R-Class (W251) Produced 2006-2013: R320CDI, R350, R420CDI, R500

Bigger intercooler?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 06-21-2016, 12:03 AM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
08R320CDI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2008 R320 CDI
Bigger intercooler?

Has anyone done it? If so, how much bigger, and how difficult was it? Seems like a good place to start in the search for more reliable power.
Old 06-23-2016, 03:32 AM
  #2  
Member
 
wolves.creed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 75
Received 20 Likes on 11 Posts
E63s
Originally Posted by 08R320CDI
Has anyone done it? If so, how much bigger, and how difficult was it? Seems like a good place to start in the search for more reliable power.
You will get more turbolag. Not worth it.
Old 06-23-2016, 01:08 PM
  #3  
Member
 
thetonka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: SoCal
Posts: 87
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
R320 Bluetec
Originally Posted by wolves.creed
You will get more turbolag. Not worth it.
Why do you think you would get more turbo lag? Adding a much bigger intercooler to my F350 produced no noticeable change in lag, lower EGTs, and higher boost pressure. And that was with a non-VGT turbo. The computer would more than likely adjust to compensate for any slight change in lag.
Old 06-23-2016, 04:13 PM
  #4  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
08R320CDI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2008 R320 CDI
I'm going to get a tuning box for it, so I figured I would go with a slightly larger intercooler to help out. Also, a cooler air charge is always better, and I wasn't thinking of going out and finding one from a semi, just one that's about 2-4 inches taller, there's plenty of room for it. Just need to get some measurements off of the stock unit and go from there. Maybe even do some exhaust mods as well.

Last edited by 08R320CDI; 06-23-2016 at 04:18 PM.
Old 06-23-2016, 04:41 PM
  #5  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
marc hanna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 1,138
Received 112 Likes on 76 Posts
2008 R320 CDI, 1987 560SL
If I recall correctly, the intercooler on this engine doesn't cool the charge air but rather the exhaust gas that drives the turbo. In that case it could cause more turbo-lag because their is a higher reserve volume in the plumbing before the turbo with no increase in actual throughput.

I don't think there is a real issue with getting enough air into these engines. Disabling the EGR will do more than a bigger intercooler. Plus it is easier and cheaper.

Turbo-lag would be best reduced probably through an additional smaller turbo that spools up with less exhaust pressure. Or you could get a different map that engages the veins in the existing variable turbo on a different timing curve.

The only time I notice turbo-lag is when I'm turning corners and hit the accelerator as a straighten out. Hard acceleration and roll-on acceleration are nice and smooth.
Old 06-23-2016, 04:54 PM
  #6  
Member
 
thetonka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: SoCal
Posts: 87
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
R320 Bluetec
Intercoolers cool the charge air after the turbo. Cooling the exhaust with a heat exchanger is only for the EGR. Those are not the same thing.
Old 06-23-2016, 05:18 PM
  #7  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
marc hanna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 1,138
Received 112 Likes on 76 Posts
2008 R320 CDI, 1987 560SL
Yup. You're right. At any rate, this is a pretty decent sized intercooler, especially considering the relatively low volumetric flow and better thermal efficiency compared to a gasoline engine.
Old 06-23-2016, 05:18 PM
  #8  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
08R320CDI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2008 R320 CDI
I'm looking at the engine as I write this, and it is definetly cooling the charge air, not the exhaust. I'm not so concerned about getting more air in, it's more about a more efficient cooling of the incoming air, and a larger intercooler will do that. At the same time, I was just wondering if anyone else had done anything with it yet. I could also just look into maybe a water sprayer setup for the intercooler, or maybe a meth injection setup could be advantageous? Just trying to come up with ideas that won't push me too far, but at the same time are relatively easy to do.

Now, as for tuning, my two front runners are GDE and Spider. While I know that the GDE setup disables EGR and the swirl motor, you get lower hp and tq increase at about 25(+\-) hp and approx 65 tq. Whereas the Spider unit gives about 65(+\-) hp, and around 120(+\-) tq increase but I don't know if the Spider unit disables the EGR or the swirl motor... The Spider unit costs about $25 less, but I don't know what shipping would be on either one. Which would you guys go for?
Old 06-23-2016, 05:30 PM
  #9  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
marc hanna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 1,138
Received 112 Likes on 76 Posts
2008 R320 CDI, 1987 560SL
The Spider just appears to be a plug-in tuning box. Is this correct? I'm not entirely convinced that these boxes, which affect the fuel rail pressure, are a good idea. Although it does have more features, it basically does the same thing as all the other tuning boxes.

I believe you can request a "performance" tune from GDE; otherwise their standard tune is for the purpose of improved fuel economy.
Old 06-23-2016, 05:40 PM
  #10  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
08R320CDI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2008 R320 CDI
Yes, the spider unit is a "plug and play" box that mainly affects fuel pressure. They do claim higher boost levels as well, but not having one, I wouldn't know if that's actually a fact, or just a claim. The website does say that it has six different "tunes" available on the one box. Everything from Eco to race. I haven't heard anything bad about either company, but from the looks of it, if I wanted a "custom" time from GDE, it would be an extra $100, unless I'm just reading it wrong.
Old 06-23-2016, 06:23 PM
  #11  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
marc hanna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 1,138
Received 112 Likes on 76 Posts
2008 R320 CDI, 1987 560SL
Yes, $100 sounds about right. Regarding the Spider, the boost likely is not increase charge pressure but rather a richer mixture - achieved through the higher fuel rail pressure. Diesel engines tend to run lean, so you have plenty of opportunity to add more fuel to increase performance. This is why in diesel racing they produce those thick clouds of black smoke; because they're running rich. That being said, running rich on a diesel with a particulate filter would run the risk of fowling it - and that's a $4K repair.

I won't assume that spider has done it right, but I haven't heard anything bad either. The benefit is that you can pop it off and return it back to stock instantly. The GDE, you'd have to re-flash, which will take about 15 minutes.

In my opinion, when tuning a diesel, first order of business should always be getting the EGR disabled.
Old 06-23-2016, 08:42 PM
  #12  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
08R320CDI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2008 R320 CDI
That's the biggest reason for wanting to go with GDE. I've heard nothing but bad things about EGR on diesels. To be honest it sounds like the worst thing they could possibly do to a diesel. Well, I guess it's time to dive back into the research and see what's what before I decide which route to go.
Old 06-23-2016, 09:07 PM
  #13  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
marc hanna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 1,138
Received 112 Likes on 76 Posts
2008 R320 CDI, 1987 560SL
Exactly. EGR is horrible for diesel engines
Old 12-25-2016, 05:06 AM
  #14  
Member
 
diesel2fast4u's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Chrysler 300C CRD srt
Standaard intercooler is more then enough for 300+ Hp
So is the standard airbox

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Bigger intercooler?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:42 PM.