SL55 AMG, SL63 AMG, SL65 AMG (R230) 2002 - 2011 (2003 US for SL55 and 2004 for the SL65)

SL55/63/65/R230 AMG: Could 600 be the best.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 08-07-2015, 02:56 PM
  #1  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
sound 8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: U.K.
Posts: 2,838
Received 16 Likes on 13 Posts
SL 63 W/B AMG , S600,C220
Could 600 be the best.

For the last few days I have been driving my S600, do not use it much since
I lost my Dad. It felt flat at first but then it started to feel quick and responsive. And then going home I had a tangle with a big Audi. My girl
ate it for breakfast.. And then I thought a SL600 must be nice, although
my 600 is re mapped think what else you could do, even a wide body.
It's funny I used to have a CL65 and I will swear the 600 was quicker , even
the gear box felt better. Now SL600's beating everyone on drag times. I love the wide body, but a SL600 with a few mods and a black kit should be
awesome the only trouble is you don't see many 600 for sale.
S8
Old 08-07-2015, 03:05 PM
  #2  
Super Member
 
F1BHP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: U.K.
Posts: 884
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 22 Posts
sl600
I think only a handful of SL600 facelift cars are in the UK, so you have almost no chance. You may find an older one 2004/2005 as maybe 20 were sold.
Old 08-10-2015, 10:23 AM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
sound 8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: U.K.
Posts: 2,838
Received 16 Likes on 13 Posts
SL 63 W/B AMG , S600,C220
That's a shame, a 2005 would be good with a wide body kit.
Trouble is finding one.
S8
Old 08-10-2015, 10:42 AM
  #4  
Banned
 
Speedriven1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Palatine, IL
Posts: 2,542
Received 72 Likes on 62 Posts
Speedriven
I like the 600s. If you were going to go and really chase records- low-mid 8s, 170+ MPH traps, etc. I'd go with a 600. Just sayin'.
Old 08-10-2015, 01:15 PM
  #5  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
BlownV8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: In my garage
Posts: 8,424
Received 1,003 Likes on 810 Posts
E55, GLS450, GL63, GLE350
Originally Posted by Speedriven1
I like the 600s. If you were going to go and really chase records- low-mid 8s, 170+ MPH traps, etc. I'd go with a 600. Just sayin'.
You're going g to need a different car for those results. Best we've seen is high 9's at 140 mph. 8's at 170 mph is a quantum leap.
Old 08-10-2015, 01:17 PM
  #6  
Banned
 
Speedriven1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Palatine, IL
Posts: 2,542
Received 72 Likes on 62 Posts
Speedriven
Originally Posted by BlownV8
You're going g to need a different car for those results. Best we've seen is high 9's at 140 mph. 8's at 170 mph is a quantum leap.
Of course it is, but it's not like it requires a new unified field theory to accomplish. As it is, no one's really done a big turbo car, no one's really done a built motor, no one's done a narrowed axle to put righteous tires on it, etc., etc. No new tech/reinvention of the wheel required.
Old 08-10-2015, 01:27 PM
  #7  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Thericker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Southern, CA.
Posts: 9,155
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 17 Posts
V12-Biturbo
Originally Posted by BlownV8
You're going g to need a different car for those results. Best we've seen is high 9's at 140 mph. 8's at 170 mph is a quantum leap.
Don't forget that high 9.9 @ 141+mph was in blazing July/Aug heat in Arizona.. I'll bet given Nov cool air 50 deg or so in great DA that particular SL600 we're talking about could run 9.5 or lower @ 146-148 mph w/current setup Now add the mandatory unsprung weight mods, & the latest/largest Speedriven big turbo setup & required mods we could def see a high 8.9x

Remember SGC in CL65 ran 10.2x @ 138 mph or there abouts, forget his actual trap, w/stock turbs & boatload of unsprung weight mods... These cars are just getting started, put the right mods w/right driver & look out

Last edited by Thericker; 08-10-2015 at 01:32 PM.
Old 08-10-2015, 01:27 PM
  #8  
Super Member
 
F1BHP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: U.K.
Posts: 884
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 22 Posts
sl600
Has anybody ever seen any times from the Brabus guys? They talk big numbers but what about the 1/4 mile?
Old 08-10-2015, 01:32 PM
  #9  
Banned
 
Speedriven1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Palatine, IL
Posts: 2,542
Received 72 Likes on 62 Posts
Speedriven
Originally Posted by Thericker
Don't forget that high 9.9 was in blazing July/Aug heat in Arizona.. I'll bet given Nov cool air 50 deg or so in great DA that particular SL600 we're talking about could run 9.5 or lower @ 146-148 mph w/current setup Now add the mandatory unsprung weight mods, & the latest/largest Speedriven big turbo setup & required mods we could def see a high 8.9x

Remember SGC in CL65 ran 10.2x @ 138 mph or there abouts, forget his actual trap, w/stock turbs & boatload of unsprung weight mods... These cars are just getting started, put the right mods w/right driver & look out
I don't think SGC had stock turbos. I could be wrong, but I vaguely remember some sort of modded turbo going on the car while I was still at RT (this is Jo, again). Could be wrong.
Old 08-10-2015, 01:33 PM
  #10  
Super Member
 
F1BHP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: U.K.
Posts: 884
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 22 Posts
sl600
ABC delete is a must if you want to get that low. I am down around 300lb from stock. With the ABC delete it could get close to 500lb so 3,800lb could be possible fairly easily.
Old 08-10-2015, 01:35 PM
  #11  
Super Member
 
F1BHP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: U.K.
Posts: 884
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 22 Posts
sl600
Hey Jo has Speedriven done anything new with the inter coolers?
Old 08-10-2015, 01:36 PM
  #12  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Thericker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Southern, CA.
Posts: 9,155
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 17 Posts
V12-Biturbo
Originally Posted by Speedriven1
I don't think SGC had stock turbos. I could be wrong, but I vaguely remember some sort of modded turbo going on the car while I was still at RT (this is Jo, again). Could be wrong.
True.. my bad he added the Black Series turbos, tho he denied using them he sold them to Jody & they def wern't brand new
Old 08-10-2015, 01:41 PM
  #13  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
BlownV8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: In my garage
Posts: 8,424
Received 1,003 Likes on 810 Posts
E55, GLS450, GL63, GLE350
I guess anything is possible with enough money but who is going to throw that much money into an SL.
Old 08-10-2015, 01:42 PM
  #14  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
BlownV8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: In my garage
Posts: 8,424
Received 1,003 Likes on 810 Posts
E55, GLS450, GL63, GLE350
Originally Posted by F1BHP
ABC delete is a must if you want to get that low. I am down around 300lb from stock. With the ABC delete it could get close to 500lb so 3,800lb could be possible fairly easily.
What have you done for that weight savings?
Old 08-10-2015, 05:11 PM
  #15  
Super Member
 
F1BHP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: U.K.
Posts: 884
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 22 Posts
sl600
Wheels, tires, brake discs and calipers. Removed spare wheel and tool kit, two lithium batteries, Recaro race seats, Fiberglass bonnet and panels however I am not sure any weight was saved on that. Alpine 007 head unit.

Probably a few other small things I can't remember. ABC delete will be on the list once it fails.
Old 08-11-2015, 01:57 AM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
AMG-Driver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Germany
Posts: 471
Received 30 Likes on 23 Posts
SL65 R230
Originally Posted by sound 8
For the last few days I have been driving my S600, do not use it much since
I lost my Dad. It felt flat at first but then it started to feel quick and responsive. And then going home I had a tangle with a big Audi. My girl
ate it for breakfast.. And then I thought a SL600 must be nice, although
my 600 is re mapped think what else you could do, even a wide body.
It's funny I used to have a CL65 and I will swear the 600 was quicker , even
the gear box felt better. Now SL600's beating everyone on drag times. I love the wide body, but a SL600 with a few mods and a black kit should be
awesome the only trouble is you don't see many 600 for sale.
S8
I had both - SL600 and SL65 and can compare both stock and both ECU-Tuned.

If you compare true accelerating times from 200-300 KM/H the SL65 is faster both stock and tuned. I must admit that the tuned SL600 felt also very fast in comparison because there was more sudden Turbo boost at 4000 RPM in the 600 but the SL65 has already a lot more punch from 2500-4000 RPM, mainly because of the different cam profile and more displacement.

After all, I see no advantages for the 600, because you can do everything like big Turbos etc. also with the 65. And the 65 already has stronger clutch,transmission, better piston cooling, bigger fuel-pump etc. AMG has done their job with the engine...

Last edited by AMG-Driver; 08-11-2015 at 02:05 AM.
Old 08-11-2015, 09:59 AM
  #17  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
sound 8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: U.K.
Posts: 2,838
Received 16 Likes on 13 Posts
SL 63 W/B AMG , S600,C220
Well guys an excellent bunch of info. In a way the 600 has more Kudos
than a 65. It's not a 65 yet would blow away a stock 55 AMG. And with a
bi-turbo engine there is more to do than I want, I wont be doing drag times
but I still want fantastic acceleration. As I said there like dragons teeth to
find, and just before I bought my wide body 63 there was a wide body 600
for sale, only trouble was high mileage but that reflected half the price I paid
for the 63. I would like to know if 600's brakes, suspension etc will be man
enough to take a tuned engine. Is the SL600 quiet, exhaust noise I mean,
cos the stock 65 is.
S8
Old 08-11-2015, 12:54 PM
  #18  
Super Member
 
F1BHP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: U.K.
Posts: 884
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 22 Posts
sl600
Yes the 600 is quiet, the suspension is great apart from the known ABC issues and the brakes cannot handle the power it has let alone the extra power.

Making it lighter will help the brakes or just change for sl65 brakes or go after market. 200cell 3" down pipes and 3" straight pipe after will fix the limited sound.
Old 08-11-2015, 09:50 PM
  #19  
Member
 
Ingenere's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arizona
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
Received 36 Likes on 20 Posts
2003 SL55 AMG, 1989 348 Challenge, 1987 Testarossa, 1992 F40, 1989 Mondial t cab, 2001 X5 4.4 Sport
Originally Posted by BlownV8
I guess anything is possible with enough money but who is going to throw that much money into an SL.
I was thinking exactly this! The SL is a great car, but really isn't designed as a track car. I've tracked mine over the years on road courses and it actually is fairly competent, but isn't a track car. It would be hugely silly to try to make it into one, when there are plenty of out of the box cars to fit that bill.

Listening to these massive builds with body kits and engine builds on what amounts to a $25K car with $50K in mods, sounds like the M3 kids who spend $35K on the car and sink another $40K in mods that they will never see again at best and devalue the car at worst.
Old 08-11-2015, 10:17 PM
  #20  
Super Member
 
F1BHP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: U.K.
Posts: 884
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 22 Posts
sl600
Maybe I just like a challenge.

The way I looked at it was I got a 6k mile car for 1/3 of the original price. I don't really mind putting money into it as I do not intend to sell my car. I like to do things the hard way.

When I did my E46 M3 I used the convertible. Was this the best choice? No! however I did enjoy going into uncharted territory.

Sometimes we just do things for the fun of it and because we are curious to see what might happen.
Old 08-12-2015, 11:50 AM
  #21  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
sound 8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: U.K.
Posts: 2,838
Received 16 Likes on 13 Posts
SL 63 W/B AMG , S600,C220
I am certainly not interested in track days or come to that Drag times
although I wouldn't mind going to Sante Pod as a spectator. No if I had
a 600 I would put a Prior wide body kit on, then a little exhaust work, I
don't think the V12 is as tuneful as a V8, but love the electric acceleration
you get from a V12. It was the silent way I was hurled toward the horizon
when I was driving my S600. So body kit yes, bigger brakes and just over
600 bhp in silence unless a small burble in acceptable. Gives you something
to look forward too, and far cheaper than a new SL , Ferrari , Lambo etc.
S8
Old 08-12-2015, 06:11 PM
  #22  
Super Member
 
F1BHP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: U.K.
Posts: 884
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 22 Posts
sl600
Sound 8 I may be heading to Santa Pod on the 12th of September if you are interested.
Old 08-24-2015, 10:15 PM
  #23  
Super Member
 
F1BHP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: U.K.
Posts: 884
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 22 Posts
sl600
So the 9.9 run as well as the 10.2 run were both using NOS. I feel disappointed really, I was so happy that someone had managed to get that kind of time and we might find a way of extracting the full potential out of these engines. Now we are back to square one.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: SL55/63/65/R230 AMG: Could 600 be the best.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:14 AM.