C32 AMG, C55 AMG (W203) 2001 - 2007

Building tuned inletmanifold! (slow progress)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 06-30-2015, 02:19 PM
  #1  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
swedepat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Sweden
Posts: 826
Received 106 Likes on 76 Posts
2011 C63 AMG, 589hp
Building tuned inletmanifold! (slow progress)

I´ve started building a new 'top' to the std manifold.
this is a 'easy' way as a lot of important brackets and more are located in the lower part.

This is an early picture of about 20minutes of testing.
It will probably be this solution but with small changes.

There will be a sheetmetal 'lid' that seals against the bottom, not on picture.
The new runners will raise above that lid and then down through it again into the plenum.



This combined with my bored throttlebody will release some power i hope.
Old 06-30-2015, 06:27 PM
  #2  
Member
 
EDgineered's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
2005 C55 black on black aka DVS C55, 2007 C230 sport silver on black for the boss
Will you lose the variable runner ability?
Old 06-30-2015, 11:22 PM
  #3  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
swedepat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Sweden
Posts: 826
Received 106 Likes on 76 Posts
2011 C63 AMG, 589hp
Yes ofcourse. *thumbup*
But i can almost bet one arm that there will only be gains throughout whole register anyway.

Less friction in runners due to round form instead of rectangular with sharp corners.
Tapered runners to gain velocity.
Correct length for a sportier engine.

And, 5.4litre engine can take a loss at ~2000rpm(where the long runners are tuned), if there will be any, the car will be fast anyway.
I do not need the low rpm torque to pull trailers
Old 07-01-2015, 02:46 PM
  #4  
Moderator Alumni
 
TruTaing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 3,255
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 7 Posts
w203 m112
Awesome. I hope this works out for ya. There were some folks on the c43 forums who polished the intake manifolds and showed that there were gains to be had.

If you're going to redesign the top half, why not just rebuild the whole thing? :x There are intake spacers available that would provide the rough shape of the intake right against the head.
Old 07-01-2015, 03:09 PM
  #5  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
swedepat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Sweden
Posts: 826
Received 106 Likes on 76 Posts
2011 C63 AMG, 589hp
It very easy when you don´t need to build all injectorbungs, throttlebody bracket etc etc etc.
And as a bonus, the 'bottom' of plenum is already done, no need for construction at all at that place.

With all my years of experiance i´ve learned one important thing.

Do NOT try to invent the wheel again!
Things that works with your plan unmodified, leave them.

And one more good rule: K.I.S.S
Old 07-01-2015, 03:55 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
///AchMeinGott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Downingtown, PA
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
none... for now
Not to doubt your abilities, and I do agree on the philosiphy that 10 less lb-ft down low means nothing, but 10 more hp up top means everything(if you bought a performance car and care about the torque curve at 1000rpm's clearly you don't race) but assuming you'll loose nothing seems like an EXTREME stretch.

I'm very interested in your results though. What were stock runner lengths and did you decide what length you'll be going with? I was actually thinking about something last weekend. Something that bugs me, and I guess it's because in the LTx/LSx world I'm coming from half of America owns one then half of them have pulled the motor apart, is 10 years later(15 if you count the 1st, torquey version) there doesn't seem to be a definitive list as to what exactly the restrictions are on the 5.4. A lot of it has to do with A) limited aftermarket and B) pricing. Is the intake so torque biased it's choking up top? There are several cams available, all for stock valvetrain, so are all mods limited until you dive into custom cams/springs($$$) Sure it has twin intake valves, but are the heads a so-so design? Is the casting pretty ugly? Just how much would a hand or CNC job free up, and is it all for not if the intake isn't cleaned up to match the ports? A 5700rpm peak hp isn't bad, but not astounding for an OHC 3-valve.

There's just a lot of questions I'm interested in, even if I would never drop the time/money to do it. I love the research.
Old 07-01-2015, 07:45 PM
  #7  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
betrezra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,589
Received 68 Likes on 44 Posts
C63 507 AMG DA Car #19
I wonder what a simple bread-box intake would do on this motor?

The 5.0 guys used these for all top end performance.
Old 07-01-2015, 08:44 PM
  #8  
tw2
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
tw2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 3,412
Received 280 Likes on 231 Posts
2005 E55 AMG, 1991 MR2
He has already ported the heads with good results. He said the casting was not great from the factory.

Exhaust transition from headers to cats is another weak point. Everything is centered around low end torque which is what your average non enthusiast is going to appreciate the most.
Old 07-08-2015, 01:43 PM
  #9  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
swedepat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Sweden
Posts: 826
Received 106 Likes on 76 Posts
2011 C63 AMG, 589hp
grinding,welding,cutting,welding and so on...
these four still to do..

gettin there





And by the way., STD inlet IS weldable.
Old 07-08-2015, 06:51 PM
  #10  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
ghiaguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 1,155
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
C55 AMG, 300D-T & Karmann Ghia
Looking good man! Can't wait to hear about the results
Old 07-09-2015, 02:44 PM
  #11  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
swedepat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Sweden
Posts: 826
Received 106 Likes on 76 Posts
2011 C63 AMG, 589hp
thanks =)

all runners welded, a lot of grinding left.

Old 07-09-2015, 05:10 PM
  #12  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
sick430's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: So Cal
Posts: 1,946
Received 20 Likes on 19 Posts
CLK Cabrio
wow, looks great. I just started taking apart a spare intake I have sitting at home. But this seems like a much better idea. If you end up selling it I call dibs
Old 07-09-2015, 05:17 PM
  #13  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
sick430's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: So Cal
Posts: 1,946
Received 20 Likes on 19 Posts
CLK Cabrio
If you look at the sls 63 intake they did something every similar. Bottom pic shows the need for a good catch can setup.


Old 07-09-2015, 05:39 PM
  #14  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
sick430's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: So Cal
Posts: 1,946
Received 20 Likes on 19 Posts
CLK Cabrio
did you take into account the added length created by the lower intake portion?
Old 07-09-2015, 06:22 PM
  #15  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Havoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Sin City
Posts: 1,863
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
2005 E55 AMG - - 2005 SL55 AMG - - - - - - 2006 SLK55 AMG - - - - - - 2013 Ducati Diavel AMG -
What size TB are you going with??
Old 07-09-2015, 07:42 PM
  #16  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
sick430's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: So Cal
Posts: 1,946
Received 20 Likes on 19 Posts
CLK Cabrio
how are you going to handle all the old vacuum lines?
Old 07-10-2015, 01:01 PM
  #17  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
swedepat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Sweden
Posts: 826
Received 106 Likes on 76 Posts
2011 C63 AMG, 589hp
Originally Posted by Havoc
What size TB are you going with??
My bored out std 78.5mm with grinded axle, same area as an 80mm without grinding the axle,.
Old 07-10-2015, 01:04 PM
  #18  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
swedepat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Sweden
Posts: 826
Received 106 Likes on 76 Posts
2011 C63 AMG, 589hp
Originally Posted by sick430
did you take into account the added length created by the lower intake portion?
yes, calculated length is from valve to radius on veloctity stack.
my ideas are from that sls manifold acutally, but with small mods to keep everything tight in enginebay
The vacumlines,, i solve that with some bungs welded into the 'lid'.
To make it aviable to trill and tap some connections.
Old 07-10-2015, 03:09 PM
  #19  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
sick430's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: So Cal
Posts: 1,946
Received 20 Likes on 19 Posts
CLK Cabrio
Great job!!!really love the idea, what is the length and diameter of the stack you are building?

Keep up the good work cant wait to see it all done!
Old 07-18-2015, 09:35 AM
  #20  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Havoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Sin City
Posts: 1,863
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
2005 E55 AMG - - 2005 SL55 AMG - - - - - - 2006 SLK55 AMG - - - - - - 2013 Ducati Diavel AMG -
Originally Posted by swedepat
My bored out std 78.5mm with grinded axle, same area as an 80mm without grinding the axle,.
Standard TB is 74mm, so you upgraded to a 78mm TB??


Here is what an 82mm TB plate looks like on the manifold..

Old 07-20-2015, 06:55 AM
  #21  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
swedepat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Sweden
Posts: 826
Received 106 Likes on 76 Posts
2011 C63 AMG, 589hp
I milled my std from 74mm to 78.5mm
And i cant find any reason for a bigger one as long as you don´t upgrade the airmassmeter etc etc.
Old 08-05-2015, 12:14 PM
  #22  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
sick430's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: So Cal
Posts: 1,946
Received 20 Likes on 19 Posts
CLK Cabrio
Hey any updates? Any more pictures? what size tubing did you use for the new runners? Also what length are they?

Keep up the good work.
Old 08-05-2015, 03:23 PM
  #23  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
swedepat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Sweden
Posts: 826
Received 106 Likes on 76 Posts
2011 C63 AMG, 589hp
a matter of fact.. worked a bit yesterday



view from throttbody.
Old 08-05-2015, 06:04 PM
  #24  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Havoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Sin City
Posts: 1,863
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
2005 E55 AMG - - 2005 SL55 AMG - - - - - - 2006 SLK55 AMG - - - - - - 2013 Ducati Diavel AMG -
Nice!!
They look thirsty for Air!!
Old 08-06-2015, 07:28 AM
  #25  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
swedepat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Sweden
Posts: 826
Received 106 Likes on 76 Posts
2011 C63 AMG, 589hp
I plan to test the manifold in a couple of weeks.

i have been a sucker for acceleration the last weeks, took of my 20" rims and mounted my std 18" rims with Federal 595RS-R tires.
I have now managed 4.6s in 0-60 och 12s dead on 1/4 mile.
With ~116-117mph trapspeed(116.22 according to GPS)
I hope to get it around 118-120mph with new manifold.
Just to break the 12s barrier at the quartermile.

How to get fast 0-60?
stickytires at first!
then a brutal takeoff ofcourse.
How to make that happen with std converter?
Well, you have to be a bit brutal.
push brake as hard as you can.
Then push gaspedal to the limit where it almost breaks loose the rear tires.
Hold a couple of seconds.
repeat three times.
then do an real takeoff.
This isn´t nice to the tranny, but with fresh oil there are no problems.
This way you will actually rise the stallspeed a couple och hundreds rpm.
Makes a huge difference in takeoff.
This is because the oil in tranny gets thinner in viscousity and makes the converter slip a little bit more.

I managed 4.6s on no prepped surface. just ordinary tarmac and about 20degree celsius.
and ofcourse, a little heatup of tires, a small burnout just to rub the tire.
Stop when first little smoke appears, should be just a 0.5-1second long, no more!
This with federal tires, these are a 'semisemi' slick...


Rgds

Last edited by swedepat; 08-06-2015 at 07:30 AM.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Building tuned inletmanifold! (slow progress)



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:16 AM.