C-Class (W204) 2008 - 2014: C180K, C200K, C230, C280, C300, C350, C200CDI, C220CDI, C320CDI

BlueEFFICIENCY in the C-Class: Fuel consumption reduced by 12 per cent

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 02-28-2008, 05:09 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
clanosiris's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pinto
BlueEFFICIENCY in the C-Class: Fuel consumption reduced by 12 per cent

http://technology.profusehost.net/ca...y-12-per-cent/

numbers that really matter -

The data for the new C 350 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY at a glance:

Displacement — 3498 cc
Bore/stroke — 92.9/86.0 mm
Compression ratio — 12.2
Output — 215 kW/292 hp at 6400 rpm
Max. torque — 365 Nm at 3000-5100 rpm
NEDC fuel consumption — 8.4 l/100 km*
Acceleration 0-100 km/h — 6.2*
Top speed — 250 km/h**
*provisional figures; **electronically limited
Old 02-28-2008, 09:53 PM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
nyca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,398
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
we all know the story regarding CDI for the US market.

But this article talks about the direct injection 350 engine in "late 2008". Where? It is supposedly not coming to the US until 2010 at the earliest.
Old 02-28-2008, 10:04 PM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
tanktube67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: SFV CA
Posts: 4,433
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
2008 Black Out C350 Saks Edition / 87 VW GTI
Originally Posted by clanosiris
http://technology.profusehost.net/ca...y-12-per-cent/

numbers that really matter -

The data for the new C 350 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY at a glance:

Displacement — 3498 cc
Bore/stroke — 92.9/86.0 mm
Compression ratio — 12.2
Output — 215 kW/292 hp at 6400 rpm
Max. torque — 365 Nm at 3000-5100 rpm
NEDC fuel consumption — 8.4 l/100 km*
Acceleration 0-100 km/h — 6.2*
Top speed — 250 km/h**
*provisional figures; **electronically limited
Thanks Iris
Old 02-29-2008, 02:19 AM
  #4  
Member
 
rebel_mtc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1991 560SEL, 1981 300SD, 1983 300SD, 2008 C350
I think the CGI would be more expensive over the standard V6

At least for the CLS that is the case.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: BlueEFFICIENCY in the C-Class: Fuel consumption reduced by 12 per cent



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:57 AM.