E320 CDI Mileage
#26
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
05 E320 CDI
I've been keeping a log of my fuel consumption of my 2005 E 320 CDI for 3.5 years and about 47000 miles (the car currently has just under 70000 miles on it.) Over that span of time the average fuel economy has been 37.66 MPG, Which I consider pretty impressive. My driving tends to be about 80% highway, usually cruising at 70 mph. This economy was calculated using the (miles driven) / (gallons pumped) technique.
I've attached a graph of the data I've collected. The blue line is the MPG calculated at each fillup. The red line is a sliding average of the last 5 tanks. This tends to smooth out the variability due to not filling the tank to the same level each fillup. I normally let the pump run to its automatic shutoff and do not top off.
On long highway drives in good conditions (warm days with no headwind,) the computer will generally show better than 40mpg over 500 miles, and even higher in optimum conditions. The second attachement is a picture of the car's MPG computer taken at the end of a trip from Birmingham, AL to Fort Worth, TX that I made in March. On that particular day, temperatures were 70-80F and I had a 10-15mph tailwind most of the way.
It's interesting to note that back when I started logging data, diesel was $1.959/gal and fuel costs worked out to 5.8 cents per mile driven. At my last fillup, that has risen to $4.499/gal, or 12.5 cents/mile
As a comparison, I also own a Honda Fit Sport with a manual transmission and have been tracking the fuel economy on it, too. Over a 1.75 year period, its average economy is 39.04 MPG. Fuel costs on a per-mile basis is currently 9 cents/mile.
#27
Senior Member
Robert, That mileage is outstanding! The highway driving really helps with the MPG. Nice to see another Texan w/ a CDI.
Jay
Jay
#28
Senior Member
Driving with the toque in diesels is very possible, and works well since there is so much low end torque, and there are not throttling losses at low RPM on a diesel.
As far as highway speed and RPM, this should apply much more to the older I6 5 speed models, since the new 7 speed transmissions keep the highway RPM very low, allowing higher speeds with little affect on fuel consumption.
As far as highway speed and RPM, this should apply much more to the older I6 5 speed models, since the new 7 speed transmissions keep the highway RPM very low, allowing higher speeds with little affect on fuel consumption.
#30
Junior Member
Thread Starter
I don't like to brag, but since you asked...
I've been keeping a log of my fuel consumption of my 2005 E 320 CDI for 3.5 years and about 47000 miles (the car currently has just under 70000 miles on it.) Over that span of time the average fuel economy has been 37.66 MPG, Which I consider pretty impressive. My driving tends to be about 80% highway, usually cruising at 70 mph. This economy was calculated using the (miles driven) / (gallons pumped) technique.
I've been keeping a log of my fuel consumption of my 2005 E 320 CDI for 3.5 years and about 47000 miles (the car currently has just under 70000 miles on it.) Over that span of time the average fuel economy has been 37.66 MPG, Which I consider pretty impressive. My driving tends to be about 80% highway, usually cruising at 70 mph. This economy was calculated using the (miles driven) / (gallons pumped) technique.
That is very meticulous you have statistically recorded your mileage.
Your car appears to return a good mileage. I am at a loss to understand what may be up with my car. I have talked to blackcdi who is also in the bay area and he feels the air filter should be replaced at this point.
My car has 12,500 miles and it has been thro' the flex-A service. I did bring up the air filter with the service advisor at beshoff motors who said air filter is not replaced at 11,500 miles (the time it was in for this service), he said MB recommends replacing it at 25,000 miles for flex-B service.
I am confused what may be going on with my vehicle. It drives well and everything but I can achieve a max mpg of only 29.
One other thing to note, and that may be an important symptom. I do get black soot deposit on the exhaust pipe. I remember seeing an ad of the CDI where a saleman stuck a sandwich near the tailpipe while the engine was running and ate it - proving how clean the exhaust is on the CDI.
If I run a finger around the inside of the tailpipe I get black soot. Is this normal?
thanks,
-terry
#31
Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
2015 GLK 250 BT
terracotta,
What you may be witnessing with the lower mpg, maybe due to intown/city driving. I've noticed the super great mpg (37+) on the highway but once I hit the city streets, the mpg drops pretty quickly. For example, my driving is around 60% city / 40% highway and finding it tough to achieve 24 mpg (my typical). Our CDIs showoff their efficiency at cruising.
What you may be witnessing with the lower mpg, maybe due to intown/city driving. I've noticed the super great mpg (37+) on the highway but once I hit the city streets, the mpg drops pretty quickly. For example, my driving is around 60% city / 40% highway and finding it tough to achieve 24 mpg (my typical). Our CDIs showoff their efficiency at cruising.
#32
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
05 E320 CDI
In normal driving my exhaust is not visible, but under heavy acceleration it is. At night, I can sometimes see my exhaust backlit by following cars even during normal acceleration.
I believe seahonu has a point about city vs highway driving, and around SF I suppose you'll also have to contend with some pretty significant hills, something which is not much of a factor in the part of Texas where I live. You can consume a lot of energy accelerating a 4000 pound vehicle and then turning all that kinetic energy into heat if you drive a lot in stop-and-go traffic. I'm fortunate that on my 40 mile commute to work traffic is such that I can run on cruise control about 75% of the time.
One other thing that I noticed is that when the engine is cold, it is not very efficient, so you pay an additional penalty for short trips that do not allow the engine to properly warm up.
#33
A lot of fuel is wasted during low load and warmup operation in order to warm up the catalytic converter. There is a late injection event that increases exhaust gas temperature without performing much useful work.
#34
Super Member
My measurements are based on calculating from tank fill-ups. The lowest that I've gotten is 23.5 city, the best 40.5 highway. Averages seem to be 26 city and 37 highway. I agree with the above poster that, at least according to the display, economy is better at 70+ than 55.
As an aside, it's amazing how well the CDI is holding its resale value.
As an aside, it's amazing how well the CDI is holding its resale value.
#35
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2013 E350
For comparison purposes only. I have a 2003 E320 with 178,000 miles. My driving is about 70% highway although there is about 10 miles of stop-and-go on the way home.
My summer mileage averages about 28-29mpg. I get about 10% less in the winter when they switch to winter gas.
JK
My summer mileage averages about 28-29mpg. I get about 10% less in the winter when they switch to winter gas.
JK
#38
Junior Member
Thread Starter
#39
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Thanks everybody for sharing the data, keep 'em coming in. I observe that people have quite a range of mileage experience. My commute to work is 11miles one way, of which it is about 8 miles of hwy. with this is get about 27mpg.
But I also did a 700mile trip from portland to SF bayarea (overnight driving), at the time this car had 7500 miles and I got only about 30mpg. That is where I think it should have been much higher.
What kind of a minimum distance would be a true test of hwy mileage?
But I also did a 700mile trip from portland to SF bayarea (overnight driving), at the time this car had 7500 miles and I got only about 30mpg. That is where I think it should have been much higher.
What kind of a minimum distance would be a true test of hwy mileage?
#41
#42
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2005 E320 CDI
#45
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: FL410
Posts: 4,968
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
'05 E320 CDI, '08 BMW X5 4.8i, '11 Duramax 2500HD
I'm in AZ not FL btw... MUCH dryer and nicer in my view than even a 85 degree in Miami!
#46
Super Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
4 Posts
E500 4matic, 2014 GL320, 2013 C300, 2015 Stingray
CDI's in snow...
Guys -
How are your cars in the snow? Sorry - don't mean to hijack this thread but with all the CDI posters here figured i'd get a quick answer!
Aceman
How are your cars in the snow? Sorry - don't mean to hijack this thread but with all the CDI posters here figured i'd get a quick answer!
Aceman
#47
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: FL410
Posts: 4,968
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
'05 E320 CDI, '08 BMW X5 4.8i, '11 Duramax 2500HD
Just spent the worse winter in Columbus OH history with mine and it was GREAT for a RWD car.. nothing like my 4WD X5 would have done, but again.. it's RWD.. I used the C mode on the transmission and it drove and handled well.
Most interestingly, it started right up everytime with less than a 2 second glowplug warmup.
Most interestingly, it started right up everytime with less than a 2 second glowplug warmup.
#48
Almost a Member!
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Michigan, West Side
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2005 E320 CDI
Yesterday I ran 60 miles with a 70 MPH average and got 39 MPG, 76 degrees, no wind. Now i didn't reset it till i was up to speed but the numbers are accurate. There is even a 100 ft. elevation increase over that 60 miles so I am running slightly up hill during a fair portion of it.
I am thrilled with the mileage. If you add in stop and go traffic I average out to around 35 MPG realistically with mostly highway driving.
I am thrilled with the mileage. If you add in stop and go traffic I average out to around 35 MPG realistically with mostly highway driving.
#49
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: FL410
Posts: 4,968
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
'05 E320 CDI, '08 BMW X5 4.8i, '11 Duramax 2500HD
Yesterday I ran 60 miles with a 70 MPH average and got 39 MPG, 76 degrees, no wind. Now i didn't reset it till i was up to speed but the numbers are accurate. There is even a 100 ft. elevation increase over that 60 miles so I am running slightly up hill during a fair portion of it.
I am thrilled with the mileage. If you add in stop and go traffic I average out to around 35 MPG realistically with mostly highway driving.
I am thrilled with the mileage. If you add in stop and go traffic I average out to around 35 MPG realistically with mostly highway driving.
#50
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chicago Suburbs, USA
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2014 E350 4Matic, 2012 Kia Soul+
I was getting 21 out of the gas 350 doing suburban driving. When I started hearing that bluetec was only doing 3-5mpg better, I lost interest in it. With diesel running about $0.50 more than premium, it didn't make economic sense to me.