E-Class (W212) 2010 - 2016: E 350, E 550
Old 06-10-2015, 06:49 PM
How-Tos on this Topic
Last edit by: IB Advertising
See related guides and technical advice from our community experts:

Browse all: Engine Diagnostics
Print Wikipost

Direct Injection and Carbon Buildup

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 03-29-2014, 03:47 PM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
shashivr4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2013 E350 Sport Wagon - 4Matic
Direct Injection and Carbon Buildup

So my wife's Lexus IS is having some issues and the dealer is stating that it's experiencing carbon buildup due to the direct injection engine. Are they're any concerns with carbon buildup on our 2012+ 350s? If so, how can we stay proactive?

Thanks!
Old 03-29-2014, 04:55 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
axhoaxho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 336
Received 19 Likes on 16 Posts
I had a 2012 E350 (DI engine) for almost three years, and no issues at all. The engine started like new every morning, regardless of the weather. The engine felt just like the day we picked it up new at the dealer.

All we did was to use 'only' Chevron Premium gas (91 Octane in CA here) in every tank since it was new. We did the annual Service A and B at the dealer. That's all.

I don't know, may be we were lucky or Mercedes engineered the engine right...

Now we traded-in the E350 with a E550 (also DI), and we plan to do the same. Fingers crossed.
Old 03-29-2014, 05:06 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
pdjv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2011 E550, 2008 SL55 AMG
I asked this question of a very knowledgeable M-B senior tech. The answer is that the engine design doesn't include anything (like EGR) that should/could lead to carbon build up in the intake.
Old 03-29-2014, 06:53 PM
  #4  
Member
 
GoBlando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
2012 E550
Originally Posted by pdjv
I asked this question of a very knowledgeable M-B senior tech. The answer is that the engine design doesn't include anything (like EGR) that should/could lead to carbon build up in the intake.
I thought EGR systems are required by law in the US.
Old 03-30-2014, 10:19 AM
  #5  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Arrie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Southern US
Posts: 4,407
Received 838 Likes on 607 Posts
2010 E550, 273 Engine: 2012 S550, 278 Engine
Originally Posted by GoBlando
I thought EGR systems are required by law in the US.
I don't believe EGR valve has ever been required by law. It just used to be about the only way to "completely" burn the fuel by burning some of the exhaust gases again. It may also have helped with emissions this way.

Modern cars of today do a much better job with measuring the available oxygen in the engine cylinders and adjusting the amount of fuel sprayed in the cylinders accordingly.
Old 03-30-2014, 12:05 PM
  #6  
Super Member
 
dfordham's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 561
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2014 E350, 2012 SL550
Albeit lengthy, this is an excellent thread concerning the engineering challenges inherent in the design of Direct Injection engines.

https://mbworld.org/forums/c-class-w...n-buildup.html

Regards,
Don
Old 03-30-2014, 04:50 PM
  #7  
Member
Thread Starter
 
shashivr4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2013 E350 Sport Wagon - 4Matic
Originally Posted by dfordham
Albeit lengthy, this is an excellent thread concerning the engineering challenges inherent in the design of Direct Injection engines.

https://mbworld.org/forums/c-class-w...n-buildup.html

Regards,
Don
Thanks for the link! Very lengthy and informative discussion, but still unclear whether there's a known problem or not. Guess time will tell. Probably will buy the extended warranty just-in-case.
Old 03-30-2014, 09:22 PM
  #8  
Super Member
 
dfordham's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 561
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2014 E350, 2012 SL550
These cars are very expensive to repair. If you are planning on keeping the car past the original warranty, getting an extended warranty is a good idea not just for potential DI problems.

Regards,
Don
Old 03-30-2014, 10:40 PM
  #9  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
mleskovar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Huntington Beach, Ca.
Posts: 5,784
Received 148 Likes on 132 Posts
'17 Jaguar XF
Originally Posted by shashivr4
..Very lengthy and informative discussion, but still unclear whether there's a known problem or not.......
A dealer MB tech told me "we're running out of engine stands to fix the carbon build up problem". All that could mean is it's more than one. I suspect usage has a lot to do with it. If....as the research shows (thanks Glyn)...it's from unburned gasoline backing up into the intake track and cooking on the hot surfaces then driving style will help minimize the problem. Avoid heavy throttle before the motor is warmed up to operating temperature and avoid WOT at low rpms unless necessary....or feeling the urge I'm guessing the latest US laws governing gasoline will help minimize this problem since it removes some of the contaminants in question.
Old 03-31-2014, 03:40 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
pdjv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2011 E550, 2008 SL55 AMG
Originally Posted by GoBlando
I thought EGR systems are required by law in the US.
EGR is a solution for meeting emissions standards. A manufacturer that can meet emissions standards without resorting to EGR is money ahead. Apparently the new M-B direct injection engines are clean enough that EGR is no longer needed.
Old 04-01-2014, 08:14 PM
  #11  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Arrie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Southern US
Posts: 4,407
Received 838 Likes on 607 Posts
2010 E550, 273 Engine: 2012 S550, 278 Engine
This talk about carbon build up on the intake valves kind of does not make sense to me. The new engines don't have EGR meaning all air flowing thru the intake valves is just clean air. How in hell would these valves get carbon build up on them?
Old 04-01-2014, 11:01 PM
  #12  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
mleskovar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Huntington Beach, Ca.
Posts: 5,784
Received 148 Likes on 132 Posts
'17 Jaguar XF
Originally Posted by Arrie
This talk about carbon build up on the intake valves kind of does not make sense to me. The new engines don't have EGR meaning all air flowing thru the intake valves is just clean air. How in hell would these valves get carbon build up on them?
dfordham's link in post #6 explains it pretty well.....https://mbworld.org/forums/c-class-w...n-buildup.html Reader's digest version is the buildup is caused mainly by unburned gas entering the intake track from the cylinder and cooking on the hot surfaces.
Old 04-02-2014, 10:33 AM
  #13  
Member
 
GoBlando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
2012 E550
The manual for my E550 specifically mentions using Top Tier Gas stations in the US to reduce the risk of carbon buildup.
Old 04-02-2014, 01:00 PM
  #14  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
C280 Sport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Saratoga Springs, New York & Sarasota, Florida.
Posts: 3,462
Received 408 Likes on 336 Posts
MB’s
Carbon build up in cars come from not driving them. (My experience basically) I have never herd of a modern car however having these issues unless it sits for months at a time not used. Also too much light driving could cause a build up...Or am I thinking only in the days of old?
Old 04-02-2014, 02:29 PM
  #15  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
mleskovar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Huntington Beach, Ca.
Posts: 5,784
Received 148 Likes on 132 Posts
'17 Jaguar XF
Originally Posted by C280 Sport
......Or am I thinking only in the days of old?
Yes.
Old 04-02-2014, 06:13 PM
  #16  
Super Member
 
alsyli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 584
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
2012 C250 Sport
Originally Posted by shashivr4
So my wife's Lexus IS is having some issues and the dealer is stating that it's experiencing carbon buildup due to the direct injection engine. Are they're any concerns with carbon buildup on our 2012+ 350s? If so, how can we stay proactive?

Thanks!
Interesting. I'm not at all technically minded, but I thought that Toyota's version of DI had some sort of combination of DI and multi-port injection to avoid the carbon build-up problem?
Old 04-02-2014, 06:36 PM
  #17  
Member
Thread Starter
 
shashivr4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2013 E350 Sport Wagon - 4Matic
Originally Posted by alsyli
Interesting. I'm not at all technically minded, but I thought that Toyota's version of DI had some sort of combination of DI and multi-port injection to avoid the carbon build-up problem?

Same models do (I believe they call it dual injection). Unfortunately, not my wife's vehicle.
Old 04-02-2014, 06:37 PM
  #18  
Member
Thread Starter
 
shashivr4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2013 E350 Sport Wagon - 4Matic
BTW, Lexus called today and stated they replaced the pistons and the rings. Apparently, all is well now.
Old 04-02-2014, 06:39 PM
  #19  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
mleskovar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Huntington Beach, Ca.
Posts: 5,784
Received 148 Likes on 132 Posts
'17 Jaguar XF
Originally Posted by alsyli
Interesting. I'm not at all technically minded, but I thought that Toyota's version of DI had some sort of combination of DI and multi-port injection to avoid the carbon build-up problem?
The purpose of the Toyota direct/port injection combination is to increase gas mileage. As a side benefit it also solves the carbon buildup problem. DI is more efficient at low rpms and port is better at high rpms.
Old 04-02-2014, 06:56 PM
  #20  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Arrie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Southern US
Posts: 4,407
Received 838 Likes on 607 Posts
2010 E550, 273 Engine: 2012 S550, 278 Engine
Originally Posted by mleskovar
dfordham's link in post #6 explains it pretty well.....https://mbworld.org/forums/c-class-w...n-buildup.html Reader's digest version is the buildup is caused mainly by unburned gas entering the intake track from the cylinder and cooking on the hot surfaces.
And how does the unburned gas enter the intake track? I assume here it means unburned gas mixed in the exhaust fumes.
Old 04-02-2014, 07:46 PM
  #21  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
mleskovar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Huntington Beach, Ca.
Posts: 5,784
Received 148 Likes on 132 Posts
'17 Jaguar XF
Originally Posted by Arrie
And how does the unburned gas enter the intake track? I assume here it means unburned gas mixed in the exhaust fumes.
Valve timing/overlap and it's not just unburned gas left over after incomplete detonation. Some of it is fresh charge that escapes back through the intake valve before it completely closes.
Old 04-02-2014, 09:19 PM
  #22  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Quadcammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Clifton, NJ
Posts: 4,949
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes on 30 Posts
96 and 08 911 turbos
keep in mind that the cars should still have pcv valves which can cause the ingestion of oil into the intake tract without fuel to help clean the valves, you could end up with some carbon build up.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Direct Injection and Carbon Buildup



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:31 AM.