When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
The rim may stick a tad out from the fender, but it's so minimal and in person this really is the best looking and sexiest offsets to run. And with the tire specs boxster and I run it damn near rolls perfect with the fender for clearance. Just fits beautiful
^^ what is the specs on those wheels.... my deal is I just installed the new TSW Portier on my w204 18x8.5 et42 18x9.5 et38 running 225/40 front tires and 255/35 rear tires im wanting to order H&R SS will I rub in the rear? can I know its going to be very close but Im wondering if lowering it will give me enough natural camber to clear my rear quarters, if not then can I do any sort of camber adjustments with a factory 4matic car as far a rear camber I would probably only need -1 degree more camber than stock... if anyone can help me out on this that would be great..
Hi from Sweden! First post here but have been snooking around for awhile!
Anyhow, here is my c350 sport with new wheels.
They are 20x10 ET50 with 255/30 Vredestein tires for the rear.
Upfront 20x8.5 ET45 with 235/30 Ns-2 tires.
Just ordered the H&R supersports and hope they Will work fine.
The wheels are Ocean Caribien. never heard of them but looked nice and did only cost 800$ for all 4 so iam happy
heres some pics. any input?
Alright so will be ordering up some M590 in a bespoke III finish that I'll keep as a surprise in the next few weeks. Tires are going to be 225/35/19F and 255/30/19R based off the common recommendation here plus past experience seeing as I'm a wheel *****.
Appears that with H&R SS most people are going 19x8.5 +35F and 9.5 +40R.
Considering with these types of wheels the lower offsets don't affect concavity there's no benefit to go low offset without the desire for flush fitment.
I am NOT into poke at all. Can anyone confirm these specs are absolutely flush and in no way protruding from the fender? I know it's beating a dead horse at this point but some pics can be deceiving. I would rather opt for 5mm less and install spacers if need be than poke and require negative camber to fit properly to my liking.
Alright so will be ordering up some M590 in a bespoke III finish that I'll keep as a surprise in the next few weeks. Tires are going to be 225/35/19F and 255/30/19R based off the common recommendation here plus past experience seeing as I'm a wheel *****.
Appears that with H&R SS most people are going 19x8.5 +35F and 9.5 +40R.
Considering with these types of wheels the lower offsets don't affect concavity there's no benefit to go low offset without the desire for flush fitment.
I am NOT into poke at all. Can anyone confirm these specs are absolutely flush and in no way protruding from the fender? I know it's beating a dead horse at this point but some pics can be deceiving. I would rather opt for 5mm less and install spacers if need be than poke and require negative camber to fit properly to my liking.
Thanks guys.
+35 front with 8.5 is flush and with the tire size witch is the same setups in running on coil overs I have very minor rub in the front only on big and hard bumps. As for the rear 9.5 +40 does have minor poke. If you want to be 100% safe then yes I suggest you go with a little higher offsets. And like you said you could always get 5mm spacers or whatever side you want. The poke is very minimal with theses specs thought. Figured I would give you my opinion on them since that's what I run. I personally think it's perfect.
04-22-2015, 12:37 PM
