CLK-Class (W209) 2003 on: CLK 270 CDI, CLK 200K, CLK 200 CGI, CLK 240, CLK 320, CLK 350, CLK 500, CLK 550 [Coupes & Cabriolets]

Considering a non AMG w209 Cabriolet as daily driver, any tips?

Old 04-30-2016, 02:00 AM
  #1  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
ROLLNNN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: So Cal... In between LA and OC
Posts: 3,595
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
2005 CLK320 Vert & 2005 CLK55 AMG
Considering a non AMG w209 Cabriolet as daily driver, any tips?

Hey Guys & Gals,
I'm considering picking up a w209 non AMG(320, 350, 500) Cabriolet as a daily driver. Im hoping to get some tips from you guys before I do. I'd like to get a facelift 2005 and newer. I've read I should stay away from the 2006-2007 models? Is this correct? Any other suggestions?

Thanks in advance!
Old 04-30-2016, 02:45 AM
  #2  
Super Member
 
DanielFD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Lebanon
Posts: 684
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
2007 BMW 550i
Its not really a "stay away" kind of thing but on the 2007.5+ models your free from having the risk of a balancer shaft issue on the 350 and camshaft adjusters on the 500/550 also the 7 speed transmission are more reliable 2008+ with revised parts and so on. a good deal would be 2009 model (last model) you can find 350s with an amg kit and steering pedals(we all love steering pedals). If 2008 and 2009 clks are out of budget and you dont want to risk it, a 2005 CLK320 is golden with the updated interior and the solid m112 engine mated to the robust 722.6 5 speed trans.
Old 04-30-2016, 08:56 AM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Yidney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,109
Received 110 Likes on 101 Posts
2008 CLK550 Cab
Other than to get an '08 or '09 no real tips. Mine is a daily driver year round, and I don't live in Cali.
Old 04-30-2016, 09:27 AM
  #4  
Super Member
 
omega48er's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 985
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
2009 clk-350 (Black) AMG, 2009 clk-550 (Pewter) AMG
Once you go w209 it's hard to drive anything else hehehhe
Old 04-30-2016, 11:14 AM
  #5  
MBworld Guru
 
Rudeney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 10,783
Received 999 Likes on 868 Posts
NO LONGER ACTIVE
Being in SoCal, you'll definitely enjoy a cabriolet as a daily driver. All the issues discussed above regarding the early 722.9 transmission and "balance shaft" are right on. I echo Daniels suggestion for a MY2005 CLK320 to avoid those problems. Regular maintenance is not terribly expensive - on par with the C-Class on which the car is based.

The only other thing I'd say is with a car this old, the soft top may be near end-of-life. The seam that runs across the top just above the rear glass is know to fail. It's glued together with an adhesive that will become brittle, crystallize, and let go. It really cannot be repaired from the outside. The best option is to replace the entire canvas. Unless you can handle it as a DIY (it's a two-day job), then budget $3K or so for the job ($1K for a Robbins canvas, $2K for labor). Another alternative is to peel back the top to expose the seam and repair it with new adhesive AND stitching. This will be less labor intensive (I'd say 70% of the labor is around the rear glass) and save you $1000 on new canvas.
Old 04-30-2016, 11:18 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
merceBENZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: New Jersey, USA
Posts: 429
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK500 Convertible
I have 2006 with bulletproof M113 engine. Transmission has been done by previous owner. Can't be happier.
Old 04-30-2016, 11:20 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
merceBENZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: New Jersey, USA
Posts: 429
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK500 Convertible
Yes, on top of that I have rare color combo. Win-win everywhere.
Shop wise. I got mine if Craigslist.
Old 04-30-2016, 11:32 AM
  #8  
MBworld Guru
 
Rudeney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 10,783
Received 999 Likes on 868 Posts
NO LONGER ACTIVE
Originally Posted by merceBENZ
I have 2006 with bulletproof M113 engine. Transmission has been done by previous owner. Can't be happier.
I assume you mean that the conductor plate was replaced? That is the primary failure (in fact, it may fail on all 722.9's int he early build range). However, there are other points of failure on these early (pre-MY2008) units. The torque converters were crap. The lock-up clutches in them will deteriorate and throw particulate into the oil. The fluid pump was also a weak point. It used a sleeve bushing instead of a needle/roller bearing where the torque converter attaches. This bushing wears and causes multiple problems. the Most benign is a whining noise. It can also cause the inner pump gear to "wobble" which cases it to score the magnesium bell housing surface that it sits against. Eventually, the gear will break and you will have catastrophic failure, pretty much requiring a transmission rebuild or replacement.

I'm not try to scare you (or anyone with an early 722.9), but after being inside mine, I now understand what happens here. It's a shame, because otherwise, these are solid units. I'd say a MY2008 or later and you're good, but before that, it's a crap shoot.
The following users liked this post:
merceBENZ (04-30-2016)
Old 04-30-2016, 12:45 PM
  #9  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
ROLLNNN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: So Cal... In between LA and OC
Posts: 3,595
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
2005 CLK320 Vert & 2005 CLK55 AMG
Thanks everyone for the posts. This information is exactly what I was looking for. I currently have a 2005 clk55 that's in my signature and love these cars. I really just want something that is going to be as reliable as possible. At first I was looking for a 2005 clk500, but read about the transmission problems. Engine power is not really a big factor for my daily so I think I'll check out the 05 clk320's. The only problem with these is they don't really come with the options i want. If it didn't have keyless go, heated seats and bix, it was a deal breaker. I guess i'll have to rethink that.

If there is anything else you can think of please let me know... Thanks again!!!

Last edited by ROLLNNN; 04-30-2016 at 03:18 PM.
Old 04-30-2016, 12:48 PM
  #10  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
ROLLNNN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: So Cal... In between LA and OC
Posts: 3,595
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
2005 CLK320 Vert & 2005 CLK55 AMG
Originally Posted by Rudeney
Being in SoCal, you'll definitely enjoy a cabriolet as a daily driver. All the issues discussed above regarding the early 722.9 transmission and "balance shaft" are right on. I echo Daniels suggestion for a MY2005 CLK320 to avoid those problems. Regular maintenance is not terribly expensive - on par with the C-Class on which the car is based.

The only other thing I'd say is with a car this old, the soft top may be near end-of-life. The seam that runs across the top just above the rear glass is know to fail. It's glued together with an adhesive that will become brittle, crystallize, and let go. It really cannot be repaired from the outside. The best option is to replace the entire canvas. Unless you can handle it as a DIY (it's a two-day job), then budget $3K or so for the job ($1K for a Robbins canvas, $2K for labor). Another alternative is to peel back the top to expose the seam and repair it with new adhesive AND stitching. This will be less labor intensive (I'd say 70% of the labor is around the rear glass) and save you $1000 on new canvas.
Hey Rudeney
does this seam deteriorate & separate over time and is something i can notice before purchasing or does it just tear apart all of sudden?

Thanks..
Old 04-30-2016, 01:36 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
merceBENZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: New Jersey, USA
Posts: 429
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK500 Convertible
Originally Posted by Rudeney
I assume you mean that the conductor plate was replaced? That is the primary failure (in fact, it may fail on all 722.9's int he early build range). However, there are other points of failure on these early (pre-MY2008) units. The torque converters were crap. The lock-up clutches in them will deteriorate and throw particulate into the oil. The fluid pump was also a weak point. It used a sleeve bushing instead of a needle/roller bearing where the torque converter attaches. This bushing wears and causes multiple problems. the Most benign is a whining noise. It can also cause the inner pump gear to "wobble" which cases it to score the magnesium bell housing surface that it sits against. Eventually, the gear will break and you will have catastrophic failure, pretty much requiring a transmission rebuild or replacement.

I'm not try to scare you (or anyone with an early 722.9), but after being inside mine, I now understand what happens here. It's a shame, because otherwise, these are solid units. I'd say a MY2008 or later and you're good, but before that, it's a crap shoot.
You are right about that. But it is not very common failure as balance shaft. Nor that expensive.
Old 04-30-2016, 04:42 PM
  #12  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Yidney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,109
Received 110 Likes on 101 Posts
2008 CLK550 Cab
Originally Posted by ROLLNNN
Hey Rudeney
does this seam deteriorate & separate over time and is something i can notice before purchasing or does it just tear apart all of sudden?

Thanks..
You can pretty much tell if it is already coming apart just by looking at it, but you cannot tell what it may do tomorrow or next month. Mine sits in the high UV Colorado sun 24/7/365 (never garaged) and so far it's fine.
Old 04-30-2016, 10:28 PM
  #13  
MBworld Guru
 
Rudeney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 10,783
Received 999 Likes on 868 Posts
NO LONGER ACTIVE
Originally Posted by merceBENZ
You are right about that. But it is not very common failure as balance shaft. Nor that expensive.
If you are talking about conductor plate failure, it is very common and I believe that they all will fail. It was a faulty Siemens speed sensor. It is not as expensive as a balance shaft repair, though. Most USA dealers charge about $1400. As for the torque converter, again, all early ones have issues due to the material used in the lock-up clutches. They may not fail early, but they sure put a bunch of black particulate into the fluid and that's not good for the rest of the transmission. Finally, the fluid pump is also a certain issue on all early models, though premature failure is rare. The sleeve bearing simply won't last. It might take 200K miles for it to fail catastrophically, but it eventually will.

Why will the pump fail? Let me explain. Here's the pump:



That inner gear is driven by a shaft that is part of the torque converter housing:



The torque converter is bolted to the engine flywheel and it always rotating when the engine is running, thus the transmission fluid pump is always operating when the engine is running. This is a very common configuration and most all modern automatic transmissions will work this way.

The red ring you see in the bottom of the hole is the seal. Just above that is the copper busing (sort of rust colored) that the torque converter rides against. It, and the torque convert shaft, will wear. When it does, it puts additional stress on that pump gear. The gear surface (the one you can see in the photo), rides against the surface of the transmission bell housing. When the torque converter starts pushing on the gear at odd angles because of the worn bushing, it will score that surface (the bell housing is magnesium, which is very soft). Eventually, the scoring will let the pump gear get "locked" and then it will break. Now, you will have metal chunks in the transmission and you need a new (or rebuilt) one.

As for cost, I fixed all this myself (before it got too bad), for well under $100. At dealer prices, they will charge over $100 just to drop the transmission. They won't open it to repair the pump - instead they will sell you a new (or rebuilt) transmission. Expect to pay about $5K in install a rebuilt, or $8K for a new one.

All of these early 722.9 transmission (I'd say prior to MY2008) on all MBZ cars have these issues. They may last 200K or 300K, but they are all going to fail.
The following users liked this post:
merceBENZ (04-30-2016)
Old 04-30-2016, 11:10 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
merceBENZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: New Jersey, USA
Posts: 429
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK500 Convertible
That's is very depressing! Now you are making me nervous. What do I do? What am I waiting for? When it is time? My car is 45k only..
Thank you for VERY detailed write up. I'm sure going to save it for my future references. I really hope I won't need it. But I'm really uncomfortable now.
Old 04-30-2016, 11:30 PM
  #15  
MBworld Guru
 
Rudeney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 10,783
Received 999 Likes on 868 Posts
NO LONGER ACTIVE
Like I said, it may be a long time before this fails, but it will happen due to the design. One of my local indy shops says they see less than one a month where this has happened. But as these cars age, it will become a more common failure. And then there's the argument about, "at what age is it considered premature failure?" I think if it fails at 100K, it's "premature", but what about 200K miles? 300K? There are 5 or 6 pre-MY2008 MBZs in my office parking lot, and all of them have the tell-tale whine.
Old 04-30-2016, 11:46 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
merceBENZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: New Jersey, USA
Posts: 429
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK500 Convertible
That's terrible QC from MB side. They need to put their suppliers straight. Total waste of money.
Old 05-01-2016, 10:50 AM
  #17  
MBworld Guru
 
Rudeney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 10,783
Received 999 Likes on 868 Posts
NO LONGER ACTIVE
Suppliers have been MBZs quality problem for years. The "balance shaft" failure problem was due to a supplier's lack of QC when forging/hardening those parts. I was never privy to how MBZ makes agreements with suppliers, but I always got the feeling that they had some sort of agreement that limited supplier liability.
Old 05-01-2016, 11:05 AM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
merceBENZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: New Jersey, USA
Posts: 429
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK500 Convertible
some sort of agreement that limited supplier liability
That ruins MB name and reliability trust. For some it will be a deal breaker. Oh well, nothing built to last nowadays.
Old 05-01-2016, 08:04 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
abqhudson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 479
Received 34 Likes on 27 Posts
2018 C300 4 Matic
A low mileage 2005 CLK 320 would be a wonderful car - if you can find one.
Old 05-01-2016, 08:22 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
merceBENZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: New Jersey, USA
Posts: 429
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK500 Convertible
CLK500 has better options such as advanced climate control, directional fog lights etc
Old 05-01-2016, 09:39 PM
  #21  
Member
 
JimVonBaden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 231
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
2005 CLK500
Originally Posted by abqhudson
A low mileage 2005 CLK 320 would be a wonderful car - if you can find one.
What would be considered "low mileage"?
Old 05-01-2016, 09:57 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
merceBENZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: New Jersey, USA
Posts: 429
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK500 Convertible
Originally Posted by JimVonBaden
What would be considered "low mileage"?
That is a good question because everybody has their own definition of that.
Old 05-01-2016, 10:42 PM
  #23  
MBworld Guru
 
Rudeney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 10,783
Received 999 Likes on 868 Posts
NO LONGER ACTIVE
Personally, when buying a use MBZ, I prefer something between 25K and 50K. I don't like very low mileage cars, because they weren't driven enough to get all the bugs worked out under warranty. Since I usually keep a car about 5 years, at 50K, I can come in under 100K miles during my ownership.
Old 05-01-2016, 11:03 PM
  #24  
MBworld Guru
 
Rudeney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 10,783
Received 999 Likes on 868 Posts
NO LONGER ACTIVE
I do need to apologize for hijacking Roland's thread. I did not mean for this to turn into a ***** session about MBZ quality or a thread about transmission woes. I do want to clarify one thing about the discussion, though. I have been pointing out problems with these cars and the root being supplier quality failure. So, does that mean I am recommending buying MBZ vehicles? Actually, to the contrary. I actually like MBZ vehicles very much and I will continue to buy them. I love the way they are engineered and I actually find them easy and intuitive to work one. Bu the best thing I like is the ability to buy one that is just out of warranty (about 4 years old) for less than half the price of a new one. Yes, all of those quality issues means they lose their value quickly. For those of us who are willing to learn to DIY, its a great opportunity. For anyone considering buying a used MBZ and needing to rely on the dealer or an indy mechanic, well, make sure you have the budget for it!
Old 05-02-2016, 12:56 AM
  #25  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
ROLLNNN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: So Cal... In between LA and OC
Posts: 3,595
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
2005 CLK320 Vert & 2005 CLK55 AMG
Originally Posted by abqhudson
A low mileage 2005 CLK 320 would be a wonderful car - if you can find one.
I've found a few in my area between 60k - 90k. Gonna try and check out a few this week

Originally Posted by merceBENZ
CLK500 has better options such as advanced climate control, directional fog lights etc
So true. I happened to drive by a small used car lot which had a 2006 clk500 cab. It basically had all the options i wanted, bix, keyless go, electronic climate control, heated/cooled seats. I walked away without even inquiring about it.

Originally Posted by Rudeney
I do need to apologize for hijacking Roland's thread. I did not mean for this to turn into a ***** session about MBZ quality or a thread about transmission woes. I do want to clarify one thing about the discussion, though. I have been pointing out problems with these cars and the root being supplier quality failure. So, does that mean I am recommending buying MBZ vehicles? Actually, to the contrary. I actually like MBZ vehicles very much and I will continue to buy them. I love the way they are engineered and I actually find them easy and intuitive to work one. Bu the best thing I like is the ability to buy one that is just out of warranty (about 4 years old) for less than half the price of a new one. Yes, all of those quality issues means they lose their value quickly. For those of us who are willing to learn to DIY, its a great opportunity. For anyone considering buying a used MBZ and needing to rely on the dealer or an indy mechanic, well, make sure you have the budget for it!
No need to apologize, I love reading all the information you post up..

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:
You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Considering a non AMG w209 Cabriolet as daily driver, any tips?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:30 PM.