Not happy with Eurocharged stage 2 performance dyno sheets
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Seattle,WA
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
744 C36 AMG,040 C43 AMG, CLK55 208, CLS55 IWC, CLK500 Rocketbunny widebody
Not happy with Eurocharged stage 2 performance dyno sheets
Got the stage 2 Eurocharged package installed on my CLS55 a few days ago and got it on the dynojet today.
MODS :
Eurocharged 55 Series Performance Engine Software
Eurocharged 55 Series Performance Transmission Software
55 Series SC pulley with Eurocharged 180mm Crank Pulley
Kleeman Headers
E55 Heat Exchanger
Johnson CM30 I/C PumpThey clam it will make
deleted primary cats
607 HP and 671 trq to the crank , well today my dyno sheets show 431.48 hp to wheels and 482.12 trq to wheels. does it not seem low, shouldn't it have around an extra 50 gain on both HP and Trq?
thoughts?
MODS :
Eurocharged 55 Series Performance Engine Software
Eurocharged 55 Series Performance Transmission Software
55 Series SC pulley with Eurocharged 180mm Crank Pulley
Kleeman Headers
E55 Heat Exchanger
Johnson CM30 I/C PumpThey clam it will make
deleted primary cats
607 HP and 671 trq to the crank , well today my dyno sheets show 431.48 hp to wheels and 482.12 trq to wheels. does it not seem low, shouldn't it have around an extra 50 gain on both HP and Trq?
thoughts?
#2
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Seattle,WA
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
744 C36 AMG,040 C43 AMG, CLK55 208, CLS55 IWC, CLK500 Rocketbunny widebody
my personal calculations are:
607 hp crank x .25 drivetrain loss = 151.75 loss
607 hp crank - 151.75 loss = 455.25 RWHP
671 crank trq x .25 loss = 167.75 loss
671 crank trq - 167.75 loss = 503.25
my whp is 431
my w torque is 482
607 hp crank x .25 drivetrain loss = 151.75 loss
607 hp crank - 151.75 loss = 455.25 RWHP
671 crank trq x .25 loss = 167.75 loss
671 crank trq - 167.75 loss = 503.25
my whp is 431
my w torque is 482
#3
SPONSOR
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Houston/ Austin /Toronto / UAE / Minneapolis / Orlando /Cincinnati
Posts: 5,459
Received 149 Likes
on
109 Posts
Eurocharged Performance ML63 and TT lambo
did you do a before and after on the car?
Did they check IAT's, and was the cooling system properly purged? Did they measure boost?
Something seems off, can you also post the full graph?
Did they check IAT's, and was the cooling system properly purged? Did they measure boost?
Something seems off, can you also post the full graph?
Trending Topics
#9
SPONSOR
You use the Euro-flash V2 software, select the tune file WITHOUT REFLASHING, and go to Datalogging. That will let you log and record your IATs and other numbers while you make your run in the car.
#10
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Seattle,WA
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
744 C36 AMG,040 C43 AMG, CLK55 208, CLS55 IWC, CLK500 Rocketbunny widebody
going to have the system checked for leaks or bubbles this week see if it changes, the air fuel ratio is out of wack at high rpms so either a bubble in the cooling or heat soak
#11
Super Member
http://www.axceleratedmotorsports.com/Tech.cfm
dont discount factors of the dyno itself...Smoothing and correction factors can greatly alter your end result....i personally prefer that the operater run my cars uncorrected, in that manner what you make is what you make. If you look at the top right of your chart you will see that there is a correction factor set and smoothing set, and then in the bottom left you will see that .99%, that is correction as well.
dont get me wrong, i am NOT saying that the previous posts are not on point or offering any vehicle specific answers as to why your car may/may not be putting down what you think it should...just pointing out that the graph you showed doesnt technically provide you with the "real" numbers that your car puts down to begin with
dont discount factors of the dyno itself...Smoothing and correction factors can greatly alter your end result....i personally prefer that the operater run my cars uncorrected, in that manner what you make is what you make. If you look at the top right of your chart you will see that there is a correction factor set and smoothing set, and then in the bottom left you will see that .99%, that is correction as well.
dont get me wrong, i am NOT saying that the previous posts are not on point or offering any vehicle specific answers as to why your car may/may not be putting down what you think it should...just pointing out that the graph you showed doesnt technically provide you with the "real" numbers that your car puts down to begin with
#12
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Seattle,WA
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
744 C36 AMG,040 C43 AMG, CLK55 208, CLS55 IWC, CLK500 Rocketbunny widebody
http://www.axceleratedmotorsports.com/Tech.cfm
dont discount factors of the dyno itself...Smoothing and correction factors can greatly alter your end result....i personally prefer that the operater run my cars uncorrected, in that manner what you make is what you make. If you look at the top right of your chart you will see that there is a correction factor set and smoothing set, and then in the bottom left you will see that .99%, that is correction as well.
dont get me wrong, i am NOT saying that the previous posts are not on point or offering any vehicle specific answers as to why your car may/may not be putting down what you think it should...just pointing out that the graph you showed doesnt technically provide you with the "real" numbers that your car puts down to begin with
dont discount factors of the dyno itself...Smoothing and correction factors can greatly alter your end result....i personally prefer that the operater run my cars uncorrected, in that manner what you make is what you make. If you look at the top right of your chart you will see that there is a correction factor set and smoothing set, and then in the bottom left you will see that .99%, that is correction as well.
dont get me wrong, i am NOT saying that the previous posts are not on point or offering any vehicle specific answers as to why your car may/may not be putting down what you think it should...just pointing out that the graph you showed doesnt technically provide you with the "real" numbers that your car puts down to begin with
#13
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Seattle,WA
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
744 C36 AMG,040 C43 AMG, CLK55 208, CLS55 IWC, CLK500 Rocketbunny widebody
i am getting my system purged for bubbles and also getting a stand alone IC coolant tank installed as we speak to help with heat soak, well see what happens, going to get it dyno again on tuesday