GLK-Class (X204) Produced 2008-2014

Get ready for a Recall

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 12-18-2014, 10:56 AM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
LesF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
2014 glk 250BT (RIP, 3/1/17}, 2010 C300
Get ready for a Recall

DETROIT (Reuters) - Mercedes-Benz is recalling 4,871 sedans and SUVs in the United States because of a potential oil leak, according to documents filed with U.S. safety regulators.
Daimler AG's Mercedes is recalling certain E-Class cars and M-Class and GLK-Class SUVs from model years 2014 and 2015 because oil may leak from around the chain tensioner gasket in the four-cylinder diesel engine, increasing the risk of a fire or a stalling engine, according to documents filed with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
The leaking oil may also be a road hazard for other vehicles, increasing the risk of a crash, according to the NHTSA documents.
Mercedes officials could not immediately be reached for comment.
Dealers will replace the chain tensioner gasket at no cost and the recall is expected to begin around Dec. 26.
The affected vehicles include certain model-year 2014-2015 E250 BlueTec and E250 BlueTec 4Matic cars and GLK250 4Matic BlueTec SUVs, and 2015 ML250 4Matic BlueTec SUVs, according to the NHTSA documents.



url for recall info


http://www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/acms/cs...4V762-1502.PDF

Last edited by LesF; 12-18-2014 at 12:28 PM.
Old 12-18-2014, 11:32 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
bugelrex's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: NYC
Posts: 356
Received 33 Likes on 26 Posts
glk
Originally Posted by LesF
DETROIT (Reuters) - Mercedes-Benz is recalling 4,871 sedans and SUVs in the United States because of a potential oil leak, according to documents filed with U.S. safety regulators.
Daimler AG's Mercedes is recalling certain E-Class cars and M-Class and GLK-Class SUVs from model years 2014 and 2015 because oil may leak from around the chain tensioner gasket in the four-cylinder diesel engine, increasing the risk of a fire or a stalling engine, according to documents filed with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
The leaking oil may also be a road hazard for other vehicles, increasing the risk of a crash, according to the NHTSA documents.
Mercedes officials could not immediately be reached for comment.
Dealers will replace the chain tensioner gasket at no cost and the recall is expected to begin around Dec. 26.
The affected vehicles include certain model-year 2014-2015 E250 BlueTec and E250 BlueTec 4Matic cars and GLK250 4Matic BlueTec SUVs, and 2015 ML250 4Matic BlueTec SUVs, according to the NHTSA documents.

Wonder if 2013 GLK250 is also included, its pretty much the same as the 2014 model
Old 12-18-2014, 12:48 PM
  #3  
Member
Thread Starter
 
LesF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
2014 glk 250BT (RIP, 3/1/17}, 2010 C300
2013's are not included
Old 12-18-2014, 01:15 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Alex Bel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Michigan
Posts: 375
Received 18 Likes on 9 Posts
2014 GLK250BT, Polar White; 2016 GLE 300d, Polar White
Originally Posted by LesF
2013's are not included
I've checked my 2014 GLK250 VIN with
http://www.mbusa.com/mercedes/recall

As of to day - clear.
Old 12-18-2014, 01:26 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
formerjeepguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: South East US.
Posts: 422
Received 60 Likes on 52 Posts
2015 GLK350
Originally Posted by Alex Bel
I've checked my 2014 GLK250 VIN with
http://www.mbusa.com/mercedes/recall

As of to day - clear.
Thanks for the link. My VIN is effected. Time to make an appointment.
Old 12-18-2014, 02:58 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Alex Bel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Michigan
Posts: 375
Received 18 Likes on 9 Posts
2014 GLK250BT, Polar White; 2016 GLE 300d, Polar White
Originally Posted by formerjeepguy
Thanks for the link. My VIN is effected. Time to make an appointment.
What kind of information the link with your VIN does show?
Old 12-18-2014, 03:03 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
formerjeepguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: South East US.
Posts: 422
Received 60 Likes on 52 Posts
2015 GLK350
Originally Posted by Alex Bel
What kind of information the link with your VIN does show?
It is essentially the same info as the nhtsa document. It just says that it applies to my vin.

Last edited by formerjeepguy; 12-18-2014 at 03:03 PM. Reason: nhtsa not nthsa
Old 12-18-2014, 03:13 PM
  #8  
Junior Member
 
LSkrabut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 72
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
2014 E250 BlueTec RWD, 2015 GLK250
Per nhtsa site,


Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC (Mercedes) is recalling certain model year 2014-2015 E250 BlueTec, E250 BlueTec 4Matic, GLK250 4Matic BlueTec, and 2015 ML250 4Matic BlueTec vehicles manufactured February 28, 2014, to November 10, 2014. In the affected vehicles, oil may leak from around the chain tensioner gasket area.
Old 12-19-2014, 09:43 AM
  #9  
Super Member
 
107123210's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 647
Received 23 Likes on 21 Posts
GLK250 2014
Originally Posted by LSkrabut
Per nhtsa site,


Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC (Mercedes) is recalling certain model year 2014-2015 E250 BlueTec, E250 BlueTec 4Matic, GLK250 4Matic BlueTec, and 2015 ML250 4Matic BlueTec vehicles manufactured February 28, 2014, to November 10, 2014. In the affected vehicles, oil may leak from around the chain tensioner gasket area.
Our 2014 GLK250 was delivered Dec1 2013, so I guess we are OK. Did they change the gasket material or supplier?
Old 12-25-2014, 12:56 PM
  #10  
Newbie
 
DenverBeng's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
GLK250, Polar White
Just got my recall notice in the mail ...
We picked our up in Nov.

Time to try and get slotted with the local dealer..
Old 12-30-2014, 09:00 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
formerjeepguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: South East US.
Posts: 422
Received 60 Likes on 52 Posts
2015 GLK350
The recall is done. The mechanic left me a few small messes to clean up - I expected better.

Last edited by formerjeepguy; 12-30-2014 at 09:17 AM.
Old 02-10-2015, 07:30 AM
  #12  
Newbie
 
Nuhouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2014 GLK 250
New noise (since recall)

Does your engine make a sound (wheezing) now that you e had the recall done?
I've had mine fixed under recall and now the engine makes a noticeable wheezing sound when pressing the accelerator.
(Not there before recall fix).
Old 02-10-2015, 08:44 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
formerjeepguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: South East US.
Posts: 422
Received 60 Likes on 52 Posts
2015 GLK350
Originally Posted by Nuhouse
Does your engine make a sound (wheezing) now that you e had the recall done?
I've had mine fixed under recall and now the engine makes a noticeable wheezing sound when pressing the accelerator.
(Not there before recall fix).
Nope. The only difference I noticed was the spilled oil under the hood and the oily smudges left on my dash by the mechanic.

Take it back and have them fix it.
Old 02-10-2015, 10:47 AM
  #14  
Member
 
fcch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Trois Rivieres, Quebec
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
SLK 350 2013
Originally Posted by formerjeepguy
Nope. The only difference I noticed was the spilled oil under the hood and the oily smudges left on my dash by the mechanic.

Take it back and have them fix it.


Sad!


After a B service, I noticed a smudge print on the roof liner where the mechanic had put his hand while opening the cargo cover (for adblue). I pointed it out to the service guy so the did a full detailing inside and out to make up for it. (usually costs about 300$ cnd).
Old 02-10-2015, 11:58 AM
  #15  
Newbie
 
DenverBeng's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
GLK250, Polar White
No wheezing sound after the work was done.

Actually took it in to get the front driver door aligned (there was an 1/16 drop compared to the rear driver side door which was visually noticable). The delaer took care of the revcall too while car was in.
Old 02-10-2015, 07:05 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
sblvro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 13 Posts
2020 C8, 2020 defender 110X, 2019 720S, 2014 GLK 350 4matic, 2015 escalade platinum, 2013 RRS HSELux
Too bad with the diesel. Glad to have gotten the 3.5 L V6 instead.
Old 02-11-2015, 10:32 AM
  #17  
Member
Thread Starter
 
LesF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
2014 glk 250BT (RIP, 3/1/17}, 2010 C300
Originally Posted by sblvro
Too bad with the diesel. Glad to have gotten the 3.5 L V6 instead.
and why is that? The better acceleration or the poorer fuel mileage?

Or just because of one recall?
Old 02-11-2015, 12:41 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
sblvro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 13 Posts
2020 C8, 2020 defender 110X, 2019 720S, 2014 GLK 350 4matic, 2015 escalade platinum, 2013 RRS HSELux
Originally Posted by LesF
and why is that? The better acceleration or the poorer fuel mileage? Or just because of one recall?
The problem with the diesel additive, availability of diesel, no spare tire and now the recall.
Old 02-11-2015, 03:15 PM
  #19  
Member
Thread Starter
 
LesF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
2014 glk 250BT (RIP, 3/1/17}, 2010 C300
Additive is available at Walmart, Target, auto parts stores, dealers and the problems with the check engine light has been addressed. You can get an emergency spare if you want, I have the runflats and they work as advertised as well MB is equipping many of the new cars with them. And a recall that affected only about 4800 sedans or suv's, would you buy any of the millions of gm or t
Toyota or ford or Honda or BMW's etc. as they all have had recalls just this past year for safety (ignitions, fire or airbag issues)?

I guess those are non issues for me. BTW I have 15000 miles on my 250 I can find fuel anywhere I've gone in Florida, Georgia, South Carolina, Tennessee, Mississippi, or Louisiana over the last 10 months.

Last edited by LesF; 02-13-2015 at 10:32 PM.
Old 02-11-2015, 03:37 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
formerjeepguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: South East US.
Posts: 422
Received 60 Likes on 52 Posts
2015 GLK350
Originally Posted by sblvro
Too bad with the diesel. Glad to have gotten the 3.5 L V6 instead.
This is flame bait. Leave it alone. To each his own.
Old 02-11-2015, 03:56 PM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
sblvro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 13 Posts
2020 C8, 2020 defender 110X, 2019 720S, 2014 GLK 350 4matic, 2015 escalade platinum, 2013 RRS HSELux
Originally Posted by formerjeepguy
This is flame bait. Leave it alone. To each his own.
Nope not a flame bait sorry. Had the chance to drive a diesel in my Italy trip. So the diesel vs gas GLK350 was a serious dilemma.
Attached Thumbnails Get ready for a Recall-image-3780407016.jpg  
Old 02-11-2015, 10:46 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
bugelrex's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: NYC
Posts: 356
Received 33 Likes on 26 Posts
glk
Originally Posted by sblvro
The problem with the diesel additive, availability of diesel, no spare tire and now the recall.
For those who are deciding between the two, here's my concerns after owning the 250 for a year

- diesel additive fillup and available (walmart etc) is definitely not a problem. a 30min DIY, if you can change a tire, you have the skills to DIY.
- more concerned about the longevity/reliability of the adblue system
- no spare is certainly a concern, 'personally' I would be paranoid taking a long trip (500+ miles). Would probably buy a GLK350 inflatable spare and leave in trunk
- I've been driving 95% city, 7 miles each way. Only seeing about 22MPG. In this particular case (very little highway), the gas vs diesel saving in terms of $$ is probably not that great since diesel costs a little more. Hige savings on highway though
- nice torque, not instant due to a very very small turbo lag. Once it builds, theres no lag
- recall doesn't affect 2013 models and not all 2014 models are affected.

Personally, if the diesel was not available for GLK, I would have bought a different car. Without the diesel, the GLK is not unique enough.
Old 02-12-2015, 09:41 AM
  #23  
Newbie
 
Ottomaddick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MBGLK250
Relatively painless but time consuming. Had mine done in November. First vehicle the dealership did the recall on. We weren't even aware of the recall until the service tech mentioned it to my wife while she was picking up a cargo net she ordered.
Old 02-12-2015, 01:16 PM
  #24  
Member
 
super7pilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 8 Posts
2014 GLK250, 1983 Caterham super 7
Originally Posted by bugelrex
For those who are deciding between the two, here's my concerns after owning the 250 for a year

- diesel additive fillup and available (walmart etc) is definitely not a problem. a 30min DIY, if you can change a tire, you have the skills to DIY.
- more concerned about the longevity/reliability of the adblue system
- no spare is certainly a concern, 'personally' I would be paranoid taking a long trip (500+ miles). Would probably buy a GLK350 inflatable spare and leave in trunk
- I've been driving 95% city, 7 miles each way. Only seeing about 22MPG. In this particular case (very little highway), the gas vs diesel saving in terms of $$ is probably not that great since diesel costs a little more. Hige savings on highway though
- nice torque, not instant due to a very very small turbo lag. Once it builds, theres no lag
- recall doesn't affect 2013 models and not all 2014 models are affected.

Personally, if the diesel was not available for GLK, I would have bought a different car. Without the diesel, the GLK is not unique enough.
Not trying to give you a hard time. But you must not have researched owning a diesel in a big city environment. It is just a fact that if you do only city driving, A diesel is NOT the engine to have. Rural and long distance is where a diesel shines. Diesels are even more subject (negatively) to the lack of heat build up than a petrol engine when commuting such short distances.
Old 02-12-2015, 02:38 PM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
bugelrex's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: NYC
Posts: 356
Received 33 Likes on 26 Posts
glk
Originally Posted by super7pilot
Not trying to give you a hard time. But you must not have researched owning a diesel in a big city environment. It is just a fact that if you do only city driving, A diesel is NOT the engine to have. Rural and long distance is where a diesel shines. Diesels are even more subject (negatively) to the lack of heat build up than a petrol engine when commuting such short distances.
i know Originally intended to take lots of long weekend trips, turned out to be more interesting to go into the city instead. The torque makes it a great city car also..


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 1 votes, 5.00 average.

Quick Reply: Get ready for a Recall



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:33 AM.