Ticking NOise from Engine
Ok to answer mdp c230k's question u r VERY LUCKY not to have any issues for a year and a half. That is unheard of for Benz now a days LOL.
I'm also in the 'no problems' category. Ok, I had a cracked button this winter on my steering wheel... no biggie, it got replaced while I drove an E320 for a day. Its been the most trouble free car Ive ever owned- better by far than my Accord. I'm not saying all Accords are unreliable cars- I bought it thinking it would be problem free- and accepting its dull, appliance like styling and character to be the trade off for it- well, it turned out to be a royal POS. The parts prices would make German makers jealous.
peace bro
Nice well put togther fantasy OUTLAND lol lol lol. Keep dreaming that Benz actually has quality over japaneese cars.
Funny, that's who scores Honda and TOyota on top. Perhaps you should stop lumping all the "japanese" makes together- as Mitsubishi and Nissan have abysmal quality. IIRC, Nissan was in the basement last year- even worse than VW.
I have no issues to admit to. I put the key in and drive it. That's it. Its quiet, rides nice, great power and handling that gets better the harder you drive it. When it comes time to replace it, i'll look for another coupe. I doubt it'll be another MB, unless they relent and start putting manuals in more of its cars. I love the CLK, but with an automatic, forget it. Its too big anyway. Perhaps if the next C-Coupe is a looker, I'll buy one.
Youre the guy who bought the 'image' car. An MB sedan, can't get more pimp than that.

peace bro
Last edited by Outland; May 23, 2003 at 09:47 PM.
...who thinks his MB is the best on the entire planet. anyway, a same type of car for you/outland is the Porsche 996 Targa, but i guess that's out of your price range. the 209 CLK is only an *** longer and 12 mm wider. IT's not any larger other than having an actual trunk and rear seat space is pretty much the same. The C-coupe is wider than the 208 CLK. So, the CLK is too big?! NO. Longer? YES.why do you think MB created the C-coupe? the answer is to attract younger buyer for it's brand "image". think about it, how many ppl out there was not able to afford a MB till the C-coupe came out. MB sells it's C-coupe to ppl who want MB's brand "image" at a affordable price.
btw, i finally found a picture for ya OUTLAND!
SKYLINE GT sedan
Last edited by FrankW; May 24, 2003 at 06:16 AM.
no point arguing with outland...cuz he's just out there...
...who thinks his MB is the best on the entire planet. anyway, a same type of car for you/outland is the Porsche 996 Targa, but i guess that's out of your price range. the 209 CLK is only an *** longer and 12 mm wider. IT's not any larger other than having an actual trunk and rear seat space is pretty much the same. The C-coupe is wider than the 208 CLK. So, the CLK is too big?! NO. Longer? YES.why do you think MB created the C-coupe? the answer is to attract younger buyer for it's brand "image". think about it, how many ppl out there was not able to afford a MB till the C-coupe came out. MB sells it's C-coupe to ppl who want MB's brand "image" at a affordable price.[/B]
As far as affordable goes, when you start buying your own car with your own money(one you don't need to ask you dad's permission on) come back and talk. Not everyone wants to sink 50K into a car, even if they can afford it. A ski condo, or cabin in the mountains for winter vacations is a higher priority for me.
Ok outland, first u r very lucky to have a good car, your friend with the celica is very UNLLUCKY. simple as that. Now lets address all the issues that Bnez had when they had the 01 made for the C class that by 02 and 03 models have NOT fixed nor have been able to fix.
Honda's transmission troubles went on for nearly 4 years, until a class action lawsuit waiting in the wings got them to change thier tune on the warranty claims. Same with the sludge problems in Toyota 4 and V6 motors. Often times it takes pressure from an outside source before companies will address the problems. Hell, Mitsubishi admited a few years ago(2000?) that it had been THROWING OUT all of its customer complaints- it flat out didn't even read them. How's that for being proactive?
How youre treated by the dealer when you have a problem makes a big difference to some people. And this is one area where brands like Lexus and Infinity have clearly done there homework. And it doesn't take stellar product to get that customer satisfaction, either. Saturn, who had its own share of problems over the years, consistently takes the number 1 spot, with Lexus in 2nd place- so its not just a trouble free car that gets attention!
I don't care who or what they created it for...it fit my needs. I had certain requirements when I bought the car, and I wanted a coupe with a manual transmission. Quite frankly, if I wanted it, an E-Class is doable. I looked at the TT seriously- rear seat was too small- which I need for a child seat. That meant stuff with two seats was out- No Z, no Vette... Believe it or not, the C230 was not my first choice of car- but having OWNED it for awhile, Ive come to really enjoy it...deal with it.
As far as affordable goes, when you start buying your own car with your own money(one you don't need to ask you dad's permission on) come back and talk. Not everyone wants to sink 50K into a car, even if they can afford it. A ski condo, or cabin in the mountains for winter vacations is a higher priority for me.
you have no right or reason to judge me about the asian/chinese and my family's own family value when it comes to buying a car or any other thing. another thing, my dad asked me if i want to consider the C32, i didn't ask or beg him to get me one. My parents are the ones that gave me a 2 cars limit, which the next one will have to get it on my own. I have no problem driving around in a Civic or a Sentra, but i'll definitely save it up for a better car. I could be still driving the same car 9-10 years from now when you get another new car or two.
btw, did i say my car is affordable for most people? NO. I said,"MB sells it's C-coupe to ppl who want MB's brand "image" at a affordable price"
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
:p :p
I agree with you there is a risk when you buy any car regradless of manufacture. Obviously we are dealing with a machine here. But 2 things to remeber regadless what you say Japaneese will always have less problems than benz.
I have to object to your blanket statement that anything "japanese" is more reliable. Nissan, Mitsubishi, and Isuzu have notorious long term reliablity problems. And even Mazda and Subaru are not in the same league as Honda and Toyota.
I think Nissan has realized this, and that's why you are seeing more emotional designs coming out of its factories of late. I think that they figured they would never have the manufacturing efficiency of Toyota or Honda, so they had better start turning out some interesting designs. Look at the results, the Altima, new Z, G35 twins, new Maxima, and even the love it or hate it Murano. I give them credit, I don't always like the results, but its refreshing to not see another UJS product. And on the flip side- its reliablity and customer satisfaction scores dropped. You do the math.
VW is another great example- its marketed and designed its cars to have a more emotional connection to the consumer- yet its reliablity is abysmal. They farmed out too much of its manufacturing operations to Mexico- and there was plenty of design defects as well.
Now your next issue with rusting. Since when do people see more old benzs than japanees cars LOL. where do you live OLD BEVERLY HILLS???? LOL LOL LOL not true. I have been to may states and many cities by far you will see many old cars but an old benz once in a while, and geez the ones i c forget rust they need a new body LOL
Next issue, who cares about nissans emtional designs etc... you addressed. The bottom line is Benz is concerned with an image and safety rather than quality. This is a known issue. For one the japanees have managed to address all 3 safety,quality and image with no problem. Why cant benz do that? Second and i will repeat this for the third time since you are not able to answer this question even though you claim you did but u have not. By the way do not rely on JD POWERS for this question, wont get you any where LOL LOL. Ok the question is, in 01 model of the C240 there were many issues, over 20 technical issues all the way from car not starting and need to have the ignition replaced to people losing complete power in the middle of the highway do to some electrical thing needing to get replaced. Now these same problems every damn one of them also have accured on the 02 models and have occured on the 03 model. WHY, WHY WHY WHY cant benz spend some time and fix it so this wont happen on the 02 models and 03 models???????????? Now take a look at lexus and acura, when they have an issue the next year its not there. Thats what i mean by quality. Please do not defend your point using celica and accord examples, compare luxury with luxury.
By the way, did you find a musem for your car? Start looking man, thats the only good benz they ever made
just messing with you
uuh...you answered the question I DIDN'T ask. oh well, so the whole thing is about your parents not getting you a car that you can appreciate...
And I learned early on that the price of a night of redline clutch dumps at the strip was a new clutch, and a days worth of wrenching on the car on the weekend when I would have rather been out with my friends.
. Wouldn't be a mini then, now would it?
Last edited by Outland; May 28, 2003 at 10:39 PM.
MINI has little to nothing to do with the decline in the sales of the 3-series. The main reason for it's decline is that the current 3-series is basically near the end of it's production. The next 3 will probably come in 05. Other reason might being that the current A4 came out not long ago and as well as the C-class and the Jag X-type. There's whole lot of more different choices compare to what was back in 99 when the E46 just came out and facing competitor like the last A4 which has been there for some time and the W202 C-class which has also been there for some time.
Outland, that is one of the best explanations of MB's market positioning and branding strategy that I have heard in a while, and I have thought since the W203 has come out that they have done a brilliant job. Hey, I'm a statistic in favor of that argument. I personally didn't buy an E class though I probably could have because it's just a little too "old" for me right now. (Then again, check out the W211- wouldn't mind driving that one!) I wanted something stylish and sporty, and you know what? Despite the few problems I have had with my car (and perhaps because of them since I have found a great service dept!) I definitely am building some brand loyalty. I am much more likely to consider one of MB's high end cars in 10 years than I would have been before I bought my C.
By the way, I may have a little perspective on the reliability issue since I work in marketing for a manufacturing company. Now, it's not automotive related, but my experience tells me that manufacturing outfits are more or less the same regardless of industry. Outland hit the nail on the head when talking about Nissan's and VW's "emotional" designs. Whenever you begin to work on something revolutionary from a design standpoint, it is going to affect quality, end of story. When you can no longer use proven suppliers, or have to begin different tooling/molding processes, etc. you are essentially starting from Square 1. The only thing you can do is use your knowledge and your best guess to eliminate problems before they make it to the line. That said, you aren't going to catch everything.
And while we would LOVE to say "why can't they fix the problems that occurred in '01 for the '02 and '03 models?", you also have to remember that cars are not manufactured by snapping your fingers. These car makers are running a business. They have parts committments to their suppliers. They have millions of parts fabricated before they start bringing the new models to be assembled. They are not going to dump those parts and shut down the line while they make new ones. So we're talking at least a year for supplier changes, that's not even taking into account the engineering and design changes that have to take place before you can begin refabricating parts.
Honda and Toyota don't have as many problems because their year-to-year changes are subtle. Styling perhaps, but the internal components change very slowly. If you only have 1 new part as opposed to 50, you have a 1/50th of the chance of problems.
If you want an illustration on the opposite end of the spectrum, just look at McLaren Mercedes' Formula 1 team after 1999. They were plagued with reliability problems after radically changing their car design, to the point that Mika Hakkinen could practically not finish a race! I seem to remember him having a DNF on one of his last races before retirement after leading 3/4 of the race. David Coulthard, who had the second car had fewer issues since many of the initial changes were made on Hakkinen's. Before anyone jumps on me for comparing Formula 1 to street cars, let me just say that this is an illustration of a proven design being changed to some unexpected and unfortunate results. (And for you Formula1 junkies out there, don't start talking to me about recent seasons to me. I stopped watching after Mika retired. Wasn't any fun to watch Michael Schumacher win every race anymore. Though if the new generation like Raikkonen and Montoya keep it up, I may just be lured back.)
And by the way, I have no problem admitting that I'm impressed by a brilliant marketing strategy. I admire a company with creativity enough to reinvent themselves. It makes the marketplace stronger and eventually results in better and more interesting products for consumers. I back up Outland 'cause he GETS it. I know you THINK you get it, but the fact that you're arguing that it's a bad thing...
Eh, whatever. I like a good debate, and I figured that reply would be controversial (LOL- how far off topic have we really gotten???), but unfortunately it's true as well. Sorry.
By the way, you should be outraged that when the space shuttle Columbia disintegrated, most of the aerospace experts said they were surprised it hadn't happened sooner, given all the things that could go wrong in space travel, and all the parts that could be damaged. A catastrophic event every so many thousands of flight hours is to be expected, they said. THAT'S NASA FOR GOD'S SAKE! So I don't get overly upset over a passenger vehicle. (Good thing Benz doesn't make space shuttles though.)
P.S. BenzC240- thanks to you and your coworkers for the compliment. I thought my explanation sounded pretty good. Ha!
Hope that made sense. BUt since i can see u r a follower and not a starter i will go easy on u for now. lol Following and accepting things and not complaing about them and talking about the problem is why things remain how they are. Please for your on first grade education do not compare the space shuttle with the car. Those peoples lives who died should not be used for mocking purposes as u have degraded your self and used. I can see u ran out of good BS material u had to stoop so low. I still cant belive that in this day and age benzs marketing impresses u. Again is that brain surgery? lol doesnt take so much to figure out. Hell if i make a paper airplane and put a spolier on it will that impress u too? LOL LOL . So again your remark "GET OVER" is used for loser,followers, and pathetic people who cant handel good quality. Your motto should be "LETS MAKE A CHANGE, lets bring this to their attention" but to sit there and accept it because of baby food analogy u brought up is plain pathetic. By the way, since u r slow ill break it down for you, my co workers were laughing at u not with you. Again,listen, wake up and learn. Be a customer not a follower.
I considered this an interesting argument for the sake of argument, sorry that you have taken it so much to heart. Obviously what I said got to you. I will refrain from the name calling, since I really don't feel that I need to. But since you lacked the subtlety to recognize irony when it is offered, I'll spell it out for you.
The space shuttle illustration was to point out that there are FAR more important things in this world to worry about. THAT is a matter of life and death. This is not. Spend your time being outraged that the lives of a space shuttle crew died and the analysts say it's amazing it didn't happen sooner (even worse- that it's an acceptable risk for the sake of science), instead of hypothesizing that your car's failure rate reflects the worthlessness and corruption of today's business culture.
Since you didn't get it the first time, the "thanks to you and your coworkers" was tongue-in-cheek.
For the rest of you reading this thread, I'm rather tired of this topic, and if I had've had the foresight to see where this would lead us, I probably would have bailed on the thread a long time ago. BenzC240, you'll probably take that as a sign that I can't "take the heat." That's your prerogative. I would've been happy to trade jabs with you had you not ran out of valid arguments and had to stoop to ridiculous ranting.
Oh, and since you offered, I would be pretty impressed by a paper airplane with a spoiler. Give me an advertising budget and I betcha I could convince you to buy it. Hell, you're so unimpressed with Benz, but I see YOU still bought into it. Enjoy your Lexus... let us know how it works out. *wink*
So, thanks everyone, it's been fun. Anyone else want to take up where I left off? BenzC240's still got lots more to say to it, I'm sure, and I'd hate to deprive this forum of his pearls of wisdom.
btw, JadeLotus, what kind of rims do you have again? the AMG type III is the 'thin spoke' and it doesn't come in 16". Maybe you meant type II monoblock?...just letting you know you might have a typo.
1. They are making sure your car will not out last the warranty period so you will buy another new car once the warranty runs out.
2. Do not buy first year car, espeically now the US Model introduces at the sametime with European model. They used to have 1-2 years delay to work out the bugs before intro to US market but not anymore.
3. MB used to be over building there cars, but not anymore. Why? too much $.
It is too bad they no longer making car like they used to but they are still par with BMW.
DL_AMG: I have to second the "don't buy the first model year" issue. I don't remember the month that MB began producing the C-class, but my build date is 9/00, so I'd have to think I have one of the first ones that came off the line. Most of the problems that I had with my car have not been reproduced in the '02 and '03 models- I guess they figured out the big issues. True, the original owner should have had those issues addressed herself, but she wasn't nearly as picky as I am- she never noticed!
Edit: FrankW, check this out and tell me what it is... MB describes these as AMG Style III and this is exactly what I have in the 16"... maybe it's the wheel that came with the sport package in '01? I'm curious now. I'm not sure if they were on the car originally- she said she didn't like the rims that were on there, so she upgraded.
Last edited by JadeLotus; May 30, 2003 at 10:54 AM.
Now to address your issue that i dont understand irony and the tongue in cheek coment, i do get it. Im not dumb, i just wanted to use it against u LOL. Come on, where is your sense of humor? or did u take this serious enough to doubt my understanding????? ask your self that question before u accuse me of taking this to "so much heart".
About the paper plane, weather its a joke, irony, or sarcasm what ever u call it, i just want to make it clear, any one with your business philosphy cant sell me anything. Trust me u wouldnt want me buying it because i would be calling u up every day telling u how much quality sucks knowing how u will use benz's strategy in building it LOL LOL LOL
I would also like to set the record straight. Before I bought my benz i did not know anyone who actauly had the C model. Therefore i was going on the words and thoughts of most people that this car will last for a very long time, good quality, and is safe. Well I got the safe part, I didnt get the rest. So according to you "me buying into it" is compeltely false. I had no idea the C class had all these issues. My mistake was not doing some home work first and reading this forum with all the problems the other people were having before I bought my car.
As to the lexus, I have to wait another 2 years then ill have this car paid off at that point im for sure getting it.
By the way, please dont think im sitting here worying about benzs problems and my car issue 24/7 LOL, I just come here say my piece thats all. If you felt too mature for this u could have stopped responding after your first reply but u didnt, check your self before u point out my issues LOL
Now the last thing. Please try and understand where i am coming from. I do get angry at people who just accept things, who are followers and who sit back and do nothing. I cant stand to see my hard earned cash go down the drain. I also do get angry at companys who take their image for granted and slack off on quality as benz has done. So if my posts on here got to u and upset u, and dispointed u then im sorry. But i can safely tell u they really werent too targeted at u personaly but they were used for venting. So if u r up for it i am willing to have a peaceful and intelegent debate on any subject.
We can always debate this further though I'm not sure we're going to come to any conclusion... though I'm glad you agree we can do it rationally. I can understand how you are upset because your car disappointed you, but I'm still think you're misconstruing my point! Actually, I didn't intend my first post to be directed to you any more than you say your comments aren't directed to me. I was actually trying to explain why it is that problems don't get fixed, not making a value judgement or defending MB. As far as my business practices go, my company probably overcorrects based on isolated incidents, which is great for the 2 customers with a problem, but not for the thousands that would have otherwise benefited from a price decrease which will now not happen because of increased manufacturing cost. So whether or not I agree with it, I can understand it. I'm willing to bet that, unless you own your own company or work for a non-profit, your executives probably have to make tough decisions that you wouldn't like, but... you get to take home a paycheck because of those decisions. So, it really all comes back around.
I was also trying to make the point that I'm glad MB didn't decide to rest on their laurels and have decided to make some risky design and engineering decisions. Until recently, I would never have considered a small Benz because they've been known to be slugs-- that's why I drove a BMW. They finally wised up and have done a good job on capturing that part of the market. I have no doubt the quality will follow- it's just too bad that you got a crappy car in the meantime, cause you probably won't see any of the ones to come. I'm not unhappy with mine. Had the first owner known anything about cars, she would have had these problems fixed and I probably would never have known about them. They actually WERE design and parts flaws, and except for the irritating purge valve that started this whole thread, I haven't seen on this board that those issues have reoccurred much in later models. So at least something got fixed.
So... you're probably not going to convince me that MB puts out only crappy cars since I am really pretty happy with mine... and I'm not going to convince you that they don't, considering your own experience. But, hey, I'm pleased to see that you proved yourself more intelligent than your typing skills indicate. (LOL- sorry, that was just a joke in good fun- couldn't resist!)
So, you're not upset, I'm not upset... actually, I kinda get a kick out of this stuff. You think we've covered this sufficiently to close out the thread? I'll catch ya on another one- if I try hard, I'm sure I'll be able to give you something else to rant about.
Hey, FrankW, you might be right about the rims. I'll have to check it out. Unfortunately, the person I bought the car from didn't know a whole lot about cars, let alone rims, so I was going on the best information I could find about the style name online. The available options have changed some since '01 so it's not all that easy. Thanks for pointing it out...
Edit: FrankW, check this out and tell me what it is... MB describes these as AMG Style III and this is exactly what I have in the 16"... maybe it's the wheel that came with the sport package in '01? I'm curious now. I'm not sure if they were on the car originally- she said she didn't like the rims that were on there, so she upgraded.
the 01-02 C-class sport pkg came with 5-spoke 16" rims, but they were not AMG rims. maybe she got replica rims or something. Best way to figure out is for you to take a picture of your rims.
Edit: found a picture of the sport pkg on the C picture thread.
Last edited by FrankW; May 30, 2003 at 11:48 PM.
Its all good, I guess u and i will never really agree on the same issues. But hey, this was fun. I have acouple of other threads im involvd in heated debates, check me out LOL. I already have a guy there banging his head
But this was fun. Check you out later






