Concrete numbers for the Belt Wrap Kit
#1
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Concrete numbers for the Belt Wrap Kit
The Belt Wrap Kit (BWK) makes a lot of sense logically, but there doesn't seem to be much concrete information out there about how much of an improvement it makes.
So... Here are some real-world numbers! I have been running my totally stock 2004 E55 (with Hoosier DOT Drag Radials) at the track a lot lately, and most of my 1/4 mile ETs were in the 12.20 range, with a couple 12.10's that seemed to come at random intervals.
I installed the BWK this weekend, and with no other changes, I ran a best of 12.045. What's even better is the consistency. I ran 4 times yesterday and only varied by 0.042s (12.087 worst, 12.045 best)
So the bottom line is I found it good for a half-a-tenth in the 1/4, with a bonus of more consistency.
Here's a link to my times:
http://myslips.com/profile.php?id=1879
EDIT: I guess these numbers aren't as "concrete" as I had originally thought. See post #10 & 16 below for more details...
So... Here are some real-world numbers! I have been running my totally stock 2004 E55 (with Hoosier DOT Drag Radials) at the track a lot lately, and most of my 1/4 mile ETs were in the 12.20 range, with a couple 12.10's that seemed to come at random intervals.
I installed the BWK this weekend, and with no other changes, I ran a best of 12.045. What's even better is the consistency. I ran 4 times yesterday and only varied by 0.042s (12.087 worst, 12.045 best)
So the bottom line is I found it good for a half-a-tenth in the 1/4, with a bonus of more consistency.
Here's a link to my times:
http://myslips.com/profile.php?id=1879
EDIT: I guess these numbers aren't as "concrete" as I had originally thought. See post #10 & 16 below for more details...
Last edited by JoeJErnst; 04-01-2015 at 12:43 PM. Reason: Pointing readers to posts with more accurate information.
#4
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
#5
MBWorld Fanatic!
On stock cars I don't think the wrap kit will make a difference but when it's a bigger crank pulley and/or smaller sc pulley that's where it might matter.
Was planning on buying new belts for with and without and then doing a test with different setups to see the difference
Was planning on buying new belts for with and without and then doing a test with different setups to see the difference
Trending Topics
#8
On stock cars I don't think the wrap kit will make a difference but when it's a bigger crank pulley and/or smaller sc pulley that's where it might matter.
Was planning on buying new belts for with and without and then doing a test with different setups to see the difference
Was planning on buying new belts for with and without and then doing a test with different setups to see the difference
Judging from the lack of gain on MPH, I can postulate that the shifts and launch is where you gained the most with the BWK. SO the shocks to the drivetrain did not cause the corresponding slip of belt like it would on a stock system
#10
Super Member
Your best 60' time resulted in your quickest ET. That's how its supposed to be and likely had nothing to do with the belt kit.
If you gained a mph or two on trap, id say you were making more power.
Concrete data would be runs compared from same day that were all logged. Way to many variables possible to attribute it to a belt mod. PCM pulling 1 or 2 degrees due to fuel octane inconsistency is a tenth alone.
If you gained a mph or two on trap, id say you were making more power.
Concrete data would be runs compared from same day that were all logged. Way to many variables possible to attribute it to a belt mod. PCM pulling 1 or 2 degrees due to fuel octane inconsistency is a tenth alone.
Last edited by Mike450; 03-31-2015 at 01:54 PM.
#11
Looking forward to seeing results on that
#12
MBWorld Fanatic!
#14
Super Member
its my understanding that you can just swap back on the original belt in the original configuration with the belt wrap pulley still on. It shouldn't be that hard to do back to back comparisons.
#16
Out Of Control!!
Nice concrete numbers. Unfortunately your interpretation of the data is completely wrong. You gained ZERO from the belt wrap kit. Your trap remained the same = NO power gain. I guess if you paid in cash you could consider it a lightweight mod because your pockets are lighter. I can take a car and cut different 60's and say the ET gains are form anything I want (i.e. lucky rabbit's foot gained 0.1s). Any educated racer would take one look at those slips and say NO power gains from belt wrap kit.
Lots of sales on this forum are driven by BS and fanboyism. I can't remember the last product that actually showed real proven results on here. One guy buys it and posts ZOMGGGG my traction control light blinks 12 times now it's soooo fast!!! And everyone buys it
I'm glad someone knows what they are talking about
Don't you have to unbolt at least one side for the belt?
Lots of sales on this forum are driven by BS and fanboyism. I can't remember the last product that actually showed real proven results on here. One guy buys it and posts ZOMGGGG my traction control light blinks 12 times now it's soooo fast!!! And everyone buys it
Your best 60' time resulted in your quickest ET. That's how its supposed to be and likely had nothing to do with the belt kit.
If you gained a mph or two on trap, id say you were making more power.
Concrete data would be runs compared from same day that were all logged. Way to many variables possible to attribute it to a belt mod. PCM pulling 1 or 2 degrees due to fuel octane inconsistency is a tenth alone.
If you gained a mph or two on trap, id say you were making more power.
Concrete data would be runs compared from same day that were all logged. Way to many variables possible to attribute it to a belt mod. PCM pulling 1 or 2 degrees due to fuel octane inconsistency is a tenth alone.
Don't you have to unbolt at least one side for the belt?
#18
Super Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 698
Received 16 Likes
on
13 Posts
C215 CL55 AMG, W124 500E, W210 E430, W124 300E
We should really measure boost aswell. In my case i have a constant 1PSI increase in boost compared to without BWK.
What does 1PSI more boost nets in Power on the engines? I think together with a Tune it will be more noticable.
What is stock boost on thees cars anyway? Anyone has solid proof by MB? I cant find any numbers by MB in the internet, even though i am german and these cars are german... grrr... I read here in one comment that the cars are supposed to have 0.8bar stock (thats 11.6PSI)
What did you guys measure as stock boost?
My CL55 made 0.68 bar (9.86 PSI) before the BWK and now 0.75bar (10.9 PSI) with BWK. If the 0.8 bar figure is correct, how comes my engine wise "stock" car makes less boost than it should? How comes the car is still a freaking beast and is still even a bit quicker than the factory claims?
What does 1PSI more boost nets in Power on the engines? I think together with a Tune it will be more noticable.
What is stock boost on thees cars anyway? Anyone has solid proof by MB? I cant find any numbers by MB in the internet, even though i am german and these cars are german... grrr... I read here in one comment that the cars are supposed to have 0.8bar stock (thats 11.6PSI)
What did you guys measure as stock boost?
My CL55 made 0.68 bar (9.86 PSI) before the BWK and now 0.75bar (10.9 PSI) with BWK. If the 0.8 bar figure is correct, how comes my engine wise "stock" car makes less boost than it should? How comes the car is still a freaking beast and is still even a bit quicker than the factory claims?
#19
MBWorld Fanatic!
If you log then you can do the test, I'm sure it's colder where you are right now also and you have the autobahn to test without getting into trouble like here lol.
Buy a new belt to fit the stock setup tight and then test with the bwk. 3rd gear pulls.
Post up your logs.
Boost
Rpm
Tps
Iat
Yes more boost will mean more power
Buy a new belt to fit the stock setup tight and then test with the bwk. 3rd gear pulls.
Post up your logs.
Boost
Rpm
Tps
Iat
Yes more boost will mean more power
#20
Super Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 698
Received 16 Likes
on
13 Posts
C215 CL55 AMG, W124 500E, W210 E430, W124 300E
Well its not logging, just momentarily seeing values that are refreshed every second. See the picture in the left corner. Its called Ultragauge.
The "old" belt before the BWK was just one year old and 8000KM (5000miles) with 95% grandpa style driving.
The "old" belt before the BWK was just one year old and 8000KM (5000miles) with 95% grandpa style driving.
#23
Super Member
#25
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Nice concrete numbers. Unfortunately your interpretation of the data is completely wrong. You gained ZERO from the belt wrap kit. Your trap remained the same = NO power gain. I guess if you paid in cash you could consider it a lightweight mod because your pockets are lighter. I can take a car and cut different 60's and say the ET gains are form anything I want (i.e. lucky rabbit's foot gained 0.1s). Any educated racer would take one look at those slips and say NO power gains from belt wrap kit.
Lots of sales on this forum are driven by BS and fanboyism. I can't remember the last product that actually showed real proven results on here. One guy buys it and posts ZOMGGGG my traction control light blinks 12 times now it's soooo fast!!! And everyone buys it
Lots of sales on this forum are driven by BS and fanboyism. I can't remember the last product that actually showed real proven results on here. One guy buys it and posts ZOMGGGG my traction control light blinks 12 times now it's soooo fast!!! And everyone buys it
Thank you for educating me, although your diplomacy could use a little work.