Coupe/Roadster
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Tuned AMG GT-R vs Tuned M6 - 1/2 Mile

Old 01-27-2019, 01:28 PM
  #1  
SGC
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
SGC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2006 CL65
Tuned AMG GT-R vs Tuned M6 - 1/2 Mile

Old 01-27-2019, 06:06 PM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
thebishman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Overland Park, KS
Posts: 2,439
Received 949 Likes on 570 Posts
‘24 BMW iX M60
Looks like the M6 got an early jump. If they had started at the same time I believe the GT R would have pulled out a larger gap.
Old 01-27-2019, 06:23 PM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
AMG 17GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: ATLANTA
Posts: 3,962
Received 694 Likes on 528 Posts
R Nine T
155 not so fast for 700hp cars in 1/2 mile.
Old 01-27-2019, 06:28 PM
  #4  
Administrator

 
Rock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 4,062
Received 505 Likes on 111 Posts
Drives Slowly
^ Right. It seems a bit off. I thought stock 600 hp cars trapped mid 150 in the 1/2 mile.
Old 01-27-2019, 06:58 PM
  #5  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
AMG 17GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: ATLANTA
Posts: 3,962
Received 694 Likes on 528 Posts
R Nine T
Originally Posted by thebishman
Looks like the M6 got an early jump. If they had started at the same time I believe the GT R would have pulled out a larger gap.
Bish in the 1/2 it’s about MPH.
Old 01-28-2019, 10:49 AM
  #6  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
thebishman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Overland Park, KS
Posts: 2,439
Received 949 Likes on 570 Posts
‘24 BMW iX M60
Originally Posted by AMG 17GT


Bish in the 1/2 it’s about MPH.

True, and I get that, but the M6 was multiple car lengths ahead at the start which I thought odd given that the GT R had equal HP, and is lighter. It vexed me! lol

Bish
Old 01-28-2019, 11:17 AM
  #7  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
AMG 17GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: ATLANTA
Posts: 3,962
Received 694 Likes on 528 Posts
R Nine T
Originally Posted by thebishman



True, and I get that, but the M6 was multiple car lengths ahead at the start which I thought odd given that the GT R had equal HP, and is lighter. It vexed me! lol

Bish
m6 AWd. I ran a Huracan In a half mile event in north Georgia and he destroyed me off the line and beat me to the line but my miles per hour was higher at 155
Old 01-28-2019, 02:21 PM
  #8  
Administrator

 
Vic55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: THE Orange County, California
Posts: 11,921
Received 795 Likes on 495 Posts
2020 Audi R8 V10, 2016 AMG GTS, 2018 E63S Edition 1, 2018 Porsche GTS Cab, 2012 C63 BS
M6 is not AWD and its a porker; I had one and it was tuned. The jump is the jump but the car with better hp to weight ratio won. I think the weight delta is circa 800 lbs??
The following users liked this post:
thebishman (01-29-2019)
Old 01-28-2019, 03:25 PM
  #9  
Junior Member
 
wrs488's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 24
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
amg gt c roadster
Originally Posted by Vic55
M6 is not AWD and its a porker; I had one and it was tuned. The jump is the jump but the car with better hp to weight ratio won. I think the weight delta is circa 800 lbs??
The looks delta is at least 2x..............



Old 01-28-2019, 04:52 PM
  #10  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
JSwan724's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 1,363
Received 536 Likes on 335 Posts
2024 AMG G63
A question to ask you is how much do you drive the Ferrari? Month/Year?

I am looking at a 2019 but I was reminded that excessive milage and the ongoing service expense would quickly change my mind.

Would you say the the MB GTR is better in this regard especially for a daily driver?

Many thanks

Jerry
Old 01-28-2019, 05:04 PM
  #11  
Super Member
 
surfah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 556
Received 80 Likes on 58 Posts
2018 AMG GTS, 2015 911 GT3, 2017 E300, 2014 X3 35i
Can't speak for the 488 but the 458 is a better daily than the GTS. The front is shorter and it's easier to navigate tight spaces. Set the transmission to Race and the suspension to Bumpy Road and it's as compliant as the GTS with a more linear throttle due to the N/A engine. With the roof up you can roll down the rear window and listen to the glorious engine note.

Also, service is included for the first 7 years of ownership. OEM warranty is for 3 years.

You take a hit in resale once mileage goes over 10K so I traded mine in for a Huracan after 2 years.
Old 01-28-2019, 07:34 PM
  #12  
Junior Member
 
wrs488's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 24
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
amg gt c roadster
Originally Posted by JSwan724
A question to ask you is how much do you drive the Ferrari? Month/Year?

I am looking at a 2019 but I was reminded that excessive milage and the ongoing service expense would quickly change my mind.

Would you say the the MB GTR is better in this regard especially for a daily driver?

Many thanks

Jerry
I bought mine in May and have 2300 miles on it so probably about 3500/yr like I did with the Cali T HS. The annual service is paid for by Ferrari for the first 7 years. I didn't have any service expense on my 2017 Cali T HS or the 2018 488 yet. I imagine that brake pad wear and replacing the tires is going to be an expense on the 488 in the next 6 months because I have tracked it twice.

My wife is DDing the AMG, it's the wifemobile. She took it to Dallas last weekend and drives it all the time now. I used to have to fight her for the Range Rover because she didn't like parking the QP, it's two inches longer than a 750Li. I have only gotten to drive the AMG a few times but I liked it. I drive the Ferrari about three to four times a week depending on weather and the trips I make where I can use it. It's easy to drive for the same reasons mentioned by surfah and the Daytona Full Electric seats in mine are more comfortable than the Recaro seats but I really, really like the cockpit layout in the AMG.
Old 01-29-2019, 08:00 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
canucklehead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 368
Received 202 Likes on 120 Posts
Winnebago, Yugo
Originally Posted by thebishman
Looks like the M6 got an early jump. If they had started at the same time I believe the GT R would have pulled out a larger gap.
Probably has more to do with the horrible lag or torque management from punching it off the line. When I drag race most of my vehicles I leave off the last amber. With the GTR I have to leave off the second amber or a bit sooner to cut a good light.
I would have hoped with a tune they could dial the TM back if that is what it is.

Last edited by canucklehead; 01-29-2019 at 08:06 AM.
Old 01-29-2019, 01:59 PM
  #14  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
thebishman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Overland Park, KS
Posts: 2,439
Received 949 Likes on 570 Posts
‘24 BMW iX M60
Originally Posted by canucklehead
Probably has more to do with the horrible lag or torque management from punching it off the line. When I drag race most of my vehicles I leave off the last amber. With the GTR I have to leave off the second amber or a bit sooner to cut a good light.
I would have hoped with a tune they could dial the TM back if that is what it is.

There is essentially zero lag in my OEM tuned GT R; at any speed. Perhaps the 'tuned' GT R which I think was advertised at 700 hp is far more 'laggy' than a stock car?

Bish
Old 01-29-2019, 03:10 PM
  #15  
Administrator

 
Vic55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: THE Orange County, California
Posts: 11,921
Received 795 Likes on 495 Posts
2020 Audi R8 V10, 2016 AMG GTS, 2018 E63S Edition 1, 2018 Porsche GTS Cab, 2012 C63 BS
Originally Posted by thebishman
There is essentially zero lag in my OEM tuned GT R; at any speed. Perhaps the 'tuned' GT R which I think was advertised at 700 hp is far more 'laggy' than a stock car?

Bish
Or Driver Error?

Thats almost always the case- these cars spool up so fast and a tune wont create more lag.
Old 01-29-2019, 05:03 PM
  #16  
Member
 
Rausky's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 83
Received 28 Likes on 18 Posts
AMG GT S
Is it also possible they had a ton of wheel spin? Curious what tires they're running because my R888Rs hook like an AWD car, even with a tune.
Old 01-29-2019, 05:27 PM
  #17  
Junior Member
 
wrs488's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 24
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
amg gt c roadster
I tuned my 991tts up to the max and it was basically overpowering the ability of the DCT to account properly for all the added torque. My car had a problem with LC because of the torque. Even with TC off, LC will manage the shift in first gear. My car was spinning halfway through first gear even with LC and then it would shift to 2nd but spin again on the shift to 3rd. I couldn't tell from the drivers seat that it was spinning like that but I could see it in the OBD data that I collected using the AP from Cobb that provided the tune. It could also be seen in the Vbox plot of speed vs time.
Old 01-29-2019, 06:25 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
canucklehead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 368
Received 202 Likes on 120 Posts
Winnebago, Yugo
Originally Posted by thebishman
There is essentially zero lag in my OEM tuned GT R; at any speed. Perhaps the 'tuned' GT R which I think was advertised at 700 hp is far more 'laggy' than a stock car?

Bish
I don't have any lag once the car is moving, but initially from a dead stop and I mash the pedal, it is literally a 2 count before anything happens.
Old 01-29-2019, 08:09 PM
  #19  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
thebishman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Overland Park, KS
Posts: 2,439
Received 949 Likes on 570 Posts
‘24 BMW iX M60
Originally Posted by canucklehead
I don't have any lag once the car is moving, but initially from a dead stop and I mash the pedal, it is literally a 2 count before anything happens.
Then you need to get your car checked; there is absolutely no way that I experience a two second lag from a stand still.

If you are doing this; mashing the pedal when stopped, make sure you're not in 'C' mode since the car has 2nd gear engaged when stopped in that mode, and if you go and 'mash the pedal', the DCT 'might' be taking a second to engage first before taking off. That 'could' be a source of the lag of which you speak.

Bish
Old 01-29-2019, 08:11 PM
  #20  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
thebishman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Overland Park, KS
Posts: 2,439
Received 949 Likes on 570 Posts
‘24 BMW iX M60
Originally Posted by Vic55
Or Driver Error?

Thats almost always the case- these cars spool up so fast and a tune wont create more lag.
You are correct, my old friend; driver error could well be the most likely reason. When I punch the throttle from a stop it's a pretty violent take-off in the GT R.

Bish
Old 01-29-2019, 08:19 PM
  #21  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
California John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Irvine, California
Posts: 1,084
Received 337 Likes on 192 Posts
2022 AMG SL63
Originally Posted by thebishman
Then you need to get your car checked; there is absolutely no way that I experience a two second lag from a stand still.

If you are doing this; mashing the pedal when stopped, make sure you're not in 'C' mode since the car has 2nd gear engaged when stopped in that mode, and if you go and 'mash the pedal', the DCT 'might' be taking a second to engage first before taking off. That 'could' be a source of the lag of which you speak.

Bish
Nope. Car is not in 2nd in Comfort Mode. It's in 1st. See photo:


Old 01-29-2019, 08:29 PM
  #22  
Junior Member
 
Patton250's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 24
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2016 C450
The green hurt my brain. Green looks good on a submariner but definitely not a Mercedes.
Old 01-30-2019, 10:53 AM
  #23  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
thebishman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Overland Park, KS
Posts: 2,439
Received 949 Likes on 570 Posts
‘24 BMW iX M60
Originally Posted by California John
Nope. Car is not in 2nd in Comfort Mode. It's in 1st. See photo:
That’s interesting John, I thought I had read in the manual that the car is in 2nd at a stop when in ‘C’ mode. I’ll check this myself when it finally gets above 40dF! lol
Old 01-30-2019, 11:00 AM
  #24  
Junior Member
 
wrs488's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 24
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
amg gt c roadster
Originally Posted by thebishman


That’s interesting John, I thought I had read in the manual that the car is in 2nd at a stop when in ‘C’ mode. I’ll check this myself when it finally gets above 40dF! lol
I recall the sales guy saying that the car starts out in 2nd using C mode. Doesn't mean that it sits in 2nd at idle though.
Old 01-30-2019, 12:38 PM
  #25  
Junior Member
 
sattman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 59
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
2016 S550 coupe and 2018 AMG GTR
When i had my S63 coupe, in comfort mode it started out in 2nd, in the GTR it starts out in 1st as the picture above indicates.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:
You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Tuned AMG GT-R vs Tuned M6 - 1/2 Mile



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:45 PM.