Go Back   MBWorld.org Forums > Mercedes-Benz Sedans > E-Class (W124)
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?
Register Photos FAQ Members Insurance Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read CarsGarageVendors
Welcome to MBWorld.org Forums


E-Class (W124) 1984-1995: E 260, E 300, E 320, E 420, E 500 (Includes CE, T, TD models)

Reply
 
 
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 04-25-2012, 06:02 PM   #1
Newbie

 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Colorado
Posts: 12
Drives: 1988 Mercedes-Benz 300E
Smile 88 300E Cold Air Intake Project

so i have been researching air intake options for my 88 300E because A: I dont like the look of the stock air cleaner B:i want to attempt to improve my performance.

ive seen a few people pull this off but they placed the filter in an ugly position where there is little to no air flow my idea is to run my pipe over the valve cover and place the filter behind a custom heat shield near the passenger side head light. i was thinking of fabricating an air duct under the bumper to divert air to my filter.
i think this may work and im gonna give it my best shot. has anybody else attempted this?
To remove this ad, register today or login if you already are registered!

Jesse88300e is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2012, 06:52 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 406
Drives: 86 W124
If you search around, you'll find that you should keep it as is, but if you'd like to make it better, a snorkel is the only thing that actually works.
__________________
86 300e, 192k, Smoke Silver/Palominohhh
ptoro01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2012, 06:59 PM   #3
Newbie

 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Colorado
Posts: 12
Drives: 1988 Mercedes-Benz 300E
Quote:
Originally Posted by ptoro01 View Post
If you search around, you'll find that you should keep it as is, but if you'd like to make it better, a snorkel is the only thing that actually works.
it seems that most of the info i found says it doesnt really make a performance difference, just visual. some people said that the stock cleaner muffles to sound of the engine and it sounds better without. I might try it just for the hell of it.

thanx for the info though, i'll look into the snorkle idea for sure.
Jesse88300e is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2012, 07:58 PM   #4
Super Member

 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 992
You're NOT going to improve the performance at all.

You might improve the aesthetics (according to you) but at the loss of what?!?!?!
__________________
'O=00=O'
BMW 2002. LONG LIVE THE LEGEND.
neanderthal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2012, 08:14 PM   #5
Newbie

 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Colorado
Posts: 12
Drives: 1988 Mercedes-Benz 300E
Quote:
Originally Posted by neanderthal View Post
You're NOT going to improve the performance at all.

You might improve the aesthetics (according to you) but at the loss of what?!?!?!
Wow calm down...didn't I just say that this will more than likely NOT IMPROVE MY PERFORMANCE.
This is something I am going to ATTEMPT, its just an EXPERIMENT on MY vehicle.

There are a lot of very nice, very helpful people on this site and I appreciate everyone who takes the time to answer my stupid questions. But don't act like I'm an idiot just because I wanna try something different.
Jesse88300e is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2012, 09:26 PM   #6
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 1,352
Drives: 1992 500E
Cold Air Intakes have been discussed, at length, before.

Try this link for a thread with the Poster Boy of Dysfunctional Posters, Zach1328.


300E performance upgrades
__________________


1992 500E
190E 16V is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2012, 10:08 PM   #7
MBWorld Fanatic!

 
Saijin_Naib's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: New Jersey, USA
Posts: 4,830
Drives: 1990 300ce 24v I6
brett.edmond.carlock Brett_E_Carlock brett-edmond-carlock Synper311
Send a message via AIM to Saijin_Naib Send a message via MSN to Saijin_Naib Send a message via Skype™ to Saijin_Naib
Jesse, I'm toying around with the same idea. However, the important thing to note is that the w124 already comes stock with a cold-air-intake, so as noted above, improved performance is likely impossible.

All you can do is unrestrict it a bit by changing the airbox and make it a colder air intake (as I did) by insulating it with some high R-Factor insulation wrap. Another alternative is to use partitions to partition it off from the rest of the bay.

I'm going to work this summer on making a "track-kit" intake that will bypass the stock airbox and bolt straight to the throttle body. Reason? I want to hear the intake noise.

Go ahead & experiment
Saijin_Naib is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2012, 11:32 PM   #8
Newbie

 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Colorado
Posts: 12
Drives: 1988 Mercedes-Benz 300E
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saijin_Naib View Post
Jesse, I'm toying around with the same idea. However, the important thing to note is that the w124 already comes stock with a cold-air-intake, so as noted above, improved performance is likely impossible.

All you can do is unrestrict it a bit by changing the airbox and make it a colder air intake (as I did) by insulating it with some high R-Factor insulation wrap. Another alternative is to use partitions to partition it off from the rest of the bay.

I'm going to work this summer on making a "track-kit" intake that will bypass the stock airbox and bolt straight to the throttle body. Reason? I want to hear the intake noise.

Go ahead & experiment
Thank you. That's all I needed to hear. I like your track kit idea I'd be curious to learn more on how one could accomplish this. Looking forward to pics when you get started.
Jesse88300e is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2012, 03:44 AM   #9
Super Member

 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 992
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jesse88300e View Post
Wow calm down...didn't I just say that this will more than likely NOT IMPROVE MY PERFORMANCE.
This is something I am going to ATTEMPT, its just an EXPERIMENT on MY vehicle.

There are a lot of very nice, very helpful people on this site and I appreciate everyone who takes the time to answer my stupid questions. But don't act like I'm an idiot just because I wanna try something different.

Suit yourself.
Those of us who have been on this board long enough have seen the millions of threads from new owners about increasing the power and all that. None of it works. You think AMG and everybody else bored out the engines because they wanted to go one step bigger or because there weren't significant gains by just changing the cam, the intake, and headers, using a high perfomance exhaust, like you'd do on a BMW or a Japanese car?

The M103 does NOT sound sexy. You're going to get more noise. It's not going to be sexy noise. If that is what you want, go for it.
__________________
'O=00=O'
BMW 2002. LONG LIVE THE LEGEND.
neanderthal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2012, 11:48 AM   #10
MBWorld Fanatic!

 
Saijin_Naib's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: New Jersey, USA
Posts: 4,830
Drives: 1990 300ce 24v I6
brett.edmond.carlock Brett_E_Carlock brett-edmond-carlock Synper311
Send a message via AIM to Saijin_Naib Send a message via MSN to Saijin_Naib Send a message via Skype™ to Saijin_Naib
M104 sounds pretty hot though

Is the m103 really that different in sound?
Saijin_Naib is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2012, 02:52 PM   #11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 406
Drives: 86 W124
I have a K&N in there, not for performance but cause its a cost-wise clean able filter, and yes it does sound a bit different. The engine vacuum isn't muffled as much. It's subtle enough, mostly on releasing the throttle fast, as it recoils..

If you want a colder engine bay, get a new fan clutch and hood vents....

As I keep repeating, fix the wear items! Your engine air intake will work its best if there are no vacuum leaks; all the rubber vacuum hoses, properly sealing valves, a good camshaft...

The M103 is different in not having variable cam timing, it screams as opposed to grumbles...
__________________
86 300e, 192k, Smoke Silver/Palominohhh
ptoro01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2012, 05:54 PM   #12
Super Member

 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 992
Way way way back when I used to be a mechanic, the shop manager and body shop manager raced a 300GE in rallies. This was in Africa.

That thing sounded marginally better than a tractor. Bone stock engine, modified intake and exhaust. The mods were more for water fording than power.
__________________
'O=00=O'
BMW 2002. LONG LIVE THE LEGEND.
neanderthal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2012, 04:00 PM   #13
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
RBYCC's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: REHOBOTH BEACH DE
Posts: 2,330
Drives: 88-300CE TWIN TURBO, 99-C43, 05-G55K, 71-280SL, 94-E320 CAB, 08 CLK63 BLACK SERIES
M103'S don't sound that bad..............

__________________
TURBOTECHNICS TWIN TURBO M103 300CE WIDEBODY


1971 280SL
1988 300CE TT
1994 E320 CABRIOLET
1999 C43 AMG
2005 G55K AMG
2008 CLK63 BLACK SERIES AMG
RBYCC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2012, 05:42 PM   #14
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 288
Drives: 300E W124, 300E W124 3.4 AMG, Audi S3 2002
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saijin_Naib View Post
M104 sounds pretty hot though
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oRCVtjcyV8w

Is the m103 really that different in sound?
Brett i beleive the sound clip is from an HFM M104...totally diferrent story that our M104 CIS.
chlippo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2012, 09:12 PM   #15
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
2PHAST's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 1,195
Drives: 500E Signal Rot
Quote:
Originally Posted by 190E 16V View Post
Cold Air Intakes have been discussed, at length, before.

Try this link for a thread with the Poster Boy of Dysfunctional Posters, Zach1328.


300E performance upgrades
**** me! That thread was painfull to read.

Someone needs to give Zach the
__________________
1993 500E
2PHAST is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2012, 12:41 PM   #16
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 1,352
Drives: 1992 500E
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2PHAST View Post
**** me! That thread was painfull to read.

Someone needs to give Zach the
We should make a "Sticky" of it, "Easy & Cheap W124 HP increases"

It just kills me what he has said...

ZACH wrote:
"Don't forget that I-6's are some of the most easily tuned engines ever made. Unlike most cars our engine bases' have plenty of room to stuff parts in there.
I've also been looking at getting the 5.0L V8 from the 500E, but idk how much that would cost."
__________________


1992 500E
190E 16V is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2012, 03:38 PM   #17
RHW
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
RHW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: North NJ
Posts: 1,234
Drives: 94 Wagon and 94 Cabriolet
Was a very funny run with Zach, some Beemer boards are now enduring same.
__________________

1994 S124 in 2012
RHW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2012, 03:38 PM
 
 
 
Reply

Tags
1988, 300ce, 300e, air, bc, benz, cold, features, heat, intake, jobs, mercedes, powered, shield, silver, special, vbulletin



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:31 AM.


Copyright © 2001-2012 InternetBrands, Inc. / MBWorld.org. All Rights Reserved.
Everyone's Personal Details

SEO by vBSEO 3.5.2