R-Class (W251) Produced 2006-2013: R320CDI, R350, R420CDI, R500

R500/R63 towing capabilities...?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 11-06-2015, 10:12 AM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Girly_tt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 114
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
ML500
R500/R63 towing capabilities...?

I currently have an 04 ml500 that I use to tow quite often with. Absolutely love it.

However, I have 2 small children in car seats, and the interior is just not family friendly enough anymore.

The R class has really hit all of the points I want in my next car.

The problem is, that I need something that can tow our sports car as well. We do a lot of long distance family trips, and bring the sports car with us.

So, my question is... Can the R class be upgraded to tow a car?

I've found little to no information on towing with the r500 / r63.

But I have been told the engine and transmission are the same as the ML... And the limiting factor was the suspension.

Is this true?

Thank you,
Emilie
Old 11-06-2015, 01:03 PM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
marc hanna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 1,138
Received 112 Likes on 76 Posts
2008 R320 CDI, 1987 560SL
Yes it can tow. The limiting factor is the type of hitch installed. The OEM hitch is vastly superior, but it will be an expensive install if you don't DIY.

There is a good thread on this somewhere.
Old 11-06-2015, 01:05 PM
  #3  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Girly_tt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 114
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
ML500
So a heavier duty tow bar will allow me to safely tow a car and trailer (5000lbs)?
Old 11-06-2015, 01:38 PM
  #4  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
marc hanna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 1,138
Received 112 Likes on 76 Posts
2008 R320 CDI, 1987 560SL
Not exactly. The OEM hitch inserts into the chassis, whereas all the aftermarket ones just bolt on underneath. So it's not just a heavier-duty thing.

I'm not sure what the numbers are on the tongue weight and tow capacity. The thread might be on the other forum.
Old 11-06-2015, 01:45 PM
  #5  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
marc hanna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 1,138
Received 112 Likes on 76 Posts
2008 R320 CDI, 1987 560SL
Post 1 starts with aftermarket and post 45 you will see pics of the OEM

http://www.benzworld.org/forums/w251...ry-wiring.html
Old 11-06-2015, 03:19 PM
  #6  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Girly_tt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 114
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
ML500
Thank you very much. That's quite helpful.

It's my understanding the engine and transmission are the same from the ml to the R?

Would the air suspension be able to handle a 5000lb load (obviously assuming the correct hitch is installed)?

And is the chassis capable of handling that kind of towing on occasion?

Or where I might be able to find they information?

Any information related to towing seems to be in short supply with these cars.

Thank you
Old 11-06-2015, 04:14 PM
  #7  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
marc hanna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 1,138
Received 112 Likes on 76 Posts
2008 R320 CDI, 1987 560SL
Engine, transmission, suspension, electronics, etc, are the same in the GL, ML, and R

The chassis should be able to handle it just fine.

Looking at some of the other heads, the OEM is only a class II, It would be worthwhile cutting off the receiver and welding a heavier one on there. I think you'll see in that thread someone actually did that.

The Curt is a class III, but it just bolts to the underside, and hangs down pretty low.
Old 11-06-2015, 04:22 PM
  #8  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Girly_tt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 114
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
ML500
Our current ml500 had a bolt on. Hitch, that ended up bending and almost snapping off during a towing job.

So we welded up a beefier custom brace.

Seems as though something like that may be in order here.

I just wanted to make sure the major components of the car were capable of handling towing what I would need, before setting on finding one as my replacement vehicle come next spring.

Thank you very much.
Old 11-06-2015, 04:37 PM
  #9  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
marc hanna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 1,138
Received 112 Likes on 76 Posts
2008 R320 CDI, 1987 560SL
If you're game for custom, I think that would be the best route. Might even be cheaper.

You can use the existing steel bumper and add-in the frame tube supports, weld on the receiver of your choice, and put the additional lateral support like the Curt has.

The R-class is basically just a lower ride-height version of the GL with cosmetic differences.
Old 11-06-2015, 06:30 PM
  #10  
Member
 
josworth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Akron, OH
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
2006 R350
Originally Posted by marc hanna
The R-class is basically just a lower ride-height version of the GL with cosmetic differences.
A quote if I ever saw one... The perfect description.

So... Longer wheel base=more stable tow vehicle..
Old 11-06-2015, 06:48 PM
  #11  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
marc hanna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 1,138
Received 112 Likes on 76 Posts
2008 R320 CDI, 1987 560SL
Longer wheel base and wider track always = more stable, but the R only has an additional 6" over the GL, but almost 13" over the ML; so I think you would notice a stability improvement over the ML for sure. The R-class is also the widest and lowest of all three. So weight distribution-, stance-, and centre of gravity-wise, the R is the best towing vehicle out of the three. Weight-wise - it's in the middle.

The rear section of the R-class where the bumper connects looks very robust, but it's hard to tell for sure unless you do some FEA on it or rig it up with strain gages. I have a few clients that do this, I wonder if they could hook me up - so to speak.
Old 11-06-2015, 09:46 PM
  #12  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Girly_tt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 114
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
ML500
This information makes me so happy!!! 😄😄

Thank you!

Custom work is no problem. We own a performance shop, and have the tools, and/or local hook ups if it's out of our comfort realm.

I was concerned with the structure, that it maybe was not reinforced as much as the suv's, and that was partly to blame for the tow ratings (or lack of).

Thank you very much!
Old 11-06-2015, 09:52 PM
  #13  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
marc hanna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 1,138
Received 112 Likes on 76 Posts
2008 R320 CDI, 1987 560SL
It's still a unibody, but structurally it's pretty good. Nothing's as good as a frame on body, but except for a G-class MB hasn't made a consumer model since the 1st gen ML.
Old 11-06-2015, 09:55 PM
  #14  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Girly_tt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 114
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
ML500
I don't need it for commercial towing or excessivly hard work, just the occasional family trip or event with the sports car in tow.
Old 11-06-2015, 10:08 PM
  #15  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
marc hanna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 1,138
Received 112 Likes on 76 Posts
2008 R320 CDI, 1987 560SL
It'll do fine for that. If you get something fabbed up post some pics and dimensions, I'd like to do the same.
Old 11-06-2015, 10:13 PM
  #16  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
marc hanna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 1,138
Received 112 Likes on 76 Posts
2008 R320 CDI, 1987 560SL
BTW, I'd recommend a 320 or 350 CDI, with the EGR delete the diesels have as much torque as the R63 plus you get 30mpg.
Old 11-06-2015, 10:18 PM
  #17  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Girly_tt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 114
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
ML500
I had read that actual gas mileage people were seeing wasn't that high?

They also seem to be quite a bit more expensive than the r500.

I had honestly not looked into them very much though due to diesel prices always being quite high... Didn't really see much for a cost savings in the long run (initial car price + fuel costs). And I really am in love with the hp numbers the 63 has to offer.... As absurd as it is to cart 2 kids around on the daily.
Old 11-06-2015, 10:22 PM
  #18  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
marc hanna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 1,138
Received 112 Likes on 76 Posts
2008 R320 CDI, 1987 560SL
EGR delete is the key. I've seen with mine 7.2L/100kms (32.7mpg) on the highway. I get 8.4 (28Mpg) mixed city and highway.

I'm not sure how the Bluetechs are faring.
Old 11-06-2015, 10:28 PM
  #19  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Girly_tt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 114
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
ML500
Which do you have?

My ml500 is awful... The best I ever saw was 20.2mpg... Generally it averages 17.5 highway... About 14 mixed.
Old 11-06-2015, 10:31 PM
  #20  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
marc hanna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 1,138
Received 112 Likes on 76 Posts
2008 R320 CDI, 1987 560SL
I have an '08 320 CDI. I can get 1000kms (620miles) on a tank.

The 63's are nice, but they're all getting pretty old now. There are a lot of diesels out there.
Old 11-06-2015, 10:35 PM
  #21  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Girly_tt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 114
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
ML500
I'm not terribly worried about age.

My 04 ml500 has over 190,000 miles. She's been a good work horse! And you'd never know it by driving it. A lot of life still left.

As long as it's a solid car over all, (major components).

I will look more into the diesels, they are much easier to find.

Are there any modifications available for power upgrades?
Old 11-06-2015, 10:42 PM
  #22  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
marc hanna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 1,138
Received 112 Likes on 76 Posts
2008 R320 CDI, 1987 560SL
The Green Diesel tune deletes the EGR and has a performance upgrade. That's what I've and I'm quite happy with it.

You can also do a DPF delete to free up exhaust flow, but I haven't done that yet.

I agree the M113 engines are good tough engines - one of MB's best V8s. I had a CLK55 and loved it. I had an ML320 also (M112 engine) and it had 370,000kms on it when I sold it - still ran like a top.
Old 11-06-2015, 10:57 PM
  #23  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Girly_tt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 114
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
ML500
Just did some quick reading on it, that's very much up my alley.

Are you aware of any software or tools than can be used to retune the ecu ourselves?

We do tuning in a number of other cars at our shop (we have an awd dyno in house), so wouldn't be opposed to playing with the numbers ourselves (if something like that is readily available).

Now I wonder how well it would take to a turbo upgrade... Haha

Slippery slope... But this may be the best route to get my husband on board with it!
Old 11-06-2015, 11:02 PM
  #24  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
marc hanna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 1,138
Received 112 Likes on 76 Posts
2008 R320 CDI, 1987 560SL
I've got a OBD2 programmer that came with my GDE tune, but I don't have any experience with writing custom tunes, just uploading someone else's predesigned tune.

Check'em out:

http://www.greendieselengineering.com/Welcome.action
Old 11-06-2015, 11:27 PM
  #25  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Girly_tt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 114
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
ML500
You don't buy chance have a link of any kind of anyone towing a 5000lb + load...would you?

This is the stupidity my same qquestion was met with on the ml Facebook group.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: R500/R63 towing capabilities...?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:13 AM.