SLK-Class (R170) 1998-2003: SLK 200, SLK 230K, SLK 320

SLK/R170: SLK 230 Kompressor performance?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 06-25-2006, 08:12 PM
  #1  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
ChrisB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Abbotsford, BC, Canada
Posts: 1,181
Received 72 Likes on 50 Posts
1999 SL 500 & 2011 E 550 4Matic
SLK 230 Kompressor performance?

Someone I know just bought a 1999 SLK 230 Kompressor.

I was wondering what the performance statistics are for the car.

HP, Tourque, Weight, 0 to 60 mph, etc.

He is quite an aggressive driver. He modified the chip in his chevy pick up truck to press it to the limit of it's performance .

Will someone like that be happy witht the SLK 230 Kompressor? I hope so. It is his first convertable.

He did buy it primarily for his wife to drive.
Old 06-25-2006, 09:03 PM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
HLG600's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: NJ
Posts: 3,771
Received 222 Likes on 173 Posts
R230 SL63 | W220 S55
Chris, certainly a MB roadster will be a better drive than a pickup truck.
Old 06-25-2006, 09:48 PM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Buellwinkle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Laguna Niguel, CA
Posts: 6,211
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I believe they did 0-60 in 6.7 seconds, not to bad for a 4 banger. You can drop that significantly with a pulley kit.
Old 06-25-2006, 11:42 PM
  #4  
Banned
 
Clk&Slk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Socal
Posts: 960
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
06' Clk 500 Cabriolet, 01' CL 55, 00' Clk 430
Originally Posted by Buellwinkle
I believe they did 0-60 in 6.7 seconds, not to bad for a 4 banger. You can drop that significantly with a pulley kit.

6.7s is for the V6 and 7.2s is for the stock 4 banger.
Old 06-26-2006, 01:40 AM
  #5  
Member
 
DesignoSLK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Surprise, AZ
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'00/'04 SLK230 Designo Copper, '17 Hyundai Santa Fe Sport Ultimate
Originally Posted by HLG600
Chris, certainly a MB roadster will be a better drive than a pickup truck.
THANK you!!! No offense Chris.

Here's a link for 1999 SLK230 specs.

http://research.cars.com/go/crp/rese...=&aff=national
Old 06-26-2006, 06:51 AM
  #6  
Almost a Member!
 
Bruce SLK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2002 SLK 32
Originally Posted by Clk&Slk
6.7s is for the V6 and 7.2s is for the stock 4 banger.
Here's some data that isn't as conservative as Mercedes puts in their sales brochures, and a little closer to what happens in real life:
http://www.fantasycars.com/derek/cars/slk.html

As I said on another board 6.6 seconds 0 to 60........
Old 07-04-2006, 09:20 AM
  #7  
Almost a Member!
 
/\/\ike230K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SLK 230K
Hi!!!!

i upgraded the ECU.....and now i have 223HP....with 320NM (225 lb-ft).
But you can upgrade the kompressor pulley! :-)
Old 07-12-2006, 01:22 AM
  #8  
Member
 
steve872's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by /\/\ike230K
Hi!!!!

i upgraded the ECU.....and now i have 223HP....with 320NM (225 lb-ft).
But you can upgrade the kompressor pulley! :-)
Mike,

Where are your dyno sheets!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Old 07-12-2006, 08:48 AM
  #9  
Almost a Member!
 
/\/\ike230K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SLK 230K
As soon as i can i'll put them here!

But i can assure you....that it CAN FEEL the difference!!!!!

The less-factors: MORE HIGH TEMPERATURES and USE ALWAYS GAS ABOVE 95.... i use 98 or 100......
Old 07-12-2006, 08:50 AM
  #10  
Almost a Member!
 
/\/\ike230K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SLK 230K
One more thing..... a very GOOD result is the ROMULUS exhaust .....for the SLK.
I put it months BEFORE the ECU upgrade and notice a very "clean" DIFERENCE on performance!!!!!!!!
Old 07-12-2006, 11:27 AM
  #11  
Member
 
steve872's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by /\/\ike230K
As soon as i can i'll put them here!

But i can assure you....that it CAN FEEL the difference!!!!!

The less-factors: MORE HIGH TEMPERATURES and USE ALWAYS GAS ABOVE 95.... i use 98 or 100......
Mike,

I am stuck with 91 octane in California. If you are indeed running 98 or 100 octane petro you indeed will see a much higher gain than us here in the states. I really want to see the dyno sheets. Master Linh (CLK/SLK) tried them 3 times and did not get any gains whatsoever. Since you are not stuck in the states and have access to much higher octane gas you have a chance with the right mods to really open it up and get that hidden Hp that our cars have. How are the emmission laws where you live. Does your car have a cat?? Keep us informed of your progress!
Old 07-13-2006, 01:22 AM
  #12  
Banned
 
Clk&Slk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Socal
Posts: 960
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
06' Clk 500 Cabriolet, 01' CL 55, 00' Clk 430
The SLK will bolt to sixty in just 7.2 seconds and reach an autobahn-cruising top speed of 143. Part of this panache is thanks to the innovative five-speed automatic transmission, which does an excellent job of managing shifts.
http://www.theautochannel.com/vehicl...o09019701.html


PERFORMANCE

EPA Economy, miles per gallon
city/highway/average 22/30/25
0-60 MPH 7.5 seconds
1/4 Mile (E.T.) 16 seconds @ 90.5 mph
Top speed 140 mph

http://www.theautochannel.com/vehicl.../solo9737.html



The fun comes from much more

than simple straight-line speed, though the SLK's claimed 0-60 mph time

of 7.4 seconds and 143-mph top speed aren't exactly unimpressive.

http://www.automallusa.net/1998/merc...s/reviews.html
Old 07-13-2006, 09:48 AM
  #13  
Almost a Member!
 
/\/\ike230K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SLK 230K
I heard that UPSOLUTE do 91 or less mod chips also......

emissions are OK and the car PASSES on the ANUALLY PERIODIC TESTS we have here in Portugal...

All i done was replacing exhaust with a ROMULUS SLK SPECIFIC.... and a UPGRADE to the ECU!

All CATs REMAINED!!! and it has th stock EXHAUST MANIFOLD!

ah yes...i tested a LITTLE times using 95.. and i NOTICE A BIT from the 98...
Old 07-13-2006, 09:52 AM
  #14  
Almost a Member!
 
/\/\ike230K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SLK 230K
did not mesured the 0-60mile.....but it KICKS!!!!!

the top speed i had on the METER....was 245km/h (i think 149mph).....
but it can do more....
Old 07-13-2006, 12:36 PM
  #15  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Buellwinkle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Laguna Niguel, CA
Posts: 6,211
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From what I've seen from Upsolute on the M111 motor on the dyno, 3-4 HP is about all it gives. They have a 29 HP spike that's just dyno noise. The true gain on that car is from a pulley kit bringing boost from 6 psi to about 10 psi. This kit includes relocating the MAF, cooler plugs and a higher pressure FPR. Kits on the other SLK forums run about $900.
Old 07-13-2006, 12:52 PM
  #16  
Almost a Member!
 
/\/\ike230K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SLK 230K
hmmmm interesting!!! put the links here if you can...

All i can tell is what i have and tested!!!!
i even DID NOT KNEW UPSOLUTE until i search on foruns and internet... eheheh

But if you think....SLK is a "TURBINATED" car..... and ALL turbinated cars like TDI's have gains of +20..+30..+40HP!

what i think...I THINK...they do (upon other things) is a BETTER ON-OFF of the Kompressor VALVE!... and maybe an INGITION-TIMING upgrading LESS CONSERVATIVE!!!! (that's why they tell to use a MORE OCTANE GAS!)...
Old 07-13-2006, 04:44 PM
  #17  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Buellwinkle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Laguna Niguel, CA
Posts: 6,211
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I agree that many turbo cars with electronic wastegates can be controlled via a chip. Supercharged cars can only be controlled by spinning them faster so you need to either have a smaller s/c pulley or a larger crank pulley. Most have a larger crank pulley. Here's my dyno, before and after on my C230 with the same M111 engine. I've done tons of dynos, tried just about everything and I know what works and what doesn't. For example, no gains for any IC and generally losses. Chips are a bust. Quality filters are good for 3-4HP, dynoed ITG and K&N, both good, ITG slightly better.


Old 07-14-2006, 09:02 AM
  #18  
Almost a Member!
 
/\/\ike230K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SLK 230K
hmmmmm interesting!
Yes..i know that SC are pulley-dependent.... BUT the control of the BYPASS- VALVE that closes to make the boost.....or open to release it.....is the secret!

I don't know...(just to ask UPSOLUTE)....but as far i feel and notice (and friends notice).....acceleration is BETTER!....and ALL is better!!!!!!

i know that pulley upgrade ADDS +30HP..... BUT and the A/F ratio???????
must have ECU remaped!!! ALSO!!!!! to mantain 14.7:1....
Old 07-12-2012, 11:00 PM
  #19  
Newbie
 
stnkng1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1999 slk mercedes
1999 slk

everyone on here is saying the 1999 slk should do 0-60 in 7,2 sec. i road tested mine today and it was 12- 13 seconds could anyone give me some advise what could be wrong it sounds like it runs good but i think it should run faster
Old 07-18-2012, 11:20 AM
  #20  
Junior Member
 
mjcother's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
remember European octane != American octane

European octane ~= American octane +5

so 93 octane which most of us use would be fine....



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Octane_rating

"Portugal: 95 RON "Euro" is sold in every station and 98 RON "Super" being offered in almost every station."

"United States: in the US octane rating is displayed in AKI."
Old 07-20-2012, 09:27 PM
  #21  
Newbie
 
deonp1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: tauranga newzealand
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1998 mercedes slk230 kompressor
Smile MY 1998 SLK230R (AMG) SUPERCHARGED.

WELL I,V HAD MY SLK230 CHIPPED TO 250BHP, AND I HAVE REDUCED THE REAR TYRE SIZE FROM 245X45X17 TO 240X40X17 AND MY CAR HANDLES BETTER.
DOES ANYONE KNOW WHERE THE OBD1 PLUG SITS ON THESE CARS THKS.
Old 07-30-2012, 12:28 AM
  #22  
Newbie
 
deonp1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: tauranga newzealand
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1998 mercedes slk230 kompressor
slk performance

Originally Posted by stnkng1
everyone on here is saying the 1999 slk should do 0-60 in 7,2 sec. i road tested mine today and it was 12- 13 seconds could anyone give me some advise what could be wrong it sounds like it runs good but i think it should run faster
hi mate replace your air filter with an kand n filter and fit two pronged plugs it should go better. from deonp1
Old 06-08-2014, 09:05 PM
  #23  
Newbie
 
dalexyz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SLK32
SLK 230 Kompressor

Just a quick question of one of you gurus: Is the compressor in the 230 the same, or same basic type as the one in my 32 AMG? Sorry, I just can't find the answer on any MB sites. Thanks
Old 07-23-2014, 04:59 PM
  #24  
Newbie
 
tektroll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SLK 230 R170
just my understanding... but the 14.7 to 1 AF is the ideal optimum for emmissions purposes its not the optimum for power... more like 12.8 or 13 to 1 AF ??
Old 07-23-2014, 05:20 PM
  #25  
Newbie
 
dalexyz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SLK32
Originally Posted by tektroll
just my understanding... but the 14.7 to 1 AF is the ideal optimum for emmissions purposes its not the optimum for power... more like 12.8 or 13 to 1 AF ??
Sorry to be so obtuse, but I don't understand how your response relates to me question. (I'm more than willing to assume its because you Brits are just smarter than we are)


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: SLK/R170: SLK 230 Kompressor performance?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:21 AM.