Staggered wheels on 4matic. Wheel gurus needed!
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Staggered wheels on 4matic. Wheel gurus needed!
Hey everyone, im looking into purchasing some new wheels for my e500 4matic. I found a set I really like but the problem is they're staggered. 19x8 in front and 19x9 in the back. I found two sizes that are super close together.
For the front 235/35/19
Tire diameter is 25.476 in
Circumference 80.035 in
For the back 275/30/19
Diameter 25.496 in
Circumference 80.098 in
Would this setup work without damaging anything or should I move on and find other wheels. Even if it would work im not sure how a 275 tire would look on a 9 inch wheel. Any advice is appreciated!
For the front 235/35/19
Tire diameter is 25.476 in
Circumference 80.035 in
For the back 275/30/19
Diameter 25.496 in
Circumference 80.098 in
Would this setup work without damaging anything or should I move on and find other wheels. Even if it would work im not sure how a 275 tire would look on a 9 inch wheel. Any advice is appreciated!
#2
MBWorld Fanatic!
275 would be fine on a 9 inch wheel, and the rolling diameter is definitely within 1/10th of an inch of each other. 19x8 in the front will be fine and you should have no issues in the back even on 19s, I obviously can't guarantee anything but I think you're good homie.
The only thing to consider is if you do a lot of canyon (mountain?) runs around here then you will increase understeer with a staggered setup since you have less grip in the front, but a 235 is still enough grip that those effects would be minimal.
The only thing to consider is if you do a lot of canyon (mountain?) runs around here then you will increase understeer with a staggered setup since you have less grip in the front, but a 235 is still enough grip that those effects would be minimal.
Last edited by AMGAffalterbach; 10-01-2014 at 07:56 PM.
#3
Normally when you go on TireRack, they have staggered sets where they "believe" would not be detrimental to the car. I did this when i purchased a staggered set for an R129 as the ASR of that vintage car was very picky but with their staggered set, i did not have a problem.
#5
Member
Thread Starter
Well judging by the fact that mercedes puts staggered wheels on the c300 4matic sport relieves my worries.
They use 225/45/17 in front
Diameter: 24.972
Circumference: 78.452
And 245/40/17 in the back
Diameter: 24.717
Circumference: 77.651
My numbers are much closer than those so I should be fine!
They use 225/45/17 in front
Diameter: 24.972
Circumference: 78.452
And 245/40/17 in the back
Diameter: 24.717
Circumference: 77.651
My numbers are much closer than those so I should be fine!
#6
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Cicero IN
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Crossfire SRT6 coupe/Crossfire SRT6 Roadster/MB E350 4 Matic
I run staggered on my e-350, but I run the same size tire. You can't tell the difference, the rears even look wider, but are not. Good luck
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Virginia
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
3 Posts
S211 E350 wagon, w211 e550, 2023 glb250, 2013 Audi q7
Hey did you ever do it ??? I'm looking at 245 35 19 & 285 30 19 Michelin a/s 3 are the only all season tire with the same rpm and overall diameter. I see the 235-275 combo gives me more options with the all seasons for my 350 4matic wagon. Please update me and send some pictures in comfort ride setting as I only have rear self leveling and can't lower the front of the wagon easily.
A BIG THANKS IN ADVANCE !!!
A BIG THANKS IN ADVANCE !!!
Well judging by the fact that mercedes puts staggered wheels on the c300 4matic sport relieves my worries.
They use 225/45/17 in front
Diameter: 24.972
Circumference: 78.452
And 245/40/17 in the back
Diameter: 24.717
Circumference: 77.651
My numbers are much closer than those so I should be fine!
They use 225/45/17 in front
Diameter: 24.972
Circumference: 78.452
And 245/40/17 in the back
Diameter: 24.717
Circumference: 77.651
My numbers are much closer than those so I should be fine!
Trending Topics
#8
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Cicero IN
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Crossfire SRT6 coupe/Crossfire SRT6 Roadster/MB E350 4 Matic
Same size
You have to run the same size like all 245/35/18. Can't change up # s. The stagger makes the rears appear larger.
#10
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: V E G A S
Posts: 9,067
Received 1,729 Likes
on
1,379 Posts
1922 Ford Model T / no OBD
#11
[QUOTE=kajtek1;6625392]
Oh dear lord. If you mean the rpm on the tach. It's revolutions on the engine when a 4-stroke cycle is completed.
Diameter is the same. 8.5/9.5 is the width. If you mean the revolutions of the wheel, it'll be the same too, same diameter same distance to make one perimeter length in circle, Perse same diameter.
Diameter is the same. 8.5/9.5 is the width. If you mean the revolutions of the wheel, it'll be the same too, same diameter same distance to make one perimeter length in circle, Perse same diameter.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Virginia
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
3 Posts
S211 E350 wagon, w211 e550, 2023 glb250, 2013 Audi q7
Lol I'm lost...
I checked rpm' son tire rack and it shows 245/35/19 & 285/30/19 @807 rpm's only with the Michelin A/S 3.
So please explain how the same size tire on a different width wheel would be the same overall diameter/RPMs per mile?
[QUOTE=cMazara;6625428]
Oh dear lord. If you mean the rpm on the tach. It's revolutions on the engine when a 4-stroke cycle is completed.
Diameter is the same. 8.5/9.5 is the width. If you mean the revolutions of the wheel, it'll be the same too, same diameter same distance to make one perimeter length in circle, Perse same diameter.
I checked rpm' son tire rack and it shows 245/35/19 & 285/30/19 @807 rpm's only with the Michelin A/S 3.
So please explain how the same size tire on a different width wheel would be the same overall diameter/RPMs per mile?
[QUOTE=cMazara;6625428]
Oh dear lord. If you mean the rpm on the tach. It's revolutions on the engine when a 4-stroke cycle is completed.
Diameter is the same. 8.5/9.5 is the width. If you mean the revolutions of the wheel, it'll be the same too, same diameter same distance to make one perimeter length in circle, Perse same diameter.
#13
[QUOTE=W211_350WagoN;6625444]Lol I'm lost...
I checked rpm' son tire rack and it shows 245/35/19 & 285/30/19 @807 rpm's only with the Michelin A/S 3.
So please explain how the same size tire on a different width wheel would be the same overall diameter/RPMs per mile?
Ah got it. That's rotation per mile. That'll be 807 tire rotations every mile.
Have to recognize I messed up, in a sense. Was talking only bout the wheel diameter and width.. For the tire size being different there's calculators that give the correct profile in this case.
I checked rpm' son tire rack and it shows 245/35/19 & 285/30/19 @807 rpm's only with the Michelin A/S 3.
So please explain how the same size tire on a different width wheel would be the same overall diameter/RPMs per mile?
Ah got it. That's rotation per mile. That'll be 807 tire rotations every mile.
Have to recognize I messed up, in a sense. Was talking only bout the wheel diameter and width.. For the tire size being different there's calculators that give the correct profile in this case.
#14
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: V E G A S
Posts: 9,067
Received 1,729 Likes
on
1,379 Posts
1922 Ford Model T / no OBD
Tires are build with rubber and rubber is flexible thing.
Not only you have nominal size on standing tire, but that will change under the load, than at speed centrifugal forces will change it as well.
If you pay attention, rpm of the tires is given at certain speed as it is not constant.
Putting the same tire on different width rims will change it profile, but radial tires have a "belt" of fabric that holds the diameter pretty firm, so difference will be negligible.
On diagonal tire they will be different, but who is using those?
Last edited by kajtek1; 11-24-2015 at 10:55 PM.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Virginia
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
3 Posts
S211 E350 wagon, w211 e550, 2023 glb250, 2013 Audi q7
So you suggest I go with 245 all around or the 285 30 at rear?
http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tirete....jsp?techid=18
Tires are build with rubber and rubber is flexible thing.
Not only you have nominal size on standing tire, but that will change under the load, than at speed centrifugal forces will change it as well.
If you pay attention, rpm of the tires is given at certain speed as it is not constant.
Putting the same tire on different width rims will change it profile, but radial tires have a "belt" of fabric that holds the diameter pretty firm, so difference will be negligible.
On diagonal tire they will be different, but who is using those?
Tires are build with rubber and rubber is flexible thing.
Not only you have nominal size on standing tire, but that will change under the load, than at speed centrifugal forces will change it as well.
If you pay attention, rpm of the tires is given at certain speed as it is not constant.
Putting the same tire on different width rims will change it profile, but radial tires have a "belt" of fabric that holds the diameter pretty firm, so difference will be negligible.
On diagonal tire they will be different, but who is using those?
#17
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: V E G A S
Posts: 9,067
Received 1,729 Likes
on
1,379 Posts
1922 Ford Model T / no OBD
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Virginia
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
3 Posts
S211 E350 wagon, w211 e550, 2023 glb250, 2013 Audi q7
That's what I was leaning towards also. But the whole tire staying the same size kind of had me thinking for a sec. Either way I should be doing the staggered and reporting back in on various threads including this one as I put 40-50k miles a year and service most of the car myself.
It's always great speaking with a few people in this community when I need a sec and third opinion.
Thanks guys!!
It's always great speaking with a few people in this community when I need a sec and third opinion.
Thanks guys!!
#20
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: V E G A S
Posts: 9,067
Received 1,729 Likes
on
1,379 Posts
1922 Ford Model T / no OBD
The car has no sensors to "see" the wheel width so the only thing that can make a difference is different rpm.
My hands are dropping down on the subject.
My hands are dropping down on the subject.
#21
Yeah but the car calculates the output needed on every wheel thinking all four corners have the same setup.
imo, If it's just a daily driver and the overall diameter is +o- the same, Then it's good. Use a tire/wheel calculator and compare each front and rear setup so you can have an idea.
imo, If it's just a daily driver and the overall diameter is +o- the same, Then it's good. Use a tire/wheel calculator and compare each front and rear setup so you can have an idea.
#22
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: V E G A S
Posts: 9,067
Received 1,729 Likes
on
1,379 Posts
1922 Ford Model T / no OBD
Computer doesn't calculate output. This is all mechanical and the 35/65% or so split is done by planetary gears. No sensors for computers there.
MB never gave precise data, but owners experience is that you can have 3% rpm difference between the wheels just fine.
Once you go to 5% the first thing to go is Cruise Control.
Than ESP and traction light will start discotheque, while the brakes will get workout.
Common understanding is that 4M is more sensitive to whreels rpm differences than RWD, but I think this is just myth.
MB never gave precise data, but owners experience is that you can have 3% rpm difference between the wheels just fine.
Once you go to 5% the first thing to go is Cruise Control.
Than ESP and traction light will start discotheque, while the brakes will get workout.
Common understanding is that 4M is more sensitive to whreels rpm differences than RWD, but I think this is just myth.
Last edited by kajtek1; 11-25-2015 at 06:30 PM.
The following users liked this post:
Birdienumnum (01-04-2024)