Rear main seal leak impacting all M177 motors?








I brought the car in because the heat wasn’t working, and the service dept. convinced me to do spark plugs at 45k miles.
When they did the plugs, they found oil leaking from the head gasket, oil separators failed, and rear main seal failed.
All replaced, without removing the engine (looks like they took the transmission out from the bottom to get at the RMS).
anyway I’m in a W222, but it’s the S560. So I think these oil separators are just a bad design it seems. Both of mine were failed.
Guess I need to budget $10k in 5 years time to do this again out of warranty.




While doing research it seems the E63s owners have started to complain about the rear main seal leaking as well as oil separators failing causing repairs that cost well into the thousands and weeks in the shop. The issue comes up on low to mid mileage cars.
I did some digging and saw the same trend among G63 owners along with people in some threads saying it’s an M177 problem in general and MB hasn’t done a recall.
Has anyone on here had any rear main seal problems? How costly/time consuming is the fix?
At this point I’m concerned the issue could impact my car too. Thanks
1) when was the first repair - under warranty?
2) second repair also same issue but with newly designed parts? Not in warranty?
i see you've got 1 post here at Mbworld, long time lurker first time caller?
thanks for your input
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
would be interested if those members can confirm that they dont drive their cars regularly. Usually when car isnt driven, oil can start to pool on the seal since the pump isnt gonna be working on an idle car and this pooling can result in a leak.
you can get it fixed as many times as you want but unless you actually drive your car, its gonna keep coming back
would be interested if those members can confirm that they dont drive their cars regularly. Usually when car isnt driven, oil can start to pool on the seal since the pump isnt gonna be working on an idle car and this pooling can result in a leak.
you can get it fixed as many times as you want but unless you actually drive your car, its gonna keep coming back
The actual parts were replaced with a new design, apparently they carried over the M157 oil vapor separators, and this new engine needed a different design and of course it still remains unclear what the long-term will be with the new design.
https://mbworld.org/forums/w213-amg/...age-e63-2.html
Also, this is a link to the sticky where there are many RMS discussions that further debate, whether or not driving it or not driving, it makes a difference for people that ultimately succumb to this issue
https://mbworld.org/forums/w213-amg/...fixes-diy.html
https://mbworld.org/forums/w213-amg/...-2018-e63.html
actual costs and prices paid in this link:
https://mbworld.org/forums/w213-amg/...-goodwill.html
This sticky has many many links to RMS discussions with much of the latest info you need:
https://mbworld.org/forums/w213-amg/...fixes-diy.html
Last edited by PeterUbers; Jan 15, 2025 at 08:16 PM.




would be interested if those members can confirm that they dont drive their cars regularly. Usually when car isnt driven, oil can start to pool on the seal since the pump isnt gonna be working on an idle car and this pooling can result in a leak.
you can get it fixed as many times as you want but unless you actually drive your car, its gonna keep coming back
While the cars are meant to be "daily driven", what does that really mean? City and stop & go traffic isn't really what they are built for. Consider that whenever I'm in Germany, daily driving means blasting down the Autobahn at 155+ mph. I used to regularly work in Northern Germany at a customer's office for a few years and had a 20 minute commute at an average speed north of 100 mph. Compare that to a commute in North America. You are lucky to exceed 45 mph. It would be interesting to see some data of the RMS failure rate on cars in Germany vs North America. Not sure if anybody has insight, but it seems reports of RMS issues come mostly from owners in North America.
While I agree that cars should be driven, at the same time my personal vehicle miles travelled have decreased significantly over the years, especially since the pandemic as I replaced many car trips with home deliveries, walkable local destinations or outright eliminated certain trips. It's been a boon for my cars. Scheduled maintenance is now annually and mostly routine stuff, no longer need new tires every year or new brakes every 18 months and the wear and tear and mileage stays low so hopefully I get to enjoy the car for several more years as I have little interest in anything the auto industry is pumping out these days and I increasingly prefer to live a car-light lifestyle with traffic happening now at all hours of the day and measurably worse than before the pandemic. Just don't really wanna be on the roads most days wasting my time. Fortunately I can do most of my daily errands on foot with much of what I need on a daily basis within a 5-10 minute walk from my house.
I've voiced a slightly different theory in the past. That is that these cars are driven, but mostly driven in a fairly mundane way. They are used as commuter and family cars, dawdling around in stop and go traffic or otherwise mundane A to B trips. Also many are frequently driven for short distances, which causes the oil to get contaminated with moisture and fuel, because the engine doesn't reach operating temperature long enough for the moisture and fuel to evaporate causing corrosion and the fuel starts attacking seals and washing away the lubrication. It's interesting to note that Audi for example has recognized this as a real issue and added sensors to their cars to measure the level of contamination and when it reaches a certain threshold it alerts the driver to go for a long drive. Many owners report to regularly get this alert with the kind of typical driving in North America, so this is a real issue.
While the cars are meant to be "daily driven", what does that really mean? City and stop & go traffic isn't really what they are built for. Consider that whenever I'm in Germany, daily driving means blasting down the Autobahn at 155+ mph. I used to regularly work in Northern Germany at a customer's office for a few years and had a 20 minute commute at an average speed north of 100 mph. Compare that to a commute in North America. You are lucky to exceed 45 mph. It would be interesting to see some data of the RMS failure rate on cars in Germany vs North America. Not sure if anybody has insight, but it seems reports of RMS issues come mostly from owners in North America.
While I agree that cars should be driven, at the same time my personal vehicle miles travelled have decreased significantly over the years, especially since the pandemic as I replaced many car trips with home deliveries, walkable local destinations or outright eliminated certain trips. It's been a boon for my cars. Scheduled maintenance is now annually and mostly routine stuff, no longer need new tires every year or new brakes every 18 months and the wear and tear and mileage stays low so hopefully I get to enjoy the car for several more years as I have little interest in anything the auto industry is pumping out these days and I increasingly prefer to live a car-light lifestyle with traffic happening now at all hours of the day and measurably worse than before the pandemic. Just don't really wanna be on the roads most days wasting my time. Fortunately I can do most of my daily errands on foot with much of what I need on a daily basis within a 5-10 minute walk from my house.
the poster above said the c63 will not have an oil vapor separator issue ... there are several c63 m177's that had the RMS leak here in this thread/forum
another 2019 c63 needing both ovs and rms replacement
https://www.google.com/url?q=https:/...d16cetaSMv1Obv
Last edited by PeterUbers; Jan 16, 2025 at 11:16 PM.
Filtration and condensation are the jobs the OVS needs to do. Technically demanding tasks, with incompletely engineered systems and cheaply manufactured parts. In summary, the MB solution is not up to the task.
The OVS system should be insulated and heated, and filter elements should be replaceable or cleanable. There should be a backup feature to prevent excess crankcase vacuum and pressure. The system and components have none of those characteristics, and therefore fail by blockage (plugging). The domino effects are breached seals and gaskets.
The overarching requirement is pollution control, related to crankcase emissions. The way this is done is to capture and recirculate all crankcase and fuel tank emissions and control crankcase pressure. The method and hardware used is insufficient.
Last edited by chassis; Jan 19, 2025 at 10:34 AM.




.
And since you originally posted this another poster with the LS1 has posted their RMS failure: https://mbworld.org/forums/c63-c63s-...ml#post9098206
I'm hoping nobody else has this failure!
Last edited by carlosinseattle; Jan 29, 2025 at 02:16 PM. Reason: added link




And since you originally posted this another poster with the LS1 has posted their RMS failure: https://mbworld.org/forums/c63-c63s-...ml#post9098206
I'm hoping nobody else has this failure!
Last edited by superswiss; Jan 29, 2025 at 02:23 PM.
I've voiced a slightly different theory in the past. That is that these cars are driven, but mostly driven in a fairly mundane way. They are used as commuter and family cars, dawdling around in stop and go traffic or otherwise mundane A to B trips. Also many are frequently driven for short distances, which causes the oil to get contaminated with moisture and fuel, because the engine doesn't reach operating temperature long enough for the moisture and fuel to evaporate causing corrosion and the fuel starts attacking seals and washing away the lubrication. It's interesting to note that Audi for example has recognized this as a real issue and added sensors to their cars to measure the level of contamination and when it reaches a certain threshold it alerts the driver to go for a long drive. Many owners report to regularly get this alert with the kind of typical driving in North America, so this is a real issue.
While the cars are meant to be "daily driven", what does that really mean? City and stop & go traffic isn't really what they are built for. Consider that whenever I'm in Germany, daily driving means blasting down the Autobahn at 155+ mph. I used to regularly work in Northern Germany at a customer's office for a few years and had a 20 minute commute at an average speed north of 100 mph. Compare that to a commute in North America. You are lucky to exceed 45 mph. It would be interesting to see some data of the RMS failure rate on cars in Germany vs North America. Not sure if anybody has insight, but it seems reports of RMS issues come mostly from owners in North America.
While I agree that cars should be driven, at the same time my personal vehicle miles travelled have decreased significantly over the years, especially since the pandemic as I replaced many car trips with home deliveries, walkable local destinations or outright eliminated certain trips. It's been a boon for my cars. Scheduled maintenance is now annually and mostly routine stuff, no longer need new tires every year or new brakes every 18 months and the wear and tear and mileage stays low so hopefully I get to enjoy the car for several more years as I have little interest in anything the auto industry is pumping out these days and I increasingly prefer to live a car-light lifestyle with traffic happening now at all hours of the day and measurably worse than before the pandemic. Just don't really wanna be on the roads most days wasting my time. Fortunately I can do most of my daily errands on foot with much of what I need on a daily basis within a 5-10 minute walk from my house.
I agree with this. I have another theory that it might also be partly due to a higher HP/tune in the E63 engine compared to the c63… if true, I’d be interested to know if the c63 engines with a higher tune have had any RMS issues as well
The OVS system filters particulate and condenses liquid and routes gases, using cheap plastic parts. Shortcomings in those functions lead to system failure.
The best solution I have seen so far is the dual catch can solution - 1 can for unboosted and 1 can for boosted. Long term viability of an aftermarket system like that is always not fully knowable.
Are the C63 before 2018 potentially touched by this failure ? Dou you have concrete examples ?
I'm coming from an Audi S4 B8 whitch was a nightmare to maintain...
Last edited by Brice3.2; Feb 22, 2025 at 09:30 AM.
they never mentioned the RMS. Should I bring it back and have them check it.
since I got it back the car warms much faster but I’ve noticed strange shifting (like stuck in neutral between gears when giving lots of gas) and gotten warnings about headlight low beams not working (left and right side).
any thoughts?





