Another Jerry/LET tune! Joining the 12s club
Yes, I finally got my Christmas present :rolf:. The Jerry’s tune finally arrived. Shipped it out Monday and got it back Wednesday eve. I installed it and took it for a drive. I did not feel any big different (hunger for power) but the wheels span all the time :rolf::rolf::rolf:. I knew my gut dyno couldn’t tell anything:crazy: so I took out my G-Tech, ran to the empty street that I used to test when having new mods, but damn… it somehows wasn’t that empty last night:nix:. I could only manage to do 1 1/4 run and 2 0-60mph runs. I screwed all my runs since so much wheel spins. All 0-60 are 4.7-4.9s/12.9s while I had 4.6s/13.14s before the tune :rolf::rolf::rolf:
The ¼ mile run (the only 1 run with all wheel spins to the 2 gear) was 2.237s 60ft :eek: 4.7s 0-60mph :eek: 8.59s 1/8mi @89.71mph :naughty: 12.91s:eek: 1/4mi @ 114.22mph :naughty: (is this the same trap speed with stock E55?) This was at see level, street tire normal pressure, 45F Code3 pulley + Intake + Filter Modified intake manifold LET tune All the three runs were showing very much same power. Compare to the best run before the tune, the peak gain was 40 whp/ 48 wtrq. It was 30+ whp and 40+ wtrq gains all the curve.:y Man, this gain is really sucked for the wheel spin. I have to re-learn to launch the beast now. I do believe I could manage this beast to very mid-low 12s/117-118mph:naughty:. Keep you an update if I can. Thank you Jerry/LET.:y PS: this info is based on G-Tech data. I just want to share what I have. Please do not quote. I am looking for more power:zoom: |
Nice! I already paid for my tune but havent had time to send it in but this monday im gonna try to over night it!
|
Originally Posted by CLKCLK
(Post 3226393)
This was at see level, street tire normal pressure, 45F
Code3 pulley + Intake + Filter Modified intake manifold LET tune All the three runs were showing very much same power. Compare to the best run before the tune, the peak gain was 40 whp/ 48 wtrq. It was 30+ whp and 40+ wtrq gains all the curve.:y |
:yWelcome to the JerryTune world:y
Now take it to the track:naughty: I will say its very hard to hit 113-118 mph even heavily modded:zoom: But hey maybe you can be the first:y |
Thank guys for all nice words :)
Originally Posted by jturkel
(Post 3227087)
wow nice gains and nice trap speed! what have you modified with the intake manifold?
Originally Posted by c32used
(Post 3227227)
:yWelcome to the JerryTune world:y
Now take it to the track:naughty: I will say its very hard to hit 113-118 mph even heavily modded:zoom: But hey maybe you can be the first:y The point of this thread is I just want to say I do see gains :) Thanks again guys! |
great numbers...i just got a powerchip tune..so i'm hoping to dyno it soon to see where i am on the power scale.
|
Nice gains, CLKCLK. While the G-tech results are a small step up from "butt-dyno," it is better than nothing, and does appear that you picked up some power :y
What is your mod list at this point? I'm not familar with a CLK32M :nix: |
Originally Posted by c32AMG-DTM
(Post 3227678)
Nice gains, CLKCLK. While the G-tech results are a small step up from "butt-dyno," it is better than nothing, and does appear that you picked up some power :y
What is your mod list at this point? I'm not familar with a :nix: i believe it's a CLK32 AMG:nix: |
Originally Posted by 60n5pt1
(Post 3228213)
i believe it's a CLK32 AMG:nix:
|
Originally Posted by 60n5pt1
(Post 3228213)
i believe it's a CLK32 AMG:nix:
CLK32M: No it's not CLK32 AMG. Have I ever said it AMG? It still bagde CLK 320. Custome Procharger 9psi, 3.27 rear differentials and more. C32: I fixed my sig. So hope to clear out the question about C32. 03 Vette: occasionally drive since it belongs to aunti now lol. You are also in the bay, we'll meet one day on the road :D. |
Originally Posted by CLKCLK
(Post 3228239)
Don't laugh too early :)
CLK32M: No it's not CLK32 AMG. Have I ever said it AMG? It still bagde CLK 320. Custome Procharger 9psi, 3.27 rear differentials and more. C32: I fixed my sig. So hope to clear out the question about C32. |
Originally Posted by SilverBulletAMG
(Post 3228385)
What did the "M" stand for? Just curious...
|
Originally Posted by TemjinX2
(Post 3227571)
great numbers...i just got a powerchip tune..so i'm hoping to dyno it soon to see where i am on the power scale.
What mods did you have if any before and after the tune? It is recommended you do the tune last after adding any mods. Otherwise, you'd need to reflash after each additional mods and could cost money unless money is no object.:zoom: |
Originally Posted by 60n5pt1
(Post 3229542)
did you get a baseline prior to the Powerchip tune?
What mods did you have if any before and after the tune? It is recommended you do the tune last after adding any mods. Otherwise, you'd need to reflash after each additional mods and could cost money unless money is no object.:zoom: I have a code3 pulley and code3 intake. I just got the tune a week ago. Pshek said he was running lean after the powerchip tune so i want to dyno it just to make sure my af ratios are ok and how much power i'm making. Thanks for the tips. |
3 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by TemjinX2
(Post 3229815)
right now i dynoed around 275whp..but that was was with the traction control on..stock...with a dying intercooler pump.
I have a code3 pulley and code3 intake. I just got the tune a week ago. Pshek said he was running lean after the powerchip tune so i want to dyno it just to make sure my af ratios are ok and how much power i'm making. Thanks for the tips. These are my numbers on a Mustang Dyno. Last tune was with a C3 pulley, C3 intake, and a PowerChip retune. I think the AF is on the safe side. |
Originally Posted by 60n5pt1
(Post 3231330)
These are my numbers on a Mustang Dyno.
Last tune was with a C3 pulley, C3 intake, and a PowerChip retune. I think the AF is on the safe side. |
Originally Posted by TemjinX2
(Post 3231334)
nice! so would that be closer to 310-322whp on a dynojet?
Thanks, but, I think the numbers are still conservative. The last tune (with C3 intake) indicated i lost some torque actually. Travis (PowerChip) is looking into it. BTW Stock RWHP is 273-275 range My reading is 281 RWHP despite all the mods. :nix: Top speed reached 165 MPH for now.:zoom: |
Originally Posted by 60n5pt1
(Post 3231358)
Thanks, but, I think the numbers are still conservative. The last tune (with C3 intake) indicated i lost some torque actually.
Travis (PowerChip) is looking into it. BTW Stock RWHP is 273-275 range My reading is 281 RWHP despite all the mods. :nix: Top speed reached 165 MPH for now.:zoom: something has to be wrong:nix: |
Originally Posted by 60n5pt1
(Post 3231358)
Thanks, but, I think the numbers are still conservative. The last tune (with C3 intake) indicated i lost some torque actually.
Travis (PowerChip) is looking into it. BTW Stock RWHP is 273-275 range My reading is 281 RWHP despite all the mods. :nix: Top speed reached 165 MPH for now.:zoom: |
Originally Posted by 60n5pt1
(Post 3231330)
These are my numbers on a Mustang Dyno.
Last tune was with a C3 pulley, C3 intake, and a PowerChip retune. I think the AF is on the safe side. |
Originally Posted by FrankW
(Post 3231854)
my air/fuel's in the 12's. from the graph you posted it looks like it's in the 11's if I didn't read it run. too lean maybe?
|
Originally Posted by EURO KNG
(Post 3231422)
only 6-8 rwhp with all your parts?
something has to be wrong:nix: That's what Vadim said. I'm missing at least 20 RWHP. :nix: It's really frustrating to see these numbers. I guess I need to take it to the tracks and find out 'cuz I do feel the car is faster.:X |
Originally Posted by 60n5pt1
(Post 3232509)
That's what Vadim said.
I'm missing at least 20 RWHP. :nix: It's really frustrating to see these numbers. I guess I need to take it to the tracks and find out 'cuz I do feel the car is faster.:X Yeah , maybe its the tune?. :nix: |
Originally Posted by 60n5pt1
(Post 3231358)
BTW Stock RWHP is 273-275 range My reading is 281 RWHP despite all the mods. :nix: Top speed reached 165 MPH for now.:zoom: |
yeah i read that a mustang dyno reads around 11-15% lower then a dynojet.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:39 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands