDER MERCEDES E55 (MODDED) PORSCHE 911 TURBO S
Quote:
Originally Posted by N.cali CL55club View Post
Here's one...just look at the dash, CL55 has 200 on the dash, CL600 160----they are pretty even stock, the 600 has a lot more HP potential with a simple tune, however it is not an ///AMG car. no big brakes, no AMG performance----55=sport 600=luxury sure you can make a 600 a lot faster with less tuning, but the 55 has a lot more performance that comes with the car already. This was a hard choice when I was in the market for a CL, but I ended up with a 55 vs the 600 for the simple fact that its a ///AMG. Cheers
Good points. The interior on the 600's looks much nicer IMO
and as has been stated a $1,000 tune get's you 65 power and then some
__________________
AZBENZ-CTSV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2012, 06:42 PM
 
 
 
Reply

Tags
adv1, amg, cl55, cl63, deep, dish, iforged, mercedes, monaco, pics, pictures, rims, sport, type, vertini, wheels



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:41 AM.


Copyright © 2001-2012 InternetBrands, Inc. / MBWorld.org. All Rights Reserved.
Everyone's Personal Details

SEO by vBSEO 3.5.2