SL55/63/65/R230 AMG: SL55 Weight
#1
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
SL55 Weight
How hard is it to get the SL55 down to 1600kg, with full interior except replacing seats. Let's assume body parts are dry carbon and such. Lightest wheels and all etc etc. Alot of work but is it likely or unlikely to get there?
#3
Well they did something similar to the sl65 bs and... It is still a pig.
Raise it on a lift and look underneath. You will understand why the car is so heavy. The sheetmetal and interior pieces are a small part of the weight. The car has been conceived as a convertible and as such its body integrity is not a result of add ons but is part of it's DNA. The car is just solid. And heavy.
Raise it on a lift and look underneath. You will understand why the car is so heavy. The sheetmetal and interior pieces are a small part of the weight. The car has been conceived as a convertible and as such its body integrity is not a result of add ons but is part of it's DNA. The car is just solid. And heavy.
#4
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Jesus Christ, these cars are PIGS!! The weight, weight kills everything, I know I'm obsessing about it but no car I've had that I haven't thought about weight. My E46 M3 was 1440kg, I did alot of lightweight mods and I still thought it was heavy, when I got the E55 it was a daily so didn't notice it as much but as a project car Mercedes really doesn't offer much. 900 pounds is insane, and that would only get it down to an "acceptable" weight. The Black is a PIG, it weighs more than the E55 with all that lightening, hard roof. If it wasn't for the way the SL looks I wouldn't even be looking at one, but they're so damn gorgeous!! Especially when you do the SL63 facelift, or even the SL Black kits which are far more common than a CLK Black kit.
Trending Topics
#8
Member
Lose the convertable mechanism
Lighter Wheels
Lighter Brake Rotars
Get rid of the RIDICULOUS ABC suspension (im looking around too)
The seats, i heard each seat weighs around 80lbs.
And there you go, not 1,600 kilo's, but good enough for an Autobahn missle.
My car weighs around 1750 kilo's right now. Im going further down, but my interior is a one-off by FabDesign so i wont be doing much to my interior. Hopefully I find a good and lighter suspension. Don't really care if the ride gets stiff or not.
Anyone with some details?
Lighter Wheels
Lighter Brake Rotars
Get rid of the RIDICULOUS ABC suspension (im looking around too)
The seats, i heard each seat weighs around 80lbs.
And there you go, not 1,600 kilo's, but good enough for an Autobahn missle.
My car weighs around 1750 kilo's right now. Im going further down, but my interior is a one-off by FabDesign so i wont be doing much to my interior. Hopefully I find a good and lighter suspension. Don't really care if the ride gets stiff or not.
Anyone with some details?
#9
Autobahn missile? You know weight has very little to do with acceleration at high speeds, right? After say 100 it is all aero and tq (straight or via gearing) to the wheels...
Keep the car in it's element and enjoy it for what it was intended to be- a luxo cruiser with a fantastic engine.
Keep the car in it's element and enjoy it for what it was intended to be- a luxo cruiser with a fantastic engine.
Last edited by alx; 07-31-2011 at 10:13 AM.
#10
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arizona
Posts: 3,703
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
3 Posts
SL55AMG, Ferrari 348, Ferrari Testarossa, Ferrari F40, Ferrari Mondial t, Ducati 916, Indycar
The idea of a weight loss program for the SL55 sounds really good on paper, but frankly, the car is not designed to be an Elise. It is a heavy, solid car.
I keep hearing lots of critics about the handling. If you are any good it really is deceptively good. I instruct, and have been out in an instructor only sessions with the 55, and have managed to put lots of pressure on GT3s and Z06s. The weak point isn't the handling, it is the brakes. At the track, 5-6 laps, thats it for me.
Just like any car, you have to adapt your driving style to the dynamics. Early on I had considered doing some big time weight loss on the car and came to the conclusion it just wasn't a good place to spend money. There are other cars that are more focussed and a better starting point for track work.
I keep hearing lots of critics about the handling. If you are any good it really is deceptively good. I instruct, and have been out in an instructor only sessions with the 55, and have managed to put lots of pressure on GT3s and Z06s. The weak point isn't the handling, it is the brakes. At the track, 5-6 laps, thats it for me.
Just like any car, you have to adapt your driving style to the dynamics. Early on I had considered doing some big time weight loss on the car and came to the conclusion it just wasn't a good place to spend money. There are other cars that are more focussed and a better starting point for track work.
#12
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2001 Lamborghini Diablo, 2009 SL65 (sold), 1998 CL600 (sold), 1989 560SEL (sold)
#14
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2001 Lamborghini Diablo, 2009 SL65 (sold), 1998 CL600 (sold), 1989 560SEL (sold)
#16
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Not exactly trolling, thought it was a valid suggestion. Thought you wanted a lightweight roadster that looks like a SL with 500+hp.
The point is the SL is an amazing car, solid as a rock but I think it could use some weight savings. By the way, has anyone weighed their car? My E55 weighs 4062 lbs (no pano). It's amazing the SL weighs more as it's smaller in size. Has anybody weighed theirs?
#17
MBWorld Fanatic!
#18
#19
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thank you John for posting this. I have told a few of my "E" buddies that the SL weighs more than the E but they think i am using it as an excuse for my slow car. One of my "E" buddies has similar mods to me. He runs about 11.5 on DRs. My PB is 11.86 on streets. The better sixty from the DRs and the 300 pound difference in weight in my opinoin explains being slower by 3.5 tenths or so perfectly.
Sorry to the OP for highjacking the thread.
Sorry to the OP for highjacking the thread.
#21
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thank you John for posting this. I have told a few of my "E" buddies that the SL weighs more than the E but they think i am using it as an excuse for my slow car. One of my "E" buddies has similar mods to me. He runs about 11.5 on DRs. My PB is 11.86 on streets. The better sixty from the DRs and the 300 pound difference in weight in my opinoin explains being slower by 3.5 tenths or so perfectly.
Sorry to the OP for highjacking the thread.
Sorry to the OP for highjacking the thread.
Glad to share the info.
Love the R230 but it's definitely a heavy beast!
#22
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Sorry to the OP for highjacking the thread.
#23
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 8,137
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes
on
14 Posts
Eurocharged 2004 E500, Eurocharged ECU/TCU 2005 SL600, 2010 Caddy SwaggerWagon
My SL600, on stock wheels. Still had all of the tool, spare, air pump etc...in the car. This is without driver and 1/8 tank of fuel.
#24
MBWorld Fanatic!
I was thinking I could shave 200+ pounds off of the SL if I could get my fat a$$ out of the car by teaching my 4 pound Chihuahua to drive. Problem is, I don't think I could find a helmet small enough to fit her.