C63 AMG (W204) 2008 - 2015

Australian Guys are on fire

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 07-27-2016, 09:23 PM
  #26  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Merc63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,562
Received 42 Likes on 36 Posts
C63 AMG
Those Australian tracks run fast. Stage 2 is running stage 3 times here.

That's about 3850lbs. Damn good time regardless.
Old 07-27-2016, 09:27 PM
  #27  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
mr747's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,398
Received 370 Likes on 212 Posts
c63
the time is legit and it wasnt stripped alot

it ran fast thats for sure
Old 07-27-2016, 09:48 PM
  #28  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Merc63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,562
Received 42 Likes on 36 Posts
C63 AMG
747 u did a stage 3 now right?
Old 07-27-2016, 10:03 PM
  #29  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
mr747's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,398
Received 370 Likes on 212 Posts
c63
Originally Posted by Merc63
747 u did a stage 3 now right?
yep im stage 3 now
Old 07-27-2016, 10:20 PM
  #30  
Member
 
marioflex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 194
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
c63 AMG
I'm not doubting the time is legit. What I think is the information is no right because 655 whp for a stage 3 seems to low for a stage 3. And 3,850 too heavy to make 9.9 with this power.
Old 07-27-2016, 10:48 PM
  #31  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
mr747's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,398
Received 370 Likes on 212 Posts
c63
Originally Posted by marioflex
I'm not doubting the time is legit. What I think is the information is no right because 655 whp for a stage 3 seems to low for a stage 3. And 3,850 too heavy to make 9.9 with this power.
its not far off 800 engine hp

The figures are nearly right
Old 07-27-2016, 10:59 PM
  #32  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Merc63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,562
Received 42 Likes on 36 Posts
C63 AMG
Physics is physics. He was doing what time before?
Old 07-27-2016, 11:05 PM
  #33  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
mr747's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,398
Received 370 Likes on 212 Posts
c63
he ran 10.4 at 134 with stock auto pump fuel 67 mm pulley no front runners
Old 07-27-2016, 11:40 PM
  #34  
Member
 
marioflex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 194
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
c63 AMG
physics said that you need 750 rwhp to move 3,850 pounds car in 9.9 @ 140 mph on a 1/4 mile. And if the car has 655 rwhp it needs to weight 3300 pound W/D. So I think they should be making 740-760 rwhp and that's what a stage 3 with a 60 pulley produce.
The following users liked this post:
BLKROKT (07-28-2016)
Old 07-27-2016, 11:51 PM
  #35  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
mr747's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,398
Received 370 Likes on 212 Posts
c63
here is the dyno

Facebook Post
Old 07-27-2016, 11:52 PM
  #36  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
mr747's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,398
Received 370 Likes on 212 Posts
c63
Facebook Post
Old 07-28-2016, 01:30 AM
  #37  
Super Member
 
charliekay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 700
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
C63 AMG
Originally Posted by mr747
he ran 10.4 at 134 with stock auto pump fuel 67 mm pulley no front runners
He ran 10.4 with front runners and no rear seats originally. Only difference this time is he went higher boost, built tranny and stripped out more weight.

If you look at the video on FPV you will see he had no front seats either and the owners partner has confirmed this, the car was fully stripped. 3800lbs is not right, that is almost the weight of a full weight C63.

The time is right and he ran 9 runs at 140mph on the day with this being the quickest. Bloody good time for a stock internal car.
The following users liked this post:
BLKROKT (07-28-2016)
Old 07-28-2016, 01:32 AM
  #38  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
mr747's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,398
Received 370 Likes on 212 Posts
c63
Originally Posted by charliekay
He ran 10.4 with front runners and no rear seats originally. Only difference this time is he went higher boost, built tranny and stripped out more weight.

If you look at the video on FPV you will see he had no front seats either and the owners partner has confirmed this, the car was fully stripped. 3800lbs is not right, that is almost the weight of a full weight C63.

The time is right and he ran 9 runs at 140mph on the day with this being the quickest. Bloody good time for a stock internal car.
thanks for confirming bud
Old 07-28-2016, 03:35 AM
  #39  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
RNS-11Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,175
Likes: 0
Received 101 Likes on 50 Posts
09 C63
I don't know what was taken out of the car but it was weighed on the day and came in at over 1700kg with driver

Last edited by RNS-11Z; 07-28-2016 at 05:25 AM.
Old 07-28-2016, 05:24 AM
  #40  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
RNS-11Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,175
Likes: 0
Received 101 Likes on 50 Posts
09 C63
This info will help with regards to the car that went 9.9. When it went 9.9 it only had 2 runs then got kicked off the track.
Attached Thumbnails Australian Guys are on fire-image.jpeg  
Old 07-28-2016, 05:27 AM
  #41  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
RNS-11Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,175
Likes: 0
Received 101 Likes on 50 Posts
09 C63
Another pic of details
Attached Thumbnails Australian Guys are on fire-image.jpeg  
Old 07-28-2016, 06:21 AM
  #42  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
RNS-11Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,175
Likes: 0
Received 101 Likes on 50 Posts
09 C63
Originally Posted by marioflex
I'm not doubting the time is legit. What I think is the information is no right because 655 whp for a stage 3 seems to low for a stage 3. And 3,850 too heavy to make 9.9 with this power.
Mario, I think Charlie went 10.0@139mph with a very similar set up and power figure. 650seems to get you low 10 high 9.
Charlie can you confirm what you had at the time? From memory you were the stage 3, race gas, slicks front runner, no interior, 60mm pulley etc.
Old 07-28-2016, 09:01 AM
  #43  
Member
 
marioflex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 194
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
c63 AMG
Just to be clear I am not doubting it's true. I just thought that there was an error on whp or weight info. I know a stage 3 can make 100 more whp. so it could get a lot better. Again It's a tremendous achievement, congratulations!!
Old 07-28-2016, 09:17 AM
  #44  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Merc63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,562
Received 42 Likes on 36 Posts
C63 AMG
Anyone ever run the 60mm pulley with a stock Non-forged internal engine?
Old 07-28-2016, 10:58 AM
  #45  
Member
 
marioflex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 194
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
c63 AMG
I have not run the 60mm with stock motor but before the blower and built engine I ran 720 rwhp on nitrous in a half mile event and it hold pretty well. But the tranny was stock and start sliping.
Old 07-28-2016, 11:54 AM
  #46  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Merc63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,562
Received 42 Likes on 36 Posts
C63 AMG
Hmmmm interesting.
Old 07-28-2016, 12:58 PM
  #47  
Member
 
marioflex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 194
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
c63 AMG
Maybe the best option is to call Weistec to see the limits of stock internals.
Old 07-28-2016, 05:05 PM
  #48  
Super Member
 
charliekay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 700
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
C63 AMG
Originally Posted by RNS-11Z
Mario, I think Charlie went 10.0@139mph with a very similar set up and power figure. 650seems to get you low 10 high 9.
Charlie can you confirm what you had at the time? From memory you were the stage 3, race gas, slicks front runner, no interior, 60mm pulley etc.
I went 10.1 @ 139mph, and I had Stage 3 with MS109, slicks and front runners but I used the standard Stage 3 pulley (67mm) and had my interior still there.

The time is possible but like I said, needed more boost and less weight.
Old 07-28-2016, 05:23 PM
  #49  
Super Member
 
charliekay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 700
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
C63 AMG
Originally Posted by RNS-11Z
Another pic of details
Sonny must have a bad memory. The pulley didn't snap off until 13/01/16.

The car went out that night and made 2 passes before the pulley snapped off, a 10.30 @ 135mph and 10.36 @ 136mph. This was with the same wheel and tyre combo as the 9.9 run, full stripped interior, and had built tranny.

That was the cars quickest ET prior to last Sunday.

Last edited by charliekay; 07-28-2016 at 05:25 PM.
Old 07-28-2016, 06:25 PM
  #50  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
RNS-11Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,175
Likes: 0
Received 101 Likes on 50 Posts
09 C63
Originally Posted by charliekay
I went 10.1 @ 139mph, and I had Stage 3 with MS109, slicks and front runners but I used the standard Stage 3 pulley (67mm) and had my interior still there.

The time is possible but like I said, needed more boost and less weight.
Mario, as you can see you see more boost and weight reduction can do 9s.

Thanks Charlie.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Australian Guys are on fire



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:50 AM.