Go Back   MBWorld.org Forums > Mercedes-Benz SUVs, Trucks, Vans, Diesels, Other > Diesel Forum
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?
Register Photos FAQ Members Insurance Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read CarsGarageVendors
Welcome to MBWorld.org Forums

Diesel Forum Forum for Diesel engine vehicle related discussion

Reply
 
 
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Rating: Thread Rating: 3 votes, 3.67 average. Display Modes
Old 04-30-2008, 04:45 PM   #101
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 131
Drives: C200cdi
Quote:
Originally Posted by gaiex View Post
I also have chiptune by MBPower, and I'm not an engine expert to know everything is done to my engine, but what I know its all well done
Yes, it a “great secret”, what the tuners do to our cars.
That’s why it is so difficult to compare,
no, it is practically impossible for common user to compare different chips.
We must only trust.
It does not seem so good, or what do you think ?


Most compares power, the bigger, the better (chip).
Personally, I don’t think so.
For me, good workmanship indicator could be for instance that tuner limits the torque/power to certain level, which technics can last.

The fact is, that technical features makes the true limits for outcoming power.
No reprogrammer can go over these limits, in real life.
There is always a common sense explanation to every power increase.
Or if not, it is not true.
To remove this ad, register today or login if you already are registered!

tuikku is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2008, 03:57 PM   #102
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
gaiex's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 1,385
Drives: '03 C220CDI SC// '04 AUDI A6 3.0TDI// '07 AUDI R8 4.2FSI// '08 C220CDI AMG// '08 CLK320CDI SPORT
Send a message via MSN to gaiex
Here are some graphs for Analise, box Carlsson vs MBpower chip tuned of my car...

Carlsson announced 170Hp and 390Nm but where did they go!?? (164Hp and 348Nm)

Carlsson
Click the image to open in full size.

MBpower
Click the image to open in full size.
gaiex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2008, 01:24 PM   #103
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 131
Drives: C200cdi
.
Nice curves.
Especially torque-curve is good.
No peak, and max is over 2000rpm.
Max power is also “in good place”.
No smoke yet.

You had two different dyno-days.
Start levels are different.
Power increase is about same.
If the dyno tells the truth, it is an accident.
The power-difference between reference and tuned is important.

There are few percents fault always.
I am not going to explain, too many words, that I don’t know.
Maybe some “native-English” can help.

Even couple of percents difference is quite noticeable.
This my car have over hundred dynoruns.
I have had very different amount of power, with exactly same consistence.
But I think, that 190kw, might be near truth.
Everything you want between 250-270.


I mean this, when I wrote “start-level”.
Click the image to open in full size.
Click the image to open in full size.
tuikku is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2008, 03:32 PM   #104
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 131
Drives: C200cdi
.
Little about torque.

The chiptuning problem is, that low-end torque increases too much, easily.
More than flywheel and clutch can stand.
High low-end torque stresses technics very much.
So, it is very easy to have too much torque, and it is quite challenging to limit it without loosing max power.
But it is possible.

The highest torque is not the “evidence of good workmanship”, but the right amount of it is.
It is quite same thing about max revs.
When max power rpm,s comes clearly under 4000rpm, there is too long spraying-time or too little air-flow.
Practically, thermal stress goes up at the same time as max power rpm,s goes down.
Yes, little more power and much more smoke.
Turbo don’t like that.

“~20%-law”, is, in fact quite good.
When you compares reference-level and tuned-level.
There are exceptions, but also “common sense” explanations to them.

Different shape torque curves
Click the image to open in full size.

Blue = stock
Red = Chiptuned
Green = Well tuned
Black = Hopefully my engine.

I have tried to “build” that kind of torque-curve to my engine.
Enough torque to low revs, but the max in quite high revs, when engine already runs more smoothly.
Controlling the boost pressure rising speed, is one “key”.
Boost pressure rising curve = low-end torque rising curve.
When boost pressure reach the max level, fuelling level do it also.
.

Last edited by tuikku; 05-02-2008 at 06:21 PM.
tuikku is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2008, 08:17 PM   #105
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
gaiex's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 1,385
Drives: '03 C220CDI SC// '04 AUDI A6 3.0TDI// '07 AUDI R8 4.2FSI// '08 C220CDI AMG// '08 CLK320CDI SPORT
Send a message via MSN to gaiex
When I did the chiptune I asked to make the car similiar to the Carlsson box (first dyno) but to improve it at high rpms.
Off course it had improved in all rpm, and the car feels a lot diferent, much much better now.

Soon I will have new Intercooler and turbo, and then I will ask for different setup, better, but based on the one I have, few changes
gaiex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2008, 12:07 PM   #106
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 131
Drives: C200cdi
.
Click the image to open in full size.


Work two holes and threads in flange.
The other is for K-type-thermo-sensor.
-> EGT
The other for 4mm metal pipe.
-> EGP

Good luck !
Maybe you need AMG-injectors, too.
But we will see.
tuikku is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2008, 06:02 AM   #107
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 131
Drives: C200cdi
.
A good friend of mine dynoed his car (E220cdi A) yesterday.
560nm torque, but “only” nearly same power, than mine.
He has little different program, more spraying time.
It gives more torque.

It really seems, that 240D.. was right.
So, this Garrett map is quite realistic.
I need bigger charger.
And I might have found it, it is already here, in Finland.
tuikku is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2008, 02:07 PM   #108
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Federal Heights, CO
Posts: 1,116
Drives: 1982 300D VNT, 1980 240D 3.0T, 1982 300TD
Quote:
Originally Posted by tuikku View Post
It really seems, that 240D.. was right.
So, this Garrett map is quite realistic.
A 2259? Don't you already have a 2359 which has a bigger turbine wheel?
240D 3.0T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2008, 02:31 PM   #109
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 131
Drives: C200cdi
Quote:
Originally Posted by 240D 3.0T View Post
A 2259? Don't you already have a 2359 which has a bigger turbine wheel?
Yes, exhaust side is ok.
That is not the problem.

It is compressor air flow capacity, especially under high pressure.

Problem, or problem….
GT2359 is surely a good charger.
I recommend it also to you.
Works very well, even with simple mechanical control.
tuikku is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2008, 09:17 AM   #110
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 131
Drives: C200cdi
.
Hopefully I have solved the turbo-problem.

I get Garrett 3067 VNT hybrid charger.
Turbine wheel is 1mm larger, than now.
That is ok.
Compressor wheel comes similar than this.
That is excellent to my purpose.

Last edited by tuikku; 05-10-2008 at 07:46 AM.
tuikku is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2008, 09:20 AM   #111
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,332
Drives: 2006 E320 CDi, 2008 3/4 Ton Suburban, 2007 "rice rickshaw" Accord 5 speed
Quote:
Originally Posted by tuikku View Post
Yes, exhaust side is ok.
That is not the problem.

It is compressor air flow capacity, especially under high pressure.

Problem, or problem….
GT2359 is surely a good charger.
I recommend it also to you.
Works very well, even with simple mechanical control.
Tuikku,

Do you have any suggestions to soup up my 2006 E320 CDi (straight six, not Bluetec)? I do not wish to be too radical and want a daily driver which can easily be converted back to stock when it comes time to sell.

For example:

Bigger injectors.
Bigger intercooler (though I can see no room for a bigger one)
Single side exit exhaust immediately after the catalyst.
Carlsson tuning box.

Your comments please.
harkgar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2008, 03:08 PM   #112
LOB
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 53
Drives: CLK 270CDi
Quote:
Originally Posted by harkgar View Post
Tuikku,

Do you have any suggestions to soup up my 2006 E320 CDi (straight six, not Bluetec)? I do not wish to be too radical and want a daily driver which can easily be converted back to stock when it comes time to sell.

For example:

Bigger injectors.
Bigger intercooler (though I can see no room for a bigger one)
Single side exit exhaust immediately after the catalyst.
Carlsson tuning box.

Your comments please.
Forget the carlsson tuning box!! A specified chiptuning is much better
LOB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2008, 04:41 PM   #113
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Federal Heights, CO
Posts: 1,116
Drives: 1982 300D VNT, 1980 240D 3.0T, 1982 300TD
Quote:
Originally Posted by tuikku View Post
I get Garrett 3067 VNT hybrid charger.
Turbine wheel is 1mm larger, than now.
Where did you find it and what make/model of vehicle is it used on?
240D 3.0T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2008, 08:01 AM   #114
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 131
Drives: C200cdi
Quote:
Originally Posted by harkgar View Post
Tuikku,

Do you have any suggestions to soup up my 2006 E320 CDi (straight six, not Bluetec)? I do not wish to be too radical and want a daily driver which can easily be converted back to stock when it comes time to sell.

For example:

Bigger injectors.
Bigger intercooler (though I can see no room for a bigger one)
Single side exit exhaust immediately after the catalyst.
Carlsson tuning box.

Your comments please.

As LOB says, reprogramming might be the best alternative for you.
With "hard" chip, that engine gives ~270kw, ++600nm.
And works still very reliable.
It is very close to charger limit.
Bigger injectors cannot give much more.
Exhaust pipe is enough big.
Bigger cooler is always a good purchase.
If there are not any tuner there, maybe then the only alternative is sent the ECU-box here, in Europe.

Your job is only drive and enjoy and make the front wheels suffer.


Charger is originally used on Hino-diesel-engines.
Trucks.
tuikku is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2008, 09:26 PM   #115
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 108
Drives: 2001 E320 Avant turbo diesel
Hi, Just wondering are the parts interchangable to the point of being able to put smaller injectors on .. say if you wanted to save the planet and some money on fuel... and does the charger have a adjustable blow of valve if so where is it.. I would like to make my cars dump louder .. I am not to bothered if it sacrifaces a few horseys
ncd20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2008, 09:30 PM   #116
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Federal Heights, CO
Posts: 1,116
Drives: 1982 300D VNT, 1980 240D 3.0T, 1982 300TD
There is no such thing as a Diesel blow off valve.
240D 3.0T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2008, 09:33 PM   #117
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 108
Drives: 2001 E320 Avant turbo diesel
Quote:
Originally Posted by 240D 3.0T View Post
There is no such thing as a Diesel blow off valve.
so what is it officially called?
ncd20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2008, 09:35 PM   #118
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Federal Heights, CO
Posts: 1,116
Drives: 1982 300D VNT, 1980 240D 3.0T, 1982 300TD
There is no such device on the engine that does anything like that.
240D 3.0T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2008, 09:39 PM   #119
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 108
Drives: 2001 E320 Avant turbo diesel
Quote:
Originally Posted by 240D 3.0T View Post
There is no such device on the engine that does anything like that.
well there is something on mine ... when I drive down the road any change in throttle and WHEEE PPSSST and smaller ones on gear changes
ncd20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2008, 04:28 AM   #120
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 131
Drives: C200cdi
Quote:
Originally Posted by ncd20 View Post
well there is something on mine ... when I drive down the road any change in throttle and WHEEE PPSSST and smaller ones on gear changes
Maybe boost pressure leaks “out”.
Check air hoses, and cooler.

240D.. is right.
Any extra valve in air-hoses is against diesel engine working principals.
Diesel needs air-surplus.
“Non-smoke” bases on that.
tuikku is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2008, 06:15 AM   #121
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 108
Drives: 2001 E320 Avant turbo diesel
Quote:
Originally Posted by tuikku View Post
Maybe boost pressure leaks “out”.
Check air hoses, and cooler.

240D.. is right.
Any extra valve in air-hoses is against diesel engine working principals.
Diesel needs air-surplus.
“Non-smoke” bases on that.
wow... Prehaps ... but you really do hear the turbo wind up and then a little vent to atmosphere I suppose it could be a leak but this car has every service stamp right up to the mileage I baught it.. and was under the belief the motor was indeed in very good shape

and when my pal was driving behind me he was saying there was allot of white/grey smoke when I had the hammer down.. I never get black smoke, or smoke at all at low speeds
and there is no venting at high speed..

its a shame its not in the design because it really is quite cool reving up next to a sti and hearing a actuall blowing off sound and then watch the jaw drop and you leave him in a cloud of diesel smoke heheh yep we are always picking on you STI drivers thats what you get for driving a road going rally car

Last edited by ncd20; 05-12-2008 at 06:32 AM.
ncd20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2008, 07:33 AM   #122
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 108
Drives: 2001 E320 Avant turbo diesel
ok I had a look under the hood and gues what I can see the valve mounted on a bracket and a actuator going to it from the turbo.. also a vacume line comes back to block off vacume nipples and on the bottom of that another vacume line goes down to a thing that looks like fish tank filter/fuel filter but instead of going some where it just has what looks like a peice of cork in it !! ??
The Valve is incrusted with oil and **** so I will steam clean it later!!
ncd20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2008, 03:39 PM   #123
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
gaiex's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 1,385
Drives: '03 C220CDI SC// '04 AUDI A6 3.0TDI// '07 AUDI R8 4.2FSI// '08 C220CDI AMG// '08 CLK320CDI SPORT
Send a message via MSN to gaiex
tuikku, can you tell me the differences between the 200cdi and 220cdi please? have they the same engine etc.?
gaiex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2008, 02:28 AM   #124
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 131
Drives: C200cdi
.
Same age engines are equal.
Only difference is program.
You can self check it here.

Same age 200cdi A = 220cdi A.
(Difference is in program)

Only real difference, that matters, is between same age 200/220 man. transmission models.
220cdi has stronger clutch/flywheel.
tuikku is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2008, 04:33 PM   #125
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 131
Drives: C200cdi
.
What´s up about LOB´s turbo-project ?

My new hybrid-charger is almost ready.
tuikku is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2008, 04:33 PM
 
 
 
Reply

Tags
2006, 530d, burn, canada, cdi, chip, class, e320, e320cdi, injector, maf, mercedes, mod, mods, om647, smoke, tuning



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:45 PM.


Copyright © 2001-2012 InternetBrands, Inc. / MBWorld.org. All Rights Reserved.
Everyone's Personal Details

SEO by vBSEO 3.5.2