Coupe/Roadster
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Stock HP/TRQ #'s

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 08-25-2017, 08:34 PM
  #1  
RJC
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
RJC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: 2000 ft over the Fl coast in a B-17
Posts: 5,512
Received 150 Likes on 106 Posts
Question Stock HP/TRQ #'s

What can I expect the motor in a stock GT C to really be delivering?
Old 08-25-2017, 10:18 PM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
thecutter64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 1,075
Received 219 Likes on 155 Posts
2018 Solarbeam Yellow AMG GTS
550 HP
Old 08-25-2017, 11:09 PM
  #3  
RJC
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
RJC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: 2000 ft over the Fl coast in a B-17
Posts: 5,512
Received 150 Likes on 106 Posts
Are you saying these engines are not underrated? Even the m278 in my 550 is 20hp over its advertised 450hp...torque is also understated. Renntech checked stock #'s for their baseline.
Old 08-25-2017, 11:52 PM
  #4  
Member
 
sl600fanatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: California
Posts: 127
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
AMG GTS, Bentley GT,SL600, Range Rover V8 5.0 Supercharged, Aston Martin Rapide S, S600
Originally Posted by RJC
Are you saying these engines are not underrated? Even the m278 in my 550 is 20hp over its advertised 450hp...torque is also understated. Renntech checked stock #'s for their baseline.
All the AMG GT series HP numbers are underrated. Not sure why. Maybe because they are hand built you cannot get precise numbers so they underrate to be conservative and avoid lawsuits.

This car is full of mysteries and surprises. Car and Driver tested a stock GTS at 0-60 3.0 seconds flat all day. Which would put the GTR probably around 2.7 or so. Which means an ECU tuned GT or GTS is around 2.6.
Old 08-26-2017, 12:23 AM
  #5  
RJC
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
RJC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: 2000 ft over the Fl coast in a B-17
Posts: 5,512
Received 150 Likes on 106 Posts
Originally Posted by sl600fanatic
All the AMG GT series HP numbers are underrated. Not sure why. Maybe because they are hand built you cannot get precise numbers so they underrate to be conservative and avoid lawsuits.

This car is full of mysteries and surprises. Car and Driver tested a stock GTS at 0-60 3.0 seconds flat all day. Which would put the GTR probably around 2.7 or so. Which means an ECU tuned GT or GTS is around 2.6.
That's what I figured. Have you any data on qm trap speeds?
Old 08-26-2017, 09:02 AM
  #6  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
emericr's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Naples FL
Posts: 2,925
Received 167 Likes on 133 Posts
2021 Porsche TTS
While I agree MB underrates the power on the GT-XX cars, the flat 3 second from C&D is an extrapolation at sea level. Even tuned, you will lucky to get close to that magic 3.0s number. 2.XX is dreamland.
If you don't believe me, line up against a Tesla P100D or 911TT with race start and see how bad from the start you get beat and catching up is way after 80mph if at all depending which model you are racing.
Originally Posted by sl600fanatic
All the AMG GT series HP numbers are underrated. Not sure why. Maybe because they are hand built you cannot get precise numbers so they underrate to be conservative and avoid lawsuits.

This car is full of mysteries and surprises. Car and Driver tested a stock GTS at 0-60 3.0 seconds flat all day. Which would put the GTR probably around 2.7 or so. Which means an ECU tuned GT or GTS is around 2.6.
Old 08-26-2017, 11:45 AM
  #7  
Member
 
sl600fanatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: California
Posts: 127
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
AMG GTS, Bentley GT,SL600, Range Rover V8 5.0 Supercharged, Aston Martin Rapide S, S600
Originally Posted by emericr
While I agree MB underrates the power on the GT-XX cars, the flat 3 second from C&D is an extrapolation at sea level. Even tuned, you will lucky to get close to that magic 3.0s number. 2.XX is dreamland.
If you don't believe me, line up against a Tesla P100D or 911TT with race start and see how bad from the start you get beat and catching up is way after 80mph if at all depending which model you are racing.
Car & Driver does not extrapolate. They state their numbers as they are measured, and they got 3.0 seconds with a 11.2 1/4 mile. Here is the review:

http://www.caranddriver.com/comparis...mg-gt-s-page-3
Old 08-26-2017, 01:14 PM
  #8  
RJC
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
RJC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: 2000 ft over the Fl coast in a B-17
Posts: 5,512
Received 150 Likes on 106 Posts
Originally Posted by sl600fanatic
Car & Driver does not extrapolate. They state their numbers as they are measured, and they got 3.0 seconds with a 11.2 1/4 mile. Here is the review:

http://www.caranddriver.com/comparis...mg-gt-s-page-3
Thanks for the link. 127 mph trap speed is within 911 Turbo S territory...I'm guessing the GT C is putting out close to 600hp.

Last edited by RJC; 08-26-2017 at 01:20 PM.
Old 08-26-2017, 01:33 PM
  #9  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
AMG 17GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: ATLANTA
Posts: 3,964
Received 696 Likes on 530 Posts
R Nine T
Originally Posted by RJC
Thanks for the link. 127 mph trap speed is within 911 Turbo S territory...I'm guessing the GT C is putting out close to 600hp.
I believe an accurate estimate is 30-50 hp underrated on these cars.

Love that quote in your sig
Old 08-26-2017, 01:53 PM
  #10  
RJC
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
RJC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: 2000 ft over the Fl coast in a B-17
Posts: 5,512
Received 150 Likes on 106 Posts
Originally Posted by AMG 17GT
I believe an accurate estimate is 30-50 hp underrated on these cars.

Love that quote in your sig
Thanks.

Sounds about right. Someone in Europe must have dyno'd one of these by now.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Stock HP/TRQ #'s



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:50 PM.