![]() |
![]() |
|
Sign in using an external account
|
|
||||||||
| Home | Register | Photos | FAQ | Members | Insurance | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Cars | Garage | Vendors | TSB & Recalls |
| W211 AMG Discuss the W211 AMG's such as the E55 and the E63 |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 | ||
|
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 2,569
Drives: E55K
|
Debate btw X-pipe and Straight Pipes...
__________________
IF NOT FAST.......................THEN YOU LAST !!!!! TTR ( Tuning Technologies R) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Almost a Member!
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Melbourne - Australia
Posts: 63
Drives: 2004 E320 with AMG bodykit
|
This should be an interesting debate.. I'm no expert but here's my reply:
My local custom tuner said that the best sound/power would be achieved by removing the bottleneck at the front caused by the 4 catalytic converters (2 each side) and replacing them with straight flow pipes.. He said that the centre resonator is not the biggest problem, the restriction occurs at the start from the manifold to the centre resonator) Personally I wouldn't recommend this because (i) The car would be street-illegal and when you come to renew your registration you'll need to pass the test (at least in my country) and they WILL find out that you have removed your cats so the car would legally be banned form being registered until you re-fit the cats! (ii) This would also trigger the "check engine" indicator on your dashboard since there are sensors hooked up to your cats and removing them triggers this error. (iii) The exhaust sound might resonate and start getting a bit on the "getto" side for my taste.. Having said that, I know a few friends who are quite happy with this configuration. If you find the exhaust sound too loud for you but the OEM being too tame, you can always install an exhaust insert (typically Cone style) to the straight flow pipes. This gets rid off the resonating sound. Here's a link on how to install it (although it's not a benz, the idea is basically the same). In the link they actually remove the muffler not the cats but you get the idea: http://www.cadillacfaq.com/faq/answe...nes/index.html This is my two-cents worth, hope it helps you |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
MBWorld Fanatic!
|
Quote:
__________________
Modify your car and enjoy the benefits ! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 2,569
Drives: E55K
|
The main question is ...What is better to USE to replace Resonators X-pipe or Straight Pipes ???
You dont want to loose too much pressure with custom made exhaust on E55K...The reason for this, it will cause the drop in S/C boost... Kleemann Germany told ME (they actually design Kleemann system for SL55 and E55)...That with their Free flowing 70mm exhaust system the pressure drops from 0.9 to 0.7...and they use ECU and pullies to bring this boost back...and this combo makes more power... Also been told that by Kleemann DK that fully freeflowing Kleemann exhausts without any CATs doesnt make more power and actually looses Togues, then Kleemann exhaust with CATS... SO... if we make fully custom exhaust and dont have ECU for it, the S/C pressure will drop and there POWER (especially TOGUES) is most likely to fall... The Q remains X or Straight for E55 ???
__________________
IF NOT FAST.......................THEN YOU LAST !!!!! TTR ( Tuning Technologies R) Last edited by E55 RUSS; 04-07-2006 at 07:34 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | ||
|
Almost a Member!
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Melbourne - Australia
Posts: 63
Drives: 2004 E320 with AMG bodykit
|
Quote:
I don't think it's possible to avoid the "missing" cats from triggering the error message.. You can simply switch it off completely for your own convenience, nothing more, nothing less.. and going back to M5-RUS's point: I think that X pipes are a little louder overall, but the H pipe is much deeper and lower pitched. Here's a quote from an article which might best answer your question: Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 202
Drives: Sold
|
I'll add my .02 to the pressure side of it. Heres what i've learned:
With a free flowing exhaust, a drop in S/C pressure is not a bad thing. Pressure is only created by the engines inability to flow a given volume of air through it. You'r boost psi may be lower with a free flow exhaust, but thats not important, because the volume of flow through the engine has increased. Also dont forget that pressure causes heat. On my Evo, stock boost was set at 19 psi. With an itnake, exhaust, intercooler, boost colntroller and tuning, the car was making 50-60 more awhp on only 17 psi of boost. Lower boost means the engine is operating more efficiently, not that its making less power. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: In my garage
Posts: 2,146
Drives: E55, Renntech CL600(sold), GL450
|
Quote:
Remember, an engine is an air pump. The more air in and the more air out the greater the power. You just have to keep in mind that the exhaust velocity must be kept as high as possible witout experiencing too much resistance in flow. Pipes that are too big will slow the velocity and pipes that are too small will restrict the flow. An x pipe is usually better for normally aspirated engines while an H pipe is better for supercharged engines. The supersprint looks to me more of a semi-X pipe design than most I've seen. Kind of a 2 into 1 back into two. You want equilization of exhaust pressure between cylinder banks but, IMHO, you don't need the air to collide like that in a forced induction motor to have the best results. I like the sound of an X-pipe more than the sound of an H pipe system. I guess it comes down to personal preference of the sound because the power difference will not be that great in a forced induction engine. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 2,569
Drives: E55K
|
If H pipe is better then X pipe forom S/C cars like E55 then why does SS using X-pipe ???
I want to find out the truth... Here is 2 options that I am considering: 1. Remove from CATS which I heard most resistant ones and make same diameter pipes to Secondary CATS or make an X pipe instead of straight pipe... 2. Replace resonators with X-pipe or Straight pipe instaed and remove Secondary CATS... Should I make same diamter Straight pipes or X-pipe as stock ot bigger like 3 inch (70mm)...dont what to loose togues...
__________________
IF NOT FAST.......................THEN YOU LAST !!!!! TTR ( Tuning Technologies R) |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 160
Drives: 05 E55, 07 SL65, 06 S4
|
These kinds of debate are always stimulating, albeit, anybody thinking that with a floor jack and a set of wrenches he can outsmart the tuners is just kidding himself big time if he expects to increase his engines output beyond SOTP measures - but it does help to increase the GDP, although even that is debatable as a muffler wasted sitting in a garage corner cant be that good for the real economy, either.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: In my garage
Posts: 2,146
Drives: E55, Renntech CL600(sold), GL450
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 75
|
We had a similar discussion related to this on the Caddy boards...
I don't believe that there is a significant difference between an X-pipe or an H-pipe. A dyno comparison between the two was posted on the Caddy boards and both had certain advantages at certain RPMs, resulting in negligible performance gains overall for either system. And I don't necessarily agree that an H-pipe increases drone---my exhaust has an H-pipe and it has no significant drone at any RPM, while some other V-owners have X-pipes and they drone like mad. That doesn't necessarily mean much, but it does suggest that there is much more to drone than just an X or H pipe.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: In my garage
Posts: 2,146
Drives: E55, Renntech CL600(sold), GL450
|
Hot Rod magazine tested the X-pipe vs the H-pipe on an Lt-1 engine. Here is the result:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 2,569
Drives: E55K
|
So H pipe (straight pipe) makes more HP or Torgues at wider ranges then X pipe...X-pipe make more on Top...but SC cars are diff or not...
__________________
IF NOT FAST.......................THEN YOU LAST !!!!! TTR ( Tuning Technologies R) |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Senior Member
|
Those numbers (X vs H) will vary for every different motor. Hell, they can even vary on the SAME motor depending on whether it's using an exhaust manifold or header, collector length of the header, etc. I even had a guy I race with tell me thay they dyno'd their motor with and without an exhaust crossover (I think they were using an h-pipe ) and even though the motor made more power on the dyno with the h-pipe, the car consistently ran 2-3mph faster at the end of the main straight at their home track and was .3-.4 of a second faster with NO crossover of any kind!! I have no idea how or why this would be the case, but it just shows that dynos don't always simulate real life and there's a lot more to the physics of exhaust flow than we can figure out here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 2,569
Drives: E55K
|
Still no explanation...
X pipe or H pipe on E55 ...which s best solution ??? why does SS makes X pipe and other tuner tend to use H (straight pipe)..
__________________
IF NOT FAST.......................THEN YOU LAST !!!!! TTR ( Tuning Technologies R) |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: strip bar in Oregon
Posts: 1,684
Drives: 211 E55(sold) & 80cc shifter kart
|
Quote:
call them and ask.
__________________
NOTKTSINMYDBS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: San Rafael, CA
Posts: 79
Drives: 00 E55 AMG
|
Quote:
__________________
Caution:The proverbial light at the end of the tunnel may be an oncoming train.
Last edited by rrrruBENZ///E55; 04-11-2006 at 04:17 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | ||
|
Super Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 665
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | ||
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: San Rafael, CA
Posts: 79
Drives: 00 E55 AMG
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Caution:The proverbial light at the end of the tunnel may be an oncoming train.
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 2,569
Drives: E55K
|
OK..thanks everybody...I think I will go for straight pipe...
__________________
IF NOT FAST.......................THEN YOU LAST !!!!! TTR ( Tuning Technologies R) |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,179
|
Here are other comparisons I have found. X-pipe is actually supposed to reduce droning b/c it helps the engine cancel out the pulses created and is also better for high end HP than H-pipes. H-pipes do not alot for smooth gas flow between the two banks.
http://www.magnaflow.com/05news/magazine/vette.asp http://www.carcraft.com/techarticles..._installation/ those two give a good idea (and pictures) of how the system should look and work. X-pipe is the best out of all three for overall performance and has been dyno tested many times on V8 to give great performance (especially on cars where there is no connection between the two exhaust tracts at all (aka E55 cars). hope that helps. |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
|
Out Of Control!!
|
Quote:
I have tried all three setups on my cars ('05 and '06 E55). The x pipe helping droning is absolutely true, except that I like to hear the two banks independently. As far as for performance, no way. Straight pipes give it WAAAY more gut. Keep in mind that I kept the stock exhaust system. If you put on a system that has too little back pressure, then an X pipe to make turbulence would help. But, if you have a truly tuned system no way that an X or H pipe will ADD. As I say, i have tried it in real life, but I don't even get the theory behind why the X or H could add power?? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Lone Star State
Posts: 1,026
Drives: w210 E55
|
The 2.5" x-pipe woke up my w210 E55. It causes some back pressure, due to cross flow......in which regulates/matches both left and right bank exhaust pulses. I don't get ANY drone with my set up; secondary cats removed, x-pipe and factory muffler.
My x-pipe is a true x-pipe....it looks like some just combine and almost share a tube....then split. I don't know if that really matters, though ![]() Get the x-pipe. Keep a little backpressure for the bottom end and enjoy the deep....not raspy.....tone.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 12
Drives: 02E55 Brilliant Silver
|
Do you have any pictures of your setup?
thanks |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| back, bypass, catalytic, converters, difference, dyno, give, hp, mbworld, pipe, pipes, power, pressure, sound, straight |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|