C Class (W205) C 180 BlueTec,C 200 BlueTec,C 220 BlueTec,C 220 BlueTec BlueEfficiency,C 250 BlueTec,C 300 BlueTec Hybridplus,C 180,C 180 BlueEfficiency,C 200,C 250,C 300,C 400 Plug-in Hybrid,C 400
Old 06-24-2015, 05:13 PM
How-Tos on this Topic
Last edit by: IB Advertising
See related guides and technical advice from our community experts:

Browse all: Interior Guides
Print Wikipost

Official C-Class Picture Thread

Old 10-10-2014, 11:24 AM
  #76  
Senior Member
 
CO2010's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes on 11 Posts
2015 C300 RWD Sport Premium
Traded in my 2010 C300 for a BMW Z4. The Z4 is a blast to drive but I love the redesign of this C Class. Going to see if they have any good lease deals this weekend!
Old 10-10-2014, 07:42 PM
  #77  
MBW Editor
 
ManuelCarrillo3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Southern California
Posts: 177
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Audi A4
Photos of the Week: Beautiful vs. Ugly C-Class



The chasm between the beautiful and the ugly in the C-Class range is astounding. What I'm actually saying is that the $650 Luxury Package ruins the W205 C-Class more than recharging your iPhone 6 Plus in the microwave.

People on the forum have a problem with the looks of this car, and I do, too. Every time I look at it, I get this expression on my face ... I think it's the same expression that would appear if my forehead were beat with a nightstick at medium force.

Read the rest on the MBWorld homepage. >>
Old 10-10-2014, 08:22 PM
  #78  
MBWorld God!

 
hyperion667's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: 39.515509, -111.549668
Posts: 30,567
Received 3,351 Likes on 2,807 Posts
2012 CLS63
why are we cussing you out?? LOL


I'm sure the right photographer could make them both look good
Old 10-10-2014, 10:26 PM
  #79  
Super Member
 
unr1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 562
Received 43 Likes on 34 Posts
.
Originally Posted by ManuelCarrillo3


The chasm between the beautiful and the ugly in the C-Class range is astounding. What I'm actually saying is that the $650 Luxury Package ruins the W205 C-Class more than recharging your iPhone 6 Plus in the microwave.

People on the forum have a problem with the looks of this car, and I do, too. Every time I look at it, I get this expression on my face ... I think it's the same expression that would appear if my forehead were beat with a nightstick at medium force.

Read the rest on the MBWorld homepage. >>
to be fair, I haven't seen the luxury style in person, yet. When I first saw pics I thought the sport style was way sexier (and it is) but that's not what luxury is about. It's grown on me and it looks to be a sophisticated styling. Sorry if it cramps your style?

People have different tastes, get over it.
Old 10-10-2014, 11:40 PM
  #80  
Super Member
 
MB-JIM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: North Scottsdale
Posts: 910
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
06 C 350 2014 GLK350
Don't use a wide angle lens in taking car photos. It will distort the closest part and make the car look out of proportion. Move back and use a medium lens and you will get realistic photos.
Old 10-11-2014, 07:54 AM
  #81  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
StanNH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Whitefield, NH
Posts: 1,822
Received 31 Likes on 30 Posts
2015 C300 Sport: Palladium, Premium, Multimedia, Leather, BLIS
If you don't like the luxury style grill, my suggestion would be that you don't buy it. If you don't like a particular wheel style ... don't buy it.

MB offers several styling options to appeal to a variety of tastes. You don't have to like them all, but that doesn't give anyone the right to insult the tastes of others. There have been some amazingly crude, cruel, and simply childish comments made here about other people's cars.

Mutual respect is what creates the sense of camaraderie found on successful forums. To the few who seem to enjoy throwing insults around with no consideration to the feelings of others ... how about acting like responsible adults for a change?

Last edited by StanNH; 10-11-2014 at 09:14 AM.
Old 10-11-2014, 08:18 AM
  #82  
Super Member
 
wilassasin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 659
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
2013 S550 4matic (AMG sport package), 2016 Corvette Stingray.
In my opinion the luxury package looks elegant and shares the lines of the sclass , many people prefer to have the 3 pointed star on their hood and love the tradition. I personally prefer a sports model of any car, so ofcourse the sport model one would be my choice but I love the fact that mercedes didn't shove one model down our throats and force everyone to have the same exact looking car.
Old 10-11-2014, 08:42 AM
  #83  
Super Member
 
miketc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 500
Received 15 Likes on 12 Posts
W205
I second that's great for MB to provide options for tradition and sport. Lux package is really nice when I saw it in the showroom; being a sportier person, I opt for the sport look but I would not trash others for their choice. PC people...
Old 10-11-2014, 02:03 PM
  #84  
Junior Member
 
mac55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 73
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
C55
The FAIL is the photographer, not the car. The White Sport C-class would look similarly un-attractive if taken with that same poor camera angle and lens.

This looks fine to me


I actually like both front-end styles for different reasons.
Attached Thumbnails Official C-Class Picture Thread-image.jpg  
Old 10-11-2014, 02:24 PM
  #85  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
StanNH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Whitefield, NH
Posts: 1,822
Received 31 Likes on 30 Posts
2015 C300 Sport: Palladium, Premium, Multimedia, Leather, BLIS
Originally Posted by mac55
The FAIL is the photographer, not the car. The White Sport C-class would look similarly un-attractive if taken with that same poor camera angle and lens.

This looks fine to me


I actually like both front-end styles for different reasons.
That was a terrible photograph. I saw several in person and they are very, very classy.
Old 10-11-2014, 03:44 PM
  #86  
Junior Member
 
mac55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 73
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
C55
Originally Posted by StanNH
That was a terrible photograph. I saw several in person and they are very, very classy.
Agreed.

In fact they ALL look very nice in person. Photos just don't do this car justice
Old 10-11-2014, 05:12 PM
  #87  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
shotgun_banjo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,851
Received 200 Likes on 139 Posts
'13 GLK350 4matic,'09 C300 4matic,'15 GLA250,'07 Honda Odyssey, '18 GLE 43
I both hate them! saw a lot of these on the road an ohh boy are they fat looking. The sport package needs to grow on me still. As a matter of fact even my sales person told me tboth packages are not a really nice and the 3 series kicked the c-class on style this time around (oh-oh did I say that out loud!? I'll get haters now)

Nevertheless the inside of the car also does indeed looks nice BUT feels smaller than my pre-facelift c-class maybe because of the curve that happened inside.

More reason for me to jump ship if the time comes unless after 3 years they introduce a facelift and corrects the styling boo-boo then maybe just maybe I won't jump ship.

One other thing. If you are buying the sport package car PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE get the OEM spoiler to lift up the bum-bum of the car a little and give it a more aggressive look as it looks way subtle without one.

Last edited by shotgun_banjo; 10-11-2014 at 05:14 PM.
Old 10-11-2014, 11:17 PM
  #88  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
amanuuh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Loma Linda, CA
Posts: 1,208
Received 11 Likes on 8 Posts
2014 CLA 45AMG , 2015 C63 (W205)
Originally Posted by ManuelCarrillo3


The chasm between the beautiful and the ugly in the C-Class range is astounding. What I'm actually saying is that the $650 Luxury Package ruins the W205 C-Class more than recharging your iPhone 6 Plus in the microwave.

People on the forum have a problem with the looks of this car, and I do, too. Every time I look at it, I get this expression on my face ... I think it's the same expression that would appear if my forehead were beat with a nightstick at medium force.

Read the rest on the MBWorld homepage. >>
Im wouldn't say the car is ugly. It just needs some moving to make it look good. The way the car comes stock with the Luxury Package looks horrible. The luxury package with a slight drop and flush wheels would be beautiful. Then again I think the people getting luxury package aren't the type of people to mod their cars.

If someone gets the luxury package throws on some nice vossens, adv1, etc and drops it, it will look sooo clean.

Last edited by amanuuh; 10-11-2014 at 11:20 PM.
Old 10-12-2014, 01:16 AM
  #89  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
joshg1001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 2,073
Likes: 0
Received 84 Likes on 68 Posts
2017 E300
I think this W205's luxury model looks better than the W204 front end luxury grill
Old 10-12-2014, 02:42 AM
  #90  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Germancar1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 4,846
Received 289 Likes on 202 Posts
2013 650i Coupe, 2010 IS250 AWD, 1999 S500
Its the wheels and the ride height like others have said here. There is nothing wrong with the car that a few tweaks won't fix, mainly the wheels.

M
Old 10-12-2014, 07:48 AM
  #91  
Super Member
 
MB-JIM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: North Scottsdale
Posts: 910
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
06 C 350 2014 GLK350
That photo, of the luxury model, is a good example on how to make a car look ugly when you use a wide angle lens on the camera.
Old 10-12-2014, 12:49 PM
  #92  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Germancar1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 4,846
Received 289 Likes on 202 Posts
2013 650i Coupe, 2010 IS250 AWD, 1999 S500
That's an excuse. Those wheels and that right height are the problem, not the camera. The camera only captures what it sees lol.

M
Old 10-12-2014, 11:41 PM
  #93  
Junior Member
 
mac55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 73
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
C55
Originally Posted by Germancar1
The camera only captures what it sees lol.
And it this example "it sees" a distorted and proportionally incorrect image through a wide angle lens.

I know what you are saying about the wheels and ride height but the example pictures in the OP are not fair examples due to one of them being more distorted than the other
Old 10-12-2014, 11:43 PM
  #94  
Senior Member
 
mihaelb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
B200T
Originally Posted by shotgun_banjo
I both hate them! saw a lot of these on the road an ohh boy are they fat looking. The sport package needs to grow on me still. As a matter of fact even my sales person told me tboth packages are not a really nice and the 3 series kicked the c-class on style this time around (oh-oh did I say that out loud!? I'll get haters now)

Nevertheless the inside of the car also does indeed looks nice BUT feels smaller than my pre-facelift c-class maybe because of the curve that happened inside.

More reason for me to jump ship if the time comes unless after 3 years they introduce a facelift and corrects the styling boo-boo then maybe just maybe I won't jump ship.

One other thing. If you are buying the sport package car PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE get the OEM spoiler to lift up the bum-bum of the car a little and give it a more aggressive look as it looks way subtle without one.
Is that sales person legally-blind, or not yet diagnosed? In what world does the current 3 series look better? This car could be fuschia-colored with pink spinners for wheels and would still look more elegant, classy and upscale than a 3 series, which looks super-plain.

I like both looks. If the higher ride height and ugly (my opinion) wheels weren't part of the luxury package, it would honestly be a very hard choice of which look to go with. Honestly, probably would go with the luxury. But the ride height and wheels kill it for me.
Old 10-13-2014, 01:04 AM
  #95  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Germancar1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 4,846
Received 289 Likes on 202 Posts
2013 650i Coupe, 2010 IS250 AWD, 1999 S500
Originally Posted by mac55
And it this example "it sees" a distorted and proportionally incorrect image through a wide angle lens.

I know what you are saying about the wheels and ride height but the example pictures in the OP are not fair examples due to one of them being more distorted than the other
The camera only takes a picture of what it sees. Hilarious excuse.

Do you need regular pictures?




It's still ugly in "regular" pictures. Looks like truck.


M
Old 10-13-2014, 03:29 AM
  #96  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
vic viper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sweden
Posts: 3,135
Received 267 Likes on 163 Posts
S213
Originally Posted by Germancar1
The camera only takes a picture of what it sees. Hilarious excuse.

Do you need regular pictures?




It's still ugly in "regular" pictures. Looks like truck.


M



Please go be a hater elsewhere, when did your specific taste become universal?
This forum and this thread in particular isnt meant for whining cynics like you.
The following users liked this post:
QuincyG (02-14-2020)
Old 10-13-2014, 03:39 AM
  #97  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Germancar1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 4,846
Received 289 Likes on 202 Posts
2013 650i Coupe, 2010 IS250 AWD, 1999 S500
Originally Posted by vic viper
Please go be a hater elsewhere, when did your specific taste become universal?
This forum and this thread in particular isnt meant for whining cynics like you.
Not a hater at all, I just call out BS on this. The camera made it look that way, hilarious

You can honestly say that you like that car, jacked up on little ugly wheels? Straight up, you actually like that?

M
Old 10-13-2014, 12:15 PM
  #98  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
vic viper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sweden
Posts: 3,135
Received 267 Likes on 163 Posts
S213
Does it matter?
Old 10-13-2014, 12:38 PM
  #99  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
StanNH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Whitefield, NH
Posts: 1,822
Received 31 Likes on 30 Posts
2015 C300 Sport: Palladium, Premium, Multimedia, Leather, BLIS
Originally Posted by vic viper
Does it matter?
Nope, not at all.
Old 10-14-2014, 01:05 AM
  #100  
Newbie
 
tuggernuts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
SLR Mclaren, Lp640 Lamborghini, Porsche 996 turbo, S65, SL63, SL55, G63, ML350, C400
Originally Posted by ManuelCarrillo3


The chasm between the beautiful and the ugly in the C-Class range is astounding. What I'm actually saying is that the $650 Luxury Package ruins the W205 C-Class more than recharging your iPhone 6 Plus in the microwave.

People on the forum have a problem with the looks of this car, and I do, too. Every time I look at it, I get this expression on my face ... I think it's the same expression that would appear if my forehead were beat with a nightstick at medium force.

Read the rest on the MBWorld homepage. >>
You used my picture and mentioned my name "Tuggernuts" Thanks!

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:
You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 3 votes, 5.00 average.

Quick Reply: Official C-Class Picture Thread



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:19 PM.