CL55 AMG, CL65 AMG, CL63 AMG (C215, C216) 2000 - 2014 (Two Generations)

ABC replacement with standard suspension

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 02-11-2016, 01:40 AM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
chazcon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Left Coast
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2002 Mercedes-Benz CL55 AMG
ABC replacement with standard suspension

Where did I see a thread here about a guy who replaced his ABC system with standard struts, anti-roll bars and the pump with a single PS pump? IS that a valid possibility for these cars or do you end up with a poorly handling machine?
Old 02-11-2016, 07:52 AM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Welwynnick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Welwyn, Herts, UK
Posts: 2,605
Received 328 Likes on 265 Posts
2006 S600
Of course you end up with a poor handling machine, why do you think they fitted ABC?

The W215, 216, 220 & 221 were all designed around self-levelling suspension (be it air or hydraulic) so they don't have enough travel to work properly with passive suspension.

But some people want a car that never goes wrong, and of course they can have what they want.

There are lots of threads about this - just do a google search for Mercedes abc.

https://mbworld.org/forums/sl-class-...-complete.html

Nick

Last edited by Welwynnick; 02-12-2016 at 09:24 AM.
Old 02-11-2016, 10:30 AM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
BlownV8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: In my garage
Posts: 8,424
Received 1,003 Likes on 810 Posts
E55, GLS450, GL63, GLE350
Put it this way, if it keeps more CL's, and SL's on the road, I'm all for the conversion. I will convert my SL when there is a good conversion offered for the V12 models. Right now, there is nothing that's proven. The SL/CL 550 has been available without ABC for a few years so to say it won't handle well without ABC is not 100% correct. BMW and Porsche make great suspensions on their cars without the use of hydraulics. MB adds a layer of complexity there that it doesn't need. There are better and more reliable suspension products on the market. Look at the Cadillac magnetic ride control. It's so good even Ferrari uses it.
Old 02-11-2016, 12:58 PM
  #4  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Welwynnick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Welwyn, Herts, UK
Posts: 2,605
Received 328 Likes on 265 Posts
2006 S600
BMW and Porsche DO use active suspension systems. They're just not called ABC.

Nick
Old 02-11-2016, 06:10 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
fastlife23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: chicago
Posts: 319
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
Cl 65
Originally Posted by BlownV8
Put it this way, if it keeps more CL's, and SL's on the road, I'm all for the conversion. I will convert my SL when there is a good conversion offered for the V12 models. Right now, there is nothing that's proven. The SL/CL 550 has been available without ABC for a few years so to say it won't handle well without ABC is not 100% correct. BMW and Porsche make great suspensions on their cars without the use of hydraulics. MB adds a layer of complexity there that it doesn't need. There are better and more reliable suspension products on the market. Look at the Cadillac magnetic ride control. It's so good even Ferrari uses it.
Absolutely 100% agree with you though I like the fact they do use the abc system which makes the 65 affordable to me. I make a great living but I like to keep my money not **** it away. If the cl/sl had a conventional suspension theres no doubt it would be worth twice as much.

Wrenching is not as fun as driving I don't care what any one says.
Old 02-11-2016, 08:06 PM
  #6  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
BlownV8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: In my garage
Posts: 8,424
Received 1,003 Likes on 810 Posts
E55, GLS450, GL63, GLE350
Originally Posted by Welwynnick
BMW and Porsche DO use active suspension systems. They're just not called ABC.

Nick
Yep but they don't use hydraulic lines attached to a crank driven pump.
Old 02-12-2016, 09:08 AM
  #7  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Welwynnick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Welwyn, Herts, UK
Posts: 2,605
Received 328 Likes on 265 Posts
2006 S600
Are you guessing, or is that just wishful thinking?

Do you think its only Mercedes owners that suffer complex, expensive, unreliable systems?

Nick
Old 02-12-2016, 09:39 AM
  #8  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
BlownV8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: In my garage
Posts: 8,424
Received 1,003 Likes on 810 Posts
E55, GLS450, GL63, GLE350
Originally Posted by Welwynnick
Are you guessing, or is that just wishful thinking?

Do you think its only Mercedes owners that suffer complex, expensive, unreliable systems?

Nick
If BMW and Porsche use a crank driven hydraulic pump for their suspensions, please correct me if I'm wrong. Most of their suspension electronically adjust the damper and rebound via an electronic valve inside of the shock. BMW uses active stabilizers on the axels to counteract body roll but I believe that is electro hydraulic. Again, educate me if I'm wrong.
Old 02-12-2016, 11:33 AM
  #9  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Welwynnick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Welwyn, Herts, UK
Posts: 2,605
Received 328 Likes on 265 Posts
2006 S600
Do any these parts look familiar?


180 bar tandem pump:




Valve block:



Valve solenoid:





Hydraulic hoses:





They look like ABC parts, but actually they're all from BMWs.


Electronic damper valves? That would be a success on the part of somebody's marketing department if a car enthusiast thought that was active suspension. Mercedes use electronic damper control as well, but its not ABC. Active suspension is where engine power is used to dynamically compensate for body roll. It does not dynamically stiffen either the springs or the dampers in response to what the car is doing, neither of which can eliminate body roll. Active suspension can (depending on how its implemented - for example BMW and Land Rover only eliminate body roll up to about 0.5 - 0.6g) and it can do it while still using soft springs and dampers.


There's no avoiding that its a complex and expensive system, though Porsche and BMW take a simpler approach by using active anti-roll bars. That means there are only two channels instead of four (so its cheaper) and the active components don't bear the weight of the car. Therefore failures aren't as catastrophic as they are with ABC. Incidentally, Mercedes also have a cheaper active anti-roll bar system; its called Active Curve System.

Nick
Old 02-12-2016, 02:36 PM
  #10  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
BlownV8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: In my garage
Posts: 8,424
Received 1,003 Likes on 810 Posts
E55, GLS450, GL63, GLE350
I know BMW had hydraulics on their older models. Is that from a recent BMW and do they still use the system?
Old 02-12-2016, 03:38 PM
  #11  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Welwynnick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Welwyn, Herts, UK
Posts: 2,605
Received 328 Likes on 265 Posts
2006 S600
Here's the current 650i F12 configuration, which is still hydraulic.

http://bmwfans.info/parts-catalog/F1...dynamic_drive/
Old 02-12-2016, 09:41 PM
  #12  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
BlownV8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: In my garage
Posts: 8,424
Received 1,003 Likes on 810 Posts
E55, GLS450, GL63, GLE350
Thanks for the info. Scratch BMW with the hydraulic system off the list of future cars........
Old 02-13-2016, 04:48 AM
  #13  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Welwynnick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Welwyn, Herts, UK
Posts: 2,605
Received 328 Likes on 265 Posts
2006 S600
Ironically funny, that. If I was EVER to move over from a Mercedes S600, it would probably be to a BMW 550i or 650i manual with dynamic drive. Nothing else.

Nick

Last edited by Welwynnick; 02-14-2016 at 06:12 AM.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: ABC replacement with standard suspension



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:58 AM.