100-200 kph 60-124mph times
#101
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: miami / delray beach
Posts: 2,841
Received 202 Likes
on
155 Posts
2014 E63s amg 4matic, 2009 C63, 2006 E55 AMG , 2001.5 AUDI S4 stg 3+ w/meth
maybe we are talking 2 different situations. From a standstill yes it's mid 6 if that's what you mean, but I meant from a roll starting it in 3rd gear from 100-200
here my friend has it recorded on video. I don't think w3 kit would do better for most people at least
https://instagram.com/p/BDy7PyaKH-7/
here my friend has it recorded on video. I don't think w3 kit would do better for most people at least
https://instagram.com/p/BDy7PyaKH-7/
vbox or it doesnt count... highly doubt only tune w/dps stock turbo e63 is running 6.0 100-200 as that is 7.2 60-130 and previous record was like 7.7 so you just smashed the record
and at 6.0 sec you are only off the 840 awhp pureturbos e63 run of 5.3 100-200 (6.3 60-130) by about 7/10ths so again, VBOX or it doesnt count
Last edited by gaspam; 02-15-2017 at 11:21 AM.
The following users liked this post:
Amg63- (02-15-2017)
#102
MBWorld Fanatic!
Nothing better out there? Wrong, I was far from saying there is nothing better out there. In fact I told him in an earlier post that an RS7 sounds like it would of been a better choice for him to achieve his goals in wanting a super fast 4 door and the response was that it's too boring for him.
and roll racing? I along with many others already know that in this segment the m5 is best suited for that.
So just because I don't agree with them that the hellcat isn't a better car that turns me into an "amg fanboy" who never admits another car can be better than it in certain things? Wrong.
I could careless if one one day a hellcat passes me, I'm not trying to get the fastest 4 door car possible and never said the E is the best fit for that, but my opinion still stands that's it's better built and has better quality and will outlast a hellcat.
You can talk all day long about modding each car and what will happen in 5 years from now when people do whatever, that's irrelevant at this point and the sky is the limit when going deeply into modding any car.
As for GM, my good friend recently had a 2014 Grand Cherokee, and has no upgraded his lease to the jeep SRT8 so I have an idea of how the quality compares. Forget my opinion, when I took him for a ride in the E63 it was him that came out saying the overall feel of the AMG was much better to him sitting in the passenger seat after a 20 minute cruise.
Only squeeking I have on mine is the pano roof, and I agree that is unacceptable on a 100k Benz, other than that however it's fine.
The comfort you you speak of is just as you say, can't have your cake and eat it. It likely handles much better than the GM you drove which is always the trade off for comfort regardless of the car brand and considering how well the AMG handles at its weight and size it sure is comfortable.
and roll racing? I along with many others already know that in this segment the m5 is best suited for that.
So just because I don't agree with them that the hellcat isn't a better car that turns me into an "amg fanboy" who never admits another car can be better than it in certain things? Wrong.
I could careless if one one day a hellcat passes me, I'm not trying to get the fastest 4 door car possible and never said the E is the best fit for that, but my opinion still stands that's it's better built and has better quality and will outlast a hellcat.
You can talk all day long about modding each car and what will happen in 5 years from now when people do whatever, that's irrelevant at this point and the sky is the limit when going deeply into modding any car.
As for GM, my good friend recently had a 2014 Grand Cherokee, and has no upgraded his lease to the jeep SRT8 so I have an idea of how the quality compares. Forget my opinion, when I took him for a ride in the E63 it was him that came out saying the overall feel of the AMG was much better to him sitting in the passenger seat after a 20 minute cruise.
Only squeeking I have on mine is the pano roof, and I agree that is unacceptable on a 100k Benz, other than that however it's fine.
The comfort you you speak of is just as you say, can't have your cake and eat it. It likely handles much better than the GM you drove which is always the trade off for comfort regardless of the car brand and considering how well the AMG handles at its weight and size it sure is comfortable.
Last edited by Amg63-; 02-15-2017 at 01:57 PM.
#103
MBWorld Fanatic!
counting the seconds on videos dont count for measuring 100-200 times, since even just count being off by 9/10ths of a sec would be a lot on a 7.0 sec time..then becomes 6.1
vbox or it doesnt count... highly doubt only tune w/dps stock turbo e63 is running 6.0 100-200 as that is 7.2 60-130 and previous record was like 7.7 so you just smashed the record
and at 6.0 sec you are only off the 840 awhp pureturbos e63 run of 5.3 100-200 (6.3 60-130) by about 7/10ths so again, VBOX or it doesnt count
vbox or it doesnt count... highly doubt only tune w/dps stock turbo e63 is running 6.0 100-200 as that is 7.2 60-130 and previous record was like 7.7 so you just smashed the record
and at 6.0 sec you are only off the 840 awhp pureturbos e63 run of 5.3 100-200 (6.3 60-130) by about 7/10ths so again, VBOX or it doesnt count
#104
#105
MBWorld Fanatic!
And I agree with you that hellcat is less boring and cheaper AND faster, not saying its not.
You are arguing benz has no better build quality, just $30k more for extra leather on the dash, and i will disagree with that wholeheartedly. Compared to M/RS/AMG it just isnt.
Its a tradeoff and your bad experience you had with benz doesnt change it.
You are arguing benz has no better build quality, just $30k more for extra leather on the dash, and i will disagree with that wholeheartedly. Compared to M/RS/AMG it just isnt.
Its a tradeoff and your bad experience you had with benz doesnt change it.
#106
And I agree with you that hellcat is less boring and cheaper AND faster, not saying its not.
You are arguing benz has no better build quality, just $30k more for extra leather on the dash, and i will disagree with that wholeheartedly. Compared to M/RS/AMG it just isnt.
Its a tradeoff and your bad experience you had with benz doesnt change it.
You are arguing benz has no better build quality, just $30k more for extra leather on the dash, and i will disagree with that wholeheartedly. Compared to M/RS/AMG it just isnt.
Its a tradeoff and your bad experience you had with benz doesnt change it.
#107
MBWorld Fanatic!
Leather i dont see whats not high quality about it, but if HC is better for you then im happy for you.
#108
Leather not about quality , about the fill , if you have a chance to touch HC leather seat you'll get right away what I'm talking about .
Screen - it's not just about screen .
In HC I can monitor
AFR wide band
oil pressure
all the tempts everywhere (oils all of them , coolant etc )
there is 14 different gauges , I'm not recall all of them .
How nice to see your AFR on tuned car .
What I'm really missing is the hold brake and line assist
The following users liked this post:
Amg63- (02-15-2017)
#109
MBWorld Fanatic!
better for me would be 1k hp E63 , but to late .
Leather not about quality , about the fill , if you have a chance to touch HC leather seat you'll get right away what I'm talking about .
Screen - it's not just about screen .
In HC I can monitor
AFR wide band
oil pressure
all the tempts everywhere (oils all of them , coolant etc )
there is 14 different gauges , I'm not recall all of them .
How nice to see your AFR on tuned car .
What I'm really missing is the hold brake and line assist
Leather not about quality , about the fill , if you have a chance to touch HC leather seat you'll get right away what I'm talking about .
Screen - it's not just about screen .
In HC I can monitor
AFR wide band
oil pressure
all the tempts everywhere (oils all of them , coolant etc )
there is 14 different gauges , I'm not recall all of them .
How nice to see your AFR on tuned car .
What I'm really missing is the hold brake and line assist
I guess its a trade off which clearly works out better for your desired goals.
Last edited by Amg63-; 02-15-2017 at 01:50 PM.
The following users liked this post:
Fairbird (02-15-2017)
#110
Senior Member
better for me would be 1k hp E63 , but to late .
Leather not about quality , about the fill , if you have a chance to touch HC leather seat you'll get right away what I'm talking about .
Screen - it's not just about screen .
In HC I can monitor
AFR wide band
oil pressure
all the tempts everywhere (oils all of them , coolant etc )
there is 14 different gauges , I'm not recall all of them .
How nice to see your AFR on tuned car .
What I'm really missing is the hold brake and line assist
Leather not about quality , about the fill , if you have a chance to touch HC leather seat you'll get right away what I'm talking about .
Screen - it's not just about screen .
In HC I can monitor
AFR wide band
oil pressure
all the tempts everywhere (oils all of them , coolant etc )
there is 14 different gauges , I'm not recall all of them .
How nice to see your AFR on tuned car .
What I'm really missing is the hold brake and line assist
The following users liked this post:
Fairbird (02-17-2017)
#111
MBWorld Fanatic!
The following users liked this post:
Zod (04-16-2017)
#115
Senior Member
Nice.
Hope you are satisfied with the car! What is your impression vs. your former tuning?
Have fun with the beast!
The following users liked this post:
Amg63- (03-23-2017)
#118
Super Member
maybe we are talking 2 different situations. From a standstill yes it's mid 6 if that's what you mean, but I meant from a roll starting it in 3rd gear from 100-200
here my friend has it recorded on video. I don't think w3 kit would do better for most people at least
https://instagram.com/p/BDy7PyaKH-7/
here my friend has it recorded on video. I don't think w3 kit would do better for most people at least
https://instagram.com/p/BDy7PyaKH-7/
#119
MBWorld Fanatic!
#120
Member
Hi guys,
I am Alex from Germany.
I have a CLS RWD with about 830hp and 1380 Nm torque.
A number of mods, happy to fill in on info on another post if of interest.
We have 102 octane fuel here in Germany and I run a 5.5 - 5.7
for the 100.200 kph. pictures attached
I am Alex from Germany.
I have a CLS RWD with about 830hp and 1380 Nm torque.
A number of mods, happy to fill in on info on another post if of interest.
We have 102 octane fuel here in Germany and I run a 5.5 - 5.7
for the 100.200 kph. pictures attached
Last edited by alexdou111; 04-15-2017 at 01:23 AM.
The following users liked this post:
Fairbird (04-15-2017)
#122
Member
Sänks män, yes Ze power is gut hehehe
a number of mods tbh
The mapping was done by:
http://cor-tuning.de/
and main mods are:
- TTH Turbo Modifikation
- Kleemann Downpipes
- Exhaust System by Supersport
- Iridium spark plugs
- modified clutch by Trade4you
- AMS cool Kit
- RK autowerks CLS63 intakes
- UPD Crank Pulley
- UPD idler Kit
- AMG differential lock modified by limitedslip.de
a number of mods tbh
The mapping was done by:
http://cor-tuning.de/
and main mods are:
- TTH Turbo Modifikation
- Kleemann Downpipes
- Exhaust System by Supersport
- Iridium spark plugs
- modified clutch by Trade4you
- AMS cool Kit
- RK autowerks CLS63 intakes
- UPD Crank Pulley
- UPD idler Kit
- AMG differential lock modified by limitedslip.de